Histological response to combination therapy with nucleos(t)ide analogs and peginterferon alpha in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients.

Although nucleos(t)ide analog (NA) monotherapy is effective in hepatitis B virus suppression and fibrosis regression, serological response rates are not satisfactory. Studies assessing the benefits of combination therapy with NAs and peginterferon alpha (PegIFNα) in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) have produced conflicting results and mainly focused on serological outcomes. Histological changes in response to combination therapy have not been evaluated in real-world practice. This study aimed to evaluate the histological changes in response to NA-PegIFNα combination therapy in CHB patients and to comprehensively compare the efficacy of NA-PegIFNα combination therapy and NA monotherapy. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 40 CHB patients who underwent either NA-PegIFNα combination therapy or NA monotherapy. Changes in histology at 48 weeks after treatment initiation were evaluated. Serological characteristics were also analysed and compared between the NA-PegIFNα combination therapy and NA monotherapy groups and between histological responders and nonresponders. Compared to baseline biopsies, both fibrosis staging and necroinflammatory grading scores were significantly lower in the second biopsies examined post-treatment in both groups. Nearly all patients experienced a reduction in inflammation (87.5% in both groups), but there was a subgroup of patients who exhibited either no significant improvement or fibrosis progression (33.3% and 31.2% in the NA monotherapy and NA-PegIFNα combination therapy groups, respectively). Nearly, all patients achieved ALT normalization and sustained virological response (SVR) after 48 weeks of antiviral treatment. Approximately one-third of individuals (36.8% and 30% in the two groups, respectively) achieved HBeAg loss at 48 weeks after treatment initiation. Although there were no significant differences in overall rates of histological, biochemical, virological and serological responses between the two groups, an earlier virological response and a higher cumulative SVR rate over time were observed during long-term follow-up in patients treated with NA-PegIFNα combination therapy (P = 0.0129). Trends of more rapid HBeAg loss and a higher cumulative HBeAg loss rate throughout long-term follow-up were also observed but were not statistically significant. The ALT normalization rates at 24 and 48 weeks after treatment initiation were associated with the histological response. Significant regression of fibrosis and resolution of necroinflammation were induced with either NA-PegIFNα combination therapy or NA monotherapy. Significant biochemical, virological and serological responses were observed in both groups, and the response rates at 48 weeks were similar in the two groups. Over time during long-term follow-up, the virological and serological responses were faster and superior following the combination regimen.

Histological responses of peginterferon alpha add-on therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis B with advanced liver fibrosis after long-term nucleos(t)ide analog treatment.

Although long-term antiviral treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogs (NAs) can lead to histological improvement in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), a substantial proportion of patients still fail to achieve regression of fibrosis. Here, we investigated whether peginterferon alpha (Peg-IFNα） add-on therapy had benefits on fibrosis regression in patients with sustained severe fibrosis even after long-term NA treatment. We conducted a retrospective analysis of data from 50 patients with CHB receiving 48 weeks of Peg-IFNα add-on therapy. All enrolled patients had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (S score ≥ 3) at baseline and underwent NA treatment for at least 1 year before Peg-IFNα addition. Paired liver biopsies before and after Peg-IFNα add-on treatment and laboratory tests at baseline, 24 weeks of treatment, 48 weeks of treatment and long-term follow-up were analysed. Of the 50 patients enrolled in this study, 34 patients (68.0%) had significant regression of fibrosis, and 42 (84.0%) showed significant remission of inflammation after Peg-IFNα add-on treatment. Compared with nonresponders, patients with significant histological improvement showed faster hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) decline and tended to have higher cumulative hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBsAg loss rates during long-term follow-up. Peg-IFNα add-on therapy led to significant regression of fibrosis and resolution of inflammation in patients with advanced fibrosis after long-term NA treatment.

Sequential combination therapy with pegylated interferon leads to loss of hepatitis B surface antigen and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients receiving long-term entecavir treatment.

Nucleos(t)ide analogues rarely result in a durable off-treatment response in chronic hepatitis B infection, whereas pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) induces a long-lasting response only in a subset of patients. We assessed the effect of sequential combination therapy with Peg-IFN-α2a and entecavir in hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive patients with prior long-term entecavir therapy and investigated the predictors of response to treatment. HBeAg-positive individuals who did not achieve HBeAg seroconversion during previous long-term entecavir therapy, receiving Peg-IFN-α2a added to ongoing entecavir therapy (sequential combination [S-C] therapy; n = 81) for 48 weeks or remaining on entecavir monotherapy (n = 116), were retrospectively included. A matched pair was created at a 1:1 ratio from each treatment group. The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at week 48. Subgroup analysis of response prediction was conducted for 81 patients with S-C therapy. More patients in the S-C therapy group achieved HBeAg seroconversion than those in the entecavir group (44% versus 6%; P < 0.0001). An HBeAg level of <200 signal-to-cutoff ratio (S/CO) at baseline was a strong predictor for higher HBeAg seroconversion than that achieved when HBeAg was ≥200 S/CO (64.2% versus 17.9%; P < 0.0001). Hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) levels at baseline and the decrease in HBsAg levels predicted HBsAg loss in the S-C therapy group. The combination of baseline HBeAg of <200 S/CO and HBsAg of <1,000 IU/ml and an HBsAg decline at week 12 of ≥0.5 log10 IU/ml provided the highest rate of HBeAg seroconversion (92.31%) and HBsAg loss (83.3%) at week 48. Patients receiving sequential combination therapy have a higher rate of HBeAg seroconversion and are more likely to experience HBsAg clearance than do those continuing entecavir monotherapy. Sequential combination therapy can be guided by baseline HBsAg/HBeAg levels and on-treatment HBsAg dynamics.

The efficacy and safety of adding on or switching to peginterferon α-2b in HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B patients with long-term entecavir treatment: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The strategies of adding on or switching to peginterferon (PEG-IFN) improved the serological response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who had previously experienced treatment with nucleos(t)ide analogues. However, robust data on which combination strategy is more effective remain lacking. METHODS: In this multicentre, parallel, open-label, randomised, controlled trial, patients with HBeAg-positive CHB who were treated with entecavir ≥2 years, and had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) <3000 IU/ml, HBeAg <200S/CO and HBV DNA <50 IU/ml were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to add on PEG-IFN, switch to PEG-IFN or continue entecavir monotherapy for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was HBeAg seroconversion at week 48. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients were randomised into three treatment arms (50 in add-on, 52 in switch-to and 51 in monotherapy). Compared with continuous entecavir monotherapy, both add-on and switch-to strategies achieved higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion (18.0% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.007; 19.2% vs. 2.0%, p = 0.005, respectively), HBeAg loss (24.0% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.010; 23.1% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.013, respectively), HBsAg < 100 IU/ml (30.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001; 34.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001, respectively), and higher HBsAg reduction (-0.90 vs. -0.06 log10 IU/ml, p < 0.001; -0.92 vs. -0.06 log10 IU/ml, p < 0.001, respectively) at week 48. The efficacy was comparable between add-on and switch-to arms (p > 0.05). Adverse events were mainly related to PEG-IFN but generally tolerable. CONCLUSION: In patients with CHB who achieved virological response with long-term entecavir, both adding on and switching to PEG-IFN are alternative strategies resulting in higher rates of HBeAg seroconversion and HBsAg reduction than continuous entecavir. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (www.chictr.org.cn, identifier: ChiCTR-IPR-17012055).