Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Liver Int ; 27(8): 1111-8, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17845540

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) patients who have failed previous treatment have low sustained viral response (SVR) rates with repeat treatment. We evaluated whether interferon (IFN) induction during retreatment improves response rates. METHODS: Two randomized, controlled trials were conducted in chronic HCV patients who failed IFN. In Study 1, patients received IFN 3 MU daily plus ribavirin (RBV) 1000 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 44 weeks (induction; n=232), or IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=237). In Study 2, patients received IFN 5 MU B.I.D. plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN) 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 46 weeks (induction; n=201), or PEG-IFN 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=206). The primary end point for both trials was SVR. RESULTS: Induction did not increase SVR compared with non-induction, but did increase the on-treatment response among genotype non-1 patients in Study 2. By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, SVR in Study 1 was 13% for induction vs. 9% for non-induction (P=NS). In Study 2 (ITT), SVR was 20% for induction vs. 24% for non-induction (P=NS). However, by non-ITT analysis of Study 2, genotype non-1-previous non-responders showed significantly higher response rates with induction than non-induction. CONCLUSION: For chronic HCV patients who have failed IFN, induction with retreatment does not improve SVR, but may be beneficial for patients with genotype non-1 HCV.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , DNA Viral/análise , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/etnologia , Hepatite C Crônica/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/patologia , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/efeitos adversos , Interferons/efeitos adversos , Fígado/efeitos dos fármacos , Fígado/patologia , Fígado/virologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Seleção de Pacientes , Polietilenoglicóis , RNA Viral/sangue , Proteínas Recombinantes , Ribavirina/efeitos adversos , Fatores Sexuais , Fatores de Tempo , Falha de Tratamento , Estados Unidos , Carga Viral
2.
Hepatology ; 46(4): 971-81, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17894303

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: This prospective, multicenter, community-based and academic-based, open-label, investigator-initiated, U.S. study evaluated efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) alfa-2b plus a flat or weight-based dose of ribavirin (RBV) in adults with chronic hepatitis C. Patients (n = 5027) were randomly assigned to receive PEG-IFN alfa-2b 1.5 microg/kg/week plus flat-dose (800 mg/day) or weight-based (800-1400 mg/day) RBV for 48 weeks (patients with genotype 1, 4, 5, or 6) and for 24 or 48 weeks (genotype 2/3 patients). Primary end point was sustained virologic response (undetectable [<125 IU/mL] serum hepatitis C virus RNA at 24-week follow-up). Sustained virologic response, but not end-of-treatment, rates were significantly higher with weight-based than with flat-dose RBV (44.2% versus 40.5%; P = 0.008). Sustained virologic response rates by intention-to-treat analysis were 34.0% and 28.9%, respectively, in genotype 1 patients (P = 0.005) and 31.2% and 26.7%, respectively, in genotype 1 patients with high baseline viral load (P = 0.056). In genotype 2/3 patients, rates were not significantly different (61.8% and 59.5%, respectively) regardless of treatment duration. Besides greater hemoglobin reductions with weight-based RBV, safety profiles were similar across RBV dosing groups, including the 1400-mg/day group. CONCLUSION: PEG-IFN alfa-2b plus weight-based RBV is more effective than flat-dose RBV, particularly in genotype 1 patients, providing equivalent efficacy across all weight groups. RBV 1400 mg/day is appropriate for patients 105 to 125 kg. For genotype 2/3 patients, 24 weeks of treatment with flat-dose RBV is adequate; no evidence of additional benefit of extending treatment to 48 weeks was demonstrated.


Assuntos
Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/fisiopatologia , Interferon-alfa/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Peso Corporal , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepacivirus/fisiologia , Hepatite C/genética , Humanos , Interferon alfa-2 , Interferon-alfa/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polietilenoglicóis , Estudos Prospectivos , RNA Viral/metabolismo , Proteínas Recombinantes , Ribavirina/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA