A Strategy against the Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Associated with Nitrogen-Containing Bisphosphonates (N-BPs): Attempts to Replace N-BPs with the Non-N-BP Etidronate.

Bisphosphonate (BP)-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) can occur when enhanced bone-resorptive diseases are treated with nitrogen-containing BPs (N-BPs). Having previously found, in mice, that the non-N-BP etidronate can (i) reduce the inflammatory/necrotic effects of N-BPs by inhibiting their intracellular entry and (ii) antagonize the binding of N-BPs to bone hydroxyapatite, we hypothesized that etidronate-replacement therapy (Eti-RT) might be useful for patients with, or at risk of, BRONJ. In the present study we examined this hypothesis. In each of 25 patients receiving N-BP treatment, the N-BP was discontinued when BRONJ was suspected and/or diagnosed. After consultation with the physician-in-charge and with the patient's informed consent, Eti-RT was instituted in one group according to its standard oral prescription. We retrospectively compared this Eti-RT group (11 patients) with a non-Eti-RT group (14 patients). The Eti-RT group (6 oral N-BP patients and 5 intravenous N-BP patients) and the non-Eti-RT group (5 oral N-BP patients and 9 intravenous N-BP patients) were all stage 2-3 BRONJ. Both in oral and intravenous N-BP patients (particularly in the former patients), Eti-RT promoted or tended to promote the separation and removal of sequestra and thereby promoted the recovery of soft-tissues, allowing them to cover the exposed jawbone. These results suggest that Eti-RT may be an effective choice for BRONJ caused by either oral or intravenous N-BPs and for BRONJ prevention, while retaining a level of anti-bone-resorption. Eti-RT may also be effective at preventing BRONJ in N-BP-treated patients at risk of BRONJ. However, prospective trials are still required.

Inhibition of necrotic actions of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (NBPs) and their elimination from bone by etidronate (a non-NBP): a proposal for possible utilization of etidronate as a substitution drug for NBPs.

PURPOSE: Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (NBPs) have powerful anti-bone-resorptive effects (ABREs). However, recent clinical applications have disclosed an unexpected side effect, osteonecrosis of the jaw. We previously found in mice that etidronate (a non-NBP), when coadministered with alendronate (an NBP), inhibited the latter's inflammatory effects. However, etidronate also reduced the ABRE of alendronate. The present study examined in mice the modulating effects of etidronate on the inflammatory and necrotic actions of zoledronate (the NBP with the strongest anti-bone-resorptive activity and the highest incidence of osteonecrosis of the jaw) and on ABREs of various NBPs including zoledronate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: NBPs were subcutaneously injected into ear pinnas of mice and ensuing inflammation and necrosis at the site of the injection were evaluated. ABREs of NBPs were evaluated by analyzing sclerotic bands induced in mouse tibias. RESULTS: Coinjection of etidronate reduced inflammatory and necrotic reactions induced by zoledronate, and also reduced the amount of zoledronate retained within the ear tissue. When both agents were intraperitoneally injected, etidronate reduced the ABRE of zoledronate and those of other NBPs. Notably, etidronate reduced the ABRE of zoledronate even when this non-NBP was injected 16 hours after the injection of zoledronate. Bone scintigram indicated that etidronate reduced the amount of zoledronate that had already bound to bone. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that etidronate may 1) inhibit the entry of NBPs into cells related to inflammation and/or necrosis, 2) inhibit the binding of NBPs to bone hydroxyapatite, 3) at least partly eliminate (or substitute for) NBPs that have already accumulated within bones, and thus 4) if used as a substitution drug for NBPs, be effective at treating or preventing NBP-associated osteonecrosis of the jaw.

[Basic Studies on the Mechanism, Prevention, and Treatment of Osteonecrosis of the Jaw Induced by Bisphosphonates].

Since the first report in 2003, bisphosphonate-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (BRONJ) has been increasing, without effective clinical strategies. Osteoporosis is common in elderly women, and bisphosphonates (BPs) are typical and widely used anti-osteoporotic or anti-bone-resorptive drugs. BRONJ is now a serious concern in dentistry. As BPs are pyrophosphate analogues and bind strongly to bone hydroxyapatite, and the P-C-P structure of BPs is non-hydrolysable, they accumulate in bones upon repeated administration. During bone-resorption, BPs are taken into osteoclasts and exhibit cytotoxicity, producing a long-lasting anti-bone-resorptive effect. BPs are divided into nitrogen-containing BPs (N-BPs) and non-nitrogen-containing BPs (non-N-BPs). N-BPs have far stronger anti-bone-resorptive effects than non-N-BPs, and BRONJ is caused by N-BPs. Our murine experiments have revealed the following. N-BPs, but not non-N-BPs, exhibit direct and potent inflammatory/necrotic effects on soft-tissues. These effects are augmented by lipopolysaccharide (the inflammatory component of bacterial cell-walls) and the accumulation of N-BPs in jawbones is augmented by inflammation. N-BPs are taken into soft-tissue cells via phosphate-transporters, while the non-N-BPs etidronate and clodronate inhibit this transportation. Etidronate, but not clodronate, has the effect of expelling N-BPs that have accumulated in bones. Moreover, etidronate and clodronate each have an analgesic effect, while clodronate has an anti-inflammatory effect via inhibition of phosphate-transporters. These findings suggest that BRONJ may be induced by phosphate-transporter-mediated and infection-promoted mechanisms, and that etidronate and clodronate may be useful for preventing and treating BRONJ. Our clinical trials support etidronate being useful for treating BRONJ, although additional clinical trials of etidronate and clodronate are needed.

Histidine decarboxylase-stimulating and inflammatory effects of alendronate in mice: involvement of mevalonate pathway, TNFalpha, macrophages, and T-cells.

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (NBPs) are powerful anti-bone-resorptive drugs, but they frequently induce various inflammatory side effects. Recent clinical applications have disclosed an unexpected new side effect, jaw-bone necrosis and exposure. In vitro studies suggest that the inflammatory effects of NBPs are due to Vgamma2Vdelta2 T-cells, stimulated directly and/or indirectly [the latter via isopentenylpyrophosphate (IPP) in the mevalonate pathway]. Rats and mice, however, lack Vgamma2Vdelta2 T-cells, yet NBPs still induce necrotic and inflammatory reactions. In mice, NBPs induce IL-1-dependent inflammatory reactions, such as inductions of histidine decarboxylase (HDC, the histamine-forming enzyme) in the liver, lung, spleen, and bone marrow, an increase in granulocytic cells in the peritoneal cavity, pleural exudation, and splenomegaly. Here, we examined the involvement of IPP, TNF, macrophages, and T-cells in the inflammatory actions of alendronate (a typical NBP) in mice. Various statins (mevalonate-synthesis inhibitors) suppressed the alendronate-induced HDC inductions, while mevalonate itself augmented such inductions. IPP injection also induced HDC. Like IL-1-deficient mice, TNF-deficient mice were resistant to alendronate-stimulated HDC induction. Alendronate-stimulated HDC inductions were significantly weaker in macrophage-depleted mice and in nude mice than in control mice. Similar, though generally less clear-cut, results were obtained when other alendronate-induced inflammatory reactions were examined. These results suggest that (i) inhibition of the mevalonate pathway causes and/or modifies at least some inflammatory actions of alendronate in mice, (ii) in addition to IL-1, TNF is also involved in the inflammatory actions of alendronate, and (iii) alendronate may act on a variety of cells, including macrophages and T-cells.

Necrotic actions of nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates and their inhibition by clodronate, a non-nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate in mice: potential for utilization of clodronate as a combination drug with a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate.

Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (NBPs) exhibit powerful anti-bone-resorptive effects (ABREs) via inhibition of farnesyl pyrophosphate synthase during cholesterol biosynthesis. Clinical applications have disclosed an unexpected side effect, namely osteonecrosis of jaw bones, and although thousands of cases have been documented in the last few years the mechanism remains unclear. Since NBPs accumulate in bone-hydroxyapatite, more jaw bone osteonecrosis cases may come to light if NBPs continue to be used as they are being used now. We have previously reported that in mice, systemic (intraperitoneal) injection of clodronate (a non-NBP) prevents the inflammatory effects of NBPs. Here, we examined in mice the local necrotic actions of various NBPs and the anti-necrotic effects of clodronate. A single subcutaneous injection of an NBP into the ear pinna induced necrosis at the injection site (relative potencies of necrotic actions of NBPs: zoledronate >> pamidronate > or = alendronate > risedronate), while non-NBPs lacked this effect. Clodronate, when injected together with an NBP, reduced or prevented the necrosis induced by that NBP, but not its ABRE. Clodronate reduced the amount of each NBP retained within tissues. These results, together with those of previous studies, suggest that (i) clodronate inhibits the inflammatory and necrotic actions of NBPs by inhibiting their incorporation into cells related to inflammation and/or necrosis, (ii) clodronate could be useful as a combination drug with NBPs for preventing their necrotic actions while retaining their ABREs and (iii) clodronate could also be useful as a substitution drug for NBPs in patients at risk of osteonecrosis of jaw bones.