Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 942
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 35(1): 21-30, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37800659

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare patient satisfaction during surgery, postoperative pain and inflammation and quality of life between high-speed drilling with irrigation and low-speed drilling without irrigation for implant bed preparation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-six posterior single edentulous patients were included in a randomized controlled clinical trial. Implant beds were created using high-speed drilling with irrigation (control group) or low-speed drilling without irrigation (test group). Patient satisfaction during surgery (in relation to drilling-time perception, vibration, pressure, noise, comfort, and drowning sensation) and postoperative pain and inflammation were evaluated using a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS)-based questionnaire. Quality of life was analyzed with a Likert scale (in relation to mouth opening, chewing, speaking, sleeping, daily routine, and job). The follow-up period was 7 days. RESULTS: Patient satisfaction in relation to drilling-time perception, vibration, pressure, and noise did not show statistically significant differences (p > .05). The highest scores of drowning sensation (p < .05) were correlated (moderate correlation (r = .57)) with lowest scores of comfort (p < .005). Both postoperative pain and inflammation means were significantly higher in the control group than in the test group. No significant differences in quality of life were observed during the postoperative period (p > .05). CONCLUSION: Low-speed drilling without irrigation for single implant site preparation was more comfortable for patients than high-speed drilling with irrigation, due to the correlation between important drowning sensation and low perceived comfort. Postoperative pain and inflammation were lower for low-speed drilling without irrigation. Further studies are needed to validate or refute these results.


Assuntos
Afogamento , Humanos , Qualidade de Vida , Dor Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Inflamação , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
2.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(7): 756-760, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38621667

RESUMO

Temporomandibular joint internal disorders commonly present with limited mouth opening and pain. Treatment options range from invasive surgical procedures to minimally invasive interventions. This technical note aims to introduce a modification to the arthrocentesis technique in which a pressure infusion cuff (VBM Classic Infusor, Medizintechnik GmbH, Germany) is used for irrigation instead of syringes or peristaltic pumps. A pressure infusion cuff (bag) is an inflatable bag with a hand pump and a sphygmomanometer that allows monitorization of the pressure, and it is intended to apply pressure on intravenous fluid bags to assist with rapid infusion of fluids. This allows the operator to maintain an efficient and stable flow pressure throughout the procedure while avoiding occupational hand and wrist problems resulting from manual irrigation with syringes. Furthermore, pressure monitoring, as read on the sphygmomanometer of the cuff, facilitates the manipulation of the needles and adjustment of the pressure should the patient experience discomfort. This increases the patient's compliance, physician's comfort, and allows the collection of quantitative data in clinical studies.


Assuntos
Artrocentese , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular , Humanos , Artrocentese/métodos , Artrocentese/instrumentação , Transtornos da Articulação Temporomandibular/cirurgia , Pressão , Desenho de Equipamento , Irrigação Terapêutica/instrumentação , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
3.
Int Endod J ; 57(7): 841-860, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38340037

RESUMO

In the last two decades, the activation of root canal irrigants with pulsed lasers as an adjunct in root canal treatment has become increasingly popular. This narrative review explains the physical basics and the working mechanism of laser-activated irrigation (LAI), explores the parameters influencing LAI efficacy, considers historical evolutions in the field and summarizes laboratory and clinical evidence with emphasis on the antimicrobial action of LAI. Cavitation is the driving force behind LAI, with growing and imploding vapour bubbles around the laser tip causing various secondary phenomena in the irrigant, leading to intense liquid dynamics throughout the underlying root canal. High-speed imaging research has shown that laser wavelength, pulse energy, pulse length and fibre tip geometry are parameters that influence this cavitation process. Nevertheless, this has not resulted in standardized settings for LAI. Consequently, there is significant variability in studies assessing LAI efficacy, complicating the synthesis of results. Laboratory studies in extracted teeth suggest that, with regard to canal disinfection, LAI is superior to conventional irrigation and there is a trend of higher antimicrobial efficacy of LAI compared to ultrasonic activation. Clinical evidence is limited to trials demonstrating similar postoperative pain levels after LAI versus no activation or ultrasonic activation. Clinical evidence concerning the effect of LAI on healing of apical periodontitis as yet is scarce.


Assuntos
Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Irrigação Terapêutica , Humanos , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/farmacologia , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Lasers , Anti-Infecciosos/farmacologia , Anti-Infecciosos/uso terapêutico , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos
4.
Int Endod J ; 57(1): 87-99, 2024 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37947444

RESUMO

AIM: To investigate the influence of pulse energy, tip geometry and tip position in simulated 3D-printed root canals with multiple side canals at different levels in all directions on the cleaning performance of laser-activated irrigation (LAI) compared to sonic activation (EDDY) and conventional needle irrigation (NI). METHODOLOGY: 3D-printed root canal models (25/.06, length 20 mm, curvature 60°, radius 5 mm) with side canals (diameter 0.2 mm) at 2, 5 and 8 mm from the apex were filled with coloured biofilm-mimicking hydrogel. LAI (Morita AdvErL Evo, Kyoto, Japan) was performed with six settings (n = 20; pulse-energy, pulses per second [PPS], tip position): LAI1 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, canal entrance [CE]), LAI2 (same as LAI1, but insertion depth 9 mm before the apical endpoint [AE] [corresponding to 1 mm above the first lateral canals]), LAI3 (80 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL, 9 mm before AE), LAI4 (same as LAI 3, but at CE) for 3 × 20 s each, LAI5 (50 mJ, 25 PPS, P400FL 2 × 20 s, CE & R200T (30 mJ, 25 PPS, 1 × 20 s, 9 mm before AE), LAI6 (30 mJ, 25 PPS, R200T, 9 mm before AE, 3 × 20 s). A continuous irrigation (3 mL/20 s) using distilled water accompanied the irrigation cycles. NI and EDDY (3 × 20 s each; 3 mL/20 s irrigation, insertion AE minus 1 mm, amplitude 4 mm) served as control groups. Biofilm-mimicking hydrogel removal (ImageJ, NIH) was assessed for the entire system, the central canal and the lateral canals using standardized photographs with a microscope (Expert DN, Müller-Optronic) and statistically analysed was performed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn tests (p = .05). Irrigant extrusion beyond the foramina was also recorded. RESULTS: LAI2 (99.08%; interquartile range [IQR]: 96.85-100.00) and LAI3 (97.50%; 96.24-100.00) achieved the significantly best and LAI6 (80.08%; 73.41-84.69) the significantly worst removal of hydrogel from the entire root canal system amongst all LAI configurations (p < .05). There were no significant differences between LAI6, EDDY (72.89%; 67.49-76.22) and manual irrigation (54.39%; 51.01-56.94) (p > .05). R200T laser tip caused significantly more often irrigant extrusion than all other techniques (p < .05). CONCLUSION: Tip design, energy settings, and the positioning of the laser tip below the canal entrance caused an improvement in cleaning performance of the LAI. However, the small R200T tip created significantly more procedural errors (irrigant extrusion) due to higher concentrated energy.


Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar , Lasers de Estado Sólido , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Hidrogéis , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
5.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 27, 2024 Jan 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214804

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare the syringe-needle irrigation (SNI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), EDDY, and shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) techniques regarding calcium hydroxide and double antibiotic paste removal from the root canal in regenerative endodontic treatments. Eighty single-rooted human teeth were decoronated and enlarged up to #100 to stimulate the immature tooth model. Root canals were irrigated with 1.5% sodium hypochlorite followed by saline solution according to the regenerative endodontic treatment protocol. Dressed teeth were divided into 2 main groups regarding the used intracanal medicaments. Calcium hydroxide and double antibiotic paste were introduced to the canals, and teeth were stored for 3 weeks. Each medicament group was divided into 4 subgroups according to the activation techniques. Medicaments were removed using a 17% EDTA solution. Teeth were split longitudinally into two parts. The remaining medicaments were evaluated under a stereo microscope with a scoring system. Data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. Regardless of the used irrigation activation systems, there was no statistically significant difference between the removal of the CH and DAP from the root canal (P>0.05). While SWEEPS had the highest ability regarding the removal of intracanal medicaments, syringe-needle irrigation had the lowest (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between PUI and EDDY (P>0.05). Complete removal of intracanal medicaments could not be achieved with any techniques. SWEEPS technology was more effective in removing intracanal medicaments in regenerative endodontic treatments compared to the sonic and ultrasonic irrigation activation systems.


Assuntos
Endodontia Regenerativa , Ultrassom , Humanos , Cavidade Pulpar , Hidróxido de Cálcio , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Antibacterianos , Lasers , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
6.
Lasers Med Sci ; 39(1): 112, 2024 Apr 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38656634

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To measure the dynamic characteristics of the flow field in a complex root canal model activated by two laser-activated irrigation (LAI) modalities at different activation energy outputs: photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) and microshort pulse (MSP). METHODS: A phase-locked micro-scale Particle Image Velocimetry (µPIV) system was employed to characterise the temporal variations of LAI-induced velocity fields in the root canal following a single laser pulse. The wall shear stress (WSS) in the lateral root canal was subsequently estimated from the phase-averaged velocity fields. RESULTS: Both PIPS and MSP were able to generate the 'breath mode' of the irrigant current under all tested conditions. The transient irrigation flush in the root canal peaked at speeds close to 6 m/s. However, this intense flushing effect persisted for only about 2000 µs (or 3% of a single laser-pulse activation cycle). For MSP, the maximum WSS magnitude was approximately 3.08 Pa at an activation energy of E = 20 mJ/pulse, rising to 9.01 Pa at E = 50 mJ/pulse. In comparison, PIPS elevated the WSS to 10.63 Pa at E = 20 mJ/pulse. CONCLUSION: Elevating the activation energy can boost the peak flushing velocity and the maximum WSS, thereby enhancing irrigation efficiency. Given the same activation energy, PIPS outperforms MSP. Additionally, increasing the activation frequency may be an effective strategy to improve irrigation performance further.


Assuntos
Reologia , Humanos , Cavidade Pulpar/efeitos da radiação , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Irrigação Terapêutica/instrumentação , Lasers , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Técnicas Fotoacústicas/métodos , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação
7.
Clin Oral Investig ; 28(7): 376, 2024 Jun 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38878107

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of manual dynamic activation (MDA), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and laser-activated irrigation (shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS)) on the periapical healing of large periapical lesions following nonsurgical root canal treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of fifty-six systemically healthy patients with a mandibular single-rooted tooth with periapical lesions of endodontic origin and a periapical index score of 3 or higher were included in the study. Before the treatment procedures, lesion volumes were determined volumetrically using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Patients were randomized into treatment (MDA, PUI, SWEEPS) and control groups (n = 14). Root canal treatment and irrigation procedures were performed by a calibrated postgraduate operator and completed at one visit. For routine follow-up, clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed by a blinded evaluator using periapical (PA) radiographs according to Molven's criteria at 3, 6, and 9 months. At 12 months, lesion volumes were quantified volumetrically using CBCT (ITK-SNAP). The data were statistically analyzed with the Wilcoxon test. The significance level was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: In all groups, the mean lesion volume after treatment was significantly smaller than the mean volume before treatment (p = 0.001). Among the 56 teeth, 11 teeth were 'totally healed', and 39 teeth were 'reduced' on PA radiographs. No 'enlargement' was detected in any group. On CBCT, the lesion volume decreased in the following order: LAI-SWEEPS (86.9%) > PUI (85.4%) > MDA (80.4%) > control (74.5%), with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limitations of the present study, although a greater percentage of healing was observed in the LAI-SWEEPS and PUI groups, irrigation procedures had no statistically significant effect on the healing of periapical lesions with a single root canal at the 12-month follow-up. On the other hand, the outcome may change in multirooted teeth with curved and complex root canal systems. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In the short term and in single-canal teeth, advanced irrigation agitation methods such as laser and ultrasonic did not make a difference in healing other than manual irrigation agitation.


Assuntos
Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Irrigação Terapêutica , Cicatrização , Humanos , Feminino , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Masculino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/métodos , Doenças Periapicais/terapia , Doenças Periapicais/diagnóstico por imagem , Mandíbula/diagnóstico por imagem
8.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(4): 1219-1224, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722732

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of sterile saline solution irrigation (lavage) performed after mandibular third molar extraction on postoperative complications, utilizing a split-mouth randomized clinical trial design. METHODS: Seventeen healthy participants requiring bilateral mandibular third molar extraction were enrolled in this single-center study. In each participant, one impacted third molar was designated as the experimental group and subjected to saline lavage at 4 °C. In contrast, the control group was the other impacted third molar, undergoing saline lavage at 25 °C. Various parameters, including postoperative pain, mouth opening, and facial swelling, were assessed using standardized measures and three-dimensional facial scanning at multiple time points. RESULTS: The average age of participants was 26.66 ± 4.1 years, with no postoperative complications observed in either group. The duration of surgery did not significantly differ between groups. Postoperative pain was significantly reduced in the experimental group during the immediate postoperative period compared with the control group, but this difference diminished over time. No significant differences were observed in mouth opening or facial swelling between groups at any time. CONCLUSION: In site 4 °C, sterile saline solution irrigation after mandibular third molar extraction may effectively reduce early postoperative complications, particularly pain, without prolonging surgical duration.


Assuntos
Dente Serotino , Dor Pós-Operatória , Solução Salina , Irrigação Terapêutica , Extração Dentária , Dente Impactado , Humanos , Dente Serotino/cirurgia , Solução Salina/administração & dosagem , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Adulto , Masculino , Dor Pós-Operatória/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Dente Impactado/cirurgia , Mandíbula/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Edema/prevenção & controle , Edema/etiologia , Medição da Dor
9.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 293, 2024 Mar 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38431616

RESUMO

Photon-initiated photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) with an Er: YAG laser has been introduced in root canal treatment to improve irrigation and facilitate the removal of bacteria in the root canal system. This study aimed to compare the antibacterial effectiveness of two different root canal irrigation techniques, conventional needle irrigation (CNI) and PIPS, using 1% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), in the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis. Sixty patients with a total of sixty teeth affected by apical periodontitis were included in this study. The teeth underwent root canal therapy, and after mechanical instrumentation, they were randomly assigned to two groups (n = 30) based on the final irrigation protocol: CNI or PIPS with 1% NaOCl. Bacterial suspensions in the root canals were evaluated using Adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP) assay kit after mechanical instrumentation and after final irrigation. Then, a follow-up was conducted after 7 days. The results revealed that final irrigation significantly reduced ATP values in both the CNI and PIPS groups (P < 0.001). The ATP values after final irrigation was greater in the CNI group compared to the PIPS group (P < 0.001). After a 7-day follow-up, percussion tenderness and fistula were significantly resolved in both groups (P < 0.05). A multivariate linear regression model was used to identify the factors that influence post irrigation ATP values. The analysis demonstrated that pre-operative percussion tenderness (P = 0.006), the presence of a fistula (P < 0.001) and the method used in the final irrigation (P < 0.001) had a significant impact on the ATP value after final irrigation. These results indicate that employing PIPS with 1% NaOCl as the final irrigation protocol exhibited superior antibacterial effectiveness and has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes in the treatment of teeth afflicted with apical periodontitis.


Assuntos
Fístula , Periodontite Periapical , Humanos , Cavidade Pulpar , Preparo de Canal Radicular , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Hipoclorito de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia , Periodontite Periapical/terapia , Trifosfato de Adenosina , Fístula/tratamento farmacológico , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/farmacologia , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
10.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 261, 2024 Feb 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38389109

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Multispecies biofilms located in the anatomical intricacies of the root canal system remain the greatest challenge in root canal disinfection. The efficacy of Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation techniques for treating multispecies biofilms in these hard-to-reach areas has not been proved. The objective of this laboratory study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation techniques, namely, photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS) and shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS), in treating multispecies biofilms within apical artificial grooves and dentinal tubules, in comparison with conventional needle irrigation (CNI), passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), and sonic-powered irrigation (EDDY). Two types of multispecies root canal biofilm models were established in combination with two assessment methods using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) with the aim to obtain more meaningful results. METHODS: Ninety extracted human single-rooted premolars were chosen for two multispecies biofilm models. Each tooth was longitudinally split into two halves. In the first model, a deep narrow groove was created in the apical segment of the canal wall. After cultivating a mixed bacterial biofilm for 4 weeks, the split halves were reassembled and subjected to five irrigation techniques: CNI, PUI, EDD, PIPS, and SWEEPS. The residual biofilms inside and outside the groove in Model 1 were analyzed using SEM. For Model 2, the specimens were split longitudinally once more to evaluate the percentage of killed bacteria in the dentinal tubules across different canal sections (apical, middle, and coronal thirds) using CLSM. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc multiple comparisons were used to assess the antibiofilm efficacy of the 5 irrigation techniques. RESULTS: Robust biofilm growth was observed in all negative controls after 4 weeks. In Model 1, within each group, significantly fewer bacteria remained outside the groove than inside the groove (P < 0.05). SWEEPS, PIPS and EDDY had significantly greater biofilm removal efficacy than CNI and PUI, both from the outside and inside the groove (P < 0.05). Although SWEEPS was more effective than both PIPS and EDDY at removing biofilms inside the groove (P < 0.05), there were no significant differences among these methods outside the groove (P > 0.05). In Model 2, SWEEPS and EDDY exhibited superior bacterial killing efficacy within the dentinal tubules, followed by PIPS, PUI, and CNI (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation techniques, along with EDDY, demonstrated significant antibiofilm efficacy in apical artificial grooves and dentinal tubules, areas that are typically challenging to access.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Ultrassom , Humanos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Microscopia Confocal , Biofilmes , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/farmacologia , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Cavidade Pulpar , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia
11.
J Contemp Dent Pract ; 25(4): 331-334, 2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38956847

RESUMO

AIM: The aim of the current study was to evaluate the penetration depth and smear layer removal of root canal irrigant using various irrigation activation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this investigation, sixty single-rooted premolars extracted for orthodontic purposes were chosen. Diamond burs were used to create an access cavity, and #10 K-file was used to determine the patency. About sixty samples were divided into the following three groups (20 samples in each group), group I: Irrigation with conventional needle, group II: Activation of EndoVac system, group III: Passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI). The efficacy of the smear layer was assessed using a scanning electron microscopy at a ×2000 magnification. One-way ANOVA was used to record and analyze the data. All statistical analyses were performed with a significance level of p < 0.05. RESULTS: At coronal third, the maximum smear layer was removed in group II (1.26 ± 0.02) followed by group III (1.84 ± 0.16) and group I (2.89 ± 0.21). At middle third, smear layer removal was maximum in group I (1.18 ± 0.10) followed by group III (1.72 ± 0.09) and group I (2.66 ± 0.18). At apical third, the more smear layer was removed in group II (1.02 ± 0.01) followed by group III (1.58 ± 0.08) and group I (2.38 ± 0.06). There was a highly significant difference found between the three different irrigation systems at all three levels (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, every irrigation device that was evaluated was successful in removing the smear layer from the root canal. However, the EndoVac system group removed a greater amount of smear layer compared with PUI and conventional needle group. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: With the goal of promoting cleaning that is beyond the ability of mechanical devices, irrigation is a crucial part of root canal therapy. If an efficient irrigation delivery system is used, the irrigants can reach the working length (WL). This type of distribution system needs to provide a suitable amount of irrigants up to the WL, as well as have enough flow and be effective at debriding the entire canal system. How to cite this article: Pujari MD, Das M, Das A, et al. Assessment of Smear Layer Removal and Penetration Depth of Root Canal Irrigant Using Different Irrigation Activation Systems: A Comparative Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):331-334.


Assuntos
Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Preparo de Canal Radicular , Camada de Esfregaço , Irrigação Terapêutica , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Irrigação Terapêutica/instrumentação , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Preparo de Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Dente Pré-Molar , Cavidade Pulpar , Técnicas In Vitro
12.
Int Endod J ; 56(6): 765-774, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36825362

RESUMO

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel ultrasonic irrigation device, remotely-generated irrigation with a non-invasive sound field enhancement (RINSE) system, in removing biofilm-mimicking hydrogel from a simulated isthmus model and compare it with sonically- and ultrasonically-activated irrigation systems. METHODOLOGY: A polycarbonate root canal model containing two standardized root canals (apical diameter of 0.20 mm, 4% taper, 18 mm long with a coronal reservoir) connected by three isthmuses (0.40 mm deep, 2 mm high, 4 mm long) was used as the test model. The isthmuses were filled with a hydroxyapatite powder-containing hydrogel. The canals were filled with irrigant, and the models were randomly assigned to the following activation groups (n = 15): EndoActivator (EA), ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI), and RINSE system (RS). Syringe irrigation (SI) with a 30G needle served as the control. Standardized images of the isthmuses were taken before and after irrigation, and the amount of hydrogel removed was determined using image analysis software and compared across groups using anova (p < .05). RESULTS: Hydrogel removal was significantly higher with the RS (83.7%) than with UAI, EA, or SI (p ≤ .01). UAI (69.2%) removed significantly more hydrogel than SI and EA (p < .05), while there was no significant difference between SI (24.3%) and EA (25.7%) (p = .978). CONCLUSIONS: RINSE system resulted in the most hydrogel removal, performing better than UAI or EA. The effect of RS was also not reliant on the insert or tip entering the pulp chamber or root canal, making it particularly useful in conservative endodontics.


Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar , Tratamento do Canal Radicular , Ondas Ultrassônicas , Biofilmes/efeitos da radiação , Cavidade Pulpar/microbiologia , Cavidade Pulpar/efeitos da radiação , Hidrogéis , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Preparo de Canal Radicular , Hipoclorito de Sódio , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Modelos Anatômicos , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/instrumentação , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/métodos
13.
Lasers Med Sci ; 38(1): 30, 2023 Jan 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36595139

RESUMO

The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of different irrigation activation methods on smear layer removal and tubular penetration. One hundred-five distal roots of mandibular molar teeth in total; 50 for smear removal efficiency (n = 10) analysis using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and 55 roots were used to examine tubular penetration using confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM). Five different irrigation activation methods were used in this study; conventional needle irrigation (CNI), sonic irrigation device of EDDY, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), PIPS and SWEEPS techniques, which are two different laser irrigation activation methods. The obtained data were statistically analyzed and the significance level was determined as p < 0.05. At the apical level, the cleanest canal walls were observed when laser methods PIPS and SWEEPS were used, while in the middle third, there was no difference in smear removal efficiencies between all groups except for the CNI (p > 0.05). Penetration depths and percentages increased from apically to coronally in all groups. The PUI and EDDY generally showed similar penetration depths and percentages to the CNI, except at the coronal root level (p > 0.05). In all groups, when PIPS was used, it showed greater penetration depth and percentage (p < 0.05). PIPS and SWEEPS techniques showed lowest and similar smear scores compared to PUI and EDDY in the apical area where access and effectiveness of the irrigation solution are difficult.


Assuntos
Preparo de Canal Radicular , Camada de Esfregaço , Humanos , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Ultrassom , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Lasers , Cavidade Pulpar
14.
Lasers Med Sci ; 38(1): 148, 2023 Jun 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37358660

RESUMO

In this study, it was aimed to evaluate the smear and debris removal efficiency of laser and ultrasonic irrigation activation methods in traditional and conservative endodontic access cavity preparations. 60 freshly extracted human mandibular molar teeth were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the access cavity preparation (n = 30): Traditional endodontic access cavities (TEC) and Conservative endodontic access cavity (CEC). After the access cavity preparation, the mesiobuccal root canals were prepared to 35/0.4 with the VDW Rotate file system. Teeth with completed root canal preparation were randomly divided into 3 subgroups according to the final irrigation activation protocol (n = 30): Conventional needle irrigation, passive ultrasonic activation and laser activation. The crowns of the teeth were removed and the mesiobuccal roots were divided longitudinally into two halves, mesial and distal. Samples were scanned with scanning electron microscopy. Photomicrographs in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of each specimen were taken at a magnification of 200 for debris and 1000 for evaluation of the smear layer. Data were analysed using the three-way Robust Anova test and Bonferroni test.The effect of access cavity design on remaining smear (p = 0.057) and debris (p = 0.5) was not statistically significant. The effect of the interaction of access cavity and irrigation activation on the remaining smear and debris was not statistically significant (p = 0.556, p = 0.333). Significantly fewer smears were detected in the laser activation group than in the ultrasonic activation and control groups. Conservative access cavities did not differ from conventional access cavities in terms of debris and smear.


Assuntos
Camada de Esfregaço , Ultrassom , Humanos , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Hipoclorito de Sódio , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Microscopia Eletrônica de Varredura , Lasers , Cavidade Pulpar
15.
Lasers Med Sci ; 38(1): 123, 2023 May 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37171630

RESUMO

The transient apical pressure side effect is an important safety consideration for Er:YAG laser-activated irrigation (LAI). Therefore, this study aimed to measure the transient apical peak pressure (TAPP) of LAI under different laser settings in various tooth models using a high-frequency sensor system. Tooth models with different pulp chamber structures, apical diameters, and curvatures were prepared using transparent resin and filled with deionised water. The Er:YAG laser fibre was placed 3 mm from the root canal orifice. Irrigation was performed at 10-40 mJ and 20-50 Hz using the super short pulse mode. The TAPP was measured using a 50,000-sample/second pressure sensor connected to the models' apices. The TAPP of LAI was significantly higher than that of other chemical preparation methods. Among all investigated factors, pulp chamber anatomy and apical diameters had the greatest effects and were highly related to the apical peak pressure. Root canal curvature showed no direct correlation with TAPP. The larger the final prepared working width, the greater the TAPP. Furthermore, both pulse energy and frequency had positive correlations with TAPP. In conclusion, tooth anatomy factors and laser parameter settings influenced TAPP during Er:YAG LAI. Therefore, proper settings of laser parameters are important to improve the safety of Er:YAG LAI.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Dente , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Tratamento do Canal Radicular/métodos , Cavidade Pulpar , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
16.
Lasers Med Sci ; 38(1): 89, 2023 Mar 21.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36943498

RESUMO

This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of standard needle irrigation (SNI), EDDY, passive ultrasonic irrigation (PUI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (PIPS), and shock wave enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) activation on the teeth with simulated internal root resorption (IRR) and contaminated with Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) analyses. A total of 79 human maxillary central incisors with a single canal were selected. The canals were accessed, and then, the roots were split in the bucco-lingual direction. Artificial IRR cavities (depth of 0.8 mm and a diameter of 1.6 mm) were prepared using round burs and 20% nitric acid in the middle region of the root halves. The root halves were reconstructed with cyanoacrylate glue, and the canals were contaminated with a culture of E. faecalis for 30 days. Root canal preparation was performed using the ProTaper Next rotary files up to X5 and 2.5% NaOCl irrigation. Teeth were randomly assigned to five groups according to the irrigation activation method (n = 15): SNI, EDDY, PUI, PIPS, and SWEEPS. The final irrigation procedures were performed using a total of 6 mL of 2.5% NaOCl for each tooth with an activation time of 3 × 30 s. The canals were stained with LIVE/DEAD BacLight dye and analyzed with CLSM to determine the percentages of dead bacteria in the biofilm. Two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analysis (P < .05). None of the irrigation activation methods tested provided 100% bacterial elimination. There was no significant difference between the irrigation activation methods tested in terms of the percentage of dead bacteria (P > 0.05). In irrigation activation methods other than PIPS, there was no significant difference in the percentage of dead bacteria between the coronal, middle, and apical regions of the roots (P > 0.05). A higher percentage of dead bacteria was found in the middle region compared to the apical region in the PIPS (P < 0.05). Within the limitations of this study, SII, EDDY, PUI, PIPS, and SWEEPS have a similar antimicrobial effect on the teeth with IRR and contaminated with E. faecalis.


Assuntos
Lasers de Estado Sólido , Reabsorção da Raiz , Humanos , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Cavidade Pulpar , Enterococcus faecalis , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/farmacologia , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
17.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(11): 6607-6612, 2023 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37770667

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the splatter contamination generated by rotary instrumentation and irrigation during simulations of surgical extractions. Specifically, comparisons of the splatters generated were made between traditional assistant-based irrigation and self-irrigating drills and between saline and hydrogen peroxide irrigant. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A fluorescein solution was infiltrated into the irrigation system of high-speed drills, and the surgical extraction procedures were performed on manikins with the typodont teeth. Filter papers were placed at the predetermined locations around the operatory to absorb the fluorescein splatters; these samples underwent photographic image analysis. RESULTS: The patient chest showed the largest area of splatters, followed by the assistant's face shield. Procedures using the hydrogen peroxide irrigant generated a larger area of splatter than those using the saline irrigant. There was no difference between the splatters produced by assistant irrigation and self-irrigating drill procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians should observe and disinfect the locations contaminated by splatters to prevent the spread of infection, since using alternative irrigant or irrigation methods did not reduce the formation of splatters. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Oral surgery drills with irrigation generate aerosols and splatters, which have potential to spread airborne pathogens. It is important to understand the patterns of splatters to mitigate contamination.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Bucais , Cirurgia Bucal , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrogênio , Controle de Infecções , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Fluoresceínas
18.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(12): 7523-7529, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37910237

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare the efficacy of XP-endo Finisher and Passive Ultrasonic Irrigation (PUI) in removing hard tissue debris from curved canals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-four mandibular molars with Vertucci's type II mesial canals were scanned in microcomputed tomography before and after preparation with HyFlex EDM, and accumulated hard tissue debris was quantified. Subsequently, the teeth were randomly divided into two groups according to the supplementary procedure: PUI with the Ultra-X insert or XP-endo Finisher. After the intervention, the specimens underwent another scanning. Two separate analyses were conducted, one for the total canal and another for the isthmus area. Unpaired and paired T-tests were used for inter- and intergroup comparisons, with a significance level set at 5%. RESULTS: Both supplementary methods reduced the amount of debris compared to the initial volume. Remarkably, the XP-endo Finisher achieved a significantly higher percentage of debris removal (71% for the total canal and 74% for the isthmus areas) compared to PUI (41% for the total canal and 52% for the isthmus area) (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both supplementary approaches reduced the amount of hard tissue debris from canal preparation, still XP-endo Finisher showed a higher reduction compared to PUI (p < 0.05). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: None of the supplementary methods rendered canals completely free of hard tissue debris. However, the supplementary approach with XP-endo Finisher resulted in lower levels of hard tissue debris than PUI in curved canals with isthmuses.


Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar , Ultrassom , Microtomografia por Raio-X , Cavidade Pulpar/diagnóstico por imagem , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Dente Molar , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/uso terapêutico
19.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(6): 2787-2796, 2023 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36642725

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: This study assessed the influence of preparation size on the efficacy of shock wave-enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (SWEEPS) and conventional irrigation (CI) on removal of accumulated hard tissue debris (AHTD) from isthmus-containing mandibular molars using micro-computed tomographic analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty extracted mandibular molars with two mesial canals connected by an isthmus were selected. Canals were shaped with Mtwo instruments (VDW, Munich, Germany) up to sizes 25/.06, 40/.04 or 40/.06 (n = 20), and specimens were distributed into 2 final irrigation groups (n = 10): SWEEPS and CI. Roots were scanned at a resolution of 10.5 µm before and after preparation and final irrigation. Data sets were co-registered, and the percentage reduction of AHTD calculated for each specimen was statistically compared using analysis of variance with a of 5% significance level. RESULTS: The preparation size did not significantly influence the percentage reduction of AHTD (p < 0.05), whereas the final irrigation technique had a significant effect on debris removal (p < 0.05). A significant reduction of AHTD was achieved after final irrigation in all groups (p < 0.05); however, SWEEPS was associated with a significantly greater percentage reduction of debris than CI (p < 0.05). None of the specimens presented a completely clean isthmus. CONCLUSIONS: Removal of AHTD was not significantly affected by the preparation size. SWEEPS was associated with significantly less debris than CI. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: SWEEPS performed significantly better than CI regarding the removal of AHTD from isthmus-containing mandibular molars irrespective of the preparation size.


Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular , Cavidade Pulpar/diagnóstico por imagem , Microtomografia por Raio-X/métodos , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos , Dente Molar/cirurgia , Tecnologia
20.
Odontology ; 111(1): 132-141, 2023 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35834067

RESUMO

This study, in which a hundred human teeth with single straight canal were used, focused on the evaluation of contrast solution penetration ability into the simulated lateral canals activated by XP-endo Finisher (XPF), EDDY, Nd:YAG, and Er:YAG laser systems with three different observation methods. The root canals were prepared up to X4 at working length using the ProTaper Next system. The teeth were decalcified and simulated lateral canals were created with #8 K-file at 2, 4, and 6 mm levels. Then the teeth were cleared using methyl salicylate and divided into 5 equal groups according to irrigation activation techniques (CSI, XPF, EDDY, Nd:YAG, and Er:YAG laser). After the contrast solution was activated, images of the simulated lateral canals were obtained by a dental microscope, digital radiography, and CBCT. The contrast solution penetration scores at the 2, 4, and 6 mm levels according to irrigation activation techniques and observation methods were analyzed statistically using Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric analysis of variance Bonferroni test post hoc comparisons. With the other 2 parameters are ignored, the highest and lowest contrast solution penetration were observed at 6 and 2 mm simulated lateral canal levels (p < 0.05), in Er:YAG irrigation activation and CSI technique (p < 0.05), and in direct visual and digital radiographic observation method (p < 0.05), respectively. Within the limits of this study, it was determined that the contrast solution penetration into the simulated lateral canals decreased from the coronal to the apical and achieved with the most effective Er:YAG laser activation technique. In addition, direct visual observation was found to be the best method for the assessment of contrast solution penetration.


Assuntos
Cavidade Pulpar , Hipoclorito de Sódio , Humanos , Hipoclorito de Sódio/farmacologia , Preparo de Canal Radicular/métodos , Irrigantes do Canal Radicular/farmacologia , Irrigação Terapêutica/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA