Is a covered stent justifiable in the treatment of coronary artery perforation? An observational analysis of long-term results of two different covered stent types.

OBJECTIVES: In this retrospective observational study, we investigate outcome of patients treated with or without covered stent (CS) implantation in the management of coronary artery perforation (CAP) during coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: CSs have shown to be effective devices to achieve acute hemostasis in large CAP. However, doubts have been raised regarding their long-term outcome. METHODS: Data of 19 061 PCI procedures during a 10-year period were reviewed. Fifty-five cases of large CAP were withheld (Ellis type 2, 3 or cavity spilling). All medical and procedural records of these cases were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Twenty-four (43.6%) patients were treated with CS implantation (15 polytetrafluoroethylene and 9 pericardium CSs). Twenty-six (47.3%) patients were managed without CS implantation, of whom five had unsuccessful delivery of a CS (stent delivery failure 17.2%). Although significantly more Ellis type-3 perforations were present in the CS group compared to the Non-CS group (75.0% vs 45.2%; P = 0.03), in-hospital mortality was not significantly different (8.3% vs 6.4%; [P = 0.79]). We observed a high rate of CS restenosis (29.2%) but a lower rate of CS thrombosis (4.2%). Despite these observations, 5-year MACE and all-cause mortality were not significantly different between CS and Non-CS group (respectively, 58.8% vs 50.0% (P = 0.26) and 26.7% vs 13.3% (P = 0.36)). CONCLUSION: Although deliverability of CSs was not flawless and a high rate of CS restenosis appeared, short- and long-term outcome were comparable between patients treated with or without CS. Therefore, CSs are justifiable in the treatment of CAP.

Bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent implantation preserves coronary vasomotion: A DESSOLVE II trial sub-study.

OBJECTIVES: We studied coronary vasomotion in patients treated with the Mistent(®) absorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (APSES) and in patients implanted with the Endeavor(®) zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). BACKGROUND: First generation (1st-gen) drug-eluting stents (DES) induce persistent vasomotor dysfunction in the treated coronary artery. It is unknown whether and to what extent the implantation of an absorbable polymer DES impairs coronary vasomotion. METHODS: This sub-study of the DESSOLVE II trial included 19 APSES Mistent(®) and 10 ZES Endeavor(®) patients. Incremental atrial pacing and quantitative coronary angiography were used to assess vasomotion proximal and distal to the stent and in a reference segment at 9 months after implantation. Percent changes in vessel diameter with pacing versus baseline were calculated and compared. Vasomotor response of the APSES group was also compared with changes observed in a historical group of 17 patients implanted with a 1st-gen sirolimus-eluting stent (SES). RESULTS: Normal vasomotion (vasodilatation) was preserved and of comparable magnitude in the APSES and in the ZES group both proximally (P = 0.34) and distally (P = 0.38) to the stent. This finding was not observed in the 1st-gen SES group showing marked pacing-induced vasoconstriction at both stent edges (P < 0.05 vs. APSES). The results were practically unchanged after excluding patients with absolute changes in vessel diameter <3% between baseline and maximal pacing. CONCLUSIONS: The implantation of an absorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent is associated with preserved coronary vasomotion, comparable to that observed after implantation of the Endeavor(®) ZES, and distinct from 1st-gen SES which induce coronary vasomotor dysfunction.

Intravascular ultrasound analysis of small vessel lesions treated with the Sparrow coronary stent system: results of the CARE II trial.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the Sparrow sirolimus-eluting stent (Sparrow-SES) against the Sparrow bare-metal stent (Sparrow-BMS) and conventional balloon-expandable bare-metal stent (BMS: Driver/Micro-Driver stent, Medtronic Vascular, Santa Rosa, CA). BACKGROUND: The Sparrow stent (Biosensors International, Singapore) consists of a guide wire-based, self-expandable, ultra-thin nitinol stent. The performance of this device with sirolimus in a fully biodegradable polymer has not been determined. METHODS: A total of 74 patients were included in this intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) sub-study of the CARE II trial, which was a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial in the treatment of single de novo native coronary artery lesions in vessels ranging from 2.0 mm to 2.75 mm in diameter (Sparrow-SES: n = 31, Sparrow-BMS: n = 22, BMS: n = 21). RESULTS: Stent volume index (VI) was significantly increased 8-month later in Sparrow-SES and Sparrow-BMS, but not in BMS (4.0 ± 1.0 to 4.6 ± 1.0 mm(3) /mm, p<0.0001, 4.0 ± 0.6 to 4.4 ± 0.8 mm(3) /mm, p<0.05, and 5.2 ± 1.0 to 5.1 ± 0.9 mm(3) /mm, p=0.421, respectively). % neointimal obstruction in Sparrow-SES was significantly smaller than those in Sparrow-BMS and BMS at follow-up (17.6 ± 9.4 vs. 36.2 ± 13.8 and 39.9 ± 11.1%, p<0.001). Sparrow-SES showed a mean 15% stent expansion and good suppression of neointimal proliferation, resulting in a significantly lower percentage of change in lumen VI during follow-up period (Sparrow-SES: -6.2 ± 16.2%, Sparrow-BMS: -30.4 ± 11.6%, BMS: -40.4 ± 10.0%, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The self-expanding Sparrow-SES demonstrated chronic stent expansion, good suppression of neointimal proliferation and resulted in a more preserved lumen in stented small vessels compared with the Sparrow-BMS and conventional balloon expandable BMS.

Five-year clinical outcome of multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus - with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: Long-term data from randomized studies on polymer-free stents are scarce. Long-term data of Cre8 amphilimus eluting stent are still not available. We sought to investigate contribution of a polymer-free design versus a permanent-polymer one on the long-term. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomized 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté (323 overall, 126 Cre8). Original primary endpoint (6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss) already demonstrated the superiority of Cre8 vs Taxus (0.14 + 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 + 0.40 mm; p < 0.001). Secondary endpoints were the device oriented composite endpoint (DOCE), patient oriented composite endpoint (POCE) up to 5-year. Long-term follow-up data confirmed the superiority shown by Cre8 in the analysis of the angiographic endpoint at 6-month, especially in the diabetic patients, where the device strongly reduced the clinical difference with non-diabetic. Landmark analysis demonstrated that the incidence of DOCE after 1-year and up to 5-year follow up was significantly lower in patients implanted with Cre8 AES (2.1% Cre8 vs. 9.3% Taxus, p = 0.009). While no differences were found in terms of DOCE rate among diabetic and non-diabetic patients treated with the Cre8 AES (HR 1.039; 95%CI 0.320-3.374), this was not true for Taxus (HR 2.64; 95%CI 1.112-6.278). CONCLUSIONS: Cre8 showed favourable safety and efficacy results versus Taxus at 5-years follow-up, with a superior clinical performance for the DOCE endpoint from 1 to 5 years. Cre8, differently from Taxus, has been able to strongly reduce the differences in clinical outcome between diabetic and non-diabetic up to 5 years, suggesting the higher efficacy of Cre8 in the treatment of diabetic patients.

Step-by-step StentBoost-guided small vessel stenting using the self-expandable Sparrow stent-in-wire.

A 56 year-old woman underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for a lesion in a small mid-left anterior descending coronary artery (reference vessel diameter by quantitative coronary angiography: 2.11 mm) with a novel drug-eluting stent specifically designed for small vessels, the CardioMind Sparrow stent delivery system. This is a self-expandable sirolimus-eluting nitinol stent directly mounted into a 0.014-inch coronary guidewire. The stent has a very thin strut thickness (67 micron), limiting its radiopacity. A specific X-ray stent-enhancing visualization technique, "StentBoost", allowed clear visualization and understanding of the steps needed for an appropriate release and deployment of the aforementioned stent.

Novel self-expanding stent system for enhanced provisional bifurcation stenting: Examination by StentBoost and intravascular ultrasound.

A 62-year-old man underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of a bifurcation lesion (Medina type 010) involving the mid-left anterior descending coronary artery and an important first diagonal branch with a novel stent specifically designed for bifurcations, the Stentys coronary bifurcation system. This is a self-expanding nitinol stent, with Z-shaped struts linked by interconnections that can be disconnected (in prespecified points every 1.5 mm all around the circumference and the length of the stent) at the level of the ostium of the side branch, simply by inflating an angioplasty balloon tracked to the ostium of the side branch, through the stent struts. The steps required for deployment of the stent and the final result obtained were evaluated by intravascular ultrasound examination and StentBoost Subtract, a specific X-ray stent-enhancing visualization technique.

Analysis of left main coronary artery bifurcation lesions treated with biolimus-eluting DEVAX AXXESS plus nitinol self-expanding stent: intravascular ultrasound results of the AXXENT trial.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of the AXXESS stent on the treatment of left main coronary artery (LMCA) bifurcation lesions using IVUS. BACKGROUND: The treatment of LMCA bifurcation lesions remains challenging even with the use of drug-eluting stents. The AXXESS system is a biolimus A9-eluting self-expanding stent, dedicated to the treatment of bifurcation lesions. METHODS: Data were obtained from the AXXENT trial, a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study designed to evaluate the efficacy of the AXXESS stent on the treatment of LMCA bifurcation lesions. IVUS was available in 26 cases at 6-months follow-up. Volumetric and cross-sectional analyses within the AXXESS stent, and cross-sectional analyses at the ostia of left anterior descending (LAD) and left circumflex coronary arteries (LCX) were performed. RESULTS: Within the AXXESS stent, percent neointimal volume obstruction was (3.0 +/- 4.1)% with a minimal lumen area of 10.3 +/- 2.6 mm(2). AXXESS stent volume showed an 12.4% increase at follow-up compared with postprocedure (P = 0.04). Lumen area was significantly smaller in the LCX ostium compared with the LAD ostium at follow-up (3.6 +/- 1.3 mm(2) vs. 5.5 +/- 2.0 mm(2), P = 0.0112). There was greater neointimal formation in the LCX ostium compared with the LAD ostium (1.37 +/- 1.20 mm(2) vs. 0.30 +/- 0.36 mm(2), P = 0.0003). CONCLUSIONS: The AXXESS stent in the LMCA showed enlargement through 6-months follow-up and significant neointimal suppression. Greater neointimal formation and relatively inadequate stent expansion may contribute to luminal narrowing in the LCX ostium.

Final five-year clinical outcomes in the EVOLVE trial: a randomised evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting stent.

AIMS: Long-term data on bioabsorbable polymer-coated everolimus-eluting stents (BP-EES) are limited. The EVOLVE trial compared the safety and efficacy of two dose formulations of the SYNERGY BP-EES with the permanent polymer-coated PROMUS Element EES (PE). METHODS AND RESULTS: The EVOLVE study was a prospective, multicentre, non-inferiority trial that randomised 291 patients with de novo coronary lesions (length: ≤28 mm; diameter: ≥2.25 to ≤3.5 mm) to receive PE (n=98), SYNERGY (n=94), or SYNERGY half-dose (n=99). At five years, there were no significant differences in the rates of TLF or individual components between groups. TLR rates trended lower in both SYNERGY arms than in the PE arm (TLR: 1.1% SYNERGY and 1.0% SYNERGY half-dose vs. 6.1% PE; p=0.07 and p=0.06, respectively). TVR was numerically lower in the SYNERGY arms compared to the PE arm (TVR: 3.3% SYNERGY and 4.2% SYNERGY half-dose vs. 10.2% PE; p=0.06 and p=0.11, respectively). No incidence of stent thrombosis was reported in any arm up to five years. CONCLUSIONS: The EVOLVE trial represents the longest-term follow-up of the SYNERGY stent available to date, demonstrating its continued safety and efficacy for the treatment of selected de novo atherosclerotic lesions up to five years.

Long-term clinical outcomes of a crystalline sirolimus-eluting coronary stent with a fully bioabsorbable polymer coating: five-year outcomes from the DESSOLVE I and II trials.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the five-year clinical results of a sirolimus-eluting stent (MiStent SES) with a bioabsorbable coating designed for sustained drug delivery during and after rapid polymer dissolution. METHODS AND RESULTS: The five-year results from the DESSOLVE I and II trials including major adverse cardiac events (MACE), target lesion failure (TLF), target vessel failure (TVF), and stent thrombosis (ST) at five-year follow-up are reported. In DESSOLVE I, 10.3% of patients receiving the MiStent SES (3/29) had a MACE event up to five years without TLF. In DESSOLVE II, 15.1% of patients in the MiStent group (18/119) had a five-year MACE event compared to 22.0% of patients in the Endeavor group (p=0.295). TLF was 9.2% in the MiStent group and 8.5% in the Endeavor group (p=1.00). TVF was 10.1% for MiStent versus 15.3% for Endeavor (p=0.331). Up to five-year follow-up, the MiStent SES has continued to demonstrate low rates of TLR across DESSOLVE I (0.0%) and DESSOLVE II (3.4%). No ST was reported with the MiStent up to five years in the DESSOLVE I trial. In DESSOLVE II, definite or probable ST was 0.0% with MiStent and 1.7% with Endeavor up to five years. CONCLUSIONS: The MiStent SES demonstrated long-term safety and effectiveness with low rates of five-year MACE, TLF, and TVF across these two clinical trials.

The SABRE Trial (Sirolimus Angioplasty Balloon for Coronary In-Stent Restenosis): Angiographic Results and 1-Year Clinical Outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this first-in-human study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of the Virtue sirolimus-eluting balloon in a cohort of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR). BACKGROUND: Angioplasty balloons coated with the cytotoxic drug paclitaxel have been widely used for ISR treatment. The Virtue angioplasty balloon (Caliber Therapeutics, New Hope, Pennsylvania) delivers sirolimus in a nanoencapsulated liquid formulation. This clinical trial is the first to examine a sirolimus-eluting balloon for ISR. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm feasibility study at 9 European centers, 50 ISR patients were treated with the Virtue balloon. Angiographic measurements at 6 months are reported, along with 12-month clinical follow-up. RESULTS: Procedural success in the intention-to-treat population was 100%. The primary safety endpoint was target lesion failure (TLF) (cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and clinically driven target lesion revascularization) assessed at 30 days (0%, n = 50). The primary performance endpoint was in-segment late lumen loss (LLL) at 6 months (0.31 ± 0.52 mm; n = 47). Secondary 6-month endpoints include binary restenosis (19.1%), diameter stenosis (30.3 ± 19.9%), and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (10.2%, n = 49). In the 36-patient per-protocol population (excluding major protocol violations and previously stented ISR), LLL was 0.12 ± 0.33 mm at 6 months. Clinical outcomes at 1 year for the intention-to-treat group were 12.2% TLF and 14.3% MACE and for the per-protocol population were 2.8% TLF and 2.8% MACE. CONCLUSIONS: This first-in-human study showed excellent procedural success for the Virtue sirolimus-eluting angioplasty balloon, 6-month LLL rates in line with current stent-free ISR treatment options, and clinical outcomes that warrant further evaluation in dedicated randomized studies.

The REMEDEE-OCT Study: An Evaluation of the Bioengineered COMBO Dual-Therapy CD34 Antibody-Covered Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Compared With a Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate vascular healing of the bioengineered COMBO Dual Therapy Stent compared with a cobalt-chromium (CoCr) everolimus-eluting stent (EES) as assessed by optical coherence tomography in patients with acute coronary syndromes. BACKGROUND: CD34+ cells promote endothelial repair after vascular injury. The bioengineered COMBO Dual Therapy Stent combines CD34+ cell-capturing technology with abluminal sirolimus release, but more data from clinical studies evaluating the vascular response are needed. METHODS: In a prospective randomized multicenter clinical trial, 60 patients with acute coronary syndromes were randomized 1:1 to COMBO or CoCr EES implantation. The primary endpoint was the percentage of uncovered stent struts per stent. Stent assessment by optical coherence tomography was performed at baseline and at 60 days, followed by independent core laboratory analysis. RESULTS: The percentage of uncovered struts per stent was higher with the COMBO than the CoCr EES at 60 days (median 14.7% vs. 7.7%; p = 0.04). However, no significant difference in uncovered stent struts was observed in the strut level-based analysis at 60 days, which also accounted for clustering (COMBO vs. CoCr EES; 13.6% vs. 6.9%; p = 0.09; generalized linear mixed models-adjusted analysis). Neointimal thickness at 60 days was lower with the COMBO compared with the CoCr EES (median 30.17 vs. 50.26 µm; p = 0.02; stent-level analysis). There were no significant differences in the frequency of major adverse cardiac events and each component of major adverse cardiac events within the study population between the 2 groups at 30, 60, 180, 360, and 540 days post-procedure. No target vessel stent thrombosis has been documented within 540 days. CONCLUSIONS: The present multicenter, prospective clinical study for the first time compared the vascular response of the bioengineered COMBO Dual Therapy Stent with a CoCr EES in patients early after acute coronary syndrome by using intracoronary optical coherence tomographic analysis. The percentage of uncovered stent struts per stent was somewhat higher after COMBO versus CoCr EES implantation as detected by optical coherence tomography, associated with reduced neointimal thickness.

The effect of variable dose and release kinetics on neointimal hyperplasia using a novel paclitaxel-eluting stent platform: the Paclitaxel In-Stent Controlled Elution Study (PISCES).

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of variable dose and release kinetics of paclitaxel on neointimal hyperplasia. BACKGROUND: Conventional paclitaxel-eluting stents use a durable polymer coating as a vehicle for drug delivery. The Conor stent (Conor Medsystems, Menlo Park, California) with intra-strut wells and erodable polymer is specifically designed for drug delivery with programmable pharmacokinetics. METHODS: Two hundred and forty-four patients with single vessel disease received either a bare metal Conor stent (n = 53) or one of six different release formulations that varied in dose (10 or 30 microg) and elution release kinetics (first order, zero order), direction (abluminal, luminal), and duration (5, 10, and 30 days). End points at six months (bare stent group) and at four months (eluting stent groups) were angiographic late loss and neointimal tissue volume by intravascular ultrasound and the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: The lowest in-stent late loss (0.38 mm, p <0.01, and 0.30 mm, p <0.01) and volume obstruction (8%, p <0.01, and 5%, p <0.01) were observed with the 10-microg and 30-microg doses in the 30-day release groups respectively, whereas the highest in-stent late loss (0.88 mm), volume obstruction (26%), and restenosis rate (11.6%) were observed in the bare stent group. The overall MACE rate of the eluting stent group was 8.6%: death 0.5%, myocardial infarction 2.7%, and target lesion revascularization (TLR) 5.3%. Sub-acute thrombosis was 0.5%. The TLR rates in the two 30-day release groups were 0% and 3.4%. CONCLUSIONS: This novel eluting stent platform, using an erodable polymer with complete elution of low doses of paclitaxel, is safe. The inhibition of the in-stent neointimal hyperplasia was best in the long release groups.

Serial Multimodality Imaging and 2-Year Clinical Outcomes of the Novel DESolve Novolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System for the Treatment of Single De Novo Coronary Lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to report the late multimodality imaging and clinical outcomes of the novel poly-l-lactic-acid-based DESolve novolimus-eluting bioresorbable coronary scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions. BACKGROUND: Bioresorbable scaffolds are an alternative to drug-eluting metallic stents and provide temporary vascular scaffolding, which potentially may allow vessel restoration and reduce the risk of future adverse events. METHODS: Overall, 126 patients were enrolled at 13 international sites between November 2011 and June 2012. The primary endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss at 6 months. Major adverse cardiac events, the main safety endpoint, were defined as the composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, or clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. All patients underwent angiography at 6 months. Serial intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography were performed in a subset of patients. RESULTS: The scaffold device success rate was 97% (n = 122 of 126), and procedural success was 100% (n = 122 of 122). The major adverse cardiac event rate was 3.3% (n = 4 of 122) at 6 months and 7.4% (n = 9 of 122) at 24 months, including 1 probable stent thrombosis within the first month. At 6-month angiographic follow-up, in-scaffold late lumen loss was 0.20 ± 0.32 mm. Paired intravascular ultrasound analysis demonstrated a significant increase in vessel, lumen and scaffold dimensions between post-procedure and 6-month follow-up, and strut-level optical coherence tomography analysis showed full strut coverage in 99 ± 1.7%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed favorable performance of the DESolve scaffold, effective inhibition of neointimal hyperplasia, and for the first time, early luminal and scaffold growth at 6 months with sustained efficacy and safety through 2 years. (Elixir Medical Clinical Evaluation of the DESolve Novolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold System-The DESolve Nx Trial; NCT02086045).

A first-in-man clinical evaluation of Ultimaster, a new drug-eluting coronary stent system: CENTURY study.

AIMS: To report the six-month angiographic and two-year clinical outcome data from the first-in-man study with the Ultimaster DES, a thin-strut cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) with an innovative abluminal-gradient-coated bioresorbable polymer. METHODS AND RESULTS: CENTURY is a multicentre, single-arm, prospective study that enrolled 105 patients (113 lesions) with coronary artery disease. All patients were scheduled to have an angiographic follow-up at six months, while 45 and 20 patients respectively had IVUS and OCT assessments. The primary endpoint was six-month in-stent late lumen loss. Secondary endpoints included clinical, IVUS and OCT outcomes. Clinical follow-up is available up to two years and will continue up to five years. Procedural success was 97.1% and device success was 100%. Angiographic late loss at six months was 0.04±0.35 mm, also reflected in a low binary restenosis rate of 0.9% and confirmed by IVUS-assessed neointimal volume obstruction of 1.02±1.62%. The mean strut coverage assessed by OCT was 96.2% with 1.66±4.02 malapposed stent struts. There were no deaths in the study, three (2.9%) periprocedural and one (0.9%) spontaneous myocardial infarction, not related to the target vessel. At one and two years, the target lesion failure rate was 3.8% and 5.7%, while the TLR rate was 1.9% and 2.8%, respectively. There was one acute definite stent thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: The Ultimaster™ novel bioresorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent demonstrated good performance, including high procedural success and strong suppression of neointimal proliferation at six months. Good safety and effectiveness were shown up to two years in the studied population.

Randomised study of a bioabsorbable polymer-coated sirolimus-eluting stent: results of the DESSOLVE II trial.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of the MiStent absorbable polymer sirolimus-eluting stent (APSES) with a zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES). METHODS AND RESULTS: The trial was a 2:1 randomisation at 26 sites of 184 patients implanted with an APSES (n=123) versus a ZES (n=61). Following stent implantation, all patients underwent quantitative coronary angiography at baseline and at nine months of follow-up, while a select subgroup also underwent optical coherence tomography (OCT). The primary efficacy hypothesis was superiority of in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) of APSES compared to ZES. At nine months, the primary endpoint was met, with a mean in-stent LLL of 0.27±0.46 mm in 103 APSES patients versus 0.58±0.41 mm in 52 ZES patients (p<0.001). The proportion of uncovered stent struts by OCT at nine months was very low in both groups. The mean neointimal thickness of covered struts (p=0.002) and percent net volume obstruction (p≤0.003) were significantly lower in the APSES than in the ZES group. Major adverse cardiac event and stent thrombosis rates were low and comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The DESSOLVE II trial demonstrated superiority in the primary efficacy endpoint of nine-month mean LLL for APSES compared to ZES. Strut coverage by OCT was high with both stents and the clinical safety endpoints including stent thrombosis were equally low in both groups. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01294748.

A next-generation bioresorbable coronary scaffold system: from bench to first clinical evaluation: 6- and 12-month clinical and multimodality imaging results.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform clinical and imaging assessments of the DESolve Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold (BCS). BACKGROUND: BCS, which is drug eluting, may have potential advantages compared with conventional metallic drug-eluting stents. The DESolve system, designed to provide vessel support and neointimal suppression, combines a poly-l-lactic acid-based scaffold with the antiproliferative myolimus. METHODS: The DESolve First-in-Man (a non-randomized, consecutive enrollment evaluation of the DESolve myolimus eluting bioresorbable coronary stent in the treatment of patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions) trial was a prospective multicenter study enrolling 16 patients eligible for treatment. The principal safety endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and clinically indicated target lesion revascularization. The principal imaging endpoint was in-scaffold late lumen loss (LLL) assessed by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) at 6 months. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging was performed at baseline and 6 months; multislice computed tomography (MSCT) was performed at 12 months. RESULTS: Acute procedural success was achieved in 15 of 15 patients receiving a study scaffold. At 12 months, there was no scaffold thrombosis and no major adverse cardiac events directly attributable to the scaffold. At 6 months, in-scaffold LLL (by QCA) was 0.19 ± 0.19 mm; neointimal volume (by IVUS) was 7.19 ± 3.56%, with no evidence of scaffold recoil or late malapposition. Findings were confirmed with OCT and showed uniform, thin neointimal coverage (0.12 ± 0.04 mm). At 12 months, MSCT demonstrated excellent vessel patency. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of the DESolve BCS. Results showing low in-scaffold LLL, low % neointimal volume at 6 months, no chronic recoil, and maintenance of lumen patency at 12 months prompt further study. (DESolve First-in-Man; EudraCT number 2011-000027-32).

The REMEDEE trial: a randomized comparison of a combination sirolimus-eluting endothelial progenitor cell capture stent with a paclitaxel-eluting stent.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the efficacy and safety results after coronary implantation of a combined sirolimus-eluting CD34 antibody coated Combo stent (OrbusNeich Medical, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida) with the paclitaxel-eluting Taxus Liberté stent (PES) (Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts). This report summarizes the first-in-man randomized, controlled multicenter REMEDEE trial (Randomized study to Evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an abluMinal sirolimus coatED bio-Engineered StEnt) angiographic, intravascular ultrasound, and clinical results up to 12 months. BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents have limited restenosis and reintervention but are complicated by especially late and very late stent thrombosis and accelerated neoatherosclerosis. Alternative or adjunct technologies should address these limitations. METHODS: One hundred eighty-three patients with de novo native coronary artery stenoses were randomized 2:1 to Combo stent or PES implantation. The primary endpoint is the angiographic in-stent late lumen loss at 9 months, which was tested for noninferiority between the 2 stent groups. Secondary endpoints include the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events. RESULTS: The Combo stent was found to be noninferior to the PES in 9-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss with 0.39 ± 0.45 mm versus 0.44 ± 0.56 mm (pnoninferiority = 0.0012). At 12 months, the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events was 8.9% in the Combo group and 10.2% in the PES group (p = 0.80) with no difference in mortality, occurrence of myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization. No stent thrombosis was reported in either group. CONCLUSIONS: In the REMEDEE trial the Combo stent has shown to be effective by meeting the primary noninferiority angiographic endpoint and safe, with an overall low rate of clinical events in both stent groups, including no stent thrombosis up to 12 months.

Six-month IVUS and two-year clinical outcomes in the EVOLVE FHU trial: a randomised evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting stent.

AIMS: The EVOLVE FHU trial demonstrated non-inferiority of six-month late loss with two dose formulations of SYNERGY, a novel bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) compared with the durable polymer PROMUS Element (PE) EES. The current analysis describes the six-month IVUS and clinical results through two years from the EVOLVE FHU trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: EVOLVE recruited 291 patients from 29 centres. At six months, IVUS-assessed in-stent net volume obstruction was 3.40 ± 5.06% for PROMUS Element (PE) vs. 2.68 ± 4.60% for SYNERGY (p=0.34) and 3.09 ± 4.29% for SYNERGY ½ dose (p=0.68 vs. PE). There were no significant differences between groups for any other measured IVUS parameter including resolved, persistent, and late-acquired incomplete stent apposition (ISA). At two years, target lesion failure (TLF) was 6.1% for PE vs. 5.5% for SYNERGY (p=0.87) and 5.2% for SYNERGY ½ dose (p=0.81). There were no significant differences between groups for cardiac death, repeat revascularisation, MI or stent thrombosis through two years. CONCLUSIONS: At six months, everolimus delivered from an ultrathin bioabsorbable abluminal polymer resulted in equivalent net volume obstruction and ISA compared with a permanent polymer EES. There were no significant differences between PE and either SYNERGY stent for any major cardiac endpoint through two years. Clinical trials number: NCT01135225.

A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to demonstrate the noninferiority of polymer-free amphilimus-eluting stents (Cre8, CID, Saluggia, Italy) versus permanent-polymer paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus Liberté, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) in de novo percutaneous coronary intervention. BACKGROUND: Although the efficacy of the drug-eluting stent has been well established, the risk-benefit balance is still suboptimal, and the safety of polymers remains uncertain. METHODS: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for de novo lesions were randomly assigned 1:1 to Cre8 or Taxus Liberté stents. Primary endpoint was 6-month angiographic in-stent late lumen loss (LLL) within a noninferiority scope. Six-month intravascular ultrasound was performed in 20% of the patients. All patients will be clinically followed up to 5 years. RESULTS: Out of 323 patients enrolled, 162 received Cre8 and 161 Taxus Liberté stents. In-stent LLL was significantly lower in Cre8 group (0.14 ± 0.36 mm vs. 0.34 ± 0.40 mm, p noninferiority <0.0001, p superiority <0.0001). Clinical endpoints (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and stent thrombosis) up to 12 months did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The Cre8 stent in de novo lesions showed significantly lower in-stent LLL at 6 months than the Taxus Liberté stent did, with a trend toward better 12-month clinical safety and efficacy results. (International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus Drug-Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De Novo Coronary Lesions [NEXT]; NCT01373502).