A survey of prescriber perceptions about the prevention of stress-related mucosal bleeding in the intensive care unit.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Practices vary between institutions and amongst prescribers regarding when to initiate stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP), which agent to choose (including doses and frequencies) and rationale, and decisions about escalation or discontinuation of therapy. The purpose of this survey is to evaluate the perceptions of prescribers about risk assessment of stress-related mucosal bleeding (SRMB) and practice patterns of SUP. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of 800 US critical care prescribers using the membership of the Society of Critical Care Medicine. The levels of agreement with specific statements were rated on a nine-point Likert scale. RESULTS: Of 712 eligible recipients, 245 (34·4%) completed the questionnaire. Respondents were primarily attending physicians (81·2%) working in adult medical or surgical (59·2%) intensive care units. Mucosal ischaemia was identified as the pathophysiological cause of SRMB by 110 (44·9%) respondents. Respondents agreed that risk factors for SRMB were acute hepatic failure, anticoagulant use, burns >35%, coagulopathy, absence of enteral feeding, recent gastroduodenal ulcer, corticosteroid use, Helicobacter pylori infection, neurologic injury, trauma, NSAID use, mechanical ventilation, shock and sepsis. Histamine subtype 2 receptor antagonists (58·4%) and proton pump inhibitors (39·6%) were the most frequently chosen agents. No consensus was reached about whether either class is associated with clostridium difficile infection or nosocomial pneumonia. Reasons to discontinue therapy included clinically improved patient status (73·1%), extubation (68·2%), reversal of 'nil-by-mouth' (68·6%) and transfer to a non-ICU setting (67·8%). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Considerable variability exists in the perceptions surrounding risk factors for SRMB and prescribing patterns for SUP therapy likely because limited or conflicting data are available addressing these issues. Opportunities exist to educate prescribers and conduct research about the pathologic cause and risk factors for SRMB, the preferred class of agents, and the appropriate discontinuation of therapy.

Clinical implications of cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors for acute dental pain management: benefits and risks.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND; Cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitors (COX-2i) demonstrate analgesic efficacy for patients who require gastrointestinal safety. The authors discuss the potential benefits and risks of these novel, but expensive, analgesics when used in dentistry. METHODS: The authors conducted a MEDLINE search focused on the subject headings of common analgesic drugs and COX-2i, using peer-reviewed journals limited to the English language. They selected for review 127 articles that met the criteria. They also tried to identify any randomized controlled trials pertinent to dentistry and indicative of evidence-based medicine. RESULTS. When comparing COX isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2), the authors found that overlapping and mutually exclusively properties coexist. COX-2i originally were developed to minimize interference with the gastroprotective properties of the COX-1 isoform, while selectively preventing prostanoid synthesis expressed solely at sites of bodily trauma or other inflammation. COX-2i were found to provide pain relief equal to or slightly exceeding that offered by many mild narcotics. They may avoid some of the serious side effects that can occur with even short-term use of nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacodynamics of COX-2i reveal an agent that includes analgesic, anti-inflammatory and gastroprotective properties but also allows for an undesirable disruption of the delicate hemodynamic balance. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Symptomatic and asymptomatic gastroparietic patients who do not have severe cardiovascular, cerebral or renal ischemic disease benefit from use of COX-2i. Long-term use of these agents in medically compromised patients may prove disastrous.

Comparison of an intravenous bolus of famotidine and Mylanta II for the control of gastric pH in critically ill patients.

The effects of the intravenous bolus administration of famotidine versus the administration of Mylanta II liquid every 2 hours on the pH of the gastric antrum, body, and fundus for 24 hours were compared in 10 critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit with isolated cranial trauma. Patients received 30 mL of Mylanta II every 2 hours via nasogastric tube for 24 hours, followed by administration of 20 mg of intravenous bolus famotidine every 12 hours for the subsequent 24-hour period. pH of the gastric antrum, body, and fundus was monitored continuously using a three antimony pH electrode/nasogastric tube assembly. Gastric pH data were analyzed for the percentage of time pH was less than 4 and median pH for the antrum, body, and fundus for each 24-hour period. The percentage of time pH was less than 4 was significantly less in the antrum and body of the stomach during famotidine therapy (8.9% +/- 3.6% and 24.9% +/- 6.9%, respectively) compared with Mylanta II (39.1% +/- 6.7% and 57.6% +/- 8.5%, respectively, both p < 0.005), but was not significantly different in the fundus (famotidine: 25.3% +/- 7.8%; Mylanta II: 28.3% +/- 6.5%). Median gastric pH for 24 hours was significantly greater in the antrum and body of the stomach during famotidine therapy (7.8 +/- 0.2 and 6.8 +/- 0.6, respectively) compared with Mylanta II (4.5 +/- 0.6 and 3.7 +/- 0.9, respectively, p < 0.005 and p < 0.01, respectively), but was not significantly different in the fundus (famotidine: 5.9 +/- 0.8; Mylanta II: 5.4 +/- 0.7). The data indicate that an intravenous bolus of famotidine every 12 hours is more effective than Mylanta II liquid every 2 hours administered via a nasogastric tube in maintaining gastric pH above 4 in critically ill patients. Famotidine produces a uniform increase in gastric pH throughout the stomach, whereas Mylanta II controls only proximal gastric pH, probably related to fundic pooling of antacid in the supine position.

Dental implications of Helicobacter pylori.

Helicobacter pylori infections of the stomach are common worldwide and may cause serious medical problems, ranging from gastritis and its sequelae to gastric carcinoma or lymphoma. Current studies indicate that H. pylori is present in dental plaque, although the number of organisms in individual samples is very low, and these numbers appear to vary from one site to another within the mouth. The presence of this organism in plaque may be intermittent, perhaps occurring as the result of gastroesophageal reflux. It is still unclear if the low numbers of H. pylori present in the mouths of most patients would be sufficient to serve as a source of infection or reinfection for gastric conditions. Whether dental plaque is a significant source for reinfection of the gastric mucosa among patients with fair to poor oral hygiene remains to be confirmed. It has been suggested that attempting to improve oral hygiene through standard periodontal procedures would be prudent as an ancillary measure to conventional ulcer therapy, especially in patients whose gastric infections have proven recalcitrant. H. pylori may also be a cofactor in the recurrence of aphthous ulceration, especially in patients sensitized through gastric colonization and mucosal attachment.

[Efficiency and safety of the intravenous application of esomeprazole (nexium - Astra Zeneca) in high risk patients subjected to mechanic ventilation].

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the research was to determine the effectivity and the safety of the intravenous application of Esomeprazole (Nexium - Astra Zeneca) like prevention of the development of stress-ulcers of the gastric mucous with high risk patients at ICU with mechanic ventilation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 47 patients subjected to mechanic ventilation over 48 hours with availability of just one more risk factor for development of stress-ulcers of gastric musous were included in the study. Samples of gastric juice for determination of the acidity and presence of fresh erythrocytes and microbiological cultures from gastric contents, wash away of the mouth cavity and tracheal aspiration were tested on the 1st, the 3rd and the 5th day from the start of the treatment. At the end of the therapy there has been determinated the outcome - survivor or died and total quantity of the haemotransfusions. RESULTS: The acidity of the gastric juice changed in the range over pH 5 during the 24 hours by the application of esomeprazole. Fibrogastroscopic examinations were performed of patients who were found to have fresh erythrocytes in the gastric contents. No one was registered with bleeding of the gastric mucous. The isolated microorganisms of the gastric juice and wash away of mouth cavity were identical with those of tracheobronchial aspiration in about 13 %. CONCLUSIONS: In our study the application of esomeprazole i.v. was effective and safe approach for profilaxy of the stress-ulcers and the bleeding of the gastric mucous. Comparative studies with H2-blockers and sucralfat are necessary for clarifying and objectifying the significance of the microbiologic isolates of the gastric contents and wash away from mouth cavity and their relation to the development of nosocomial pneumonia.

Comparative efficacy of cimetidine, famotidine, ranitidine, and mylanta in postoperative stress ulcers. Gastric pH control and ulcer prevention in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

To determine the comparative efficacy of several histamine (H2)-receptor antagonists (cimetidine, famotidine, and ranitidine) and the antacid Mylanta-II (Stuart Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE) in gastric pH control and the prevention of postoperative stress ulceration, a prospective, randomized study was performed in a homogeneous population of patients with elective coronary artery bypass. None of the 57 patients in the study population had a documented history of ulcer disease. There were four treatment groups, each with similar demographics (age and sex). Cimetidine-treated group consisted of 15, famotidine-treated group of 18, ranitidine-treated group of 19, and antacid-treated group of 5 patients. There was no hemodynamically significant postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in any of the patients. When the agents were compared for efficacy of gastric pH control, statistically better pH control was found in the famotidine- and ranitidine-treated groups (P less than 0.003) than in the cimetidine-treated group (pH less than or equal to 4.0) during the 20-hour observation period. Side effects (hematologic and neurological) were noted only in the cimetidine-treated group. The results of this study indicate that in patients in postoperative intensive care, better gastric pH control, and thus prevention of gastric stress ulcers, is achieved with either famotidine or ranitidine rather than cimetidine or antacid.

Cimetidine versus antacids in the prevention of stress erosions in critically ill patients.

To assess the efficacy of cimetidine versus Mylanta II in the prevention of stress erosions, 44 patients at risk were randomized to receive cimetidine 300 mg/6 h intravenously to a maximum of 400 mg/4 h; or Mylanta II 30 ml/h through a nasogastric tube to a maximum of 90 ml/h. The minimum dose of medication was used to maintain hourly gastric pH greater than or equal to 4. All patients were to be endoscoped after 72 h and erosions graded by an endoscopist who had no knowledge of their treatment regime. Grade 3 or 4 erosions occurred in five of 21 cimetidine-treated patients and eight of 16 antacid-treated patients (p greater than 0.05). A gastric pH greater than or equal to 4 was maintained 79.5% of the time by cimetidine and 97.9% of the time by Mylanta II (p less than 0.001). Cimetidine and antacids are equal in the prevention of stress erosions although Mylanta II is superior in hourly pH control. Hourly pH control does not entirely explain the beneficial effect of cimetidine in the prevention of stress ulcers. There was no significant bleeding in this study. Fatalities in patients at risk of developing stress ulcers result from the underlying disease, not from hemorrhage from stress-induced mucosal lesions. In critically ill patients, endoscopic examination should be restricted to the rare case with manifest hemorrhage.

[First clinical experiences with cholestyramine for the prophylaxis of stress ulcer (author's transl)]. / Erste klinische Erfahrungen mit Cholestyramin zur Stressulkus-Prophylaxe.

In a general and accident surgical intensive care ward, the possibility of prophylaxis with the exchange resin cholestyramine (which combines with bile acids) was investigated in 68 patients threatened by stress ulcers. Whereas two patients in the control group treated with an antacid (N = 24) developed deep stress ulcers, only one patient among those treated with cholestyramine alone (N=8) developed superficial erosions; no bleeding occurred at all when it was combined with an antacid (N=36). Entefal tolerance of cholestyramine was good during parenteral feeding. No side-effects were observed. The elimination of the ulcerogenic function of duodenogastric reflux in stress ulcer is discussed as a mode of action.