Adhesion and optics: The challenges of esthetic oral rehabilitation on varied substrates-Reflections based on a clinical report.

Patients with challenging prosthodontic conditions require rehabilitation with a biological, functional, and esthetic approach. When one or more teeth are badly discolored, their restoration is problematic because poor appearance affects not only the crown but also the periodontal tissues. This clinical report describes a complex esthetic rehabilitation with conservative tissue management and ceramic restorations. Subepithelial connective tissue graft surgery and the replacement of a cast metal post with a glass fiber post addressed the problem of a discolored maxillary central incisor. The discolored right maxillary incisor was restored with a combination of a medium-opaque, lithium-disilicate ceramic coping to mask the dark root and to approximate the color of the other incisors. Subsequently, 6 ceramic veneers were placed. A knowledge of the materials' optical properties and adhesion possibilities helped solve this complex problem.

Clinical Time Required and Internal Adaptation in Cavities restored with Bulk-fill Composites.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the restorative time required and the internal adaptation after thermomechanical aging of class I restorations using either the conventional incremental technique or bulk-fill technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cavities (Class I) were prepared on the occlusal surface of human third molars. 40 teeth were divided into four experimental groups according to the restorative technique (n = 10): G1 = 3 mm increment of Surefill SDR Flow + 1 mm Filtek P60; G2 = 3 mm increment of Filtek Bulk-Fill + 1 mm Filtek P60; G3 = Filtek P60 inserted with incremental technique; G4 = 3 mm increment of Filtek Z350 Flow XT + 1 mm increment of Filtek P60. The required restorative clinical time for each technique was marked. Specimens were submitted to thermomechanical loading (20,000 mechanical cycles-80 N/thermal cycling-5/55°C for 30 seconds). After, samples were sectioned, ratio of internal gaps to interface length (%) was recorded using dye-staining-gap technique. Data were submitted to analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's test (95% significance). RESULTS: There was no significant difference in gap formation and none of the groups was completely gap-free. However, a significant reduction on required restorative clinical time was observed for G1 (167 ± 7 seconds), G2 (169 ± 4 seconds), and G4 (169 ± 8 seconds) when compared with G3 (204 ± 8 seconds). CONCLUSION: No significant difference in gap formation was found among bulk-fill and conventional incremental restorative technique tested; however, the use of a bulk-fill composite reduced 20% of the required restorative clinical time. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: None of the restorative techniques applied were able to prevent internal gap formation. The use of bulk-fill composite reduced the required clinical time to perform class I restorations.