Treatment de-escalation for HPV-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma with radiotherapy vs. trans-oral surgery (ORATOR2): study protocol for a randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPC) have substantially better treatment response and overall survival (OS) than patients with HPV-negative disease. Treatment options for HPV+ OPC can involve either a primary radiotherapy (RT) approach (± concomitant chemotherapy) or a primary surgical approach (± adjuvant radiation) with transoral surgery (TOS). These two treatment paradigms have different spectrums of toxicity. The goals of this study are to assess the OS of two de-escalation approaches (primary radiotherapy and primary TOS) compared to historical control, and to compare survival, toxicity and quality of life (QOL) profiles between the two approaches. METHODS: This is a multicenter phase II study randomizing one hundred and forty patients with T1-2 N0-2 HPV+ OPC in a 1:1 ratio between de-escalated primary radiotherapy (60 Gy) ± concomitant chemotherapy and TOS ± de-escalated adjuvant radiotherapy (50-60 Gy based on risk factors). Patients will be stratified based on smoking status (< 10 vs. ≥ 10 pack-years). The primary endpoint is OS of each arm compared to historical control; we hypothesize that a 2-year OS of 85% or greater will be achieved. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival, QOL and toxicity. DISCUSSION: This study will provide an assessment of two de-escalation approaches to the treatment of HPV+ OPC on oncologic outcomes, QOL and toxicity. Results will inform the design of future definitive phase III trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03210103. Date of registration: July 6, 2017, Current version: 1.3 on March 15, 2019.

Documentation and incidence of late effects and screening recommendations for adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: A retrospective review of adolescent and young adult (AYA) head and neck cancer (HNC) patients treated with radiation therapy (RT) at British Columbia Cancer  was performed to determine the incidence of late toxicities, the documented late side effects discussed and the screening recommendations provided at the time of transfer of care to primary care providers (PCPs). METHODS: Charts (n = 162) were reviewed for all patients 15 to 35 years at diagnosis with HNC treated with RT from 1960 to 2010 who survived > 5 years after diagnosis. RESULTS: A discussion regarding the risk of long-term side effects was documented in the initial consultation for 85% of patients. The majority of patients (78%) developed > 1 documented late effect. The most common were xerostomia (44%), skin changes (28%), neck fibrosis (22%), nasal crusting (16%), epistaxis (16%), and dental decay (14%). In all, 20% were currently followed or were followed until they died. Of the 80% transferred to their PCP, 14% had a formal discharge summary. For those discharged from British Columbia Cancer, documented recommendations included regular dental care (34%) and screening for hypothyroidism (5%) and second malignancy (4%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of AYA HNC patients treated with RT developed late side effects, and most PCPs were not sent a discharge summary outlining screening recommendations for delayed late effects. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: AYA HNC survivors treated with RT are at high risk for late effects and would benefit from a survivorship care plan outlining these risks and screening recommendations.

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Adolescent and Young Adult Head and Neck Cancer Survivors Treated with Radiotherapy.

Purpose: There are few studies of adolescent and young adult (AYA) head and neck (H&N) cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy. A recall of AYA H&N survivors was performed and this article evaluates their cross-sectional patient-reported outcomes. Methods: AYA H&N cancer survivors who had received radiotherapy in British Columbia between 1970 and 2010 participated in this study. Participants completed the Psychosocial Screen for Cancer-Revised (PSSCAN-R), Research and Development (RAND)-36 health-related quality of life, and the Vanderbilt Head and Neck Symptom Survey, version 2.0 (VHNSS 2.0), to evaluate late effects from treatment. Results: There were 36 participants in the study. Severe symptoms (greater than or equal to 4/10) were reported on the VHNSS 2.0 by 51% of participants for xerostomia, 35% for dysphagia, and 37% for dental/mucosal sensitivity. On the PSSCAN-R, 35% had moderate/high anxiety scores and 48% had moderate/high depression scores. The mean RAND-36 participant scores were as follows: physical functioning, 86.1; physical role functioning, 71.4; emotional role functioning, 75.1; energy/fatigue, 56.6; emotional well-being, 74.6; social functioning, 76.3; bodily pain, 71.7; and general health, 65.6. Conclusions: AYA survivors in our study reported significant late effects from H&N radiotherapy and high depression and anxiety scores, but generally high health-related quality of life. Prospective evaluation of psychosocial needs and H&N-related complications is warranted in this subgroup at high risk of late effects from treatment.

A cross-sectional assessment of long-term effects in adolescent and young adult head and neck cancer survivors treated with radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Adolescent and young adult (AYA) head and neck (H&N) cancer survivors are at risk of long-term complications. A cross-sectional study of survivors recalled for clinical evaluation was performed to evaluate late effects in this population. METHODS: Surviving patients who had been diagnosed with H&N cancer between the ages of 15 and 39 years and treated with radiation therapy (RT) in British Columbia between 1970 and 2010 were invited to participate in this study. Survivors were assessed in consultation by a radiation oncologist for a complete history and physical exam. Comprehensive data collection of subjective and objective late effects of RT and screening investigations were completed. RESULTS: Of 36 AYA H&N participants, the majority were female (61%), and the most common tumour sites were thyroid (28%), oropharynx (17%), salivary gland (14%) and larynx (14%). Dental extractions post treatment was performed for 33% and dental implants for 17%. The majority (72%) reported xerostomia, 50% had dysphagia to solids and 25% hearing loss. Of the non-thyroid cancer patients who underwent RT to their neck, 45% developed hypothyroidism. There were 28% of participants with asymptomatic carotid stenosis and 27% with thyroid nodules; all were diagnosed after recall screening. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of AYA H&N cancer treated with RT reported numerous long-term complications. Comprehensive follow-up and screening guidelines should be established for this at-risk population. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: AYA H&N cancer survivors and their primary care practitioners should be educated on screening recommendations and the risk of late effects.

Randomized Trial of Radiotherapy Versus Transoral Robotic Surgery for Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Long-Term Results of the ORATOR Trial.

PURPOSE: The incidence of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has risen rapidly, because of an epidemic of human papillomavirus infection. The optimal management of early-stage OPSCC with surgery or radiation continues to be a clinical controversy. Long-term randomized data comparing these paradigms are lacking. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with T1-T2, N0-2 (≤ 4 cm) OPSCC to radiotherapy (RT) (with chemotherapy if N1-2) versus transoral robotic surgery plus neck dissection (TORS + ND) (with or without adjuvant therapy). The primary end point was swallowing quality of life (QOL) at 1-year using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. Secondary end points included adverse events, other QOL outcomes, overall survival, and progression-free survival. All analyses were intention-to-treat. Herein, we present long-term outcomes from the trial. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were randomly assigned (n = 34 per arm) between August 10, 2012, and June 9, 2017. Median follow-up was 45 months. Longitudinal MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory analyses demonstrated statistical superiority of RT arm over time (P = .049), although the differences beyond 1 year were of smaller magnitude than at the 1-year timepoint (year 2: 86.0 ± 13.5 in the RT arm v 84.8 ± 12.5 in the TORS + ND arm, P = .74; year 3: 88.9 ± 11.3 v 83.3 ± 13.9, P = .12). These differences did not meet the threshold to qualify as a clinically meaningful change at any timepoint. Certain differences in QOL concerns including more pain and dental concerns in the TORS + ND arm seen at 1 year resolved at 2 and 3 years; however, TORS patients started to use more nutritional supplements at 3 years (P = .015). Dry mouth scores were higher in RT patients over time (P = .041). CONCLUSION: On longitudinal analysis, the swallowing QOL difference between primary RT and TORS + ND approaches persists but decreases over time. Patients with OPSCC should be informed about the pros and cons of both treatment options (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01590355).

Sclerosing Odontogenic Carcinoma with Local Recurrence: Case Report and Review of Literature.

Sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma is a rare locally destructive neoplasm with many histologic mimics. Here the diagnostic challenges are presented of a case of sclerosing odontogenic carcinoma with variable histologic features, including unusual and unexpected negative immunostaining for CK19.

Detection and modulation of capsaicin perception in the human oral cavity.

Capsaicin causes a burning or spicy sensation when this vanilloid compound comes in contact with trigeminal neurons of the tongue. This compound has low solubility in water, which presents difficulties in examining the psychophysical properties of capsaicin by standard aqueous chemosensory tests. This report describes a new approach that utilizes edible strips for delivering precise amounts of capsaicin to the human oral cavity for examining threshold and suprathreshold amounts of this irritant. When incorporated into pullulan-based edible strips, recognition thresholds for capsaicin occurred over a narrow range, with a mean value near 1 nmol. When incorporated into edible strips at suprathreshold amounts, capsaicin yielded robust intensity values that were readily measured in our subject population. Maximal capsaicin intensity was observed 20 s after strips dissolved on the tongue surface, and then decreased in intensity. Suprathreshold studies showed that complete blockage of nasal airflow diminished capsaicin perception in the oral cavity. Oral rinses with vanillin-linoleic acid emulsions decreased mean intensity values for capsaicin by approximately 75%, but only modestly affected recognition threshold values. Also, oral rinses with isointense amounts of aqueous sucrose and sucralose solutions decreased mean intensity values for capsaicin by approximately 50%. In addition, this decrease in capsaicin intensity following an oral rinse with sucrose was partially reversed by the sweet taste inhibitor lactisole. These results suggest that blockage of nasal airflow, vanillin, sucrose, and sucralose modulate capsaicin perception in the human oral cavity. The results further suggest a chemosensory link between receptor cells that detect sweet taste stimuli and trigeminal neurons that detect capsaicin.