Mirabegron versus Solifenacin in Children with Overactive Bladder: Prospective Randomized Single-Blind Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of mirabegron versus solifenacin in the treatment of newly diagnosed overactive bladder (OAB) in children. METHODS: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study on pediatric patients with newly diagnosed OAB. Patients were randomized into 3 groups: mirabegron (50 mg once daily) in group I, solifenacin (5 mg) in group II, and placebo in group III. Before starting our treatment and at the end of the 3 months course, we obtained a 3-day voiding diary. This diary included incontinence episode per day, mean voided volume per micturition, mean number of micturition per day, and post-void residual urine. Moreover, the parents/patients were asked to rate symptom relief, and the adverse events were recorded throughout the study period. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients aged from 5 to 14 years completed this study. At the end of this trial, both groups I and II showed significant improvement versus placebo regarding our efficacy parameters with no significant difference between group I and II. The overall success rate based on assessment of symptom relief was significantly higher in the treated groups (87.5% in I and 90.2% in II) versus placebo (55.8%). Dry mouth was reported in 2.8, 10, and 0% and constipation in 2.8, 11.4, and 1.4% in group I, II, and III, respectively, without statistically significant difference between group I and placebo. However, there was a significant difference between group II and placebo regarding these side effects. CONCLUSION: Both mirabegron and solifenacin have comparable efficacy regarding the control of OAB symptoms in the newly diagnosed children, but mirabegrone seems to have less side effects.

Long-term safety and efficacy of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients with overactive bladder who had a suboptimal response to mirabegron monotherapy: A multicenter, randomized study in Japan (MILAI II study).

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term safety (primary objective) and efficacy (secondary objective) of antimuscarinic add-on therapy in patients receiving mirabegron. METHODS: During a 2-week screening period, patients (aged ≥20 years, mirabegron treatment for ≥6 weeks, residual overactive bladder symptoms) received mirabegron 50 mg once daily. These patients were subsequently randomized to 52 weeks' treatment with mirabegron 50 mg/day plus an antimuscarinic (solifenacin 5 mg, propiverine 20 mg, imidafenacin 0.2 mg, or tolterodine 4 mg) with the potential to double the antimuscarinic dose (except for tolterodine) at week 8. Safety assessments included treatment-emergent adverse events, vital signs, 12-lead electrocardiograms, post-void residual volume, and laboratory evaluations. Efficacy was assessed using changes from baseline in overactive bladder symptom score total score; overactive bladder questionnaire short form score; micturitions, urgency episodes, urinary incontinence episodes, and urgency urinary incontinence episodes/24 h; mean volume voided per micturition; and number of night-time micturitions. RESULTS: Overall, 80.2% of patients (88.1% women, mean age 65 years) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event, with similar rates for all treatments. The adverse events most commonly reported were dry mouth, nasopharyngitis, and constipation. No marked change was observed in systolic or diastolic blood pressure for any treatment, although pulse rate increased slightly in the mirabegron and propiverine, and mirabegron and tolterodine groups. For all treatments, significant improvements were observed in all efficacy parameters, including overactive bladder symptom score total and questionnaire short form scores. CONCLUSIONS: Antimuscarinic add-on therapy is well tolerated and effective after initial treatment with mirabegron in patients with overactive bladder symptoms.

Efficacy and safety of fesoterodine treatment for overactive bladder symptoms in elderly women with and without hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: To assess fesoterodine treatment in elderly women with overactive bladder with and without hypertension. METHODS: Data for 2527 elderly women with overactive bladder symptoms, including urgency urinary incontinence, were pooled from 10 double-blind, placebo-controlled fesoterodine studies. RESULTS: A total of 1523 elderly women (60.3%) had a history of hypertension, and 1004 women (39.7%) had no hypertension history. Overactive bladder symptoms, mean bodyweight and mean body mass index at baseline were significantly higher in women with overactive bladder and hypertension versus those without hypertension (P < 0.05). Statistically significant improvements in overactive bladder symptoms at week 12 were observed for fesoterodine treatment versus placebo in women with hypertension and those without (P < 0.05). The diary-dry rate (no urgency urinary incontinence episodes), the proportion with less than eight micturitions/24 h, overactive bladder symptom bother and health-related quality of life were also statistically significantly improved by fesoterodine treatment in both populations. Incidence of treatment-related adverse events with fesoterodine was similar in women with hypertension (39.3%) and without hypertension (44.6%). Dry mouth and constipation were the most common treatment-related adverse events with fesoterodine in women with hypertension (26.2% and 5.2%, respectively) and without hypertension (30.5% and 8.0%). CONCLUSIONS: A relationship among the severity of overactive bladder symptoms, hypertension and obesity in elderly women is suggested. Fesoterodine provides significantly greater improvements in overactive bladder symptoms and health-related quality of life versus placebo in women with or without hypertension. Hypertension does not appear to affect the efficacy and safety of fesoterodine in elderly women with overactive bladder symptoms, including urgency urinary incontinence.

Efficacy and safety of combinations of mirabegron and solifenacin compared with monotherapy and placebo in patients with overactive bladder (SYNERGY study).

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential of solifenacin 5 mg combined with mirabegron 25 or 50 mg to deliver superior efficacy compared with monotherapy, with acceptable tolerability, in the general overactive bladder (OAB) population with urinary incontinence (UI). PATIENTS AND METHODS: After a 4-week placebo run-in, patients aged ≥18 years with wet OAB (urgency, urinary frequency and UI) for ≥3 months who recorded on average ≥8 micturitions/24 h, ≥1 urgency episode/24 h, and ≥3 UI episodes over the 7-day micturition diary, were eligible for randomisation to double-blind treatment [2:2:1:1:1:1 ratio, solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg (combined S5 + M25 group); solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg (combined S5 + M50 group); solifenacin 5 mg; mirabegron 25 mg; mirabegron 50 mg; or placebo for 12 weeks], and 2-weeks' single-blind, placebo run-out. Co-primary efficacy variables were change from baseline to end of treatment (EoT) in the mean number of UI episodes/24 h and micturitions/24 h, assessed using a 7-day electronic micturition diary. Secondary efficacy variables included change from baseline to EoT in the mean volume voided/micturition, change from baseline at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT in mean number of UI episodes/24 h, micturitions/24 h, urgency episodes/24 h, urgency UI (UUI) episodes/24 h and nocturia episodes/24 h; the percentage of patients (responders) achieving zero UI episodes/24 h at EoT in the last 7 days prior to each visit, micturition frequency normalisation (<8 episodes/24 h) at weeks 4, 8, 12 and EoT; and the number of UUI episodes and nocturia episodes in the 7-day diary. Safety assessments included incidence and frequency of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), post-void residual (PVR) urine volume, and changes from baseline in laboratory parameters. RESULTS: Whilst the combined S5 + M50 group was superior to solifenacin 5 mg for UI, with a mean (standard error) adjusted difference of -0.20 (0.12) UI episodes/24 h (95% confidence interval -0.44, 0.04, P = 0.033), there was no statistical superiority vs mirabegron 50 mg [-0.23 (0.12) UI episodes/24 h; P = 0.052]. In secondary analyses, all active treatment groups had greater improvements in UI episodes/24 h vs placebo, with effect sizes for the combined therapy groups (combined S5 + M25 group: -0.70 episodes/24 h; combined S5 + M50 group: -0.65 episodes/24 h) that were substantially higher than those obtained with monotherapy (range -0.37 episodes/24 h for mirabegron 25 mg to -0.45 episodes/24 h for solifenacin 5 mg). For micturitions/24 h, adjusted change from baseline to EoT was greater in the combined therapy groups vs monotherapies (combined S5 + M50 group, nominal P values 0.006 and <0.001 vs solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 50 mg, respectively; combined S5 + M25 group, nominal P values 0.040 and 0.001 vs solifenacin 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg, respectively). All active treatment groups had greater improvements in the mean numbers of micturitions/24 h vs placebo, with effect sizes for the combined therapy groups (combined S5 + M25 group: -0.85 micturitions/24 h; combined S5 + M50 group: -0.95 micturitions/24 h) higher than with mirabegron monotherapy (25 mg: -0.36; 50 mg: -0.39 micturitions/24 h) and solifenacin 5 mg (-0.56 micturitions/24 h). The combined S5 + M50 group was statistically significantly superior to both monotherapies at EoT for UUI episodes, urgency episodes and nocturia, with effect sizes that appeared to be additive. The combined S5 + M25 group was statistically significantly superior to mirabegron 25 mg for the same variables, except for nocturia. In responder analyses at the EoT, odds ratios in favour of both combined therapies vs monotherapies were shown for the proportion of patients with zero UI episodes and those achieving micturition frequency normalisation. There was a slightly increased frequency of TEAEs in the combined therapy groups vs monotherapies and placebo. Most of the TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity. Events indicative of urinary retention were reported slightly more frequently in the combined therapy groups vs monotherapy and placebo. PVR volume was slightly increased in the combined therapy groups vs solifenacin 5 mg, mirabegron monotherapy, and placebo groups. There were slightly higher frequencies of dry mouth, constipation, and dyspepsia in the combined therapy groups vs monotherapies. There were no concerns regarding electrocardiograms and laboratory data. CONCLUSION: In the largest OAB study to date, combined therapy with solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 25 mg and solifenacin 5 mg + mirabegron 50 mg provided consistent improvements in efficacy compared with the respective monotherapies across most of the outcome parameters, with effect sizes generally consistent with an additive effect. Although the combined S5 + M50 group did not achieve a statistically significant effect vs mirabegron 50 mg in the primary analysis of one of the co-primary endpoints (change from baseline in mean number of UI episodes/24 h), it approached statistical significance (P = 0.052), and the nominal P values for the other co-primary endpoint (micturitions/24 h) were <0.05. Most effects of combined therapy vs monotherapy were observable by week 4. The clinical relevance of the improvements seen with combined therapy for several objective OAB outcome measures was also supported by the improvements of combined therapy vs monotherapy in the responder analyses.

Cost-Effectiveness of Mirabegron Compared with Antimuscarinic Agents for the Treatment of Adults with Overactive Bladder in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Mirabegron, a first-in-class selective oral ß3-adrenoceptor agonist, has similar efficacy to most antimuscarinic agents and a lower incidence of dry mouth in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of mirabegron 50 mg compared with oral antimuscarinic agents in adults with OAB from a UK National Health Service perspective. METHODS: A Markov model including health states for symptom severity, treatment status, and adverse events was developed. Cycle length was 1 month, and the time horizon was 5 years. Antimuscarinic comparators were tolterodine extended release, solifenacin, fesoterodine, oxybutynin extended release and immediate release (IR), darifenacin, and trospium chloride modified release. Transition probabilities for symptom severity levels and adverse events were estimated from a mirabegron trial and a mixed treatment comparison. Estimates for other inputs were obtained from published literature or expert opinion. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and total health care costs, including costs of drug acquisition, physician visits, incontinence pad use, and botox injections, were modeled. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from £367 (vs. solifenacin 10 mg) to £15,593 (vs. oxybutynin IR 10 mg) per QALY gained. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £20,000/QALY gained, the probability of mirabegron 50 mg being cost-effective ranged from 70.2% versus oxybutynin IR 10 mg to 97.8% versus darifenacin 15 mg. A limitation of our analysis is the uncertainty due to the lack of direct comparisons of mirabegron with other agents; a mixed treatment comparison using rigorous methodology provided the data for the analysis, but the studies involved showed heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron 50 mg appears to be cost-effective compared with standard oral antimuscarinic agents for the treatment of adults with OAB from a UK National Health Service perspective.

Mirabegron in overactive bladder: a review of efficacy, safety, and tolerability.

AIMS: Mirabegron, the first ß3 -adrenoceptor agonist to enter clinical practice, has a different mechanism of action from antimuscarinic agents. This review presents data on the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of mirabegron in studies conducted to date. METHODS: All clinical data on mirabegron that are currently in the public domain are included, including some in-press manuscripts. RESULTS: In Phase III clinical trials in patients with overactive bladder (OAB), mirabegron at daily doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg demonstrated significant efficacy in treating the symptoms of OAB, including micturition frequency, urgency incontinence, and urgency. Significant improvements in micturition frequency, urgency incontinence, and mean volume voided/micturition were seen as early as the first assessment (week 4) for mirabegron 50 and 100 mg, and were maintained throughout treatment. Responder analyses showed a significant improvement with mirabegron 50 and 100 mg in terms of dry rates, ≥50% reduction in mean number of incontinence episodes/24 hr, and the proportion of patients with ≤8 micturitions/24 hr at final visit. The benefit of mirabegron 50 and 100 mg was also evident in patients ≥65 years of age, and in both treatment-naïve patients and those who previously discontinued antimuscarinic therapy. These data therefore demonstrate a clinically meaningful benefit with mirabegron in the objective endpoints of OAB. Assessment of measures of health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction showed that patients perceived treatment with mirabegron as meaningful. In OAB clinical trials of up to 12 months mirabegron appeared to be well tolerated. The most common adverse events (AEs) observed with mirabegron in clinical trials of up to 12 months were hypertension, nasopharyngitis, and urinary tract infection. The incidence of dry mouth was similar to placebo, and was between three and fivefold less than for tolterodine extended release 4 mg. Since dry mouth is the most bothersome AE associated with antimuscarinic drugs and often a reason for treatment discontinuation, mirabegron may be a valuable treatment option for these patients. CONCLUSIONS: In Phase III clinical trials, mirabegron at daily doses of 25, 50, and 100 mg demonstrated significant efficacy in treating symptoms of OAB and, at doses of 50 and 100 mg, demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo on key secondary endpoints, as early as the first assessment (week 4), and these were maintained throughout treatment. In OAB clinical trials of up to 12 months, mirabegron appeared to be well tolerated.

The efficacy and tolerability of the ß3-adrenoceptor agonist mirabegron for the treatment of symptoms of overactive bladder in older patients.

INTRODUCTION: mirabegron is a ß3-adrenoceptor agonist developed for the treatment of symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB). As the prevalence of OAB increases with age, a prospective subanalysis of individual and pooled efficacy and tolerability data from three 12-week, randomised, Phase III trials, and of tolerability data from a 1-year safety trial were conducted in order to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron in subgroups of patients aged ≥65 and ≥75 years. METHODS: primary efficacy outcomes were change from baseline to final visit in the mean number of incontinence episodes/24 h and the mean number of micturitions/24 h. Tolerability was assessed by the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: over 12 weeks mirabegron 25 mg and 50 mg once-daily reduced the mean numbers of incontinence episodes and micturitions/24 h from baseline to final visit in patients aged ≥65 and ≥75 years. Mirabegron was well tolerated: in both age groups, hypertension and urinary tract infection were among the most common TEAEs over 12 weeks and 1 year. The incidence of dry mouth, a typical anticholinergic TEAE, was up to sixfold higher among the older patients randomised to tolterodine than any dose of mirabegron. CONCLUSIONS: these analyses have demonstrated the efficacy of mirabegron over 12 weeks and the tolerability of mirabegron over 12 weeks and 1 year in OAB patients aged ≥65 and ≥75 years, supporting mirabegron as a therapeutic option in older patients with OAB.

Endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux with non-simultaneous involuntary detrusor contraction in chronic spinal cord injury patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze whether it is correct to use endoscopic treatment via bulking agents of vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) seen on video urodynamics with non-simultaneous involuntary detrusor contraction in chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed with a cohort of 76 patients (age 48.9 ± 14.4 years) (mean ± standard deviation) of both sexes with chronic SCI who underwent endoscopic treatment of VUR during the years 2008 to 2011. Patients were subjected to clinical examinations and video urodynamic studies preoperatively and 22 ± 11.4 months after the intervention. RESULTS: Resolution of VUR was achieved in 46 cases (61%). Cured patients had a statistically significant younger age and showed stress urinary incontinence more frequently. On the contrary, a greater grade of VUR, presence of bilateral reflux and presence of NDO were positively associated with treatment failure. The variables that independently influenced the cure of the reflux were NDO and reflux grade. CONCLUSIONS: The failure rate was high in patients with NDO, even though the reflux was not synchronous with involuntary detrusor contraction, and therefore these patients should have NDO eradicated before doing any anti-reflux procedures.

Severity of overactive bladder symptoms and response to dose escalation in a randomized, double-blind trial of solifenacin (SUNRISE).

UNLABELLED: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Antimuscarinics are effective and well tolerated for treatment of OAB. Studies have found that a flexible dosing strategy can be effective in improving OAB symptoms with minimal impact on tolerability. This study confirms these findings with two doses of solifenacin, and shows that improved outcomes can be achieved by increasing solifenacin dose (from 5 to 10 mg) in patients with more severe symptoms. OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between severity of baseline overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms and requests for solifenacin dose increases, and the efficacy of 5 and 10 mg solifenacin doses in relieving OAB symptoms in patients who requested a dose increase. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a 16-week clinical study, patients with OAB were randomized to double-blind treatment with solifenacin or placebo once daily. At week 8, all patients could request a dose increase; these patients entered a second phase of 8 weeks in which those in the solifenacin group were randomized to either 5 or 10 mg doses. The primary efficacy variable was mean change in the number of urgency episodes with or without incontinence per 24 h, measured using the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale (PPIUS; grades 3 and 4). RESULTS: Of 591 patients receiving solifenacin at 8 weeks, 275 (46.5%) requested a dose increase to 10 mg, and were further randomized to receive 10 mg (n = 140) or to remain on 5 mg (n = 135). Patients who requested a dose increase at week 8 generally had more severe OAB symptoms at baseline and a smaller response at week 8 to the initial solifenacin 5 mg dosage than those who did not. Greater reductions in the mean number of severe urgency episodes (PPIUS grades 3 and 4) were observed from week 8 to the end of treatment for patients requesting a dose increase and randomized to 10 mg solifenacin compared with those randomized to remain on 5 mg (mean reductions -0.9 vs -0.4, respectively), although these did not reach statistical significance. Statistically significant reductions were observed in mean total urgency score (TUS; -2.7 vs -0.6; P = 0.010), mean maximum PPIUS urgency rating (-0.3 vs -0.1; P = 0.034) and mean micturition frequency (-0.8 vs -0.1; P = 0.037). For all other OAB variables, greater changes were observed in the solifenacin 10 mg group but these did not reach statistical significance. Of those who requested a dose increase, eight (5.7%) patients randomized to receive 10 mg and one (0.7%) patient randomized to remain on 5 mg reported new or worsening cases of dry mouth. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing the solifenacin dose to 10 mg further improved OAB symptoms in patients who requested a dose increase after 8 weeks' treatment with 5 mg solifenacin. The present study supports the view that patients with severe OAB symptoms benefit from a higher antimuscarinic dose.

Ultra-soft and highly stretchable tissue-adhesive hydrogel based multifunctional implantable sensor for monitoring of overactive bladder.

A highly stretchable and tissue-adhesive multifunctional sensor based on structurally engineered islets embedded in ultra-soft hydrogel is reported for monitoring of bladder activity in overactive bladder (OAB) induced rat and anesthetized pig. The use of hydrogel yielded a much lower sensor modulus (1 kPa) compared to that of the bladder (300 kPa), while the strong adhesiveness of the hydrogel (adhesive strength: 260.86 N/m) allowed firm attachment onto the bladder. The change in resistance of printed liquid metal particle thin-film lines under strain were used to detect bladder inflation and deflation; due to the high stretchability and reliability of the lines, surface strains of 200% could be measured repeatedly. Au electrodes coated with Platinum black were used to detect electromyography (EMG). These electrodes were placed on structurally engineered rigid islets so that no interfacial fracture occurs under high strains associated with bladder expansion. On the OAB induced rat, stronger signals (change in resistance and EMG root-mean-square) were detected near intra-bladder pressure maxima, thus showing correlation to bladder activity. Moreover, using robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery, the sensor was placed onto the bladder of an anesthetized pig. Under voiding and filling, bladder strain and EMG were once again monitored. These results confirm that our proposed sensor is a highly feasible, clinically relevant implantable device for continuous monitoring OAB for diagnosis and treatment.

Comparison Of Solifenacin And Mirabegron For The Treatment Of Overactive Bladder.

BACKGROUND: Overactive bladder is mostly treated with a combination of behavioural interventions and commonly prescribed anti-muscarinic medication therapy, including solifenacin, which has considerable side effects and lowers the quality of life. Mirabegron relaxes the detrusor muscle and is a recently approved drug for the treatment of OAB. This study examined the effectiveness and safety of two medications, solifenacin and mirabegron. METHODS: This study was a comparative cross-sectional study conducted at Sami Medical Center, Abbottabad for a period of 6 months from August 2022 to January 2023. Female patients of aged ≥18 years with symptoms of OAB were enrolled. RESULTS: Current study showed that the average age of patients was 37.47±12.48 years in Group S and 39.93±7.93 in Group M. The population consists of 60 (100%) females. After 4 weeks of follow up dizziness, dry mouth, constipation hypertension and blurred vision were found insignificant between both groups with p-values of 0.312, 0.161, 0.076, 0.076, and 0.313 respectively. OABSS score improved significantly and after therapy 4.20±1.32 in Group S and 3.43±1.13 in Group M. There was no significant difference in frequency of treatment withdrawal p-value 0.150. CONCLUSIONS: When it comes to relieving symptoms of OAB, both solifenacin and mirabegron are effective. The OABSS improved with both drugs; however, mirabegron was associated with fewer treatment-related adverse events. We advocate using mirabegron as the first-line treatment. Solifenacin can be utilized if patients are no longer getting the desired effects from Mirabegron.

Patient Perception of Bladder Condition after Treatment with Solifenacin and Tolterodine in Overactive Bladder Patients.

BACKGROUND: Solefinacin and Tolterodine are new generation antimuscarinics claimed to have bladder specific action and less adverse effect like dry mouth. The objective of the study was to compare the improvement in urinary symptoms among patients using solefinacin and tolterodine with overactive bladder symptoms. METHODS: A hospital based cross-sectional comparative study was done for one year duration. All patients with overactive bladder symptoms were included and in every alternate patient's solefinacin and tolterodine were given after taking note of baseline OAB symptoms, PPBC score and UPS score. Participants were followed up after one month and noted improvement in endpoint OAB symptoms. Comparison of baseline to end-point symptoms changes among each group of participants were analyzed for statistical significance. RESULTS: Among 101 participants included in the study, 49 participants were in solefinacin group and 52 participants were in tolterodine group. The end-point comparison of urgency symptoms were improved by 20.1±6.76 (mean ± SD) units in solefinacin group and by 17.0 ± 9.18 units in tolterodine group. Urgency perception score improved to 2.1±0.66 for patients under solefinacin and 2±0.73 for tolterodine. Patient perception of bladder condition (PPBC) showed improvement in solefinacin group by 3.2±1.26 units and in tolteradine by 2.8±1.54 units (p = 0.165). Comparing the patient's perception of treatment outcome, massive improvement was reported by 81.6% of those receiving Solefinacinand 65.4% receiving tolterodine, though not statistically significant ( p = 0.131). CONCLUSIONS: Solefinacin and Tolterodine showed improvement in urinary symptoms, UPS and PPBC. Both showed comparable efficacy without significant superiority over one another.

Once-daily trospium chloride 60 mg extended-release provides effective, long-term relief of overactive bladder syndrome symptoms.

AIMS: Once-daily extended-release (XR) trospium chloride has been evaluated for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) in two 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. This pooled analysis of the 9-month open-label extensions to these studies evaluated the long-term efficacy and tolerability of trospium XR. METHODS: Following double-blind treatment, subjects with OAB could enter the open-label period, during which they received trospium 60 mg XR once daily for 36 weeks. The primary efficacy variables were changes from baseline in the number of toilet voids and urgency urinary incontinence (UUI) episodes per day at Week 48. Adverse events (AEs) were also recorded. RESULTS: Of the 1,027 subjects who completed double-blind treatment, 944 (92%) continued into the open-label period (placebo-to-trospium, N = 483; trospium-to-trospium, N = 461); 332 (68.7%) and 335 (72.7%), respectively, completed the open-label period. At Week 48, the mean change from baseline in the number of toilet voids/day was -3.21 in the placebo-to-trospium group and -3.35 in the trospium-to-trospium group, and the median change from baseline in the number of UUI episodes/day was -2.33 in both groups. Efficacy was maintained relative to Week 12 in trospium-to-trospium subjects, while improvement was seen following trospium initiation in placebo-to-trospium subjects. Improvement from baseline was also observed on secondary efficacy parameters at Week 48. Trospium was well tolerated; dry mouth and constipation were the most common class treatment-emergent AEs. Central nervous system AEs were rare and did not increase with long-term treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term treatment of OAB with once-daily trospium 60 mg XR is effective and well tolerated.

Vibegron (RVT-901/MK-4618/KRP-114V) Administered Once Daily as Monotherapy or Concomitantly with Tolterodine in Patients with an Overactive Bladder: A Multicenter, Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Antimuscarinics have shown modest efficacy with unwanted side effects in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). Efficacy of vibegron, a new ß3-adrenergic receptor agonist, for OAB is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of once-daily oral vibegron in OAB patients (primary), and its safety, tolerability, and efficacy when administered alone or concomitantly with tolterodine (secondary). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: International, phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active comparator-controlled, two-part superiority trial (2011-2013) in OAB-wet or OAB-dry patients aged 18-75 yr (NCT01314872). INTERVENTIONS: Part 1: once-daily oral vibegron monotherapy (3 [V3], 15 [V15], 50 [V50], or 100 [V100] mg), tolterodine extended release 4mg (TER4), or placebo for 8 wk, or combination V50/TER4 for 4 wk and then V50 for 4 wk; part 2: V100/TER4, V100, TER4, or placebo for 4 wk. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Average daily micturitions at week 8 of part 1 (primary); urge incontinence episodes, total incontinence episodes, and urgency episodes (secondary). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 1395 patients were randomized. From baseline to week 8, V50 and V100 significantly decreased average daily micturitions (least square mean difference [95% confidence interval], -0.64 [-1.11, -0.18]; p=0.007 and -0.91 [-1.37, -0.44]; p<0.001, respectively) and the number of urge incontinence episodes (-0.72 [-1.11, -0.33] and -0.71 [-1.10, -0.32], respectively; both p<0.001) versus placebo. All vibegron doses were well tolerated. The incidence of dry mouth was higher with TER4 than with vibegron monotherapy. Results are limited by the relatively short treatment duration. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily V50 and V100 improved OAB symptoms; vibegron was well tolerated as monotherapy and concomitantly with tolterodine. Further development is warranted. PATIENT SUMMARY: Antimuscarinics, commonly used to treat overactive bladder, produce modest efficacy and unwanted side effects. In this study, a different type of drug (vibegron) was efficacious and safe, alone or with an antimuscarinic (tolterodine).

Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Mirabegron and Solifenacin in Combination Compared with Monotherapy in Patients with Overactive Bladder: A Randomised, Multicentre Phase 3 Study (SYNERGY II).

BACKGROUND: The long-term potential of solifenacin and mirabegron combination treatment for patients with overactive bladder (OAB) has not been previously assessed. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of solifenacin succinate 5mg plus mirabegron 50mg tablets (combination treatment) versus solifenacin or mirabegron monotherapy in patients with OAB over 12 mo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Randomised, double-blind, multicentre, phase 3 trial (SYNERGY II) of patients with "wet" OAB symptoms (urinary frequency and urgency with incontinence) for ≥3 mo. The study was conducted from March 2014 to September 2016; with 1829 patients randomised. The full analysis set was comprised of 1794 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary objective was safety, measured as treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Efficacy was measured as the change from baseline to the end of treatment in the mean number of incontinence episodes/24h and micturitions/24h. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The median age was 60 yr (range 19-86 yr) and 1434 patients (80%) were female. Overall, 856 patients (47%) experienced ≥1 TEAE. TEAE frequency was slightly higher in the combination group (596 patients, 49%; mirabegron 126 patients, 41%; solifenacin 134 patients, 44%). Serious TEAEs were reported by 67 patients (3.7%); one was considered possibly treatment-related (mirabegron group, atrial fibrillation). Dry mouth was the most common TEAE (combination 74 patients, 6.1%; solifenacin 18 patients, 5.9%; mirabegron 12 patients, 3.9%). Combination therapy was statistically superior to mirabegron and solifenacin for the number of incontinence episodes (vs mirabegron: adjusted mean difference [AMD] -0.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.7 to -0.2, p<0.001; vs solifenacin: AMD -0.1, 95% CI -0.4 to 0.1, p=0.002) and micturitions (vs mirabegron: AMD -0.5, 95% CI -0.8 to -0.2, p<0.001; vs solifenacin: AMD -0.4, 95% CI -0.7 to -0.1, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron and solifenacin combination treatment for OAB symptoms was well tolerated over 12 mo and led to efficacy improvements over each monotherapy. This innovative combination is a treatment option that could become widely used in the clinic. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study looked at the safety and efficacy of a combination of solifenacin succinate 5mg plus mirabegron 50mg tablets over 12 mo in patients with the overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms of increased urination frequency, heightened urgency to urinate, and unintentional passing of urine. We compared this treatment with solifenacin succinate 5mg or mirabegron 50mg alone, and found that the combination treatment was well tolerated by patients and led to greater improvements in symptoms. This novel combination could be an improved treatment option in the clinical setting for patients with OAB. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02045862.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Mirabegron Compared with Antimuscarinic Monotherapy or Combination Therapies for Overactive Bladder: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Mirabegron is an established treatment alternative to antimuscarinic therapy for patients with overactive bladder (OAB), as shown by efficacy and tolerability data from phase III trials. OBJECTIVE: To assess efficacy and tolerability of mirabegron 50mg versus antimuscarinic monotherapies and combination therapies. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (2000-2017) assessing eligible treatments for OAB. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Efficacy assessments included micturition frequency, urgency urinary incontinence, dry rate, and 50% reduction in incontinence. Tolerability assessments included dry mouth, constipation, blurred vision, and hypertension. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 64 studies (n=46 666) were included in the network meta-analysis. Mirabegron 50mg was significantly more efficacious than placebo for all efficacy endpoints. Comparable overall efficacy was observed for mirabegron 50mg versus most active treatments, but solifenacin 10mg monotherapy and solifenacin 5mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50mg in combination were more efficacious for some/all outcomes. Mirabegron 50mg was significantly better tolerated regarding dry mouth, constipation, and urinary retention than 21/22, 9/20, and 7/10 active comparators, respectively; similar overall tolerability was observed between mirabegron 50mg and all treatments (including placebo) for the remaining endpoints. Limitations of the study included between-trial variations in the definition of certain endpoints and heterogeneity of the available data (eg, number of studies and patients assessed) for comparator treatments across different endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: The relief of key OAB symptoms produced by mirabegron 50mg is significantly better than placebo, and similar to a range of common antimuscarinics, with the benefit of significantly fewer bothersome anticholinergic side effects such as dry mouth. Combination treatment of solifenacin 5mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50mg appears to provide an efficacy benefit compared with mirabegron 50mg, with the expected side effects of individual antimuscarinics. PATIENT SUMMARY: This study assessed the efficacy and tolerability of different drug treatments for OAB. Mirabegron 50mg was as effective as antimuscarinic therapy, with fewer common, bothersome side effects such as dry mouth, constipation, and urinary retention. Combination treatment of solifenacin 5mg plus mirabegron 25 or 50mg was more effective than mirabegron 50mg alone, but with more anticholinergic side effects.

Efficacy, safety and tolerability of fesoterodine for overactive bladder syndrome.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the efficacy, tolerability and safety of the new antimuscarinic agent fesoterodine relative to placebo for overactive bladder syndrome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter trial performed in the United States. Overall 836 subjects with urinary frequency, urinary urgency or urgency urinary incontinence were randomized to placebo (274), 4 mg fesoterodine (283) or 8 mg fesoterodine (279) once daily for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was the change in the number of micturitions per 24 hours. Co-primary end points were the change in the number of urgency urinary incontinence episodes per 24 hours and the treatment response. Secondary efficacy end points were other bladder diary variables, such as the change in mean voided volume per micturition, number of continent days and number of urgency episodes per 24 hours. Tolerability and safety were assessed by evaluating adverse events, electrocardiograms, post-void residual urine volume, laboratory parameters and treatment withdrawals. RESULTS: Treatment with 4 or 8 mg fesoterodine resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements from baseline to end of treatment for the primary and co-primary end points compared with placebo (p <0.05). Results for most secondary end points, including mean voided volume per micturition, number of continent days and number of urgency episodes per 24 hours, were also significantly improved vs placebo. The adverse events reported more frequently with fesoterodine than with placebo were dry mouth, constipation and urinary tract infection. CONCLUSIONS: The 2 doses of fesoterodine were well tolerated and they statistically significantly improved overactive bladder symptoms.

Novel uses for antidiuresis.

Overactive bladder (OAB) is a bothersome condition that affects millions of people worldwide. It consists of urgency, incontinence, frequency and nocturia. Treatment, in the form of lifestyle interventions, bladder training and pelvic floor muscle exercises, aim to alleviate symptoms. These treatment modalities have drawbacks, including being time consuming and require stamina on the part of the patient and treating physician. Drugs may be used if conservative measures fail or in combination with them. Antimuscarinics are the mainstay of OAB medication but may cause dry mouth, blurred vision or constipation. It is, therefore, crucial that new treatment modalities are sought to help with this potentially debilitating condition. Antidiuresis, using desmopressin, forms a potential candidate for a novel treatment. As the bladder fills with urine, symptoms of OAB are experienced by patients. It would be reasonable to hypothesise that if the rate of bladder filling is reduced then so would the symptoms of OAB. Desmopressin reduces the production of urine by the kidneys, therefore reducing the amount of urine in the bladder and, therefore, the symptoms of OAB. Desmopressin has been used previously in small single centre trials in neurogenic OAB patients with some success but recently two multi-centre, multinational randomised placebo controlled trials using this concept have been completed in idiopathic OAB sufferers and reported in the literature. The results were quite promising although there were minor side effects. These trials suggest that this potential novel treatment modality for OAB sufferers might avoid the necessity for invasive treatments, such as botulinum toxin, neuromodulation or surgery, in some instances. These trials also open the way to combination therapy with current treatment modalities of OAB.

[Trospium chloride once daily for overactive bladder syndrome: results of a multicenter observational study]. / Trospiumchlorid als Einmalgabe bei überaktiver Blase: Ergebnisse einer multizentrischen Beobachtungsstudie.

BACKGROUND: An extended release form of trospium chloride (Urivesc 60 mg® slow release capsules) was recently approved for the treatment of overactive bladder syndrome (OAB). A multicentric, prospective observational study was conducted under routine private practice conditions to assess the safety and efficacy of this treatment in this indication, as well as the effect on quality of life parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 305 patients with OAB syndrome (mean age 60 years, 79% females) were evaluated in this prospective, non-interventional observation study. All patients received trospium chloride once daily (Urivesc® 60 mg extended release capsules) in accordance with the approved prescribing instructions. At the start of therapy and after a treatment period of 4 and 13 weeks (median) the patient urological endpoints and quality of life parameters were assessed. Safety and tolerability were evaluated from the documentation of all adverse events occurring during the entire observation period. RESULTS: Mean daily frequency of micturition decreased over the treatment period with once daily trospium chloride from 11.7 ± 4.3 to 7.7 ± 2.9 per 24 h (p<0.0001). In parallel the mean individual urine volume voided increased from 169.3 ± 79.8 ml to 238.4 ± 122.0 ml (p<0.0001). The proportion of patients with incontinence fell from 36.7% at the initiation of therapy to 20.3% at the end of therapy. Furthermore, the mean number of incontinence pads used declined from 3 per day to 1 per day. More than one third of initially incontinent patients (39.3%) needed no incontinence pads at the end of the treatment period. Quality of life parameters improved significantly in all five subsections recorded (i.e. daily life, family life, sleep quality, self esteem and ability to travel). The safety and tolerability of Urivesc 60 mg extended release was good, with a particularly low incidence of mouth dryness (1% of patients) reported. No central nervous system (CNS) associated adverse events and no serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: As a once daily formulation prescribed under normal private practice conditions, the new trospium chloride extended-release formulation consistently demonstrated efficacy and tolerability for treatment of OBS. Treatment with once daily trospium chloride 60 mg extended release capsules significantly improved the frequency of micturition and nocturia, as well as incontinence episodes and use of absorptive pads in this patient population, accompanied by an improvement in quality of life. The reason for the good tolerability, in particular the relatively low incidence of mouth dryness, is probably due to the lower peak plasma concentration of trospium (cmax) enabled by the modified-release galenical form employed by the 60 mg extended release formulation. Once daily administration enabled enhanced compliance for the modified release formulation and associated improved tolerability. The limited access of trospium to the CNS afforded by the intact blood-brain barrier and absence of metabolic interaction potential via cytochrome P450 are established characteristics of trospium chloride. This infers a lower potential to impair cognitive function and a lower potential for metabolic interactions with concomitant medications. In the context of elderly patients and multimorbid and polypharmacy scenarios, the sum of these characteristics may afford distinct advantages in treating OAB patients.

Randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study investigating the effect of solifenacin and oxybutynin in elderly people with mild cognitive impairment: the SENIOR study.

BACKGROUND: Compared with younger people, the elderly are more likely to suffer from overactive bladder (OAB) and to have other chronic conditions that affect physical or cognitive function. Despite this, there are few data on the cognitive safety of antimuscarinic agents in older patients and none that examine the effect of these agents on those with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cognitive effects during chronic stable dosing with solifenacin and oxybutynin versus placebo in older (≥75 yr) subjects with MCI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomised, double-blind, triple-crossover trial in 26 elderly volunteers with MCI. Cognitive function was assessed using Cognitive Drug Research (CDR) computerised testing. INTERVENTION: Three treatment periods of 21 d each with solifenacin 5mg once daily, oxybutynin 5mg twice daily, or placebo, separated by 21-d washout periods. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The primary end point was change from baseline in cognitive function with solifenacin at 6h postdose and oxybutynin at 2h postdose (time points close to their predicted time to peak concentration). Secondary end points included change in cognitive function at additional time points, and safety and tolerability assessments. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Neither agent was associated with significant changes from baseline in any of the five standard, composite outcomes of cognitive function (power of attention, continuity of attention, quality of working memory, quality of episodic memory, and speed of memory). In a secondary analysis, oxybutynin was associated with significant decreases in power and continuity of attention versus placebo at 1-2h postdose. Both agents were well tolerated, with the most frequently reported adverse event being mild or moderate dry mouth. CONCLUSIONS: Solifenacin had no detectable effect on cognition in this group of elderly people with MCI.