Endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection with or without lauromacrogol for gastric varices: A randomized pilot study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Current guidelines recommend injection of cyanoacrylate as first-line therapy to prevent gastric variceal rebleeding. The method still poses a risk of ectopic embolism, which possibly correlates with the volume of cyanoacrylate used. In this trial, we evaluated the short-term efficacy and safety of tissue adhesive injection combined with lauromacrogol for treating gastric varices. METHODS: Patients admitted to our hospital for variceal hemorrhage were enrolled and blindly randomized into two treatment groups: lauromacrogol group (lauromacrogol-cyanoacrylate-lauromacrogol) and lipiodol group (lipiodol-cyanoacrylate-lipiodol). Patient follow-up was 6 months. Primary outcome was rebleeds, and secondary outcomes were mortality, gastric varices eradication, and treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: Between March 6, 2013 and October 16, 2013, 96 patients met the criteria. Two cases were lost to follow-up, and all treated cases were successful. No procedural-related adverse events were observed in either group. Cyanoacrylate volumes used in the lauromacrogol group were significantly less than those of the lipiodol group (0.9 ± 0.5 vs 2.0 ± 1.2 mL, P = 0.000). Eleven patients developed upper gastrointestinal rebleeding, which did not show significant difference between groups. On multivaritate analysis, portal venous thrombosis and fever were potential risk factors of rebleeding. Treatment failure, complications, gastric varices obturation, and survival did not differ between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Tissue adhesives combined with lauromacrogol is a safe therapeutic option for gastric varices, with comparably less cyanoacrylate volume used. Because of the small number of study patients, it cannot be proven to have better efficacy than without lauromacrogol. Multicenter studies with larger patient groups are necessary.

Practice patterns in endoscopic treatment for gastric varices: A Chinese survey.

OBJECTIVES: Gastric varices (GV), a common complication of liver cirrhosis, often cause serious consequences. However, the management of GV remains debated. In this study we aimed to explore the practice patterns of Chinese practitioners in GV treatment and discuss whether these patterns conform to the guidelines in China and around the world. METHODS: Between October 2020 and January 2021, an online questionnaire was sent to doctors from different regions in China via WeChat. Data on the practice patterns for endoscopic treatment with and without a multidisciplinary discussion team (MDT) clinic for GV were analyzed. RESULTS: Questionnaires were collected from 241 practitioners from 29 provinces in China. Before endoscopic treatment, 100 (41.5%) of the practitioners arranged computed tomography angiography (CTA) examination. In endoscopic tissue adhesive (ETA) treatment, 183 (75.9%) of the practitioners chose ETA combined with lauromacrogol. Approximately one-fourth of all practitioners did not prescribe drugs to reduce portal pressure. Only 75 (31.1%) of physicians preferred using early transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) for patients at a high risk of treatment failure for GV. Compared to those without MDT clinics, practitioners with MDT clinics more often chose early TIPS for high-risk patients (39.0% vs 18.9%, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment for GV differ across China. Practitioners with MDT clinics can better use assistant strategies such as CTA to evaluate the risk and efficacy. Further clinical studies are needed, and more guidelines and consensuses are warranted to standardize clinical practice for GV.

Long-term efficacy of endoscopic ligation plus cyanoacrylate injection with or without sclerotherapy for variceal bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the long-term outcomes and efficacy of continued ligation plus cyanoacrylate injection compared with those of combined ligation and sclerotherapy plus cyanoacrylate injection for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding in cirrhotic patients with concomitant esophageal and gastric varices. METHODS: Medical records of the patients who were admitted for variceal bleeding due to liver cirrhosis were retrospectively reviewed and their related data was collected. The patients were divided into two groups, including the continued ligation plus cyanoacrylate injection group [the sclerotherapy (-) group] and the combined ligation and sclerotherapy plus cyanoacrylate injection group [the sclerotherapy (+) group]. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted and log-rank test was used to compare the differences between the two groups. RESULTS: Altogether 125 patients were enrolled between 1 April 2004 and 31 December 2012. After a median follow-up of 23.4 months, no significant difference was observed between the two groups in regard to variceal rebleeding (29.7% vs 47.5%, P = 0.097) and mortality (12.5% vs 14.8%, P = 0.879). Among patients with ascites the cumulative rebleeding rate was significantly lower in the sclerotherapy (-) group (26.3% vs 59.4%, P = 0.020). A relapse of bleeding after the initial endoscopic therapy was an independent prognostic factor of rebleeding (P = 0.004). Portal thrombosis was an independent prognostic factor for mortality (P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: No superiority of combined ligation and sclerotherapy compared with continued ligation and cyanoacrylate injection for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding is observed.

Randomized controlled trial comparing endoscopic ligation with or without sclerotherapy for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding.

OBJECTIVES: A recently published network meta-analysis showed that ligation combined with sclerotherapy might be the most efficacious intervention for secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding. Most studies excluded patients with concomitant gastric varices; thus, the outcomes in such patients have not yet been reported. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of two endoscopic procedures for secondary prophylaxis in cirrhotic patients presenting with both esophageal and gastric varices. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A randomized controlled study was carried out in a tertiary care referral center. Patients were randomized into two groups: sclerotherapy- and sclerotherapy+ group. Continued endoscopic ligation was used to treat esophageal varices in the sclerotherapy- group, whereas combined ligation and sclerotherapy with lauromacrogol was performed in the sclerotherapy+ group. A cyanoacrylate injection was used for gastric varices in both groups. All participants were followed up for 6 months. RESULTS: Overall, 96 patients were included between 25 March 2012 and 25 June 2013. Three patients were lost during follow-up (one in the sclerotherapy- group and two in the sclerotherapy+ group). The cumulative recurrence rate of bleeding was significantly higher in the sclerotherapy+ group (14.6 vs. 35.4%, P=0.013). The cumulative mortality rate (2.1 vs. 6.3%, P=0.286) and the incidence rate of adverse events were similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Continued ligation+cyanoacrylate injection was superior to combined ligation and sclerotherapy+cyanoacrylate injection during the first 6 months in terms of rebleeding in cirrhotic patients presenting with both esophageal and gastric varices. Long-term results entail further investigation (http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT01592578).

[Use of endoscopic tissue adhesive injection for gastric varices].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of endoscopic tissue adhesive(N-octyl-α-cyanoacrylate) injection for the treatment of gastric varices. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed to review the clinical and follow up data of 169 patients with gastric variceal who received tissue adhesive injection at the Fudan University Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital between April 2004 and December 2011. RESULTS: There were 128 males and 41 females with a mean age of 56.8(37-85) years old. One hundred and thirty-one patients received one injection, 38 received two injections or more with a mean of 1.12 per patient. Volume of injection ranged from 1 to 3 ml(mean, 1.7 ml). Eighty-three patients received adhesive injection alone, 231 received injection combined with ligation, 50 received combined sclerotic agent injection. All the patients had follow up ranging from 1 to 78 months(mean, 3.4 months). The treatment outcome was satisfactory in 130 patients(76.9%), good in 36(21.3%), and ineffective in 3(1.8%). The rate of ectopic embolization was 3.0%, and the rate of early re-bleeding was 1.2%. Postoperatively there were no septic complications or esophageal stricture. There were no deaths within 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Injection of tissue adhesive under endoscopic guidance for treatment of gastric varices is convenient, safe and effective.