The role of immediate versus secondary removal of the odontogenic focus in treatment of deep head and neck space infections. A retrospective analysis of 248 patients.

OBJECTIVES: Aim of this study was to investigate conditions and predisposing factors for head and neck infection progress regarding the length of stay (LOS) in hospital, with special emphasis on the time of removal of the odontogenic infection focus. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A 3-year retrospective study reviewed hospital records of 248 subjects who were treated under inpatient conditions with severe odontogenic infections who received surgical incisions, drainage, and intravenous (IV) antibiotics. Outcomes measured included age, gender, involved fascial spaces, LOS, number of infected spaces, antibiotics administered, and comorbidities. We precisely recorded the time between abscess incision and focus extraction. RESULTS: Removal of infection focus (tooth) in the same stay (1 stay, n = 106; group 1; mean 6.5 days ± 3) showed significantly higher (p = 0.042) LOS than extraction in a second stay (2 stays, n = 46; group 2; 5.3 ± 3.1). Group 3 patients showed infection after removal of teeth in outpatient management (1 stay ex-op, n = 96) and presented significantly lower LOS (5.6 ± 2.5) compared to group 1 (p = 0.0216). LOS of group 3 to group 2 patients showed no significance (p = 0.668). Infection expansion and diabetes showed a significant increase of LOS. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous removal of infection focus and abscess incision leads to the lowest LOS. If tooth extraction is performed after incision, subsequent focus extraction performed in a second stay shows lower overall-LOS than extraction at the same stay at later stage. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Multiple factors tend to increase the LOS of patients with severe head and neck infections of odontogenic origin. Our data reveals the role of removal of odontogenic focus and additionally ranks further parameters that influence the LOS. Based on our findings, decisions regarding the surgical treatment can be recommended.

Staged bone grafting for the management of segmental long bone defects caused by trauma or infection using induced-membrane technique.

Treatment of segmental bone defects resulting from trauma or infection is extremely difficult. Bone segment transport with distraction osteogenesis and vascularized fibula transfer are the commonest used methods of treatment. Bone transport has problems with docking site. Vascularized fibula is technically demanding and hypertrophy occurs late. Induced membrane (Masquelet) technique is a relatively recent and simple treatment option consisting of two stages. A biological membrane is formed around cement spacer which is inserted in bone defect. In the second stage, the spacer is carefully removed and the membrane filled with autologous cancellous bone graft. From May 2013 to October 2015, we treated 20 patients with post-traumatic and post-infectious bone defect using Masquelet technique. There were 17 males and 3 females, with an average age of 38 years (range 12-64). The etiology of defect was open fractures in 6 cases (30%), infected non union in 11 cases (55%) and aseptic atrophic nonunion in 3 cases (15%). The mean size of bone defect after debridement was 7.2 cm. Soft tissue defect was present in 3 cases which was reconstructed. In the first stage involves thorough debridement, stabilization of the bone (either external or internal) and insertion of antibiotic cement spacer. 2nd stage was done after 4 to 8 weeks with insertion of morselized cancellous bone graft harvested from iliac bone, then tight closure done. 17 cases (85%) united, 2 cases (10%) of graft resorption and 1 case (5%) of infected graft. The time to union ranged from 4 to 11 months after 2nd stage with mean 7.4 months. In conclusion, induced membrane (Masquelet) technique is a safe, simple and reliable method for treating segmental bone defect. The major complications of this technique include infection and graft resorption.

Immediate implants placed in fresh sockets associated to periapical infectious processes. A systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: The development of treated implant surfaces, added to the increase of the aesthetic requirements by the patients has led to a change in the treatment protocols as well as the development of techniques such as the one-fase implants and the immediate prosthetic loading. One of the usual contraindications of the implant treatment is the presence of periapical disease associated to the tooth to be replaced. The aim of this paper is to review the published literature on immediate implant placement in extraction sockets of teeth with periapical pathology, considering the level of scientific evidence, and following the principles of medicine and evidence-based Dentistry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search of articles published between 1982 and 2012 was conducted. The search terms immediate, dental implant, extraction, infected, periapical pathology were used. Search was limited to studies in animals and humans, published in english language. RESULTS: 16 articles were selected from a total of 438, which were stratified according to their level of scientific evidence using the SORT criteria (Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy). Studies in both animals and humans presented high rates of implant survival, but human studies are limited to a small number of cases. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is a limited evidence regarding implant placement immediately to the extraction of teeth affected by chronic periapical pathology. Following analysis of the articles, and in function of their scientific quality, a type B recommendation is given in favor of the immediate implant placement in fresh sockets associated to periapical infectious processes.

Polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for breast augmentation: another injectable failure.

BACKGROUND: Increasing complications of polyacrylamide hydrogel (PAAG) augmentation mammoplasty, such as chronic persistent infection, have recently caught the attention of both the medical field and the general public. MATERIAL/METHODS: A total of 96 patients with severe chronic infection following PAAG augmentation mammoplasty were treated in the present study including 63 cases with infection confined to the breast and 33 with systemic infection. Endoscopy and surgery were performed to completely remove the materials and clear the infected tissues followed by drug-irrigation and vacuum-assisted closure for several days. RESULTS: In patients with severe infection there were large amounts of PAAG, fibers and infiltration of numerous neutrophils and macrophages. The infection-inducing materials were extensively dispersed in the mammary and subcutaneous tissues, pectoral fascia and intermuscular space. In addition, there was scattered distribution of PAAG materials in the armpit, chest wall and abdominal wall, which were mixed with necrotic tissues and surrounded by lymphocytes, giant cells, macrophages and other inflammatory cells, forming chronic granulomatous and fibrous lesions. Infection was controlled following surgical intervention. No residual infectious foci or recurrent infections were noted among these patients. Although the severe infection did not result in mastectomy, patients had breast atrophy and various degrees of deformation. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic infection following PAAG augmentation mammaplasty usually causes systemic infection and other devastating adverse reactions. This study confirms PAAG augmentation mammaplasty is another failed attempt. More attention should be paid to the injection of large doses of liquid filler.

Histological examination of experimentally infected root canals after preparation by Er:YAG laser irradiation.

The influence of Er:YAG laser irradiation on periodontal tissues along the root surface and apical region during root canal preparation was histologically evaluated using experimentally infected root canals of rats. Eighty experimentally mesial infected root canals of mandibular first molars in rats were divided into four groups. In three groups, root canals were irradiated using an Er:YAG laser at 2 Hz with 34, 68, or 102 mJ/pulse for 30 s. Non-irradiated canals served as controls. The influence of laser irradiation on periodontal tissues along the root surface and apical area was evaluated histologically under light microscopy at 0 (immediately after), 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks after irradiation. At all periods, no inflammation or resorption on the root surfaces caused by laser irradiation was observed in any cases in the control or 34 mJ/pulse-irradiated groups. However, mild to severe inflammation with resorption of root surfaces was observed in some cases in the 68- and 102-mJ/pulse-irradiated groups. No significant difference was apparent between control and laser-irradiated groups at the apical area for all experimental periods (p > 0.05). These results suggest that thermal influences on periodontal tissues of experimentally infected root canals during root canal preparation by Er:YAG laser irradiation are minimal if appropriate parameters are selected. Er:YAG laser irradiation is thus a potential therapy for human infected root canals.

Infection in fracture fixation: can we influence infection rates through implant design?

Musculoskeletal infection is one of the most common complications associated with surgical fixation of bones fractured during trauma. These infections usually involve bacterial colonisation and biofilm formation on the fracture fixation device itself, as well as infection of the surrounding tissues. Antibiotic prophylaxis, wound debridement and postsurgical care can reduce the incidence of, but do not prevent, these infections. Much research and development has been focussed on ways to further reduce the incidence of infection and in the following short review we describe our experiences investigating the contribution of the basic design of fracture fixation devices on the susceptibility to infection. It has been shown in animal studies that device size, shape, mode of action and material and topography play an interrelated role in the susceptibility to infection. Although direct extrapolation from animal studies to the clinical setting is difficult, close consideration of the design factors that can reduce the incidence of infection in animal models is expected to help minimise the incidence of infection associated with any clinically implemented fracture fixation device.

Lessons learned reconstructing complex scalp defects using free flaps and a cranioplasty in one stage.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to review our experience in single-stage reconstruction of skull and scalp defects, aiming to highlight pitfalls in our management. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients who had a single-stage cranioplasty and free-tissue transfer at our institution over the last 10 years. Thirteen patients (9 men and 4 women) with an average age of 66.5 years (range, 34-83 years) were identified. Etiology of the defects included malignancy (n = 7), osteoradionecrosis (n = 3), and infection (n = 3). The size of the bony defect averaged 103.1 cm(2) (range, 12-300 cm(2)). Cranioplasty procedures included reconstruction by methylmethacrylate and titanium mesh (n = 10), methylmethacrylate only (n = 1), or mesh only (n = 2). Free flaps used were anterolateral thigh (n = 10), latissimus dorsi (n = 2), or a rectus flap (n = 1). RESULTS: Five patients (38%) developed at least 1 complication. These included 2 anastomotic problems that were successfully salvaged, 5 cases of wound dehiscence, and 1 mortality due to a respiratory event. Four patients developed a recurrence, and 2 patients required flap contouring at a second stage. Two patients had further reconstruction using 1 (1 patient) or 2 (1 patient) additional free flaps. CONCLUSIONS: Given the complexity of these procedures, the high recurrence rate, and the likelihood of complications, methylmethacrylate is contraindicated in 1-stage cranioplasty and soft-tissue reconstruction in high-risk patients. For unfavorable local conditions (eg previous infection, radiotherapy), the surgeon can either postpone the cranioplasty until the soft-tissue reconstruction has healed, or use a nonanatomical titanium mesh alone. The soft-tissue flap should be harvested of larger dimensions than anticipated.

Absorbable Polyglactin vs. Non-Cross-linked Porcine Biological Mesh for the Surgical Treatment of Infected Incisional Hernia.

BACKGROUND: The use of absorbable meshes during contaminated or infected incisional hernia (IH) repair is associated with high morbidity and recurrence rates. Biological meshes might be more appropriate but have been described in highly heterogeneous series. This study aimed at comparing the efficacy of absorbable vs. biological meshes for the treatment of contaminated or infected IH in a homogeneous series with a standardized technique. METHODS: Data of all patients operated on between 2008 and 2015 for contaminated or infected IH, using an absorbable (A) Vicryl® or a biological (B) Strattice® mesh, were reviewed. Patient characteristics, infectious complication rates, and recurrence-free outcome (RFO) were compared between the two groups. A propensity score methodology was applied to a Cox regression model to deal with unbalanced characteristics between groups. RESULTS: Patient demographics in A (n = 57) and in B (n = 24) were similar except that B patients had larger parietal defects (p < 0.001) and higher Center for Disease Control (CDC) wound class (p = 0.034). Patients in A had statistically significantly more postoperative early (61.4% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.03) and late (31.2% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.046) infectious complications. Six-, 12-, and 36-month RFO rates were 77%, 47%, and 24%, and 96%, 87%, and 82% in A and B, respectively, p < 0.001. Raw multivariable Cox regression analysis found that B (HR = 0.1, 95% CI [0.03-0.34], p < 0.001) was independently associated with prolonged RFO (HR = 0.091, 95% CI [0.045-0.180], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Biological meshes seem to be superior to absorbable meshes in patients with contaminated or infected incisional hernia. These results need to be confirmed by prospective randomized trials.

Acutely infected teeth: to extract or not to extract?

Not only laymen but also dentists generally believe that extraction of acutely infected teeth should be avoided until the infection subdues by using systemic antibiotics. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications in routine extractions of acutely infected teeth with extractions of asymptomatic teeth. This prospective study was performed with 82 patients. Severe pain on percussion of the relevant tooth was considered as basic criteria for acute infection. The acutely infected teeth were labeled as the study group (n = 35) and the asymptomatic teeth as the control group (n = 47). The extractions were done using standard procedures. The amount of anesthetic solution used and duration of extractions were recorded. Postoperative severe pain and exposed bone with no granulation tissue in the extraction socket were indications of alveolar osteitis (AO). The level of statistical significance was accepted as 0.05. Symptoms that could indicate systemic response, including fever, fatigue, and shivering were not found. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of AO, amount of anesthetic solution used, and duration of extraction. The presence of an acute infection characterized by severe percussion pain is not a contraindication for tooth extraction. Infected teeth should be extracted as soon as possible and the procedure should not be postponed by giving antibiotics.

Difficult Cases of Odontogenic Deep Neck Infections: A Report of Three Patients.

BACKGROUND: Deep neck infections are important otolaryngologic emergencies due to serious complications and the risk of airway compromise, which can lead to mortality. Although the most common causes among pediatric patients are tonsillitis and pharyngeal infections, odontogenic infections are an important cause in adults. CASE REPORT: We present three patients with multiple deep neck space abscess formation due to odontogenic infection. Two of them required tracheotomy due to airway compromise, and one had mediastinitis. CONCLUSION: An underestimated tooth infection can cause hazardous complications such as mediastinitis and respiratory distress requiring tracheotomy.

Thermal tissue damage caused by ultrasonic cement removal from the humerus.

BACKGROUND: Ultrasound devices can selectively remove cement during revision arthroplasty. These instruments initially were designed for the hip and knee but also have been applied to the upper extremity. We describe a patient in whom a radial nerve palsy and a pathologic humeral fracture developed after ultrasonic cement removal was performed because of an infection at the site of a total elbow arthroplasty. Biopsies of the humerus, the triceps muscle, and the radial nerve showed widespread necrosis consistent with thermal injury. METHODS: A study involving six human cadaveric specimens was conducted to measure temperature elevations in bone and adjacent soft tissue during cement removal with use of an ultrasound device with and without irrigation. RESULTS: While temperature increased only minimally during cement polymerization, ultrasonic melting and removal of cement with use of constant energy delivery led to markedly elevated temperatures in the humeral cortex, the triceps muscle, and the radial nerve. These temperatures were above the known thresholds for thermal injury and necrosis. Subsequently, strategies designed to allow for safe ultrasonic cement removal from the humerus were applied, including intermittent delivery of energy and the use of cold irrigation between probe passes. These strategies resulted in markedly lower maximum temperatures in all tissues tested. CONCLUSIONS: Temperatures in the humerus, triceps, and, most importantly, the radial nerve can reach potentially dangerous levels when ultrasound technology is used to remove cement from the humerus. We suggest intermittent cold irrigation of the humeral canal, no tourniquet use, education of surgeons with regard to proper techniques designed to limit heat generation, and consideration of exposure and protection of the radial nerve when ultrasound devices are used.

Anatomic correlates of normal and diseased adenoids in children.

In order to better understand the pathogenesis and sequelae of obstructive adenoid hyperplasia in children, the anatomic relationships of the adenoids to the hard and soft palates, oropharynx, and nasopharynx were studied in vivo in 94 children. Direct, intraoperative palatal, nasopharyngeal, and oropharyngeal measurements were performed in 19 children with normal, nondiseased adenoids (controls [C]) and compared to 75 children undergoing adenoidectomy for obstructive adenoid hyperplasia (OAH) (n = 44) or chronic adenoid infection (CAI) (n = 31). As expected, the weight and volume of the adenoids removed were significantly greater in the OAH vs. CAI group (P < .001). Before adenoidectomy, the volume of the nasopharynx was significantly smaller in the OAH group; however, nasopharyngeal volumes after adenoidectomy were quite similar in all three groups and ranged from 5.4 to 6.2 cc. Only the change in the volume of the nasopharynx after adenoidectomy for obstruction was significant (2.5 +/- 1.2 cc, P < .01). Differences in oropharyngeal and palatal dimensions were not associated with longstanding obstruction from adenoid hyperplasia. These data indicate that the nasal obstruction from adenoid hyperplasia is due to an absolute increase in adenoid size rather than a relatively smaller nasopharynx. Differences in palatal and oropharyngeal dimensions usually described and attributed to longstanding nasal obstruction could not be demonstrated in this study.

[The treatment of infected odontogenic jaw defects with demineralized bone allograft]. / Lechenie odontogennykh infitsirovannykh defektov cheliustei demineralizovannoi allokost'iu.

Reparative osteogenesis of infected mandibular defects with these defects filled with mineral-free allobone, impregnated with a complex antiseptic solution, was studied in 36 rabbits by morphologic methods. Good results of such treatment permitted using this plastic material in 79 patients with cavitary odontogenic mandibular defects. 8-12 months after surgery osseous tissue structure at the site of defect did not differ from the adjacent tissue. Mineral-free bone tissue impregnated with complex antiseptic solution holds good promise in transplantation surgery.

Acutely infected teeth: to extract or not to extract?

Abstract: Not only laymen but also dentists generally believe that extraction of acutely infected teeth should be avoided until the infection subdues by using systemic antibiotics. The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications in routine extractions of acutely infected teeth with extractions of asymptomatic teeth. This prospective study was performed with 82 patients. Severe pain on percussion of the relevant tooth was considered as basic criteria for acute infection. The acutely infected teeth were labeled as the study group (n = 35) and the asymptomatic teeth as the control group (n = 47). The extractions were done using standard procedures. The amount of anesthetic solution used and duration of extractions were recorded. Postoperative severe pain and exposed bone with no granulation tissue in the extraction socket were indications of alveolar osteitis (AO). The level of statistical significance was accepted as 0.05. Symptoms that could indicate systemic response, including fever, fatigue, and shivering were not found. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in terms of AO, amount of anesthetic solution used, and duration of extraction. The presence of an acute infection characterized by severe percussion pain is not a contraindication for tooth extraction. Infected teeth should be extracted as soon as possible and the procedure should not be postponed by giving antibiotics.

Complicaciones infecciosas severas del territorio maxilofacial: presentación de casos clínicos / Severe infectious complications of the maxillofacial territory: clinical cases presentation

RESUMEN: Las infecciones en el territorio maxilofacial, son cuadros frecuentes, de origen polimicrobiano, con manifestaciones clínicas muy variables y que están asociadas a múltiples vías de ingreso de los microorganismos al territorio. Un gran porcentaje de estas infecciones se origina en la cavidad oral, principalmente en lesiones bacterianas que sufren los dientes. La compleja anatomía de la cabeza y el cuello, permiten que muchas de estas infecciones se diseminen por espacios profundos, llegando a comprometer órganos o regiones anatómicas adyacentes, que pueden llevar a cuadros clínicos de alto riesgo vital. Los casos clínicos presentados en este artículo corresponden a pacientes tratados en el hospital San Juan de Dios a causa de procesos infecciosos del territorio maxilofacial, por equipos multidisciplinarios.

ABSTRACT: Infections in the maxillofacial territory are frequent cases of polymicrobial origin, with very variable clinical manifestations and are associated with multiple entering pathways of microorganisms in the territory. A large percentage of these infections originate in the oral cavity, mainly in bacterial lesions that undergo experienced by the teeth. The complex anatomy of the head and neck allows many of these infections to spread through deep spaces, leading to compromising adjacent organs or anatomical regions, which can lead to high-risk clinical conditions. The clinical cases presented in this article correspond to patients treated at the San Juan de Dios hospital because of infectious processes of the maxillofacial territory, by multidisciplinary teams.

The canine fossa puncture technique in chronic odontogenic maxillary sinusitis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) including middle meatus antrostomy (MMA) has been advocated as the technique of choice in the treatment of maxillary chronic odontogenic sinusitis (COS). However, recently the endoscopic canine fossa puncture (CFP) has been proposed as an alternative surgical technique of accessing the entire antrum when pathology is limited only to the maxillary sinus. This study was designed to assess the outcomes of the CFP approach versus ESS (comprising MMA) in the management of COS. METHODS: A prospective study was performed on patients with COS produced by odontogenic infections (periapical granulomas or small inflammatory cysts of the molars or bicuspids), oroantral fistula (OAF), large odontogenic cysts, and maxillary foreign bodies (dental fillings, teeth roots, and implants). Patients were randomly allocated into two groups: 56 patients underwent CFP and in 54 patients the maxillary sinus was approached through MMA. After a mean follow-up of 18.5 months, recurrence rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, OAF recurred in 10 patients: 4 in the MMA group (7.4%) and 6 in the CFP group (10.7%). The difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.39, Fisher exact test). CONCLUSION: In patients with COS a conservative approach with avoidance of endonasal surgery is suggested: in COS without a fistula, CFP at the time of dental treatment will be sufficient. In OAF cases, CFP yielded similar results with MMA. Nevertheless, additional study with a larger sample and a longer follow-up is required to validate these results.