The impact of dialysis solution biocompatibility on ultrafiltration and on free water transport in rats.

This study compares different peritoneal dialysis fluids (PDF) in rats over a short contact time. For greater accuracy, net ultrafiltration (UF) and peritoneal transport indices, mass transfer area coefficient (MTAC) were scaled for the in vivo peritoneal surface area recruited (ivPSA) measured by microcomputerized tomography. Wistar rats underwent nephrectomy (5/6ths), were randomized into two groups and given 1.5% glucose PDF, either conventional acidic lactate (n = 14) or pH neutral bicarbonate (BicaVera) (n = 13); MTAC and UF were measured using a 90-min peritoneal equilibrium test (PET), fill volume (IPV) of 10 ml/100 g; small pore fluid transport was determined from sodium balance and used to calculate free water transport (FWT). Each ivPSA value was significantly correlated with the actual IPV, which varied from one rat to another. At 90 min of contact, there was no difference in recruited ivPSA in relation to PDFs. There was a difference (p < 0.01) in net UF/ivPSA 0.45 vs. 1.41 cm(2)/ml for bicarbonate versus lactate, as there was in the proportion of FWT with bicarbonate (42 ± 5% of net UF) compared to lactate (29 ± 4% of net UF). Net UF for individual values of ivPSA differs between conventional PDF and more biocompatible solutions, such as bicarbonate PDF. This observed change in UF cannot be fully explained by differences in glucose transport. The changes in FWT may be explained by the impact of the PDF biocompatibility on aquaporin function.

A possible cranio-oro-facial phenotype in Cockayne syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Cockayne Syndrome CS (Type A - CSA; or CS Type I OMIM #216400) (Type B - CSB; or CS Type II OMIM #133540) is a rare autosomal recessive neurological disease caused by defects in DNA repair characterized by progressive cachectic dwarfism, progressive intellectual disability with cerebral leukodystrophy, microcephaly, progressive pigmentary retinopathy, sensorineural deafness photosensitivity and possibly orofacial and dental anomalies. METHODS: We studied the cranio-oro-facial status of a group of 17 CS patients from 15 families participating in the National Hospital Program for Clinical Research (PHRC) 2005 « Clinical and molecular study of Cockayne syndrome ¼. All patients were examined by two investigators using the Diagnosing Dental Defects Database (D[4]/phenodent) record form. RESULTS: Various oro-facial and dental anomalies were found: retrognathia; micrognathia; high- arched narrow palate; tooth crowding; hypodontia (missing permanent lateral incisor, second premolars or molars), screwdriver shaped incisors, microdontia, radiculomegaly, and enamel hypoplasia. Eruption was usually normal. Dental caries was associated with enamel defects, a high sugar/carbohydrate soft food diet, poor oral hygiene and dry mouth. Cephalometric analysis revealed mid-face hypoplasia, a small retroposed mandible and hypo-development of the skull. CONCLUSION: CS patients may have associated oro-dental features, some of which may be more frequent in CS children - some of them being described for the first time in this paper (agenesis of second permanent molars and radiculomegaly). The high susceptibility to rampant caries is related to a combination of factors as well as enamel developmental defects. Specific attention to these anomalies may contribute to diagnosis and help plan management.