Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
BMC Biol ; 13: 29, 2015 Apr 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25895830

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The digestive systems of animals can become highly specialized in response to their exploration and occupation of new ecological niches. Although studies on different animals have revealed commonalities in gut formation, the model systems Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster, which belong to the invertebrate group Ecdysozoa, exhibit remarkable deviations in how their intestines develop. Their morphological and developmental idiosyncrasies have hindered reconstructions of ancestral gut characters for the Ecdysozoa, and limit comparisons with vertebrate models. In this respect, the phylogenetic position, and slow evolving morphological and molecular characters of marine priapulid worms advance them as a key group to decipher evolutionary events that occurred in the lineages leading to C. elegans and D. melanogaster. RESULTS: In the priapulid Priapulus caudatus, the gut consists of an ectodermal foregut and anus, and a mid region of at least partial endodermal origin. The inner gut develops into a 16-cell primordium devoid of visceral musculature, arranged in three mid tetrads and two posterior duplets. The mouth invaginates ventrally and shifts to a terminal anterior position as the ventral anterior ectoderm differentially proliferates. Contraction of the musculature occurs as the head region retracts into the trunk and resolves the definitive larval body plan. Despite obvious developmental differences with C. elegans and D. melanogaster, the expression in P. caudatus of the gut-related candidate genes NK2.1, foxQ2, FGF8/17/18, GATA456, HNF4, wnt1, and evx demonstrate three distinct evolutionarily conserved molecular profiles that correlate with morphologically identified sub-regions of the gut. CONCLUSIONS: The comparative analysis of priapulid development suggests that a midgut formed by a single endodermal population of vegetal cells, a ventral mouth, and the blastoporal origin of the anus are ancestral features in the Ecdysozoa. Our molecular data on P. caudatus reveal a conserved ecdysozoan gut-patterning program and demonstrates that extreme morphological divergence has not been accompanied by major molecular innovations in transcriptional regulators during digestive system evolution in the Ecdysozoa. Our data help us understand the origins of the ecdysozoan body plan, including those of C. elegans and D. melanogaster, and this is critical for comparisons between these two prominent model systems and their vertebrate counterparts.


Assuntos
Padronização Corporal , Trato Gastrointestinal/embriologia , Invertebrados/embriologia , Animais , Evolução Biológica , Diferenciação Celular , Movimento Celular , Proliferação de Células , Desenvolvimento Embrionário , Endoderma/citologia , Trato Gastrointestinal/citologia , Invertebrados/citologia , Mesoderma/embriologia , Modelos Biológicos , Boca/citologia
2.
Dev Genes Evol ; 225(4): 207-19, 2015 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26093940

RESUMO

Zinc finger transcription factors encoded by hunchback homologs play different roles in arthropods, including maternally mediated control, segmentation, and mesoderm and neural development. Knockdown experiments in spider and insect embryos have also revealed homeotic effects and gap phenotypes, the latter indicating a function of hunchback as a "gap gene". Although the expression pattern of hunchback has been analysed in representatives of all four major arthropod groups (chelicerates, myriapods, crustaceans and insects), nothing is known about its expression in one of the closest arthropod relatives, the Onychophora (velvet worms). We therefore examined the expression pattern of hunchback in embryos of the onychophoran Euperipatoides rowelli. Our transcriptomic and phylogenetic analyses revealed only one hunchback ortholog in this species. The putative Hunchback protein contains all nine zinc finger domains known from other protostomes. We found no indication of maternally contributed transcripts of hunchback in early embryos of E. rowelli. Its initial expression occurs in the ectodermal tissue of the antennal segment, followed by the jaw, slime papilla and trunk segments in an anterior-to-posterior progression. Later, hunchback expression is seen in the mesoderm of the developing limbs. A second "wave" of expression commences later in development in the antennal segment and continues posteriorly along each developing nerve cord. This expression is restricted to the neural tissues and does not show any segmental pattern. These findings are in line with the ancestral roles of hunchback in mesoderm and neural development, whereas we find no evidence for a putative function of hunchback as a "gap gene" in Onychophora.


Assuntos
Invertebrados/embriologia , Invertebrados/genética , Fatores de Transcrição/genética , Animais , Artrópodes/classificação , Artrópodes/genética , Expressão Gênica , Invertebrados/classificação , Filogenia
3.
Proc Biol Sci ; 282(1805)2015 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25788603

RESUMO

The ancestral states of bilaterian development, and which living groups have conserved them the most, has been a controversial topic in biology for well over a hundred years. In recent years, the idea that gastrulation primitively proceeded via the formation of a slit-like blastopore that then evolved into either protostomy or deuterostomy has gained renewed attention and some molecular developmental support. One of the key pieces of evidence for this 'amphistomy' theory comes from the onychophorans, which form a clear ventral groove during gastrulation. The interpretation of this structure has, however, proved problematic. Based on expression patterns of forkhead (fkh), caudal (cad), brachyury (bra) and wingless (wg/Wnt1), we show that this groove does not correspond to the blastopore, even though both the mouth and anus later develop from it. Rather, the posterior pit appears to be the blastopore; the posterior of the groove later fuses with it to form the definitive anus. Onychophoran development therefore represents a case of 'concealed' deuterostomy. The new data from the onychophorans thus remove one of the key pieces of evidence for the amphistomy theory. Rather, in line with other recent results, it suggests that ancestral bilaterian development was deuterostomic.


Assuntos
Gástrula/embriologia , Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento , Invertebrados/embriologia , Animais , Evolução Biológica
4.
Zh Obshch Biol ; 65(5): 371-88, 2004.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15559569

RESUMO

The paper is an attempt to attack the old problem of the origin of Bilateria by the methods of evolutionary tetrad (i.e. combination of comparative anatomy, comparative embryology, paleontology, and molecular biology). Three groups of theories of classical comparative anatomy (planulod-turbellarian, archicoelomate, and metameric) are discussed. Comparative embryology brings out clearly that the ventral side of embryo comes from the blastoporal region in all groups of Bilateria (except Chordata, where the blastoporal region corresponds to the dorsal side that is come out of the upside-down morphology of chordates) and mouth and anus comes from the anterior and posterior ends of elongated blastopore. From the point of view of paleontology, some of vendian metazoans demonstrate transitional conditions between the Radiata and Bilateria. Vendian bilaterians are metameric organisms with normal or asymmetric position of segments and could be pictured as "bilateral coelenterates" creeping on the oral surface. In Cnidaria, the expression of homologues of "Brachyury", "goosecoid", and "fork head" genes are revealed in the circular region around the mouth. In Bilateria, these genes are expressed along the elongated blastopore and around the mouth and anus. These results support the old conception on the amphistomic origin of mouth and anus as well as the homology between the oral disc of cnidarians and ventral side of Bilateria. The combination of four mentioned approaches enables us to propose the conception of the origin of Bilateria from vendian bilateral coelenterates with numerous metameric pouches of gastral cavity. Bilaterian ancestors crawled on the oral disc (= ventral side). These ancestors gave rise to both phanerosoic cnidarians and triploblastic bilaterians. Cnidarian ancestors attached to bottom by the aboral pole with the resulting degradation of aboral nerve ganglion. Bilateral symmetry of anthozoans is considered to be primitive feature for cnidarians. In case of triploblastic Bilateria, the elongated blastopore closed in the middle and subdivided into mouth and anus (amphistomy) and gastral pouches separated from the central part of gastral cavity and transformed to metameric coelomic chambers. The primary bilaterians are supposed to be complicated organisms having coelom and segmentation. The complexity of primary Bilateria provides an explanation for the abundance of highly organized organisms (arthropods, mollusks etc.) in Cambrian time. It is postulated that Ctenophora is the only group recent eumetazoans with primary axial symmetry.


Assuntos
Evolução Biológica , Invertebrados/anatomia & histologia , Animais , Antozoários , Cordados , Cnidários , Ctenóforos , Genes Homeobox , Invertebrados/embriologia , Invertebrados/genética , Morfogênese , Paleontologia
5.
Curr Biol ; 22(22): 2161-6, 2012 Nov 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23103190

RESUMO

The fate of the blastopore during development in the bilaterian ancestor is currently not well understood. In deuterostomes, the blastopore forms the anus, but its fate in protostome groups is variable. This variability, combined with an absence of information from key taxa, hampers the reconstruction of the ancestral developmental mode of the Protostomia and the Bilateria. The blastopore fate of the bilaterian ancestor plays a crucial role in understanding the transition from radial to bilateral symmetric organisms. Priapulids have a conservative morphology, an abundant Cambrian fossil record, and a phylogenetic position that make them a key group in understanding protostome evolution. Here, we characterize gastrulation and the embryonic expression of genes involved in bilaterian foregut and hindgut patterning in Priapulus caudatus. We show that the blastopore gives rise to the anus at the vegetal pole and that the hindgut markers brachyury and caudal are expressed in the blastopore and anus, whereas the foregut markers foxA and goosecoid are expressed in the mouth in the animal hemisphere. Thereby, gastrulation in the conservatively evolving protostome P. caudatus follows strictly a deuterostomic pattern. These results are more compatible with a deuterostomic rather than protostomic (blastopore forms the mouth) or amphistomic (mouth and anus are formed simultaneously) mode of development in the last common bilaterian ancestor.


Assuntos
Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento/fisiologia , Invertebrados/embriologia , Invertebrados/metabolismo , Animais , Evolução Biológica
6.
Evol Dev ; 7(5): 483-9, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16174040

RESUMO

Apical organs are a well-known structure in almost all ciliated eumetazoan larvae, although their function is poorly known. A review of the literature indicates that this small ganglion is the "brain" of the early larva, and it seems probable that it represents the brain of the ancestral, holopelagic ancestor of all eumetazoans, the gastraea. This early brain is lost before or at metamorphosis in all groups. Protostomes (excluding phoronids and brachiopods) appear to have brains of dual origin. Their larvae develop a pair of cephalic ganglia at the episphere lateral to the apical organ, and these two ganglia become an important part of the adult brain. The episphere and the cerebral ganglia show Otx expression, whereas Hox gene expression has not been seen in this part of the brain. A ventral nervous system develops around the blastopore, which becomes divided into mouth and anus by fusion of the lateral blastopore lips. The circumblastoporal nerve ring becomes differentiated into a nerve ring around the mouth, becoming part of the adult brain, a pair of ventral nerve cords, in some cases differentiated into a chain of ganglia, and a ring around the anus. This part of the nervous system appears to be homologous with the oral nerve ring of cnidarians. This interpretation is supported by the expression of Hox genes around the cnidarian mouth and in the ventral nervous system of the protostomes. The development of phoronids, brachiopods, echinoderms, and enteropneusts does not lead to the formation of an episphere or to differentiation of cerebral ganglia. In general, a well-defined brain is lacking, and Hox genes are generally not expressed in the larval organs, although this has not been well studied.


Assuntos
Gânglios dos Invertebrados/embriologia , Regulação da Expressão Gênica no Desenvolvimento/fisiologia , Invertebrados/embriologia , Animais , Invertebrados/genética , Larva/genética , Larva/metabolismo
7.
Differentiation ; 71(4-5): 237-50, 2003 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12823225

RESUMO

Most metazoans require skeletal support systems. While the formation of bones and teeth in vertebrates has been well studied, endo- and exoskeleton development of non-vertebrates, especially calcification during terminal differentiation, has been neglected. Biomineralization of skeletons in invertebrates presents interesting research opportunities. We undertake here to survey some of the better understood examples of skeletal development in selected invertebrates. The differentiation of the skeletal spicules of euechinoid larvae and other non-vertebrate deuterostomes, the shells of molluscs, and the calcification of crustacean carapaces are surveyed. The diversity of these different kinds of animals and our present limited understanding make it difficult to identify unifying themes, but there certainly are unifying questions: How is the mineral precursor secreted? What is the nature of the interaction of mineral with the matrix proteins of the skeleton? Is there any conservation of protein domains in matrix proteins found in skeletal elements from different phyla? Are there common strategies in the development of organs that form mineralized structures?


Assuntos
Diferenciação Celular/fisiologia , Invertebrados/embriologia , Esqueleto , Animais , Proteínas da Matriz Extracelular/fisiologia , Invertebrados/crescimento & desenvolvimento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA