The development of archosaurian first-generation teeth in a chicken mutant.

Modern birds do not have teeth. Rather, they develop a specialized keratinized structure, called the rhamphotheca, that covers the mandible, maxillae, and premaxillae. Although recombination studies have shown that the avian epidermis can respond to tooth-inductive cues from mouse or lizard oral mesenchyme and participate in tooth formation, attempts to initiate tooth development de novo in birds have failed. Here, we describe the formation of teeth in the talpid2 chicken mutant, including the developmental processes and early molecular changes associated with the formation of teeth. Additionally, we show recapitulation of the early events seen in talpid2 after in vivo activation of beta-catenin in wild-type embryos. We compare the formation of teeth in the talpid2 mutant with that in the alligator and show the formation of decidedly archosaurian (crocodilian) first-generation teeth in an avian embryo. The formation of teeth in the mutant is coupled with alterations in the specification of the oral/aboral boundary of the jaw. We propose an epigenetic model of the developmental modification of dentition in avian evolution; in this model, changes in the relative position of a lateral signaling center over competent odontogenic mesenchyme led to loss of teeth in avians while maintaining tooth developmental potential.

Embryotoxicity of cisplatin and a cisplatin-procaine complex (DPR) studied in chick embryo.

Cisplatin is widely used as an antitumor drug. To reduce its toxic side effects in patients, cisplatin has been bound with procaine in a cisplatin-procaine complex (DPR). The lethal and teratogenic effects of cisplatin alone and of complexed cisplatin were determined in the chick embryo in ovo in order to compare their influence on rapidly proliferating embryonic tissues. The embryotoxic (lethal + teratogenic) effect was examined after a single intra-amniotic injection of one of six different doses, ranging from 0.03 to 30.0 microg, on embryonic days (ED) 3, 4 or 5. The minimal embryotoxic dose was lower for cisplatin alone (0.03-0.3 microg) than for cisplatin in the DPR complex (0.3-3.0 microg), suggesting that cisplatin alone is more embryotoxic than complexed cisplatin. Both substances caused malformations in the surviving embryos evaluated on ED 9. These malformations included microphthalmia, microcephaly, hypoplasia of the upper and lower jaw, cleft beak, and haemocephaly. Moreover, heart septum defects and limb reduction deformities were found after exposure to the DPR complex. The embryotoxicity of complexed cisplatin exhibited a stage-response effect. It was highest on day 3 and gradually decreased until ED 5. Such an apparent stage-response effect was not observed for cisplatin alone. The embryotoxicity of procaine hydrochloride - a component of the complex - was also tested. Procaine hydrochloride alone did not produce any embryotoxic effect, not even after a single injection of the maximal tested dose (100.0 microg per embryo). We also examined the protective effect of procaine hydrochloride, whose separate administration at ED 4 was followed by the injection of 0.3 microg cisplatin. We did not observe any protective effect of procaine hydrochloride if injected separately.