Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Surg Res ; 234: 325-333, 2019 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30527492

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The use of surgical meshes in ventral hernia repair has significantly reduced hernia recurrence rates. However, when placed intraperitoneally prosthetic materials can trigger the development of peritoneal adhesions. The present experimental study evaluated the combined icodextrin 4% and dimetindene maleate treatment in preventing peritoneal adhesion formation to polypropylene and titanium-coated polypropylene meshes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty female white rabbits were divided into four groups. A 2 × 2 cm piece of mesh was fixed to intact peritoneum in all animals through a midline laparotomy. A lightweight polypropylene mesh was implanted in groups 1 and 2 and a titanium-coated polypropylene mesh in groups 3 and 4. Groups 2 and 4 were treated, intraoperatively, with intravenous dimetindene maleate (0.1 mg/kg) and intraperitoneal solution of icodextrin 4% (20 mL/kg) and for the next 6 d with dimetindene maleate intramuscularly. The observation period lasted 15 d. Adhesion scores, percentage of mesh affected surface, tissue hydroxyproline levels, and tissue histopathology were examined. RESULTS: All animals in group 1 and 57% of animals in group 3 presented postoperative adhesions. The combination of antiadhesives significantly reduced the extent and severity of adhesions as well as the hydroxyproline levels in groups 2 and 4 compared with groups 1 and 3. On microscopic evaluation, animals in group 1 exhibited higher inflammation scores compared with group 2, whereas animals in groups 2 and 4 had better mesotheliazation compared with groups 1 and 3. CONCLUSIONS: The combined administration of icodextrin 4% and dimetindene maleate reduces the extent and severity of adhesions and may be successfully used to prevent adhesion formation after mesh intraperitoneal placement.


Assuntos
Dimetideno/administração & dosagem , Icodextrina/administração & dosagem , Polipropilenos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Substâncias Protetoras/administração & dosagem , Telas Cirúrgicas/efeitos adversos , Aderências Teciduais/prevenção & controle , Animais , Dimetideno/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Icodextrina/uso terapêutico , Injeções Intramusculares , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Injeções Intravenosas , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Substâncias Protetoras/uso terapêutico , Coelhos , Distribuição Aleatória , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol ; 123(4): 494-503, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29753311

RESUMO

Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is commonly observed among peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients, and hyperbranched polyglycerol (HPG) is a promising glucose-sparing osmotic agent for PD. However, the biocompatibility of a HPG-based PD solution (HPG) in subjects with MetS has not been investigated. This study compared the local and systemic effects of a HPG solution with conventional physioneal (PYS) and icodextrin (ICO) PD solutions in rats with MetS. Obese type 2 diabetic ZSF1 rats received a daily intraperitoneal injection of PD solutions (10 mL) for 3 months. The peritoneal membrane (PM) function was determined by ultrafiltration (UF), and the systemic responses were determined by profiling blood metabolic substances, cytokines and oxidative status. Tissue damage was assessed by histology. At the end of the 3-month treatment with PD solutions, PM damage and UF loss in both the PYS and ICO groups were greater than those in the HPG group. Blood analyses showed that compared to the baseline control, the rats in the HPG group exhibited a significant decrease only in serum albumin and IL-6 and a minor glomerular injury, whereas in both the PYS and ICO groups, there were more significant decreases in serum albumin, antioxidant activity, IL-6, KC/GRO (CXCL1) and TNF-α (in ICO only) as well as a more substantial glomerular injury compared to the HPG group. Furthermore, PYS increased serum creatinine, serum glucose and urine production. In conclusion, compared to PYS or ICO solutions, the HPG solution had less adverse effects locally on the PM and systemically on distant organs (e.g. kidneys) and the plasma oxidative status in rats with MetS.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/metabolismo , Soluções para Diálise/toxicidade , Glicerol/toxicidade , Icodextrina/toxicidade , Rim/efeitos dos fármacos , Obesidade/metabolismo , Diálise Peritoneal/efeitos adversos , Peritônio/efeitos dos fármacos , Polímeros/toxicidade , Animais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Citocinas/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangue , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/genética , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/fisiopatologia , Soluções para Diálise/administração & dosagem , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Glicerol/administração & dosagem , Icodextrina/administração & dosagem , Mediadores da Inflamação/sangue , Injeções Intraperitoneais , Rim/metabolismo , Rim/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Obesidade/sangue , Obesidade/genética , Obesidade/fisiopatologia , Compostos Orgânicos/administração & dosagem , Compostos Orgânicos/toxicidade , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Diálise Peritoneal/métodos , Peritônio/metabolismo , Peritônio/fisiopatologia , Permeabilidade , Polímeros/administração & dosagem , Ratos Zucker , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA