Mandibular molar protraction: A comparison between fixed functional appliances and temporary anchorage devices.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare the efficiency of temporary anchorage devices (TADs) and fixed functional appliances (FFAs) for mandibular molar protraction. METHODS: Orthodontic records of 1050 consecutively treated patients with molar protraction were screened. Thirty-six records (22 females and 14 males; mean age, 17.4 years) were divided into two groups: TAD (21 subjects with 25 edentulous spaces) and FFA (15 subjects with 24 edentulous spaces). The primary outcome measure was the efficiency of protraction [magnitude and time required for protraction (rate) and anchor loss (AL)]. The secondary outcomes involved measuring the type of tooth movement (TOTM), external apical root resorption (EARR), alveolar bone height change (ABHC), alveolar bone width change (ABWC) and appliance failure. RESULTS: The rate of tooth movement was significantly higher for FFAs (0.83 ± 0.35 mm/month) versus TADs (0.49 ± 0.2 mm/month) (P = .005). Total treatment duration was less for FFAs (34.78 ± 8.1 months) versus TADs (47.72 ± 13.94 months) (P = .002). TOTM was similar for both (P = .909). EARR was 1.42 ± 1.38 mm for TAD and 1.25 ± 0.88 mm for FFA (P = .81). ABHC increased in the FFA group (1.01 ± 3.62 mm) and decreased for the TAD group (0.68 ± 1.66 mm). ABWC increased for both TAD (1.81 ± 1.73 mm) and FFA (1.75 ± 1.35 mm). The failure rate was 50% for FFAs and 33% for TADs. CONCLUSIONS: Both systems provided translation of lower molars with comparable anchorage control. However, FFAs were more efficient than TADs for lower molar protraction.

Impact of initial lip competence on the outcome of class II functional appliances therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the impact of initial lip position on class II functional appliance therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 34 class II division 1 patients (23 females, 19 males; mean age 12.4 ± 0.9 years) that met the inclusion criteria (> ½ class II molar relationship, overjet > 6 mm, ANB > 4°, neutral or horizontal growth pattern, cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS) II - III, mean wear-time > 10 h/day) were consecutively divided into two groups (lip incompetence (LI); lip competence (LC)). All patients were treated with the Sander bite jumping appliance (BJA). Wear time was microelectronically measured. Lateral cephalograms were taken at the beginning (T0) and after 1 year of treatment (T1). An untreated class II group served as a control (CG). Inter-group comparisons were determined with Mann-Whitney U tests for independent samples. RESULTS: Significant skeletal treatment effects were found in both treated groups when compared to the CG with significantly more pronounced mandibular skeletal effects in the LI than in the LC group (mandibular base length p < 0.001, composite mandibular base length p < 0.001, condylar head growth p = 0.002, co-pg p < 0.00, go-pg p = 0.003, reduction of the ANB angle p = 0.009, and Wits appraisal p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The more pronounced mandibular effects in the LI group were composed of the functional orthopedic effect plus harmonization of the lip competence. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Functional harmonization of lip incompetence with BJA enhances mandibular growth stimulation. Lip incompetence seems to impede mandibular growth and its harmonization seems to be a preventive approach.

The skeletal and dental effects of Hanks Herbst versus twin block appliances for class II correction in growing patients: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite the popularity of the Twin Block (TB) and the Hanks Herbst (HH) functional appliances, there is limited prospective research comparing these removable and fixed designs, respectively. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare the skeletal and dental effects associated with TB and HH functional appliances as well as to detect factors that might influence the success or failure of treatment in adolescents with Class II malocclusion. DESIGN AND SETTING: A parallel-group randomized controlled trial was undertaken in a single-centre hospital in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A total of 80 participants (aged 10-14 years) with overjet of 7 mm or more were randomized to receive either the HH or TB appliance. Cephalometric radiographs were collected at the start of the study and immediately after the withdrawal of the functional appliances and measured using Pancherz analysis. Participants were allocated to the TB or HH group, based on an electronic randomization, stratified for gender and allocation concealed. Blinding to the allocated arm was not possible. However, all data were coded and anonymized to ensure that assessors were blinded to the group allocation. The main outcome was the anterior-posterior skeletal and dento-alveolar changes at the end of the functional phase. RESULTS: Fifteen (37.5%) participants from the TB group and 7 (15.5%) from HH failed to achieve full overjet reduction (<4 mm) after 12 months of treatment. Overjet reduction was 2 mm greater with HH compared to TB (P = .05; 95% CI: 0.2, 3.2). No significant differences regarding skeletal and dental changes were reported, with the exception that participants in HH group experienced greater lower molar protraction (P = .002; 95% CI: -2.8, -0.8) and mandibular incisors advancement (P = .001; 95% CI: -2.9, -1), indicating greater dental than skeletal effects. CONCLUSION: The TB appliance was associated with a higher rate of treatment discontinuation. No significant clinical differences were observed in the skeletal and dental effects, although the HH may be associated with more pronounced effects on the mandibular dentition. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered online before the start of the trial (ISRCTN11717011).

Stability of class II correction with the Austro Repositioner associated with multi-brackets fixed appliances in dolichofacial patients.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate the changes produced by the Austro Repositioner, and to assess the stability of Class II malocclusion treatment with the Austro Repositioner associated with fixed appliances and its capacity to control the vertical dimension in dolichofacial patients. METHODS: A group of patients with Class II malocclusion due to mandibular retrognathism and a dolichofacial growth pattern treated with the Austro Repositioner combined with fixed appliances were compared to a matched untreated control group of subjects with Class II malocclusion. Evaluations were made on the basis of lateral cephalograms taken at T1 (initial records), T2 (end of treatment), and T3 (1 year after treatment). Statistical comparisons were performed with paired- and two-sample t tests. RESULTS: The experimental (treated) group comprised 30 patients, 14 boys and 16 girls, and the control group comprised 30 subjects (15 boys and 15 girls) with similar ages at T1, T2 and T3. In the treated group, a significant decrease in the ANB angle was found (- 3.79 ± 1.46; p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in the maxillary skeletal measurements. In contrast, the SNB angle showed a significant increase of 3.77 ± 1.49 in the treated group compared with a nonsignificant increase of 0.77 ± 1.55 in the control group (p = 0.002). Vertical changes showed a significant decrease in the FMA angle (- 3.36 ± 1.62), while the lower anterior facial height distance and the overbite increased significantly in the treated group, reflecting a change in vertical dimensions after treatment. No significant changes were observed in either the treated or control group during the one-year posttreatment period; thus, the treatment results remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: The Austro Repositioner combined with fixed appliances could be considered an optimal treatment modality in Class II dolichofacial patients.

Contemporary Twin Block appliance wear protocols: A survey of UK orthodontists.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine contemporary trends in the use of the Twin Block appliance among UK orthodontists, including the wear time currently prescribed. In addition, the study explored if there had been any change in wear time prescribed, considering recent research evidence proposing part-time wear. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, online survey. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the British Orthodontic Society (BOS). METHODS: The questionnaire was emailed to all BOS members in November 2021 and hosted on the QualtricsXM platform. The questionnaire was piloted for content validity and tested for reliability. RESULTS: A response rate of 19% was attained. Nearly all (n = 244, 99%) participants used the Twin Block, and 90% (n = 218) prescribed full-time wear including/excluding eating. Although the majority (n = 168, 69%) had not made changes to their wear time prescriptions, nearly one-third (n = 75, 31%) had. Those who reported a change in their prescriptions currently prescribe less wear time than before, and commonly quoted 'research evidence' as the reason. A wide range in success rates (41%-100%) was reported, with patient compliance as the main reason for treatment discontinuation. CONCLUSION: The Twin Block is a popular functional appliance among orthodontists in the UK, originally designed by Clark to be worn full time to maximise functional forces applied to the dentition. However, this wear regime may place considerable strain on patient compliance. Most participants prescribed full-time Twin Block wear excluding eating. Approximately one-third of orthodontists made changes to their wear time prescriptions during their practising career, and currently instruct less wear time than before.

Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients-a retrospective cephalometric investigation.

OBJECTIVE: To compare skeletal and dentoalveolar changes after orthodontic treatment of class II malocclusion in patients with hypodivergent and hyperdivergent growth patterns through cast splint fixed functional appliances (FFA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: N = 42 out of n = 47 patients with mandibular plane angles < 34° or ≥ 34° were divided into a hypodivergent (n = 24) and a hyperdivergent (n = 18) group. All patients received a single-step mandibular advancement protocol through an FFA. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed after initial leveling and alignment (T1) and immediately after FFA removal (T2). The therapeutic effect was calculated through comparison with age-matched controls from a growth survey. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Hypodivergent and hyperdivergent patients showed different treatment outcomes, but significant differences existed only for overbite and interincisal angle. Nearly all measurements suggested similar treatment-related changes for both groups with exception for dentoalveolar parameters. CONCLUSION: Treatment with FFA causes similar skeletal and dentoalveolar effects in hypodivergent and in hyperdivergent patients. The correction of overjet and molar relationship is mainly caused by dentoalveolar changes. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hyperdivergent patients do not respond unfavorably to FFA treatment compared to hypodivergent patients. Lower incisor protrusion occurs more pronounced in hypodivergent patients. The growth pattern ought to be considered when choosing FFA for class II treatment.

The effect of text message reminders on compliance with Twin Block appliances: A randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether text reminders influence patient compliance with Twin Block appliances. The null hypothesis was that there was no statistically significant differences in Twin Block compliance between those who receive text reminders and those that do not. DESIGN: Single-blind parallel randomised controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Health Service Executive (HSE) orthodontic outpatient clinic in Dublin, Ireland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 59 patients aged 11-15 years with a 5a Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need (IOTN grade) starting treatment with Twin Block appliances. METHODS: A computer-generated unstratified allocation sequence was used to randomise the participants into the control group (CG) or the text group (TG). Both groups were asked to wear their appliances full-time. In addition to the same verbal and written instruction received by the CG, the TG received text message reminders to wear their appliances every 3 days. The primary outcome measure was wear time reported by Theramon® sensors embedded in the appliances. Data on wear time were uploaded from the Theramon® sensors onto cloud software. Participants in both groups were asked to fill out wear diaries and submit these at each visit. Treating clinicians and the primary investigator were blinded to the allocation group. Participants were followed up for 4 months. Participants were not blinded to their treatment group. RESULTS: In total, 29 participants were allocated to the CG and 30 to the TG. The data for 53 participants were analysed, 24 from the CG and 29 from the TG. The median hours/day of wear recorded using the Theramon® sensors was 13.77 (interquartile range [IQR] = 10.19) for the CG and 17.72 (IQR = 5.62) for the TG. The difference in wear time recorded was not statistically significant (P = 0.16). CONCLUSION: The study concluded that text message reminders had no statistically significant influence on patient compliance with Twin Block appliances.

Skeletal and dental effects of Herbst appliance anchored with temporary anchorage devices: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The aim was to evaluate the efficiency of using temporary anchorage devices (TADs) in minimizing the anchorage loss and increasing the skeletal effects during correction of Class II malocclusion with Herbst appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Search without restrictions was performed up to January 2021 in three electronic databases (CENTRAL, MEDLINE and EMBASE) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective cohort studies. The included studies assessed the dental and skeletal changes in Class II malocclusion patients who were treated using Herbst appliance with or without TADs. The strength of evidence was ranked using GRADE. RESULTS: Fifty-five records were initially retrieved. A total of 6 studies with 198 patients were finally considered. 4 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis showed that using TADs with acrylic splint Herbst appliance was effective in controlling the inclination of mandibular incisors by a mean difference of -5.49 degrees (95% C.I [-7.36, -3.63], P < .001) when compared to Herbst appliance alone. The results showed also that incorporating TADs with Herbst treatment resulted in greater mandibular skeletal effects including increasing mandibular bone base length by mean difference of 2.22 mm (95% C.I [0.82. 3.61], P = .002) and mandibular length by mean difference of 3.7 mm (95% C.I [1.55, 5.85], P < .001) when compared to Herbst appliance alone. CONCLUSIONS: Based on a very low level of confidence, it seems that incorporating TADs during orthodontic treatment with Herbst appliance results in minimizing the anchorage loss and increasing the skeletal effects of Herbst appliance during correction of Class II malocclusion.

Evaluation of skeletal and dentoalveolar changes in class II division I pediatric patients receiving myofunctional appliance therapy: A preliminary study.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The treatment effect of myofunctional appliance therapy has remained debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the skeletal and dentoalveolar effects in class II division I pediatric patients receiving Education Fonctionnelle (EF) myofunctional appliance therapy. METHODS: Thirteen patients undergoing EF appliance treatment (9 boys and 4 girls；average 9.3years old) met the inclusion criteria and 13 untreated patients (9 boys and 4 girls；average 9.9 years old) served as controls. Initial and one-year follow-up lateral cephalometric measurement was used to assess skeletal and dentoalveolar changes. Gender ratio was analyzed using Chi-square test. Age and cephalometric measurement changes within and between the two groups were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed rank test and Benjamini - Hochberg procedure. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age, gender ratio, and initial cephalometric measurement data between the two groups. One-year follow-up skeletal findings revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Regarding the dentoalveolar changes, only the values of the upper incisor angle related parameters revealed significances between the two group (with adjusted p value). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary small sample size study, the EF group demonstrated significant upper incisor angle decrease, lower incisor angle increase, and lower incisor tip to mandibular plane distance decrease in comparison to the values measured in the control group. However, only the upper incisor angle changes were statistically significant after p-value adjustment. The skeletal effect of the EF appliance could not be verified in one-year follow-up of cephalometric data.

The effect of combined maxillary pad movable appliance and FR-III functional appliance in the treatment of skeletal Class III malocclusion of deciduous teeth.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the therapeutic effect of maxillary pad movable appliance combined with FR-III functional appliance in treating skeletal Class III malocclusion of deciduous teeth and provide a reference for optimizing clinical treatment methods. METHODS: A total of 30 pediatric patients were randomly selected between April 2012 and April 2019. They were in stage IIA osseous skeletal Class III malocclusion, treated with maxillary pad movable appliance to relieve the reverse, combined with FR-III functional appliance to maintain a median relationship to stage IIIA. A self-control study of children before and after treatment was used, and paired t-test was used to evaluate the changes in the measurement indexes of the IIA and IIIA stage X-rays and changes in the bone and soft tissue profiles. RESULTS: After 3 years of treatment, SNA, ANB, and NA-PA in the sagittal osteofacial index of the jawbones increased, SNB decreased, and the Y-axis angle in the vertical index of the jawbones increased. U1-SN, U1-NA, U1-NA distance, L1-MP, L1-NB, and L1-NB distance in the index of labial inclination of upper and lower central incisors increased, while U1-L1 decreased. The sagittal anomalies of the jawbones were improved, and there were significant differences before and after treatment (P < 0.05). FCA, ULP, and UL-EP increased, soft-tissue facial prominence and facial height increased, and the relationship between the upper lip and the aesthetic plane was harmonious. None of the 30 children with skeletal Class III malocclusion in the deciduous stage experienced recurrence in stage IIIA. CONCLUSIONS: Combined treatment with the maxillary pad movable appliance and the FR-III functional appliance is suitable for children with skeletal Class III malocclusion in the deciduous stage.

Changes of epiglottis and hyoid bone position after orthodontic treatment with cast splint fixed functional appliances.

OBJECTIVES: Angle Class II malocclusions including a retrognathic mandible are the most frequent orthodontic problems. Both removable and fixed functional appliances can be used for mandibular advancement. Mandibular advancement after treatment with any fixed functional appliance has numerous therapeutic effects, such as stretching of masticatory muscles, ligaments, membranes and surrounding soft tissues, thus causing positional changes of the hyoid bone and epiglottis. This retrospective study investigates and compares treatment effects upon epiglottis- and hyoid bone position and posterior airway space in class II patients who received mandibular advancement through two different cast splint fixed functional appliances. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two groups of 21 patients each ('Functional Mandibular Advancer' (FMA) and Herbst appliance) were investigated. The same experienced orthodontist performed the treatment in all patients, employing a single-step advancement protocol. The mandible always received initial protrusion into an edge-to-edge position. Conventional lateral cephalograms were available pre-treatment (T1) and immediately after appliance removal (T2) for all patients. The measurements comprised (I) hyoid bone, (II) epiglottis or (III) posterior airway space. Treatment-related changes were analysed with one-sample Student's t tests for intragroup comparisons and independent Student's t tests for intergroup comparisons. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Measurements of the hyoid bone showed mostly increases for both appliances after treatment. Intergroup comparisons were not significant for FMA patients but significant for selected measurements in Herbst appliance patients. Intergroup comparisons showed insignificant changes. The posterior airway space was always insignificantly increased after treatment. The greatest increase was found caudally. Intergroup comparisons showed insignificant changes. CONCLUSIONS: Both fixed functional appliances cause an anterior and caudal displacement of epiglottis and hyoid bone and enlarge the posterior airway space. The therapeutic effects of the Herbst appliance are slightly larger, although not significantly. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Treatment with either Herbst appliance of FMA alters the hyoid bone position and enlarges the posterior airway space. Still, long-term data are as yet unavailable; it remains unknown if the effects upon posterior airway space remain stable, and if a resulting posterior airway space enlargement may have clinical influence upon obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome.

Incremental or maximal mandibular advancement in the treatment of class II malocclusion through functional appliances: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

To systematically review the effects of functional appliances (FA) using incremental vs maximal mandibular advancement regarding cephalometric measurements in class II malocclusion individuals and to assess patient-centred-outcomes. Six electronic databases were searched without restrictions up to April 2020. We included randomized and non-randomized controlled trials using identical FA. Trials involving participants who used adjunct appliances, inter-maxillary elastics, who received surgical treatment or that recruited individuals with cleft lip/palate or craniofacial deformity/syndrome were excluded. Risks of bias assessments were performed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool-2 and ROBINS-I tools. Mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals were calculated from random-effects meta-analyses. The GRADE tool was used to assess the certainty of the evidence. Six studies were included. Low to very low certainty of evidence indicated that incremental mandibular advancement resulted in greater gains in mandibular length (MD = 0.89 [0.38, 1.34], P = .0005), anterior mandibular displacement (MD = 0.73 [0.40, 1.06], P < .0001) and SNB angle (MD = 0.44 [0.02, 0.85], P = .04). No significant differences were found for maxillary, dento-alveolar and upper airway outcomes between construction bite protocols (P > .05). Study design and appliance-related factors influenced the results of the subgroup analyses. Existing evidence is inadequate to assess patient-related response and long-term outcome could not be assessed. Currently, there are a heterogeneous number of studies with low quality and methodological issues can lead to biases that strongly limit an evidence-based conclusion. Weak evidence suggests gains in mandibular skeletal parameters in the short term using FA with incremental mandibular advancement. Randomized trials evaluating key topics such as patient-centred outcomes need to be conducted to guide clinical management. PROSPERO (CRD42019147436).

Differential skeletal and dental effects after orthodontic treatment with bite jumping appliance or activator: a retrospective cephalometric study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this retrospective cephalometric study was to compare treatment outcomes with "bite jumping appliance" (BJA) or Andresen-Häupl type activator. It especially focused on skeletal and dental structures in patients with class II malocclusion. The study hypothesis was that differences in treatment-related changes would occur between patients treated with BJA or activator. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pre- and posttreatment lateral cephalograms of 73 patients with a class II malocclusion were analyzed. Thirty-seven patients (22 females, 15 males) received treatment with a BJA (pretreatment age 11.1 ± 1.07 years) and 36 patients (20 females, 16 males) with an activator (pretreatment age 11.3 ± 1.12 years). Treatment time was 14.0 ± 1.8 months with BJA and 12.0 ± 2.0 months with activator. Paired t tests were used for intragroup and t tests for independent samples for intergroup comparisons. Results were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. RESULTS: The comparison of sagittal and vertical skeletal changes after BJA and activator treatment did not reveal significant differences. Significant changes occurred for lower incisor inclination (P = 0.0367) and overjet (P = 0.0125) only. The reduction of overjet and proclination of lower incisors were more pronounced in BJA patients. CONCLUSIONS: Both "bite jumping appliance" (BJA) and Andresen-Häupl type activator were able to improve the occlusion of patients with a class II malocclusion. Dental effects were more pronounced for the BJA. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Marked lower incisor proclination contributed significantly to overjet correction in BJA patients. This ought to be respected when choosing a removable functional appliance for patients whose lower incisors are already proclined prior to treatment.

Odontogenic keratocyst: An incidental finding during an orthodontic examination.

For all orthodontic patients, a detailed clinical examination is essential to obtain the correct diagnosis before the formulation of an orthodontic treatment plan. Additional information may be required from radiographs in order to supplement this clinical examination. While orthodontists principally prescribe dental panoramic tomographs for orthodontic patients to confirm the presence, position and morphology of unerupted teeth, the absence or presence of disease within the supporting structures may be overlooked. This case report presents one such instance where the pre-orthodontic radiographic examination of a young male patient revealed the presence of an asymptomatic odontogenic keratocyst in the right posterior body of the mandible.This case report discusses how this incidental finding was diagnosed, managed and how its surgical treatment subsequently affected the orthodontic management of the patient. Furthermore, this case highlights the importance of undertaking a thorough and systematic approach when analysing any prescribed radiographs, in order to reduce the risk of overlooking any evidence of underlying disease.

Maurice Berman prize for clinical excellence 2018.

This paper describes the orthodontic treatment of the three cases awarded the 2018 Maurice Berman Prize. The award is made on the basis of case complexity, case-mix variety, quality of treatment provided and results obtained, and the quality and format of the three case reports submitted through to post-treatment records.

What evidence exists for myofunctional therapy with prefabricated appliances? A systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment efficacy/efficiency with prefabricated myofunctional appliances (PMA) for children with malocclusion. DATA SOURCES: Nine databases searched without limitations till July 2019. DATA SELECTION: Randomised trials comparing PMAs to functional appliance treatment or no treatment. DATA EXTRACTION: Study selection, data extraction and risk of bias assessment were done in duplicate. DATA SYNTHESIS: Random-effects meta-analyses of mean differences (MDs) or relative risks (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were conducted on seven publications (three published and one unpublished trials; 232 patients; 53% male; mean age 10.2 years). Compared to no treatment, one trial indicated that PMAs were somewhat effective in reducing overjet (MD -2.4; 95% CI -3.3 to -1.5), reducing overbite (MD -2.5; 95% CI -3.2 to -1.8), reducing mandibular crowding (RR 0.4; 95% CI 0.2-0.8) and establishing Class I canine relationship (RR = 2.3; 95% CI 1.1-4.9). However, compared to custom-made functional appliances, three trials indicated that PMAs were less effective in reducing the ANB angle (MD 0.9; 95% CI 0.5-1.4), increasing mandibular ramus length (MD -2.2; 95% CI -2.9 to -1.51), reducing overjet (MD 1.5; 95% CI 0.9-2.1), establishing a solid Class I molar relationship (RR 0.3; 95% CI 0.2-0.7), reducing the nasolabial angle (MD 5.8; 95% CI 0.8-10.8) and reducing facial convexity (MD -2.6; 95% CI -4.3 to -0.9). Finally, the quality of evidence was moderate to low due to risk of bias. CONCLUSIONS: PMAs are more effective in reducing overjet, overbite, mandibular crowding and establishing Class I canine relationship than no treatment. However, compared to custom-made functional appliances, PMAs are less effective in producing dental, skeletal or soft-tissue changes, even though they are less costly.

Mini-implant-supported twin-block appliance: An innovative modification.

Twin block is a commonly used appliance for correction of retrognathic mandible in growing patients. However, it has a drawback of causing lower incisor proclination, which reduces its potential of achieving maximum skeletal effects. Thus, we introduced a novel modification in the present design to facilitate greater anteroposterior effects in skeletal dimension. The aim of the present case reports is to evaluate the efficacy of this modified twin block. Here we present two cases treated with mini-implant-supported twin-block appliance, which successfully controlled the lower incisor position, thereby increasing the envelope for orthopedic correction in class II myofunctional therapy. This modification is useful in growing patients with retruded mandible to achieve maximum skeletal effects.

Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to compare the effects on soft tissue profile in class II patients after treatment with either "Functional Mandibular Advancer" (FMA) or Herbst appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included n = 42 patients treated with either FMA (n = 21) or Herbst appliance (n = 21) by the same experienced orthodontist. The treatment followed a single-step advancement protocol. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed through a set of customized measurements. The actual therapeutic effect was calculated using data from a growth survey. After testing for normal distribution and homogeneity of variance, data were analyzed by one-sample Student's t tests and independent Student's t tests. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: For both FFAs, significant upper lip retrusion, increase in lower lip's thickness, and length of the lower face occurred. Additionally, significant lower lip retrusion and straightening of the profile were found in FMA and Herbst appliance patients. All remaining variables revealed no significant differences. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-related changes on the facial soft tissue profile could be regarded similar in class II patients treated with FMA or Herbst appliance. No treatment-related changes that were specific for FMA or Herbst appliance could be identified. Only moderate changes were noted comparing pre- and posttreatment soft tissue profiles. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Despite proven differences in skeletal and dental treatment effects, the facial profile has not to be taken into consideration when choosing between FMA and Herbst appliance for class II treatment.

Mandibular Condylar Aplasia Treated with a Functional Appliance: A Five years Follow Up.

This report presents a follow up of a clinical case published five years ago by the same authors. In the previous report, the authors showed a young girl treated with a myofunctional appliance due to a mandibular condylar agenesia. After a traditional graft had failed, the patient successfully responded to the functional treatment by forming a mandibular condyle. In this new report, the authors are showing how the mandibular condyle has continued developing within normal limits and, the mandibular ramus has continued positively remodeling. The bone biology embedded in the biological process reported here is discussed by the authors.

Histological Alterations from Condyle Repositioning with Functional Appliances in Rats.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to assess the morphological and histological alterations of the condyle of rats undergoing forward mandibular repositioning via functional appliance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Functional appliances were mounted onto the upper jaws of rats. Morphological analysis was conducted on micro-CT images of sacrificed animals. Histological changes in condyle were examined by immunohistochemistry using proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), matrix metalloproteases (MMPs), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), tissue inhibitors of matrix metalloproteinases (TIMP-1), interleukin 1b (IL-1ß), Aggrecan and Type II collagen. Osteoclast activity was identified by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. RESULTS: Morphological analysis confirmed the forward positioning of the condyles of rats by the appliance, but the position gradually returned to normal on days 14 after treatment. An increase in PCNA positive cells was observed in the posterior region of the condyles on days 7, whereas PCNA positive cells decreased in the anterior region. Aggrecan and Type II collagen localization increased in the posterior region throughout the entire period, but decreased in the anterior region on days 14. In both regions, IL-1ß and VEGF localization was significantly increased for 14 days while MMPs localization was evident throughout the entire period. The TRAP positive cells were significantly elevated on days 3 and 7. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the functional appliance therapy induces significant morphological and histological changes in the anterior and posterior regions of the condyle and subsequently causes adaptive cellular functions such as chondrocyte differentiation and cartilage matrix formation.