The Impact of Parental Education on Schoolchildren's Oral Health-A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study in Romania.

The present study is part of the first national oral health survey for children in Romania. The aim of this study was to determine caries prevalence in correlation with the level of the parents' education, preventive behavior, and socioeconomic parameters in 11-14-year-old schoolchildren in Romania. A cross-sectional epidemiological survey was designed and conducted in 2019-2020. The sampled children were selected from 49 schools distributed in rural and urban areas of Romania, including its capital. Data were collected using the Oral Health Questionnaire for Children developed by the World Health Organization and described in the WHO Oral Health Surveys-Basic Methods, 5th edition, 2013, after positive informed consent. To express prevalence and severity of carious lesions, International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) criteria were recorded in school for 814 schoolchildren (388 boys and 426 girls) aged between 11 and 14 years old (mean age 12.29 ± 0.6). Elements regarding the specificity of the child (gender, age, and parental education) were tabulated against preventive behavior. The parents' education was correlated with three clinical indices in order to assess the existence or lack of certain significant differences among schoolchildren in Romania. In terms of correlation between the mother's education and preventive behavior, results showed a significant positive correlation in case of dental check-ups (rs = 0.08 *, p < 0.05), brushing (rs = 0.02 **, p < 0.01), and use of different types of dental hygiene aids (rs = 0.06 **, p < 0.01) and a negative correlation with tooth pain or discomfort (rs = -0.01 **, p < 0.01). A statistically significant positive relationship was highlighted between the mother's education and the presence of restorations (rs = -0.09 **, p < 0.01). Regarding the father's education, there was a positive relationship with oral hygiene behavior (rs = 0.18 **, p < 0.01) but a negative relationship with the D3T index (rs = -0.18 **, p < 0.01). In conclusion, there was a strong correlation between the parents' education, preventive behavior, and oral health status of Romanian schoolchildren.

Does the antiviral therapy of patients with chronic hepatitis exert nephrotoxic effects?

INTRODUCTION: HBV and HCV chronic hepatitis can be accompanied by secondary renal disease. In addition, these patients receive antiviral drugs with potential nephrotoxicity. It is known that interferon (IFN) therapy in HCV-infected kidney transplant recipients is followed by rejection of the transplant in 50% of the cases. Ribavirin is contraindicated in hemodialyzed patients and in patients with a GFR <50 ml/min/1.73 m(2). IFN therapy requires dosage reduction and close monitoring in patients with a GFR <50 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and in patients with end stage renal disease. The aim of our study was to assess the nephrotoxicity of antiviral drugs in patients with chronic hepatitis by measuring three renal biomarkers: urinary albumin, N-acetyl-ß-D-glucosaminidase (NAG) and α 1-microglobulin, as well as glomerular filtration rate (GFR-MDRD4) before and at 6 months of therapy. METHODS: Fifty-five patients (28 male and 27 female, with a mean age of 47.85 ± 12.03 years) with chronic hepatitis (40 patients with HCV, 13 patients with HBV, 1 patient with HBV+HCV, and 1 patient with HBV+HDV) were enrolled into the study. Different antiviral drug associations were used on a case-by-case basis. The 40 patients with HCV chronic hepatitis received either Peg-IFN-α 2a+Ribavirin (37 patients) or Peg-IFN-α 2b+Ribavirin (3 patients). The 13 patients with HBV chronic hepatitis received Peg-IFN-α 2a (9 patients), Lamivudine (2 patients), Entecavir (1 patient), or Adefovir (1 patient). The patient with HBV+HCV chronic hepatitis received Peg-IFN-α 2a+Ribavirin. The patient with HBV+HDV chronic hepatitis received IFN-α 2a. Urinary albumin (ELISA), NAG (colorimetrical method), α 1-microglobulin (ELISA), and serum creatinine were measured before and at 6 months of antiviral therapy. Urinary markers were expressed as either mg/gCr (for albumin and α 1-microglobulin) or U/gCr (for NAG). Statistical analysis (Pearson's correlation coefficient, paired t-test and χ(2)-test) was performed. RESULTS: At 6 months of therapy urinary albumin/gCr did not increase significantly: 16.58 ± 23.39 vs. 15.85 ± 24.96 mg/gCr before therapy, p = 0.87. Urinary NAG/gCr did not increase significantly: 4.21 ± 3.37 vs. 3.83 ± 3.2 U/gCr before therapy, p = 0.53. Urinary α 1-microglobulin/gCr was almost unchanged: 4.38 ± 4.47 vs. 4.38 ± 3.57 mg/gCr before therapy, p = 0.99. The GFR did not decline significantly: 92.41 ± 22.21 vs. 94.59 ± 36.1 ml/min/1.73 m(2) before therapy, p = 0.7. Ten patients (18.18%) were albuminuric before therapy, and 14 patients (25.45%) were albuminuric at 6 months of therapy, a non-significant increase (p = 0.35). We found a correlation between urinary albumin/gCr and NAG/gCr and between urinary albumin/gCr and α 1-microglobulin/gCr both at baseline and at 6 months of therapy: r = 0.54, p = 0.0005; r = 0.29, p = 0.03; r = 0.51, p = 0.0005; and r = 0.4, p = 0.002, respectively. In the patient receiving Adefovir, a known nephrotoxic drug, two of the three biomarkers (urinary albumin/gCr and NAG/gCr) increased, most notably NAG/gCr. Both HCV and HBV chronic hepatitis therapy were associated with non-significant changes in renal biomarker excretion and GFR. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of Adefovir, all of the drug associations used in this study were safe.

Pegylated-interferon alpha 2a treatment for chronic hepatitis C in patients on chronic haemodialysis.

AIM: To evaluate the response to pegylated-interferon alpha 2a in chronic hepatitis C patients on chronic haemodialysis. METHODS: Ten patients with chronic C hepatitis were enrolled in this study. All had increased aminotransferases for more than 6 mo, positive antiHCV antibodies and positive PCR HCV-RNA. We administrated Peg-Interferon alpha 2a 180 microg/wk for 48 wk. After 12 wk of treatment we evaluated the biochemical and early virological response (EVR). At the end of the treatment we evaluated the biochemical response and 24 wk after the end of the treatment we evaluated the sustained virological response (SVR). We monitored the side-effects during the treatment. RESULTS: Two patients dropped out in the first 12 wk of treatment and 2 after the first 12 wk of treatment. After 12 wk of treatment, 7 out of 8 patients had biochemical response and EVR and 1 had biochemical response but persistent viremia. We had to reduce the dose of pegylated-interferon to 135 mug/wk in 2 cases. Three out of 6 (50%) patients had SVR 24 wk after the end of the treatment. Intention-to-treat analysis showed that 3 out of 10 patients (30%) had SVR. Side-effects occurred in most of the patients (flu-like syndrome, thrombocytopenia or leucopoenia), but they did not impose the discontinuation of treatment. CONCLUSION: After 12 wk of treatment with Peg-Interferon alpha 2a (40 ku) in patients on chronic haemodialysis with chronic C hepatitis, EVR was obtained in 87.5% (7/8) of the cases. SVR was achieved in 50% of the cases (3/6 patients) that finished the 48 wk of treatment.