Comparative detection of Plasmodium vivax and Plasmodium falciparum DNA in saliva and urine samples from symptomatic malaria patients in a low endemic area.

BACKGROUND: Definite diagnosis of malaria relies on microscopy detection of blood stages of parasites in peripheral blood and requires blood sample collection. The nested PCR method has shown to be more sensitive and superior to microscopy in detecting co-infections of Plasmodium species in circulation while Plasmodium falciparum DNA can be identified in urine and saliva specimens of patients, albeit at a lower sensitivity. METHODS: Matched blood, saliva and urine samples were collected from 100 microscopy-positive and 20 microscopy-negative febrile patients who attended a malaria clinic in Tak Province, northwestern Thailand for nested PCR analysis targeting the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene of human malaria. Both P. falciparum and Plasmodium vivax have been known to circulate at a comparable rate in the study area. RESULTS: Comparing with microscopy results, nested PCR of saliva samples had a sensitivity of 74.1% for P. falciparum detection and 84% for P. vivax detection while 44.4% and 34.0% of the corresponding values were observed for urine samples. Both nested PCR results of saliva and urine samples had a specificity of 100% for identification of P. falciparum and P. vivax when compared with nested PCR results from blood. Co-infections of both species were found in four, 26 and 8 patients by microscopy and nested PCR of blood and saliva samples, respectively. Although the positive rates of nested PCR of saliva samples for P. falciparum increased with parasite density, no tendency occurred in results from nested PCR of saliva samples for P. vivax as well as those of urine samples. CONCLUSIONS: Saliva and urine samples could be alternative noninvasive sources of DNA for molecular detection of both P. falciparum and P. vivax. Further improvement of the detection method will offer an opportunity to use these samples for diagnosis of malaria.

Improved performance with saliva and urine as alternative DNA sources for malaria diagnosis by mitochondrial DNA-based PCR assays.

Saliva and urine from malaria-infected individuals contain trace amounts of Plasmodium DNA, and therefore, could be used as alternative specimens for diagnosis. A nested PCR targeting the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (Cytb-PCR) of four human malaria species and Plasmodium knowlesi was developed and tested with 693 blood samples from febrile patients living in diverse malaria-endemic areas of Thailand, and compared with microscopy and nested PCR targeting small-subunit rRNA (18S-PCR). Cytb-PCR was 16% and 39.8% more sensitive than 18S-PCR and microscopy, respectively, in detecting all of these malarial species in blood samples. Importantly, 34% and 17% of Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax mono-infections, respectively, detected by microscopy were, in fact, mixed P. falciparum and P. non-falciparum infections. Analysis of matched blood, saliva and urine from 157 individuals showed that microscopy and Cytb-PCR of saliva yielded no significant difference in detecting P. falciparum and P. vivax. However, Cytb-PCR of saliva was more sensitive than microscopy for diagnosis of mixed-species infections. A combination of Cytb-PCR of saliva and of urine significantly outperformed microscopy (p 0.0098 for P. falciparum, p 0.006 for P. vivax, and p 0.0002 for mixed infections). Furthermore, Plasmodium malariae and P. knowlesi could also be identified in saliva and urine with this method. Therefore, the Cytb-PCR developed herein offers a high potential for the use of both saliva and urine for malaria diagnosis, with a sensitivity comparable with or superior to that of microscopy.