Clinical outcomes of 3-5 years follow-up of immediate implant placement in posterior teeth: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Immediate implant placement in posterior teeth has become popular in recent years. However, only a few studies focused on evaluating the long-term success of immediate implant placement. PURPOSE: To analyze the clinical outcomes of immediate implant placement in the posterior region with conventional loading with 3-5 years follow-up following the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference. METHOD: The study was done in 25 bone-level implants (Straumann® SLActive® bone level tapered implant, Straumann®, Basel, Switzerland) in 19 patients who underwent immediate implant placement in a posterior tooth with conventional loading with 3-5 years follow-up. The overall success and survival of these placements were evaluated following the International Congress of Oral Implantologists (ICOI) Pisa Consensus Conference using chart records, clinical examination, radiographic evaluation, and outcomes measurement. Patient satisfaction was evaluated by using a numeric rating scale. The biological and technical status, modified Pink Esthetic Score (mPES), complications, and marginal bone change were also evaluated. The analysis was done using SPSS version 21 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). The data were analyzed using a paired samples t-test. RESULTS: It was found that 24 out of the 25 (96%) dental implants survived for an average of 57 ± 8.07 months. All of the 24 surviving dental implants were considered an operational success. The average mPES was 9.75 ± 0.44. The major prosthetic complications seen were: (1) proximal contact loss (41.67%), (2) loosening of the screw (8.33%), and (3) cement debonding (4.17%). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate implant placement in a posterior tooth with conventional loading yields a predictable result with some complications. The most prominent complications were proximal contact loss, followed by loosening of the screw and cement debonding. The implant survival rate was 96% at a mean time follow-up of 4 years and 9 months.

Agreement test of P value versus Bayes factor for sample means comparison: analysis of articles from the Angle Orthodontist journal.

BACKGROUND: Researchers are cautioned against misinterpreting the conventional P value, especially while implementing the popular t test. Therefore, this study evaluated the agreement between the P value and Bayes factor (BF01) results obtained from a comparison of sample means in published orthodontic articles. METHODS: Data pooling was undertaken using the modified PRISMA flow diagram. Per the inclusion criteria applied to The Angle Orthodontist journal for a two-year period (November 2016 to September 2018), all articles that utilised the t test for statistical analysis were selected. The agreement was evaluated between the P value and Bayes factor set at 0.05 and 1, respectively. The percentage of agreement and Kappa coefficient were calculated. Plotting of effect size against P value and BF01 was analysed. RESULTS: From 265 articles, 82 utilised the t test. Of these, only 37 articles met the inclusion criteria. The study identified 793 justifiable t tests (438 independent-sample and 355 dependent-sample t tests) for which the agreement percentage and Kappa coefficient were found to be 93.57% and 0.87, respectively. However, when anecdotal evidence (1/3 < BF01 < 3) was considered, almost half of the studies missed statistical significance. Furthermore, two-thirds of the significantly reported P values (0.01 < P < 0.05; 30 independent-sample and 20 dependent-sample t tests) showed only anecdotal evidence (1/3 < BF01 < 1). Moreover, BF01 indicated moderate evidence (BF01 > 3) for approximately one-third of the total studies, with nonsignificant P values (P > 0.05). Furthermore, accompanying the P values, the effect sizes, especially for studies with independent-sample t tests, were very high with a strong potential to show substantive significance. Although it is best to extend the statistical calculation of a doubted P value (just below 0.05), especially for orthodontic innovation, orthodontists may reach a balanced decision relying on cephalometric measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The Kappa coefficient indicated perfect agreement between the two methods. BF01 restricted this judgement to approximately half of them, with two-thirds of these studies showing nonsignificant P values. Simple extensions of statistical calculations, especially effect size and BF01, can be useful and should be considered when finalising statistical analyses, especially for orthodontic studies without cephalometric analysis.

Agreement of the Newly Developed Moyers' Equations and Moyers' Tables.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop the Moyers' prediction equation to be used with tooth widths predicting app on smartphone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four equations were developed separately for sex and dental arches. Internal validation with Moyers' table was finished. External validation on 37 subjects with agreement test of both Moyers' prediction equations and Moyers' prediction tables was performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A general linear model procedure was used to create four prediction equations. Internal validation was evaluated using the coefficient of determination. External validation was performed using Bland and Altman (BA) test. RESULTS: Four equations were developed for OrthoAnalysis app on smartphone. The overall coefficient of determination of all equations and prediction table was 0.998 (p < 0.05) indicating good agreement of the two methods. The agreement test on the 37 subjects was that the BA test revealed the BA limits of agreement between the residuals of two predictions was -0.001 mm and ranged from -0.143 to 0.140 mm with almost all plots lying inside this difference interval. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, four novel estimation equations were developed and showed very low difference to the well accepted original Moyers' prediction tables. Therefore, the equations used in the orthodontic app for predicting unerupted tooth width were verified and valid for clinical use.

Preferences and Satisfaction Toward an Orthodontic Clinical App.

OBJECTIVES: To promote the development of professional orthodontic apps and to grow app engagement, many contributing factors should first be scrutinized. The main purpose of this research was to assess whether gap analysis facilitates strategic app design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Gap analysis was first conducted to reveal users' preferences. Then, the OrthoAnalysis app was developed on an Android operating system using Java programming language. Finally, a self-administered survey was issued to 128 orthodontic specialists to assess their satisfaction toward usage of the app. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The content validity of the questionnaire was ascertained using an index of Item-Objective Congruence of more than 0.5. The reliability of the questionnaire was also analyzed with Cronbach's Alpha reliability coefficient (ɑ = 0.87). RESULTS: Besides the most important factor, "content," many issues were listed, and all were required to engage users. A strong and engaging app should show accurate, trustworthy, and practical clinical analysis that operates smoothly and fast with ease, along with a user-friendly, appealing, and trustworthy interface. In short, because of the preliminary gap analysis that was done to evaluate the potential app engagement power prior to app design, the result of the satisfaction assessment showed that nine traits including overall satisfaction were of high levels. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic specialists' preferences were assessed using gap analysis and an orthodontic app was designed and appraised. This article presents the orthodontic specialists' preferences and summarizes the process of achieving app satisfaction. Therefore, to create a clinical app with strong engagement power, a strategic initial plan using gap analysis can be recommended.

Computerized three-dimensional cephalometric template for Thai adults.

Cephalometry is essential in several fields of study. These include health science, anthropology, and forensic studies. Furthermore, cephalometric norms are essential for numerous disciplines in the health sciences, such as clinical anatomy, plastic surgery, pediatrics, pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and forensic medicine. Three-dimensional (3D) cephalometric templates offer an advanced but simple method for these specialties. This study aimed to establish cephalometric norms by developing 3D templates for Thai adults, based on cephalometric landmark coordinates obtained from skull cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans of individuals with normal skeletal patterns. Full-head CBCT scans of 45 individuals (20 men and 25 women) were obtained from the archive. All had a Class I molar relationship with minor crowded teeth. The scans were captured in a normal head position, and the coordinates of 21 important cephalometric landmarks were identified using Slicer 4.10.2 software. Manual affine transformation of all landmarks was used to transfer medical image coordinates (Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine [DICOM] or Right-Anterior-Superior [RAS] systems) to Cartesian universal coordinates. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman (BA) plots were used to assess inter- and intra-examiner reliability (ICC = 0.961-1.000, BA mean errors = -0.1 mm). Important cephalometric measurements were compared to the most relevant and recent study with a sample size of 200. Most measurements showed no statistical difference (one-sample t-test, p > 0.05). Independent samples t-tests revealed that there was no statistically significant difference in the X and Y axes; however, most mean coordinates between men and women in the Z-axis coordinates were statistically significant. Consequently, 3D cephalometric templates were generated separately for adult Thai men and women using landmark coordinates. Although they are available for all disciplines at no cost through QR codes, these templates should be used with care, especially for the upper and lower incisor angulation. The application and future development of each specialty are also described here.