Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 26(7): 761-73, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24901821

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To investigate in this phase 2a study (ZENITH) the safety, tolerability, and antiviral activity of VX-222, a selective, non-nucleoside inhibitor of hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase, combined with various telaprevir-based regimens for treatment of genotype 1 HCV. METHODS: In total, 152 treatment-naive patients received VX-222+telaprevir ('DUAL' regimen; n=47), with ribavirin ('TRIPLE' regimen; n=46), or with peginterferon+ribavirin ('QUAD' regimen; n=59) for 12 weeks. Patients with detectable HCV RNA at weeks 2 and/or 8 received peginterferon+ribavirin for 24 (DUAL and TRIPLE) or 12 (QUAD) additional weeks. RESULTS: VX-222 (100 or 400 mg twice daily) was well tolerated, with an increased rate of gastrointestinal adverse events observed with the higher dose. Across VX-222 400-mg twice-daily regimens, the QUAD was associated with the highest frequency of grade 3/4 adverse events. The DUAL was discontinued because of high viral breakthrough before week 12. Sustained virologic response (SVR) 24 weeks after end of treatment (SVR24), including patients treated with 12 or 24 additional weeks of peginterferon+ribavirin, was 67% for TRIPLE (VX-222 400 mg twice daily) and 79 and 90% for QUAD (VX-222 100 and 400 mg twice daily, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results provide valuable information regarding the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of telaprevir combined with a non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitor, as dual therapy or with ribavirin without or with peginterferon. Telaprevir and VX-222, alone or with ribavirin without or with peginterferon, were generally well tolerated, with improved tolerability without peginterferon. SVR24 rates achieved with TRIPLE and QUAD regimens containing telaprevir and VX-222 were comparable to those observed with telaprevir-based therapy.


Assuntos
Cicloexanóis/administração & dosagem , Hepacivirus/efeitos dos fármacos , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Tiofenos/administração & dosagem , Proteínas não Estruturais Virais/antagonistas & inibidores , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Antivirais/efeitos adversos , Cicloexanóis/efeitos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferon-alfa/administração & dosagem , Interferon-alfa/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oligopeptídeos/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/efeitos adversos , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/efeitos adversos , Tiofenos/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
2.
PLoS One ; 7(4): e34372, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22511937

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C infection, telaprevir (TVR) in combination with peginterferon and ribavirin (PR) significantly increased sustained virologic response (SVR) rates compared with PR alone. However, genotypic changes could be observed in TVR-treated patients who did not achieve an SVR. METHODS: Population sequence analysis of the NS3•4A region was performed in patients who did not achieve SVR with TVR-based treatment. RESULTS: Resistant variants were observed after treatment with a telaprevir-based regimen in 12% of treatment-naïve patients (ADVANCE; T12PR arm), 6% of prior relapsers, 24% of prior partial responders, and 51% of prior null responder patients (REALIZE, T12PR48 arms). NS3 protease variants V36M, R155K, and V36M+R155K emerged frequently in patients with genotype 1a and V36A, T54A, and A156S/T in patients with genotype 1b. Lower-level resistance to telaprevir was conferred by V36A/M, T54A/S, R155K/T, and A156S variants; and higher-level resistance to telaprevir was conferred by A156T and V36M+R155K variants. Virologic failure during telaprevir treatment was more common in patients with genotype 1a and in prior PR nonresponder patients and was associated with higher-level telaprevir-resistant variants. Relapse was usually associated with wild-type or lower-level resistant variants. After treatment, viral populations were wild-type with a median time of 10 months for genotype 1a and 3 weeks for genotype 1b patients. CONCLUSIONS: A consistent, subtype-dependent resistance profile was observed in patients who did not achieve an SVR with telaprevir-based treatment. The primary role of TVR is to inhibit wild-type virus and variants with lower-levels of resistance to telaprevir. The complementary role of PR is to clear any remaining telaprevir-resistant variants, especially higher-level telaprevir-resistant variants. Resistant variants are detectable in most patients who fail to achieve SVR, but their levels decline over time after treatment.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Evolução Molecular , Genótipo , Hepacivirus/genética , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Oligopeptídeos/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/administração & dosagem , Ensaios Clínicos Fase II como Assunto , Ensaios Clínicos Fase III como Assunto , Farmacorresistência Viral/genética , Quimioterapia Combinada , Hepatite C Crônica/virologia , Humanos , Interferons/administração & dosagem , Interferons/uso terapêutico , Oligopeptídeos/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/administração & dosagem , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Proteínas Recombinantes/administração & dosagem , Proteínas Recombinantes/uso terapêutico , Ribavirina/administração & dosagem , Ribavirina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA