Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 63
Filtrar
Mais filtros

País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 29(2): 227-234, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29250831

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether the subperiosteal injection of simvastatin (SIM) with a novel in situ gel-forming system, SrHA/Alg (strontium hydroxyapatite/alginate), can stimulate vertical bone augmentation in a rat calvarial model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The SrHA/Alg solution was synthesized and combined with different doses of SIM (0.01, 0.02, 0.1, and 0.2 mg) to form the following groups: (1) SrHA/Alg only, (2) SrHA/Alg/0.01, (3) SrHA/Alg/0.02, (4) SrHA/Alg/0.1, and (5) SrHA/Alg/0.2. The SIM release pattern was analyzed, and rat primary periosteum-derived cell (PDC) responses were investigated. Twenty male Wistar rats were enrolled in the calvarial subperiosteal injection experiment with each animal receiving a 200-µl single subperiosteal injection of SrHA/Alg with different amounts of SIM (0, 0.01, 0.02, and 0.1 mg) incorporated (n = 5). The 0.2 mg dose group was not tested in vivo due to the severe toxicity found in vitro. The new bone formation was assessed histologically and radiologically at 8 weeks. RESULTS: The slow release of SIM was confirmed, and PDC viability decreased in the SrHA/Alg/0.2 group. Alkaline phosphatase positive areas and mineralization areas were significantly greater in the SrHA/Alg/0.01 and SrHA/Alg/0.02 groups (p < .05). The mRNA expression level of Runx2 significantly increased in the SrHA/Alg/SIM-0.02 group by day 7 (p < .05) and significantly higher levels of VEGF were found in the SrHA/Alg/0.01 and SrHA/Alg/0.02 groups at different time points (p < .05). In vivo, no prominent clinical sign of inflammation was observed, and the most significant bone gain was shown in the SrHA/Alg/0.02 group (p < .05). The osteoclast formation within the newly formed bone area was reduced in the SrHA/Alg/0.1 group (p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: When combined with SrHA/Alg system, the 0.02 mg SIM seemed to be the optimal dose to stimulate subperiosteal bone formation without inducing inflammation. This combination may hold potential therapeutic benefits for clinical bone augmentation in a minimally invasive manner.


Assuntos
Aumento do Rebordo Alveolar/métodos , Osteogênese por Distração/métodos , Periósteo/citologia , Sinvastatina/uso terapêutico , Alginatos/administração & dosagem , Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Animais , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Géis/administração & dosagem , Géis/uso terapêutico , Ácido Glucurônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Hidroxiapatitas/administração & dosagem , Hidroxiapatitas/uso terapêutico , Técnicas In Vitro , Injeções , Masculino , Periósteo/efeitos dos fármacos , Periósteo/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Sinvastatina/administração & dosagem , Estrôncio/administração & dosagem , Estrôncio/uso terapêutico
2.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 6: CD011947, 2017 06 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28639707

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers, also known as bedsores, decubitus ulcers and pressure injuries, are localised areas of injury to the skin or the underlying tissue, or both. Dressings are widely used to treat pressure ulcers and promote healing, and there are many options to choose from including alginate, hydrocolloid and protease-modulating dressings. Topical agents have also been used as alternatives to dressings in order to promote healing.A clear and current overview of all the evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding the use of dressings or topical agents for the treatment of pressure ulcers. Such a review would ideally help people with pressure ulcers and health professionals assess the best treatment options. This review is a network meta-analysis (NMA) which assesses the probability of complete ulcer healing associated with alternative dressings and topical agents. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of dressings and topical agents for healing pressure ulcers in any care setting. We aimed to examine this evidence base as a whole, determining probabilities that each treatment is the best, with full assessment of uncertainty and evidence quality. SEARCH METHODS: In July 2016 we searched the Cochrane Wounds Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations); Ovid Embase and EBSCO CINAHL Plus. We also searched clinical trials registries for ongoing and unpublished studies, and scanned reference lists of relevant included studies as well as reviews, meta-analyses, guidelines and health technology reports to identify additional studies. There were no restrictions with respect to language, date of publication or study setting. SELECTION CRITERIA: Published or unpublished randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effects of at least one of the following interventions with any other intervention in the treatment of pressure ulcers (Stage 2 or above): any dressing, or any topical agent applied directly to an open pressure ulcer and left in situ. We excluded from this review dressings attached to external devices such as negative pressure wound therapies, skin grafts, growth factor treatments, platelet gels and larval therapy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently performed study selection, risk of bias assessment and data extraction. We conducted network meta-analysis using frequentist mega-regression methods for the efficacy outcome, probability of complete healing. We modelled the relative effectiveness of any two treatments as a function of each treatment relative to the reference treatment (saline gauze). We assumed that treatment effects were similar within dressings classes (e.g. hydrocolloid, foam). We present estimates of effect with their 95% confidence intervals for individual treatments compared with every other, and we report ranking probabilities for each intervention (probability of being the best, second best, etc treatment). We assessed the certainty (quality) of the body of evidence using GRADE for each network comparison and for the network as whole. MAIN RESULTS: We included 51 studies (2947 participants) in this review and carried out NMA in a network of linked interventions for the sole outcome of probability of complete healing. The network included 21 different interventions (13 dressings, 6 topical agents and 2 supplementary linking interventions) and was informed by 39 studies in 2127 participants, of whom 783 had completely healed wounds.We judged the network to be sparse: overall, there were relatively few participants, with few events, both for the number of interventions and the number of mixed treatment contrasts; most studies were small or very small. The consequence of this sparseness is high imprecision in the evidence, and this, coupled with the (mainly) high risk of bias in the studies informing the network, means that we judged the vast majority of the evidence to be of low or very low certainty. We have no confidence in the findings regarding the rank order of interventions in this review (very low-certainty evidence), but we report here a summary of results for some comparisons of interventions compared with saline gauze. We present here only the findings from evidence which we did not consider to be very low certainty, but these reported results should still be interpreted in the context of the very low certainty of the network as a whole.It is not clear whether regimens involving protease-modulating dressings increase the probability of pressure ulcer healing compared with saline gauze (risk ratio (RR) 1.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92 to 2.94) (moderate-certainty evidence: low risk of bias, downgraded for imprecision). This risk ratio of 1.65 corresponds to an absolute difference of 102 more people healed with protease modulating dressings per 1000 people treated than with saline gauze alone (95% CI 13 fewer to 302 more). It is unclear whether the following interventions increase the probability of healing compared with saline gauze (low-certainty evidence): collagenase ointment (RR 2.12, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.22); foam dressings (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.26); basic wound contact dressings (RR 1.30, 95% CI 0.65 to 2.58) and polyvinylpyrrolidone plus zinc oxide (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.37 to 4.62); the latter two interventions both had confidence intervals consistent with both a clinically important benefit and a clinically important harm, and the former two interventions each had high risk of bias as well as imprecision. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: A network meta-analysis (NMA) of data from 39 studies (evaluating 21 dressings and topical agents for pressure ulcers) is sparse and the evidence is of low or very low certainty (due mainly to risk of bias and imprecision). Consequently we are unable to determine which dressings or topical agents are the most likely to heal pressure ulcers, and it is generally unclear whether the treatments examined are more effective than saline gauze.More research is needed to determine whether particular dressings or topical agents improve the probability of healing of pressure ulcers. The NMA is uninformative regarding which interventions might best be included in a large trial, and it may be that research is directed towards prevention, leaving clinicians to decide which treatment to use on the basis of wound symptoms, clinical experience, patient preference and cost.


Assuntos
Bandagens , Fármacos Dermatológicos/uso terapêutico , Úlcera por Pressão/terapia , Cicatrização , Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Curativos Hidrocoloides , Colagenases/uso terapêutico , Clara de Ovo , Géis/uso terapêutico , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Metanálise em Rede , Pomadas/uso terapêutico , Excipientes Farmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Fenitoína/uso terapêutico , Povidona/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Óxido de Zinco/uso terapêutico
3.
Indian J Med Res ; 146(5): 646-653, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29512608

RESUMO

Background & objectives: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) graft, designed and developed at our institute for vascular reconstruction, is porous to promote optimal incorporation and neointima formation, requiring pre-clotting or biomodification by sealing the pores before implantation. The objective of this study was to characterize, test and perform preclinical evaluation of hydrogel (alginate dialdehyde cross-linked gelatin) sealed fluoropassivated PET vascular prosthesis in pig model, so as to avoid pre-clotting, for its safety and efficacy before employing the indigenous and less expensive graft for clinical use. Methods: Hydrogel sealed, fluoropassivated PET vascular prosthesis were tested for haemocompatibility and toxicity followed by small animal toxicology tests and in vivo experiments in pigs receiving implantation at thoracic aorta. All 33 animals received test as well as control grafts with a plan for phased explantation at 2, 12 and 26 weeks. All animals underwent completion angiogram at the end of procedure as well as before graft explantation. Results: Haemocompatibility tests for haemolysis and toxicity tests showed no adverse events in tested mice and rabbits. Completion angiogram showed intact anastamosis and patent graft in each animal in post-operative period and at explantation. Gross and histopathological examination showed well-encapsulated grafts, clean glistening neointima and no evidence of thrombus in both test and control grafts. Interpretation & conclusions: Hydrogel sealed, fluoropassivated PET vascular prosthesis was found non-toxic, haemocompatible and remained patent in in vivo studies at planned intervals.


Assuntos
Aorta Torácica/cirurgia , Prótese Vascular , Polietilenotereftalatos/uso terapêutico , Remodelação Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Animais , Aorta Torácica/patologia , Aorta Torácica/transplante , Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Gelatina/uso terapêutico , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hidrogéis/uso terapêutico , Camundongos , Polietilenotereftalatos/química , Coelhos , Rifampina/farmacologia , Suínos
4.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 39(1): 62-7, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26725428

RESUMO

We examined whether calcium alginate (Ca-Alg) reduces blood cholesterol levels in rats fed a high-cholesterol diet. First, we examined taurocholate adsorption in vitro by various types of sodium alginate (Na-Alg). High molecular-weight, guluronic acid-rich Na-Alg showed the greatest adsorption of taurocholate, and therefore the corresponding Ca-Alg was chosen for the in vivo study. Rats were fed a high-cholesterol diet or a Ca-Alg-containing diet for 2 weeks. Body weight and diet intake were measured, and the general condition of the animals was monitored during this period. After 14 d, the plasma concentration of cholesterol, portal plasma concentration of bile acid, and bile acid in feces were measured. The plasma concentration of cholesterol was significantly reduced in rats fed a 2% Ca-Alg-containing diet. Furthermore, the portal concentration of bile acid was significantly lowered in the 2% Ca-Alg group. A tendency for a Ca-Alg concentration-dependent increase in fecal excretion of bile acid was also seen, although it was not statistically significant. While several changes in biochemical parameters and histopathological findings were observed, all the values remained within the physiological range. These results indicate that Ca-Alg is effective in reducing plasma cholesterol. A possible mechanism would be enhanced fecal excretion of bile acid due to reduced intestinal reabsorption, which in turn might stimulate bile acid synthesis from cholesterol in the liver, leading to a decrease in plasma cholesterol.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Colesterol/sangue , Hipercolesterolemia/tratamento farmacológico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Alginatos/administração & dosagem , Alginatos/farmacologia , Animais , Gorduras na Dieta/administração & dosagem , Gorduras na Dieta/efeitos adversos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Epicloroidrina/uso terapêutico , Ácido Glucurônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Glucurônico/farmacologia , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Hexurônicos/farmacologia , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Hipercolesterolemia/sangue , Hipercolesterolemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipolipemiantes/administração & dosagem , Imidazóis/uso terapêutico , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , Masculino , Distribuição Aleatória , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Resinas Sintéticas/uso terapêutico , Organismos Livres de Patógenos Específicos
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 3: CD011082, 2016 Mar 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27007217

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) provide secured venous access in neonates. Antimicrobial dressings applied over the CVC sites have been proposed to reduce catheter-related blood stream infection (CRBSI) by decreasing colonisation. However, there may be concerns on the local and systemic adverse effects of these dressings in neonates. OBJECTIVES: We assessed the effectiveness and safety of antimicrobial (antiseptic or antibiotic) dressings in reducing CVC-related infections in newborn infants. Had there been relevant data, we would have evaluated the effects of antimicrobial dressings in different subgroups, including infants who received different types of CVCs, infants who required CVC for different durations, infants with CVCs with and without other antimicrobial modifications, and infants who received an antimicrobial dressing with and without a clearly defined co-intervention. SEARCH METHODS: We used the standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 9), MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE (EBCHOST), CINAHL and references cited in our short-listed articles using keywords and MeSH headings, up to September 2015. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials that compared an antimicrobial CVC dressing against no dressing or another dressing in newborn infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We extracted data using the standard methods of the CNRG. Two review authors independently assessed the eligibility and risk of bias of the retrieved records. We expressed our results using risk difference (RD) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). MAIN RESULTS: Out of 173 articles screened, three studies were included. There were two comparisons: chlorhexidine dressing following alcohol cleansing versus polyurethane dressing following povidone-iodine cleansing (one study); and silver-alginate patch versus control (two studies). A total of 855 infants from level III neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) were evaluated, 705 of whom were from a single study. All studies were at high risk of bias for blinding of care personnel or unclear risk of bias for blinding of outcome assessors. There was moderate-quality evidence for all major outcomes.The single study comparing chlorhexidine dressing/alcohol cleansing against polyurethane dressing/povidone-iodine cleansing showed no significant difference in the risk of CRBSI (RR 1.18, 95% CI 0.53 to 2.65; RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.02 to 0.03; 655 infants, moderate-quality evidence) and sepsis without a source (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.52; RD 0.01, 95% CI -0.04 to 0.06; 705 infants, moderate-quality evidence). There was a significant reduction in the risk of catheter colonisation favouring chlorhexidine dressing/alcohol cleansing group (RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.86; RD -0.09, 95% CI -0.15 to -0.03; number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) 11, 95% CI 7 to 33; 655 infants, moderate-quality evidence). However, infants in the chlorhexidine dressing/alcohol cleansing group were significantly more likely to develop contact dermatitis, with 19 infants in the chlorhexidine dressing/alcohol cleansing group having developed contact dermatitis compared to none in the polyurethane dressing/povidone-iodine cleansing group (RR 43.06, 95% CI 2.61 to 710.44; RD 0.06, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.08; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 17, 95% CI 13 to 33; 705 infants, moderate-quality evidence). The roles of chlorhexidine dressing in the outcomes reported were unclear, as the two assigned groups received different co-interventions in the form of different skin cleansing agents prior to catheter insertion and during each dressing change.In the other comparison, silver-alginate patch versus control, the data for CRBSI were analysed separately in two subgroups as the two included studies reported the outcome using different denominators: one using infants and another using catheters. There were no significant differences between infants who received silver-alginate patch against infants who received standard line dressing in CRBSI, whether expressed as the number of infants (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.78; RD -0.12, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.09; 1 study, 50 participants, moderate-quality evidence) or as the number of catheters (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.27 to 1.89; RD -0.05, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.10; 1 study, 118 participants, moderate-quality evidence). There was also no significant difference between the two groups in mortality (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.15 to 2.05; RD -0.04, 95% CI -0.13 to 0.05; two studies, 150 infants, I² = 0%, moderate-quality evidence). No adverse skin reaction was recorded in either group. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Based on moderate-quality evidence, chlorhexidine dressing/alcohol skin cleansing reduced catheter colonisation, but made no significant difference in major outcomes like sepsis and CRBSI compared to polyurethane dressing/povidone-iodine cleansing. Chlorhexidine dressing/alcohol cleansing posed a substantial risk of contact dermatitis in preterm infants, although it was unclear whether this was contributed mainly by the dressing material or the cleansing agent. While silver-alginate patch appeared safe, evidence is still insufficient for a recommendation in practice. Future research that evaluates antimicrobial dressing should ensure blinding of caregivers and outcome assessors and ensure that all participants receive the same co-interventions, such as the skin cleansing agent. Major outcomes like sepsis, CRBSI and mortality should be assessed in infants of different gestation and birth weight.


Assuntos
Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Bandagens , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bandagens/efeitos adversos , Clorexidina/uso terapêutico , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Etanol/uso terapêutico , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Poliuretanos , Povidona-Iodo/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Compostos de Prata/uso terapêutico
6.
Molecules ; 21(6)2016 Jun 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27294905

RESUMO

The aim of our research activity was to obtain a biocompatible nanostructured composite based on naturally derived biopolymers (chitin and sodium alginate) loaded with commercial antibiotics (either Cefuroxime or Cefepime) with dual functions, namely promoting wound healing and assuring the local delivery of the loaded antibiotic. Compositional, structural, and morphological evaluations were performed by using the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analytical techniques. In order to quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate the biocompatibility of the obtained composites, we performed the tetrazolium-salt (MTT) and agar diffusion in vitro assays on the L929 cell line. The evaluation of antimicrobial potential was evaluated by the viable cell count assay on strains belonging to two clinically relevant bacterial species (i.e., Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus).


Assuntos
Alginatos/química , Antibacterianos/química , Quitina/química , Nanocompostos/uso terapêutico , Cicatrização/efeitos dos fármacos , Alginatos/síntese química , Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/síntese química , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Quitina/síntese química , Quitina/uso terapêutico , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Escherichia coli/patogenicidade , Ácido Glucurônico/síntese química , Ácido Glucurônico/química , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/síntese química , Ácidos Hexurônicos/química , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Nanocompostos/química , Polímeros/síntese química , Polímeros/química , Polímeros/uso terapêutico , Espectroscopia de Infravermelho com Transformada de Fourier , Staphylococcus aureus/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus/patogenicidade
7.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr ; 60(2): 230-5, 2015 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25079477

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is a frequently occurring condition in infants capable of causing distressing symptoms. The aim of our study is to evaluate the efficacy of Mg alginate plus simethicone (Gastrotuss Baby, DMG Italia SRL, Pomezia, Italy), compared with rice-starch-thickened formula or with reassurance alone, in the treatment of GER in infants. METHODS: The present randomized controlled trial was conducted in full-term infants affected by symptoms suggestive of GER, evaluated through a validated questionnaire (Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised). The patients were randomized into 3 groups according to treatment (group A: Mg alginate plus simethicone; group B: thickened formula; group C: reassurance with lifestyle changes). Evaluation of symptom scores was performed after 1 month (T1) and 2 months (T2). RESULTS: A total of 64 (85.3%) of 75 enrolled infants (median age 5 months; range 1-10) concluded the study. After 1 month of treatment (T1), infants treated with Mg alginate plus simethicone showed a statistically significant improvement in symptoms compared with the thickened formula and reassurance (P < 0.03, <0.0001, respectively). At the end of the study, all 3 groups of patients showed a significant reduction in symptom scores (P < 0.002, <0.038, <0.03, respectively). Median symptom score values were more significantly reduced in group A than in group B and in group C (group A vs group B P < 0.002; group A vs group C P < 0.0001; group B vs group C P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mg alginate plus simethicone seems to be more efficacious on GER symptom scores than thickened formula and reassurance with lifestyle changes alone.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Antiespumantes/uso terapêutico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Simeticone/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/terapia , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Fórmulas Infantis/administração & dosagem , Estilo de Vida , Masculino , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Inquéritos e Questionários
8.
J Wound Care ; 24(6): 252, 254-6, 258-0, 2015 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26075373

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the vacuum assisted wound closure (VAC) system (negative pressure wound therapy; NPWT) and alginate wound dressings in terms of quality of life (QoL), pain resource use and cost in patients with deep peri-vascular groin infection after vascular surgery. METHOD: Patients with deep peri-vascular groin infection (Szilagyi grade III) were included and randomised to NPWT or alginate therapy. EuroQol 5D (EQ-5D) and brief pain inventory (BPI) were used to evaluate QoL and pain, respectively. RESULTS: Wound healing time until complete skin epithelialisation was shorter in the NPWT (n=9) compared to the alginate group (n=7), median 57 and 104 days, respectively (p=0.026). No difference was recorded in QoL and pain between the groups at study start and the second assessment. QoL analysis within groups between time points, showed that patients in NPWT groups improved in EQ-5D domains, 'self-care' (p= 0.034), 'usual activities' (p=0.046); EQ-5D index value (p=0.046) and EQ-VAS (p=0.028). Patients in the NPWT group reported significantly less pain 'affecting their relations with other people' and 'sleep' between time points. The NPWT group had significantly fewer dressing changes compared to the alginate group (p<0.001). The median frequency of wound dressing changes outside hospital was 20 (IQR 6-29) in the NPWT group (n=9), compared to 48 (IQR 42-77) in the alginate group (n=8; p=0.004). The saved personnel time for wound care in the first week for the NPWT group, compared with the alginate group, was 4.5 hours per week per nurse. The total hospitalised care cost was 83-87% of the total cost in both groups. CONCLUSION: NPWT therapy in patients with deep peri-vascular groin infection can be regarded as the dominant strategy due to improved clinical outcome with equal cost and quality of life measures.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Curativos Hidrocoloides/economia , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Tratamento de Ferimentos com Pressão Negativa/economia , Manejo da Dor/economia , Qualidade de Vida , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/terapia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Virilha/cirurgia , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/efeitos adversos , Cicatrização/fisiologia
10.
Osteoarthritis Cartilage ; 21(8): 1099-107, 2013 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23680875

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the structural benefit of a new biomaterial composed of alginate-chitosan (AC) beads dispersed in a hydrogel (H) derived from chitosan on the development of osteoarthritis (OA) in rabbit. DESIGN: OA was induced by the surgical transection of the anterior cruciate ligament in rabbits. Animals received a single intra-articular injection (900 µl) of AC beads in H hydrogel, H hydrogel alone or saline a week after surgery. OA development was followed by X-rays. Blood samples were collected throughout the study to measure biological markers (Prostaglandins E2 - PGE2 and C reactive protein - CRP). Macroscopic observation and histological evaluation of articular cartilage and synovial membrane were performed 6 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: AC beads in H hydrogel prevented from the development of OA based on the reduction of the Kellgren & Lawrence (K&L) score. It also significantly reduced the histological score of cartilage lesion severity. This effect was homogenous on every joint compartment. It was due to a significant effect on cartilage structure and cellularity scores. The injection of AC beads in H hydrogel also tended to reduce the synovial membrane inflammation. No significant variation of biological markers was noted. CONCLUSIONS: The present pilot study provides interesting and promising results for the use of AC beads in H hydrogel in animal. It indeed prevented the development of OA cartilage lesions without inflammatory signs. The potencies of this biomaterial to protect OA joint should be further documented. It could then represent a new alternative for viscosupplementation in human OA management.


Assuntos
Alginatos/administração & dosagem , Artrite Experimental/prevenção & controle , Quitosana/administração & dosagem , Osteoartrite/prevenção & controle , Viscossuplementos/administração & dosagem , Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Animais , Artrite Experimental/diagnóstico por imagem , Artrite Experimental/patologia , Biomarcadores/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/metabolismo , Cartilagem Articular/patologia , Quitosana/uso terapêutico , Dinoprostona/sangue , Avaliação Pré-Clínica de Medicamentos/métodos , Ácido Glucurônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Hidrogel de Polietilenoglicol-Dimetacrilato , Mediadores da Inflamação/metabolismo , Injeções Intra-Articulares , Microesferas , Osteoartrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Osteoartrite/patologia , Projetos Piloto , Coelhos , Radiografia , Membrana Sinovial/patologia , Viscossuplementação/métodos , Viscossuplementos/uso terapêutico
11.
Br J Surg ; 100(7): 904-10, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23592329

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative adhesion formation is a common consequence of abdominal surgery, and constitutes a major source of morbidity and mortality. This study evaluated an ultrapure alginate-based antiadhesive barrier gel. METHODS: Experiments were performed in a rat model with caecal abrasion and peritoneal side wall excision. The primary endpoint was the incidence of adhesions at 14 days after surgery. In experiment 1 (24 rats), animals treated with alginate gel were compared with controls that had no antiadhesive barrier. In experiment 2 (42 rats), alginate gel was compared with sodium hyaluronate carboxymethyl cellulose (HA/CMC) membrane and with no antiadhesive barrier. To check for any remote action of the gel, in experiment 3 (45 rats) application of alginate gel to the ipsilateral versus contralateral side of injury was compared with no antiadhesive barrier. RESULTS: In experiment 1, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions from eight of 12 in control animals to one in 12 (P = 0·009). Tissue healing assessed by histology was similar in both groups. In experiment 2, ultrapure alginate gel and HA/CMC membrane showed similar antiadhesive effectiveness, reducing the incidence of adhesions from ten of 14 rats in the control group to three of 14 (P = 0·021) and two of 14 (P = 0·006) respectively. In experiment 3, ultrapure alginate gel reduced the incidence of adhesions at the site of direct application (1 of 15) compared with controls (13 of 15; P = 0·001), but not if applied remotely (9 of 15; P = 0·214). CONCLUSION: Ultrapure alginate gel decreased the incidence of postoperative adhesion formation in this rat model.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Animais , Ceco/cirurgia , Géis , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Peritônio/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Suturas , Aderências Teciduais/patologia
12.
Dermatology ; 227(4): 361-6, 2013.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24281776

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites sometimes cause more postoperative morbidity for patients than the wound covered with the graft. Yet, there is no consensus on which dressings are best suited to treat these donor sites. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate two commonly used modern wound dressings in the postoperative healing of STSG donor sites in a prospective randomized controlled trial. METHODS: 38 patients were randomly assigned to treatment of an STSG donor site with an alginate dressing or a polyurethane film dressing. The primary outcome measures were postoperative pain scores, secondary outcome variables were time to epithelialization, dressing changes and complications. RESULTS: Postoperative pain on day 1 was significantly lower in the polyurethane film group (2.05 vs. 0.79, p = 0.035) as compared to the alginate group. This difference was not detected on day 5 (0.89 vs. 0.53, p = 0.52). Time to epithelialization did not differ significantly between the two dressing groups. There were more dressing changes in the polyurethane film group and problems with leakage. CONCLUSION: Whereas film dressings resulted in initially lower pain scores, alginate dressings caused fewer additional dressing changes and less leakage.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Poliuretanos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Pele , Sítio Doador de Transplante/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Bandagens , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reepitelização , Fatores de Tempo
13.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 26(2): 67-73, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23337646

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative healing of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites using traditional dressings (paraffin gauze) or modern wound dressings (alginate dressing and polyurethane film) in a randomized controlled trial. METHOD: Thirty patients were randomly assigned to treatment of an STSG donor site with an alginate dressing and a polyurethane film or nonadherent paraffin gauze. Outcome variables were pain (measured with a visual analog scale), amount of dressing changes, healing time, cosmetic outcome, treatment costs, and overall satisfaction with the procedure. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pain (postoperative day 1: 2.1 vs 1.2, P = .26; postoperative days 5-7: 1.0 vs 0.9, P = .47; final removal: 1.9 vs 1.0, P = .19) and time to healing (18.1 vs 15.4 days, P = .29) between alginate/polyurethane film dressing and nonadherent paraffin gauze. The semiocclusive dressings with polyurethane film required multiple dressing changes, whereas the nonadherent paraffin gauze could be left in place until complete epithelialization. Treatment costs were substantially lower for paraffin gauze. CONCLUSIONS: Semiocclusive dressings with alginate dressings and polyurethane film showed no advantages over treatment with paraffin gauze. With lower costs and better patient acceptance, paraffin gauze dressings were the preferred treatment for STSG donor sites.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Bandagens , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Poliuretanos/uso terapêutico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Transplante de Pele , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Sítio Doador de Transplante , Cicatrização
15.
Rev Enferm ; 36(11): 29-34, 2013 Nov.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24404714

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: High levels of bacterial load have shown a deleterious influence on wound healing. Using antimicrobial dressings can control ulcers' bioburden. The aim of our study was to evaluate the improving of infected diabetic foot ulcers due an alginate's fiber and hydrocolloid silver dressing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analysed a case series of 6 patients with diabetic foot ulcers without peripheral vascular disease and diagnosed from critical colonization and/or local infection according the presence of inflammation clinical signs. Patients were treated for a minimum period of two weeks. We analysed the percentage reduction in ulcer area from the day of enrolment to antimicrobial dressing removal. RESULTS: The duration of treatment had a median of 5 weeks with a minimum of 2 weeks and up to 6. The median percentage of area reduction of the wounds was 47.7% (range: 0.5%-90%). The mean percentage reduction on the lesion was 58% from 2 weeks and 67.14% at 3 weeks. All patients had reduced significantly their size at 3 weeks from beginning of treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The use of an alginate's fiber and hydrocolloid silver dressing promotes healing on diabetic foot ulcers with local infection, reducing the inflammatory clinical signs significantly over a period of three weeks.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Infecções Bacterianas/complicações , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Bandagens , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Coloides/uso terapêutico , Pé Diabético/complicações , Compostos de Prata/uso terapêutico , Idoso , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cicatrização
16.
Int Wound J ; 9(2): 126-31, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22051247

RESUMO

Split-thickness skin grafting (SSG) is a common reconstructive technique for the treatment of patients with deep burns and other traumatic injuries. The management of the donor site after harvesting an SSG remains controversial because of a variety of dressings available for use. The aim of this randomized controlled trial was to compare the effectiveness of a polyurethane dressing, Allevyn™, to a calcium alginate, Kaltostat®. From August 2009 to April 2010, 36 patients were randomized to Allevyn™ or Kaltostat® for donor site management following split skin graft surgery. Pain intensity and adverse events were the primary outcomes assessed. Secondary outcome measures included time for wound healing, ease of application and removal and overall patient satisfaction. Time to first dressing change was earlier in those randomized to Allevyn™ compared with Kaltostat® (5·5 days versus 8·11 days, P = 0·014). In patients randomized to Allevyn™, excessive exudate lead to a significantly increased number of dressing changes before day 10 (14 days versus 7 days, P = 0·018). The total number of dressing changes applied was also greater in those with Allevyn™ compared with Kaltstat® (P = 0·007). There were no significant differences between the two treatment groups with respect to time to wound healing, level of pain intensity, length of stay, staff and patient satisfaction levels. This trial showed Allevyn™ to be associated with increase demands on nursing time, increased cost of dressing products, medical consumables and wastes. Kaltostat® remains the dressing of choice for initial donor site dressing in this burns unit.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Bandagens , Poliuretanos/uso terapêutico , Transplante de Pele , Queimaduras/cirurgia , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Cicatrização
17.
J Mater Chem B ; 10(38): 7847-7861, 2022 10 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36070420

RESUMO

Fungal keratitis (FK) is a refractory ophthalmic disease that can result in vision impairment and even blindness due to the severe fungal invasiveness and excessive inflammatory response. Therefore, antifungal treatment combined with local immunosuppressive therapy is regarded as the most effective strategy to improve the clinical outcome of FK. Oxidized polysaccharides with aldehyde groups possess obvious inhibitory activity towards microorganisms. Herein, we use chondroitin sulfate (CS), a recognized anti-inflammatory biopolysaccharide, to prepare oxidized chondroitin sulfate (OCS) via sodium periodate (NaIO4) oxidation for the treatment of FK. The chemical structure of OCS was characterized by FTIR, 1H NMR, and XPS, revealing that the O-dihydroxy in the D-glucuronic acid unit of CS was selectively broken by NaIO4, forming active aldehyde groups. The introduction of aldehydes not only retains the anti-inflammatory activity but also confers OCS with antifungal property. In vitro antifungal experiments showed that OCS inhibits the growth, represses the biofilm formation and alters the membrane integrity of A. fumigatus. The toxicity of OCS was evaluated by cytotoxicity tests (CCK-8) and the Draize eye test in vitro and in vivo. qRT-PCR confirmed that OCS had similar anti-inflammatory activity as CS. In mice with A. fumigatus keratitis, OCS versus CS or PBS showed an excellent therapeutic effect, characterized by a lower corneal inflammation score, less fungal load, reduced neutrophil recruitment, and the downregulated expression of pro-inflammatory factors. Our findings demonstrate that OCS improves the prognosis of A. fumigatus keratitis in mice by inhibiting the growth of fungi, reducing the recruitment of neutrophils and inhibiting the inflammatory response. It provides innovative ideas for the development and application of OCS in medicine and biomaterials fields.


Assuntos
Aspergilose , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas , Ceratite , Aldeídos , Animais , Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Aspergilose/tratamento farmacológico , Aspergilose/metabolismo , Aspergillus fumigatus , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Sulfatos de Condroitina/farmacologia , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Oculares Fúngicas/microbiologia , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ceratite/tratamento farmacológico , Ceratite/metabolismo , Camundongos , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Soluções Oftálmicas , Prognóstico , Sincalida/uso terapêutico
18.
Surg Today ; 41(7): 970-7, 2011 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21748614

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Postoperative intra-abdominal adhesion sometimes causes significant morbidity. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of our newly developed antiadhesive material, alginate flakes, to the most commonly used combination of hyaluronic acid and carboxymethyl cellulose film. METHODS: Sodium alginate was formed into a gel, powder, or flakes. In the ex vivo study, these different alginate forms were attached onto pig skin and their antisolubility properties in saline and attachment stability were compared. In the in vivo study, a rat surgical adhesion model was used to study the properties of the alginates, and the rats were euthanized on day 14 after surgery. The efficacy of the antiadhesive materials was evaluated using an adhesion scoring system, and the locations that were treated with the antiadhesives were histologically examined. RESULTS: In the alginate groups, the alginate flakes were superior with respect to the antisolubility and the attachment stability ex vivo as well as with respect to the antiadhesive efficacy in vivo. The adhesion score was almost the same as that observed in the alginate flake and cellulose film groups. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an alginate flake material and demonstrated its antiadhesive effects both ex vivo and in vivo. This is the first reported study using this flake-like material, which has a unique characteristic in that it can be applied by spraying in compressed air. Alginate flakes may therefore be especially useful in the field of laparoscopic surgery.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Dermatológicos , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Alginatos/administração & dosagem , Animais , Materiais Biocompatíveis/administração & dosagem , Carboximetilcelulose Sódica/administração & dosagem , Carboximetilcelulose Sódica/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/administração & dosagem , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Ácido Hialurônico/administração & dosagem , Ácido Hialurônico/uso terapêutico , Modelos Animais , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Suínos
19.
Int Wound J ; 7(6): 467-71, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20860635

RESUMO

Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) (B. Braun Hospicare Ltd, Collooney Co. Sligo, Ireland), alginate silver wound dressing, is an advanced wound dressing which combines the potent broad-spectrum antimicrobial action of silver with enhanced exudate management properties of calcium alginate and polyurethane foam. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) and 1% silver sulfadiazine (1% AgSD) in the outpatient management of partial-thickness burn wounds at Burn Unit, Siriraj Hospital. A prospective descriptive study was conducted between January 2008 and January 2009 in Burn Unit, Division of Trauma Surgery, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Thailand. The 65 patients with partial-thickness burn wounds, less than 24 hours post-burn injury, had a total body surface area (TBSA%) less than 15% were treated at Siriraj Outpatient Burn Clinic. All patients were divided into Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) treated group (30 patients) and 1% AgSD treated group (35 patients). The data were compared by the demographics including age, gender, % TBSA burn, pain score, number of wound dressing change, nursing time and time of wound healing. Patients included in both groups were comparable with no significant differences in demographic data of age, gender, location of burn and type of burn injury (P > 0·05 evaluated by paired Student's t-test) between both group. The present results showed that average pain scores in the Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) treated group were significantly lower than the 1% AgSD treated group (2·23 ± 1·87 versus 6·08 ± 2·33, respectively) between both groups (P < 0·02). Patients treated with Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) had significantly lower number of wound dressing change (P < 0·02) and nursing time (P < 0·02) compared with 1% AgSD treated group. The Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) group needed less frequent wound dressing. Healing time was 7 ± 3·51 days after the application of Askina Calgitrol Ag(®). This was significantly shorter than that of control wounds (14 ± 4·18 days). Application of Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) leads to a good burn wound outcome. The present study confirms the effectiveness of Askina Calgitrol Ag(®) in the outpatient management of partial-thickness burn wounds.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Assistência Ambulatorial/métodos , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/uso terapêutico , Bandagens , Queimaduras/terapia , Sulfadiazina de Prata/uso terapêutico , Administração Cutânea , Adulto , Queimaduras/complicações , Queimaduras/patologia , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Pesquisa em Enfermagem Clínica , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/diagnóstico , Dor/etiologia , Dor/prevenção & controle , Medição da Dor , Poliuretanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Higiene da Pele/métodos , Higiene da Pele/enfermagem , Tailândia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
20.
Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac ; 111(3): 152-4, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20299067

RESUMO

Some losses of matter in the posterior area of the oral cavity require reconstruction with vascularized tissue to prevent retraction and a limited mouth opening. Bichat's fat pad or Bichat's fat ball is rarely used for oral mucosal reconstruction despite its proximity, easy availability, plasticity and simple use as a flap. Bichat's fat pad is resistant to lipolysis even in case of major weight-loss. It usually herniates in the exeresis site of a jugal tumor or intermaxillary commissure. When this is not the case, it can be obtained by a horizontal vestibular incision. The fat pad is unfolded and sutured without tension to the margin of the defect. The flap may be protected by a Bourdonnet dressing. Epithelialization begins 8 to 10 days after surgery. It is completed in the second or third week. The fat volume is variable, thus filling can only be applied to areas with loss of matter under 6cm. The technique is simple and quick. Postoperative evolution is usually uneventful; healing is quick as well as recovery of normal feeding function.


Assuntos
Tecido Adiposo/transplante , Doenças da Boca/cirurgia , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Tecido Adiposo/patologia , Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Bandagens , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Bochecha/cirurgia , Epitélio/fisiopatologia , Fasciotomia , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Doenças Labiais/cirurgia , Mucosa Bucal/cirurgia , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Técnicas de Sutura , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Cicatrização/fisiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA