Effectiveness of betadine-coating gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Peristomal wound infection is a common complication in patients receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG). The main reason for peristomal infection might be the oral microbes coating the gastrostomy tube during implantation. Povidone-iodine solution can be applied for skin and oral decontamination. We designed a randomized controlled trial to test the effectiveness of a Betadine® (povidone-iodine) coated gastrostomy tube to reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. METHODS: A total of 50 patients were randomized to Betadine and control groups (25 patients in each group) from April 2014 to August 2021 at a tertiary medical center. All patients received the pull method for PEG implantation using a 24-french gastrostomy tube. The primary endpoint was peristomal wound infection rate 2 weeks after the procedure. RESULTS: Changes in Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio (N/L ratio) and C-Reative protein (Delta CRP) at 24 h after PEG were higher in the control group than in the Betadine group (N/L ratio, 3.1 vs. 1.2, p = 0.047; CRP, 2.68 vs.1.16, p = 0.009). The two groups did not differ in post-PEG fever, peristomal infection, pneumonia, or all-cause infection. Delta CRP could predict peristomal infection and all-cause infection within 2 weeks (AUROC 0.712 vs. 0.748; p = 0.039 vs. 0.008). The best cut-off-point of Delta CRP for the diagnosis of peristomal wound infection was 3 mg/dl. CONCLUSION: The betadine coating gastrostomy tube method could not reduce peristomal infection after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. CRP elevation of less than 3 mg/dl may be used to exclude the potential peristomal wound infection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT04249570 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04249570 ).

Feasibility and Efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Hepaticogastrostomy Without Dilation: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Recently, endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) procedures have been gradually established; nonetheless, some adverse events (AEs) have been reported. Dilation procedures using a non-cautery or cautery device increase the incidence of AEs in EUS-HGS. AIMS: We evaluated EUS-HGS procedures without dilation and the factors associated with dilation. METHODS: We enrolled 79 patients who underwent EUS-HGS between July 2015 and March 2021 at two centers, 72 of whom had technical success (72/79, 91%). During the EUS-HGS procedures, we defined patients without dilation procedures as the dilation (-) group. We divided the patients into two groups: the dilation (+) (35 patients) and dilation (-) (37 patients) groups. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to adjust for confounding bias between the two groups. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with dilation. RESULTS: There was no difference in clinical success rate between the dilation (+) and dilation (-) groups (91% vs. 95%, P = 0.545). The AE rate (P = 0.013) and long procedure time (P = 0.017) were significantly higher in the dilation (+) group than in the dilation (-) group before and after propensity score matching. Factors associated with dilation were plastic stent placement (odds ratio [OR], 6.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-28.7; P = 0.007) and puncture angle of ≤ 90° (OR, 44.6; 95% CI, 5.1-390; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A dilation procedure in EUS-HGS may not always be necessary. However, patients with an angle of ≤ 90° between the needle and intrahepatic biliary tract or plastic stent deployment require dilation procedures.

Risk factors for gastrostomy tube dependence in transoral robotic surgery patients.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of gastrostomy tube dependence after transoral robotic surgery (TORS), and to determine which patient or surgical factors increase the likelihood of gastrostomy tube dependence. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent TORS for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) at a single institution from January 2011 through July 2016. Patients who underwent TORS for recurrent OPSCC were excluded. Primary outcome was gastrostomy tube (g-tube) dependence. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify risk factors for g-tube dependence at 3-months and 1-year. RESULTS: A total of 231 patients underwent TORS during the study period. At 3-month follow-up, 58/226 patients (25.7%) required g-tube. At 1-year and 2-year follow-up, 8/203 (3.9%) and 5/176 (2.8%), remained dependent on g-tube, respectively. Advanced T stage (T3) (OR = 6.07; 95% CI, 1.28-28.9) and discharge from the hospital with enteral access (OR = 7.50; 95% CI, 1.37-41.1) were independently associated with increased risk of postoperative gastrostomy tube dependence at 1 year on multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term gastrostomy tube dependence following TORS is rare, particularly in patients that receive surgery alone. Patients with advanced T stage tumors have poorer functional outcomes. Early functional outcomes, as early as discharge from the hospital, are a strong predictor for long-term functional outcomes.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy through a cervical esophageal fistula. An alternative, much improved technique for patient safety.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy [PEG] by the pull-technique is easy and safe to perform through the oral cavity. However, the presence of a cervical esophageal fistula, either due to tumor invasion or simply inflammation and tissue necrosis after previous intervention or radiotherapy, in the anterior cervical region is of crucial importance when passing the endoscope and the PEG catheter from the mouth downwards. METHODS: We describe a modification of the standard peroral PEG, which is to insert the endoscope from the cervical esophageal opening instead of the oral cavity, and we support the use of this "stoma" as a way to protect it and avoid possible forceful dilatation/expansion when advancing the endoscope and the gastrostomy catheter through the mouth. RESULTS: The performance of PEG through the cervical esophageal opening was applied in 8 cases of esophageal fistula of different primary etiology but where the oro-pharyngeal passage was easily accessible. The procedure was technically successful in all patients, and no bleeding or tearing of the friable esophageal wall was evident. CONCLUSION: The use of the esophageal fistula at the anterior cervical region as a route for PEG insertion is a safe and practical alternative, highly to be recommended.

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is the method of choice for feeding and nutritional support in patients with a normal gastrointestinal function who require long-term enteral nutrition. We report our experience regarding an alternative endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided PEG technique. A retrospective clinical experience case series study was conducted from January 2019 to November 2019 at a tertiary center. Adult patients deemed unfit for conventional PEG due to absence of transillumination or previous gastric surgery were enrolled. An EUS target was created by filling a glove with saline and placing it in the abdomen. EUS was performed and the target identified from the stomach. The abdominal wall was punctured from the stomach and a guidewire was advanced. The guidewire was knotted to a string, which was passed into the stomach and drawn back through the mouth. The procedure was continued following the traditional technique. Four patients underwent EUS-PEG in our center during the study period. Mean age was 65 years and 50% were male. Two patients (50%) had a body mass index over 30. PEG indications were tongue malignancies (50%), cerebrovascular disease (25%) and dementia (25%). One patient had a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and percutaneous endoscopic jejunostomy was performed. Technical success rate was 100% and no complications occurred. This case series shows that the EUS-guided PEG technique is a safe alternative in patients deemed unfit for conventional PEG.

Pancreatic pseudocyst drainage in children by image-guided cystogastrostomy and stent insertion.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic ultrasound is seldom available at paediatric centres; therefore drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts in children has traditionally been achieved by surgery. OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the feasibility and safety of performing image-guided internal drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts with a flanged self-expanding covered nitinol pancreatic pseudocyst drainage stent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case note review of children undergoing image-guided cystogastrostomy at two paediatric hospitals. Percutaneous access to the stomach was achieved via an existing gastrostomy tract or image-guided formation of a new tract. Under combined ultrasound, fluoroscopic or cone-beam CT guidance the pancreatic pseudocysts were punctured through the posterior wall of the stomach. A self-expanding covered nitinol stent was deployed to create a cystogastrostomy opening. RESULTS: Image-guided cystogastrostomy was performed in 6 children (4 male; median age 6 years, range 46 months to 15 years; median weight 18 kg, range 13.8-47 kg). Two children had prior failed attempts at surgical or endoscopic drainage. Median maximum cyst diameter was 11.5 cm (range 4.7-15.5 cm) pre-procedure. Technical success was 100%. There were no complications. There was complete pseudocyst resolution in five children and a small (2.1-cm) residual pseudocyst in one. Pseudocyst-related symptoms resolved in all children. CONCLUSION: Pancreatic pseudocyst drainage can be successfully performed in children by image-guided placement of a cystogastrostomy stent. In this cohort of six children there were no complications.

Creation of a neopylorus after pyloric exclusion using a "double-endoscope" technique.

OBJECTIVE: Pyloric exclusion may be implemented in the setting of a high-grade duodenal or pancreatic injury. After exclusion, the pylorus should spontaneously open in 3-6 weeks. However, we present the case of a critically ill 17-year-old male with a gunshot wound to the abdomen that underwent stapled pyloric exclusion with gastrostomy and jejunostomy tube placement who did not achieve pyloric patency after 5 months, and describe an innovative "double-endoscope" technique to correct it. METHODS: A gastroscope was inserted through the mouth into the stomach, and an endoscope was inserted retrograde through the jejunostomy site to the duodenum. The closed pylorus was seen from both ends with transillumination. A needle knife was pushed through the membrane with clear visualization from the contralateral side. A balloon dilation catheter was then passed over a guidewire, and the neopylorus was sequentially dilated. A gastrojejunostomy tube was placed to ensure patency of the neopylorus. Postoperative imaging showed no evidence of leak or pneumoperitoneum. Serial endoscopic dilations were performed every 1-4 weeks to prevent restricturing. RESULTS: The patient recovered well. After the first follow-up endoscopic dilation, he was eating a regular diet and had no retained food products. After four endoscopic dilations, the patient remained symptom free and the pylorus was widely patent. His gastrostomy and jejunostomy tubes were removed. CONCLUSIONS: Here we presented a rare complication of pyloric exclusion and an innovative approach that used a "double-endoscope" technique and serial endoscopic dilations to establish and maintain a neopylorus, avoiding the morbidity of a major surgical procedure.

Feeding in Oral Cancer Patients After Massive Ablative Surgery: Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy or Nasogastric Tube.

Feeding after ablative oral cancer surgery is a major concern in postoperative care phase. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative phase of healing in patients undergoing nasogastric tube insertion and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. In this single randomized clinical trial, 40 patients were randomly allocated to 2 groups according to a randomized list: group one (20 patients) had nasogastric tube for 4 weeks and group two (20 patients) underwent percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy for 4 weeks or more after the surgery. Occurrence of infection and wound dehiscence was assessed. Weight loss was defined as reduction in patients' weight at 4 weeks after the surgery compared with preoperation. Weight loss was 7.9 ±â€Š1.91 kg in group one and 5.3 ±â€Š1.38 kg in group two; the difference in this regard between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P = 0.001). In group one, 10 subjects had dehiscence versus 3 subjects in group two; this difference was significant (P = 0.04). Analysis of the data demonstrated a significant difference in postsurgical infection between the 2 groups (P = 0.044). It seems that gastrostomy may be an appropriate method for feeding in patients with extensive oral cancer.

The Effects of Glucose Therapy Agents-Apple Juice, Orange Juice, and Cola-on Enteral Tube Flow and Patency.

To develop evidence-based hypoglycemia treatment protocols in patients receiving total enteral nutrition, this study determined the effect on enteral tube flow of glucose therapy agents: apple juice, orange juice, and cola, and it also examined the effects of tube type and feed type with these glucose therapy agents. For this study, 12 gastrostomy tubes (6 polyethylene and 6 silicone) were set at 50 mL/h. Each feeding set was filled with Isosource HN with fibre or Novasource Renal. Each tube was irrigated with 1 glucose therapy agent, providing approximately 20 g of carbohydrate every 4 h. Flow-rate measurements were collected at 2 h intervals. The results showed that the glucose therapy agent choice affected flow rates: apple juice and cola had higher average flow rates than orange juice (P = 0.01). A significant difference was found between tube type and enteral formula: polyethylene tubes had higher average flow rates than silicone tubes (P < 0.0001), and Isosource HN with fibre had higher flow rates than Novasource Renal (P = 0.01). We concluded that apple juice and cola have less tube clogging potential than orange juice, and thus may be considered as primary treatment options for hypoglycemia in enterally fed patients. Polyethylene tubes and Isosource HN with fibre were less likely to clog than silicone tubes and Novasource Renal.

Mapping the Mandibular Lingula in Pierre Robin Sequence: A Guide to the Inverted-L Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The inverted-L osteotomy for mandibular distraction in Pierre Robin sequence (PRS) is a useful technique for avoiding injury to the tooth root and inferior alveolar nerve. Identification of the lingula is understudied and may decrease iatrogenic complications. This study aims to map the position of the lingula in the micrognathic mandible and compare the location of the lingula in relative normal mandible. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of symptomatic PRS patients. Three-dimensional CT scans were reviewed and the relative lingula position described. RESULTS: The study includes 11 PRS patients and 4 controls. The average measurements were overjet 9.99 (PRS) versus 4.28 mm (control) (P = 0.001), vertical ramus height 16.05 versus 23.04 mm (P = 0.003), and width 15.16 versus 20.67 mm (P = 003); horizontal ramus length 26.58 versus 40.62 mm (P = 0.001), gonial angle 132.64° versus 123.5° (P = 0.018); horizontal lingula position 7.25 versus 10.75 mm (P = 0.001), vertical position 9.02 versus 11.34 mm (P = 0.026). The ratio along the x-axis in PRS was 0.44 versus 0.52 in controls (P = 0.138); along the y-axis, the ratio was 0.57 versus 0.49 (P = 0.078). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to normal controls, overjet is greater, vertical ramus height and widths are lesser, horizontal ramus length is lesser, and the gonial angle is greater in PRS patients. When analyzed as proportions along the height and width of the vertical ramus, there is no statistical difference (P > 0.05) in the position of the lingula between PRS patients and normal controls.

Pre-Operative Characteristics Helping to Avoid Gastrostomy Tube After Mandibular Distraction in Neonates With Pierre-Robin Sequence: A Institutional Case-Series and Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: to investigate the ability of mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO) to avoid gastrostomy tube (G-tube). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EBSCOhost, Cochrane, and Embase. REVIEW METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the number of MDO cases performed at our institution for patients with Robin Sequence (RS) over the past 10 years. In our institutional review, patients were excluded if they had a G-tube already placed at the time of surgery. We also performed a systematic review of the literature. Articles were excluded if they did not detail feeding outcomes after MDO, or if MDO was performed on patients that did not have RS. RESULTS: In our systematic review, 12 articles were included that comprised a total of 209 neonates with RS that underwent MDO. A total of 174 (83.3%) patients avoided a G-tube once MDO was performed. A total of 14 patients met the inclusion criteria at our institution. Of the 14 RS patients, 9 (64%) avoided having a G-tube placed and all (14/14) avoided tracheostomy. The average birth weight of patients avoiding a G-tube was 3.11 kg compared to 2.25 kg (P = .045) in the group requiring a G-tube. In the group avoiding a G-tube, the average weight at time of operation was 3.46 kg compared to 2.83 kg (P = .037) in the group requiring a G-tube. CONCLUSION: MDO may be considered as a surgical option to prevent G-tube placement for neonates with non-syndromic RS who have difficulty with PO feeding but whose airway obstruction is not severe enough to require respiratory support. Based on our institutional experience, a minimum weight of 3.00 kg correlated with higher success rates of PO intake and avoiding a G-tube.

Usefulness of a continuous suction mouthpiece during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a single-center, prospective, randomized study.

BACKGROUND: No mouthpiece has been designed to control salivary flow during endoscopic procedures. A new continuous suction mouthpiece (CSM) was developed, and its usefulness for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) was evaluated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-two patients who were scheduled to undergo PEG or the exchange of a gastrostomy button or tube were assigned to one of two groups: the group using the CSM and the group using the conventional mouthpiece. Aspiration pneumonia, procedure duration, extent of salivary flow, frequency of saliva suction, and number of choking episodes during the procedures were evaluated and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The same number of patients was randomly allocated to each group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in sex, age, procedure type, duration of procedure,depth of sedation, and indication for the procedure. The grade of salivary flow was significantly lower in patients with the CSM than in patients with the conventional mouthpiece (P < 0.001). Significantly fewer suctions and choking episodes were observed in patients with the CSM than in patients with the conventional mouthpiece (P = 0.013, and P = 0.015, respectively). Aspiration pneumonia and other significant adverse events were not observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: CSM reduced the number of episodes associated with salivary flow in PEG-related procedures. The device is expected to reduce complications such as aspiration not only in PEG but in other upper endoscopic procedures.

Dysphagia and quality of life.

Swallowing difficulties can be a symptom of many different disease processes, and are associated with adverse health outcomes; malnutrition, dehydration, pneumonia and death. The use of feeding tubes directly into the stomach as in percutaneous endoscopic gastrosomy (PEG) is an increasingly common treatment option for these patients with more and more being cared for in the community. Living with a gastrostomy tube brings physical and emotional impacts and direct consequences for quality of life. Guidance from the Royal College of Physicians recommends 'nil by mouth' should be a last resort even when swallow function is deemed unsafe. Impaired swallowing can cause increased anxiety and fear. Many patients avoid oral intake leading to malnutrition, isolation and depression. Understanding and balancing the risks and potential benefits of continuing oral intake or choosing gastrostomy makes this a complex and challenging area of health care.

New laser soldering-based closures: a promising method in natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

BACKGROUND: Complete closure of gastrotomy is the linchpin of safe natural orifice transgastric endoscopic surgery. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of a new method of gastrotomy closure by using a sutureless laser tissue-soldering (LTS) technique in an ex vivo porcine stomach. DESIGN: In vitro experiment. SETTING: Experimental laboratory. INTERVENTIONS: Histological analysis and internal and external liquid pressure with and without hydrochloric acid exposure were determined comparing gastrotomy closure with LTS and with hand-sewn surgical sutures. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Comparison of LTS and hand-sewn surgical gastrotomy closure. The primary outcome parameter was the internal leak pressure. Secondary parameters were the difference between internal and external leak pressures, the impact of an acid environment on the device, histological changes, and feasibility of endoscopic placement. RESULTS: The internal liquid leak pressure after LTS was almost twice as high as after hand-sewn surgical closure (416 ± 53 mm Hg vs 229 ± 99 mm Hg; P = .01). The internal leak pressure (416 ± 53 mm Hg) after LTS was higher than the external leak pressure (154 ± 46 mm Hg; P < .0001). An acidic environment did not affect leak pressure after LTS. Endoscopic LTS closure was feasible in all experiments. Histopathology revealed only slight alterations beneath the soldering plug. LIMITATIONS: In vitro experiments. CONCLUSIONS: Leak pressure after LTS closure of gastrotomy is higher than after hand-sewn surgical closure. LTS is a promising technique for closure of gastrotomies and iatrogenic perforations. Further experiments, in particular survival studies, are mandatory.

Failure to thrive, oral intake, and inpatient status prior to gastrostomy tube placement in the first year of life is associated with persistent use 1-year later.

BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy tube (GT) placement is a common procedure in infants (≤1-year-old). There is variation in patient selection and a paucity of studies examining which patients require long term enteral access. The objective of this study was to assess demographic and clinical factors associated with persistent GT use (PGU) at 1-year after placement. METHODS: We performed a single-institution retrospective review of patients ≤1-year-old who underwent GT placement from January 31, 2014, and January 31, 2020, using institutional NSQIP-P data supplemented with chart review. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with PGU. Clinical predictors were selected a priori, and a p-value less than 0.05 was used to detect a significant association. RESULTS: 140 patients were included, and 118 had a 1-year follow-up. At 1-year following GT placement, 38 patients had weaned from their GT (32.2%). Failure to thrive (FTT), and inpatient admission prior to surgery are associated with increased odds of PGU at 1-year after surgery, OR: 5.19 and 6.02, respectively. There is an inverse association between the percentage of feeds taken by mouth at the time of surgery and the odds of PGU at 1-year (OR: 0.03). CONCLUSION: Patients who have FTT (documented prior to surgery) or an inpatient admission prior to GT had a higher odds of PGU at 1-year post-op. Additionally, the amount taken by mouth at the time of GT placement was inversely related to PGU. These factors are important in determining the need for a surgical gastrostomy tube. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

The challenges of meeting nutritional requirements in children and adults with epidermolysis bullosa: proceedings of a multidisciplinary team study day.

This is a report of a study day held in London on 3 March 2010 to discuss measures with which to meet the nutritional requirements of patients with epidermolysis bullosa (EB). Members of national and international multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) caring for patients with EB attended this event. The study day focused on four challenging aspects of management intimately associated with nutritional status in EB, necessitating close cooperation between MDT members: iron-deficiency anaemia, gastrostomy placement and feeding, muscle mass and mobility, and dental health. The study day provided a unique forum for dietitians, doctors, nurses, physiotherapists, psychologists, psychotherapists, dentists, dental hygienists and occupational therapists to share knowledge and debate problems common to all who strive to promote best practice in this rare and complex group of conditions.

Different experiences and perspectives between head and neck cancer patients and their care-givers on their daily impact of a gastrostomy tube.

BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy feeding in head and neck cancer patients is recognised standard practice in some cancer centres with beneficial effects on outcomes for appropriately selected patients. However, the impact on patients and care-givers needs consideration. The present study aimed to understand the daily impact of gastrostomy feeding on head and neck cancer patients and their care-givers to identify improvements to services. METHODS: Twenty-one adult patients were randomly selected from the Head and Neck centre at University College London Hospital. Six head and neck cancer patients and three care-givers participated in focus groups. The sessions were recorded, fully transcribed and qualitatively thematically analysed, and the resulting data were tabulated. RESULTS: Patients and care-givers expressed opposite experiences within knowledge and understanding of why the tube was necessary; their personal perceptions and objectives of nutritional support. Themes expressing similar experiences included: developing positive coping strategies; preventing nutritional decline; tube dependency; dentures; finance; active care; and psychological support. Furthermore, both groups expressed the benefits of retaining a support network for rehabilitation with the hospital-based specialist team. Also patients and carers recognised that the gastrostomy tube helped patient survival and, with timely dietetic management, helped them wean off the tube reliance with more confidence. CONCLUSIONS: It is essential that patients and care-givers attend pretreatment clinics to discuss nutritional support via the artificial route; their quality of life can be enhanced if guided through a specialist support pathway based at the clinical site where they initiated their care, with links to key agencies.

[Application of laminated anastomosis with absorbable suture in cervical esophagogastrostomy].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical results of laminated anastomosis using absorbable suture in cervical esophagogastrostomy, and to reduce the incidence of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic stricture. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 210 patients who underwent cervical esophagogastrostomy after subtotal esophagectomy from January 2008 to June 2010. Among them, 96 cases were treated with traditional full layer interrupted varus suture (varus group) and the remaining 114 cases were treated with seromuscular layer and mucosal layer laminated anastomosis with absorbable suture (laminated group). Esophageal angiography was performed in 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after the operation. The diameter of anastomatic stoma was measured on the anteroposterior and lateral angiography image respectively. The area of anastomatic stoma was calculated. The degree of stenosis was assessed according to the patients' dysphagia symptom. RESULTS: There was no operative deaths, no serious pulmonary complications and chylothorax, no sever esophageal reflux in all patients. The ratio of cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leakage was 2.1% (2/96) in the varus group. No anastomotic leakage in the laminated group. Compared with the varus group, the area of the anastomatic stoma in the laminated group was significantly increased in all measured time points (P<0.01). The incidence of obstruction in the laminated group was decreased significantly (P<0.01) in 1 month or in 3 months after operation compared with the varus group. CONCLUSION: Application of the laminated anastomosis with absorbable suture in cervical esophagogastrostomy can significantly reduce the incidence of anastomotic stenosis.

Double Tract Reconstruction Reduces Reflux Esophagitis and Improves Quality of Life after Radical Proximal Gastrectomy for Patients with Upper Gastric or Esophagogastric Adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to compare the difference between double tract reconstruction and esophagogastrostomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent radical proximal gastrectomy with esophagogastrostomy or double tract reconstruction were included in this study. RESULTS: Sixty-four patients were included in this study and divided into two groups according to reconstruction method. The two groups were well balanced in perioperative safety and 3-year overall survival (OS). The rates of postoperative reflux esophagitis in the double tract reconstruction group and esophagogastrostomy group were 8.0% and 30.8%, respectively (p=0.032). Patients in the double tract reconstruction group had a better global health status (p < 0.001) and emotional functioning (p < 0.001), and complained less about nausea and vomiting (p < 0.001), pain (p=0.039), insomnia (p=0.003), and appetite loss (p < 0.001) based on the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Regarding the EORTC QLQ-STO22 questionnaire, patients in the double tract reconstruction group complained less about dysphagia (p=0.030), pain (p=0.008), reflux (p < 0.001), eating (p < 0.001), anxiety (p < 0.001), dry mouth (p=0.007), and taste (p=0.001). The multiple linear regression analysis showed that reconstruction method, postoperative complications, reflux esophagitis, and operation duration had a linear relationship with the global health status score. CONCLUSION: Double tract reconstruction could better prevent reflux esophagitis and improve quality of life without scarifying perioperative safety or 3-year OS.