RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Fixation with the axis vertebra (C2) using pedicle screws is commonly used to treat an unstable occipitocervical junction; however, it is accompanied by a risk of vertebral artery injury. The occiput-C2 (OC2) crossing translaminar screw fixation technique may avoid this risk, but rod implantation is difficult. Offset connectors can help facilitate this construct. This study aimed to evaluate the stability of a technique for OC2 crossing translaminar screw fixation using offset connectors (C2LAMâ¯+â¯OF) in comparison with other methods. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Six fresh-frozen human cadaveric occipital-cervical spines were tested intact under flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. These were then made into a type II odontoid fracture model, instrumented with an occipital plate, and tested in the following modes: C2 bilateral pedicle screws (C2P), a single C2 pedicle screw and bilateral C3 lateral mass screws (C2Pâ¯+â¯C3M), C2 crossing translaminar screws (C2LAM), and C2LAMâ¯+â¯OF. The OC2 range of motion (ROM) for each construct was obtained and compared using a repeated-measures analysis. RESULTS: The ROM of the C2LAMâ¯+â¯OF construct was found not to be significantly different from that of the C2P and C2Pâ¯+â¯C3M fixations in every direction (pâ¯>â¯0.05). However, the C2LAMâ¯+â¯OF construct was superior to the C2LAM construct in axial rotation (pâ¯<â¯0.05). CONCLUSIONS: OC2 crossing translaminar screw fixation using offset connectors offers similar stability to C2 pedicle screw fixation and is an effective alternative method for treating an unstable occipitocervical junction.