Desensitization of NMDA channels requires ligand binding to both GluN1 and GluN2 subunits to constrict the pore beside the activation gate.

N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor channels are activated by glutamate (or NMDA) and glycine. The channels also undergo desensitization, which denotes decreased channel availability, after prolonged exposure to the activating ligands. Glycine apparently has a paradoxical negative effect on desensitization, as the increase in ambient glycine in concentrations required for channel activation would increase sustained NMDA receptor currents. We hypothesized that this classical "glycine-dependent desensitization" could be glycine-dependent activation in essence. By performing electrophysiological recordings and biophysical analyses with rat brain NMDA receptors heterogeneously expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes, we characterized that the channel opened by "only" NMDA (in nominally glycine-free condition probably with the inevitable nanomolar glycine) would undergo a novel form of deactivation rather than desensitization, and is thus fully available for subsequent activation. Moreover, external tetrapentylammonium ions (TPentA), tetrabutylammonium ions, and tetrapropylammonium ions (TPA, in higher concentrations) block the pore and prohibit channel desensitization with a simple "foot-in-the-door" hindrance effect. TpentA and TPA have the same voltage dependence but show different flow dependence in binding affinity, revealing a common binding site at an electrical distance of ~0.7 from the outside yet differential involvement of the flux-coupling region in the external pore mouth. The smaller tetraethylammonium ion and the larger tetrahexylammonium and tetraheptylammonium ions may block the channel but could not affect desensitization. We conclude that NMDA receptor desensitization requires concomitant binding of both glycine and glutamate, and thus movement of both GluN1 and GluN2 subunits. Desensitization gate itself embodies a highly restricted pore reduction with a physical distance of ~4 Å from the charged nitrogen atom of bound tetraalkylammonium ions, and is located very close to the activation gate in the bundle-crossing region in the external pore vestibule.

An inactivation stabilizer of the Na+ channel acts as an opportunistic pore blocker modulated by external Na+.

The Na+ channel is the primary target of anticonvulsants carbamazepine, phenytoin, and lamotrigine. These drugs modify Na+ channel gating as they have much higher binding affinity to the inactivated state than to the resting state of the channel. It has been proposed that these drugs bind to the Na+ channel pore with a common diphenyl structural motif. Diclofenac is a widely prescribed anti-inflammatory agent that has a similar diphenyl motif in its structure. In this study, we found that diclofenac modifies Na+ channel gating in a way similar to the foregoing anticonvulsants. The dissociation constants of diclofenac binding to the resting, activated, and inactivated Na+ channels are approximately 880 microM, approximately 88 microM, and approximately 7 microM, respectively. The changing affinity well depicts the gradual shaping of a use-dependent receptor along the gating process. Most interestingly, diclofenac does not show the pore-blocking effect of carbamazepine on the Na+ channel when the external solution contains 150 mM Na+, but is turned into an effective Na+ channel pore blocker if the extracellular solution contains no Na+. In contrast, internal Na+ has only negligible effect on the functional consequences of diclofenac binding. Diclofenac thus acts as an "opportunistic" pore blocker modulated by external but not internal Na+, indicating that the diclofenac binding site is located at the junction of a widened part and an acutely narrowed part of the ion conduction pathway, and faces the extracellular rather than the intracellular solution. The diclofenac binding site thus is most likely located at the external pore mouth, and undergoes delicate conformational changes modulated by external Na+ along the gating process of the Na+ channel.

Modulation of NMDA channel gating by Ca2+ and Cd2+ binding to the external pore mouth.

NMDA receptor channels are characterized by high Ca2+ permeability. It remains unclear whether extracellular Ca2+ could directly modulate channel gating and control Ca2+ influxes. We demonstrate a pore-blocking site external to the activation gate for extracellular Ca2+ and Cd2+, which has the same charge and radius as Ca2+ but is impermeable to the channel. The apparent affinity of Cd2+ or Ca2+ is higher toward the activated (a steady-state mixture of the open and desensitized, probably chiefly the latter) than the closed states. The blocking effect of Cd2+ is well correlated with the number of charges in the DRPEER motif at the external pore mouth, with coupling coefficients close to 1 in double mutant cycle analyses. The effect of Ca2+ and especially Cd2+ could be allosterically affected by T647A mutation located just inside the activation gate. A prominent "hook" also develops after wash-off of Cd2+ or Ca2+, suggesting faster unbinding rates of Cd2+ and Ca2+ with the mutation. We conclude that extracellular Ca2+ or Cd2+ directly binds to the DRPEER motif to modify NMDA channel activation (opening as well as desensitization), which seems to involve essential regional conformational changes centered at the bundle crossing point A652 (GluN1)/A651(GluN2).

Block of tetrodotoxin-resistant Na+ channel pore by multivalent cations: gating modification and Na+ flow dependence.

Tetrodotoxin-resistant (TTX-R) Na(+) channels are much less susceptible to external TTX but more susceptible to external Cd(2+) block than tetrodotoxin-sensitive (TTX-S) Na(+) channels. Both TTX and Cd(2+) seem to block the channel near the "DEKA" ring, which is probably part of a multi-ion single-file region adjacent to the external pore mouth and is involved in the selectivity filter of the channel. In this study we demonstrate that other multivalent transitional metal ions such as La(3+), Zn(2+), Ni(2+), Co(2+), and Mn(2+) also block the TTX-R channels in dorsal root ganglion neurons. Just like Cd(2+), the blocking effect has little intrinsic voltage dependence, but is profoundly influenced by Na(+) flow. The apparent dissociation constants of the blocking ions are always significantly smaller in inward Na(+) currents than those in outward Na(+) current, signaling exit of the blocker along with the Na(+) flow and a high internal energy barrier for "permeation" of these multivalent blocking ions through the pore. Most interestingly, the activation and especially the inactivation kinetics are slowed by the blocking ions. Moreover, the gating changes induced by the same concentration of a blocking ion are evidently different in different directions of Na(+) current flow, but can always be correlated with the extent of pore block. Further quantitative analyses indicate that the apparent slowing of channel activation is chiefly ascribable to Na(+) flow-dependent unblocking of the bound La(3+) from the open Na(+) channel, whereas channel inactivation cannot happen with any discernible speed in the La(3+)-blocked channel. Thus, the selectivity filter of Na(+) channel is probably contiguous to a single-file multi-ion region at the external pore mouth, a region itself being nonselective in terms of significant binding of different multivalent cations. This region is "open" to the external solution even if the channel is "closed" ("deactivated"), but undergoes imperative conformational changes during the gating (especially the inactivation) process of the channel.

Inhibition of Na(+) current by imipramine and related compounds: different binding kinetics as an inactivation stabilizer and as an open channel blocker.

Use-dependent block of Na(+) channels plays an important role in the action of many medications, including the anticonvulsants phenytoin, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine. These anticonvulsants all slowly yet selectively bind to a common receptor site in inactivated but not resting Na(+) channels, constituting the molecular basis of the use-dependent block. However, it remains unclear what channel gating process "makes" the receptor, where the receptor is located, and how the slow drug binding rate (to the inactivated channels) is contrived. Imipramine has a diphenyl structural motif almost identical to that in carbamazepine (a dibenzazepine tricyclic compound), as well as a tertiary amine chain similar to that in many prototypical local anesthetics, and has also been reported to inhibit Na(+) channels in a use-dependent fashion. We found that imipramine selectively binds to the inactivated (dissociation constant approximately 1.3 microM) rather than the resting Na(+) channels (dissociation constant >130 microM). Moreover, imipramine rapidly blocks open Na(+) channels, with a binding rate approximately 70-fold faster than its binding to the inactivated channels. Similarly, carbamazepine and diphenhydramine are open Na(+) channel blockers with faster binding rates to the open than to the inactivated channels. These findings indicate that the anticonvulsant receptor responsible for the use-dependent block of Na(+) channels is located in or near the pore (most likely in the pore mouth) and is made suitable for drug binding during channel activation. The receptor, however, continually changes its conformation in the subsequent gating process, causing the slower drug binding rates to the inactivated Na(+) channels.