Genetic Counselor Practices Involving Pediatric Patients with FAP: an Investigation of their Self-Reported Strategies for Genetic Testing and Hepatoblastoma Screening.

Familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is a cancer predisposition syndrome that causes early-onset polyposis and is associated with an increased risk for hepatoblastoma. There is currently a lack of consensus on when to order APC (adenomatous polyposis coli) gene testing or implement surveillance for hepatoblastoma. An online questionnaire was completed by 62 genetic counselors to capture their current practices regarding these questions. Extracolonic findings associated with FAP that were most likely to prompt APC testing in an otherwise asymptomatic 10 year-old child with a negative family history were multiple desmoid tumors, congenital hypertrophy of the retinal pigment epithelium (CHRPE), jaw osteomas, and hepatoblastoma. For hepatoblastoma screening, the majority did recommend this in children less than age five years with known APC mutations. An interval of every 3-6 months was most commonly suggested; however, responses extended to screening on a less than annual basis. These results highlight the need for further investigation into why some genetic counselors do not recommend APC testing in young at-risk children and what factors influence views about the ideal age and indication for APC testing. Studies of these issues would help to define the best clinical practice model for genetic testing and hepatoblastoma screening in pediatric patients with FAP.

Direct-to-consumer genetic testing for predicting sports performance and talent identification: Consensus statement.

The general consensus among sport and exercise genetics researchers is that genetic tests have no role to play in talent identification or the individualised prescription of training to maximise performance. Despite the lack of evidence, recent years have witnessed the rise of an emerging market of direct-to-consumer marketing (DTC) tests that claim to be able to identify children's athletic talents. Targeted consumers include mainly coaches and parents. There is concern among the scientific community that the current level of knowledge is being misrepresented for commercial purposes. There remains a lack of universally accepted guidelines and legislation for DTC testing in relation to all forms of genetic testing and not just for talent identification. There is concern over the lack of clarity of information over which specific genes or variants are being tested and the almost universal lack of appropriate genetic counselling for the interpretation of the genetic data to consumers. Furthermore independent studies have identified issues relating to quality control by DTC laboratories with different results being reported from samples from the same individual. Consequently, in the current state of knowledge, no child or young athlete should be exposed to DTC genetic testing to define or alter training or for talent identification aimed at selecting gifted children or adolescents. Large scale collaborative projects, may help to develop a stronger scientific foundation on these issues in the future.

Genetic testing practices for Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A disease.

INTRODUCTION: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1A (CMT1A) is caused by a PMP22 gene duplication. CMT1A has a robust electrical phenotype that can be used to direct genetic testing. We compared specialty CMT center CMT1A diagnosis rates to those of outside physicians. METHODS: Charts were reviewed for 102 patients with CMT1A seen at a specialty CMT clinic between 2001 and 2009. Nerve conduction studies, family history, date of genetic testing, and type of genetic testing (single gene vs. panel) were collected. RESULTS: Although the specialty clinic ordered more PMP22 duplication testing alone beginning at an earlier year, thereby reducing costs, both the specialty clinic and outside physicians began the decade doing panel testing and ended the decade looking at only PMP22. CONCLUSIONS: Specialty centers adapt earlier to changes in testing practice than non-specialty centers. As the landscape of genetic testing changes, the algorithms for testing will also likely change.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: frequency of genetic subtypes and guidelines for genetic testing.

BACKGROUND: Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of diseases with approximately 45 different causative genes described. The aims of this study were to determine the frequency of different genes in a large cohort of patients with CMT and devise guidelines for genetic testing in practice. METHODS: The genes known to cause CMT were sequenced in 1607 patients with CMT (425 patients attending an inherited neuropathy clinic and 1182 patients whose DNA was sent to the authors for genetic testing) to determine the proportion of different subtypes in a UK population. RESULTS: A molecular diagnosis was achieved in 62.6% of patients with CMT attending the inherited neuropathy clinic; in 80.4% of patients with CMT1 (demyelinating CMT) and in 25.2% of those with CMT2 (axonal CMT). Mutations or rearrangements in PMP22, GJB1, MPZ and MFN2 accounted for over 90% of the molecular diagnoses while mutations in all other genes tested were rare. CONCLUSION: Four commonly available genes account for over 90% of all CMT molecular diagnoses; a diagnostic algorithm is proposed based on these results for use in clinical practice. Any patient with CMT without a mutation in these four genes or with an unusual phenotype should be considered for referral for an expert opinion to maximise the chance of reaching a molecular diagnosis.

Strategy for genetic testing in Charcot-Marie-disease.

BACKGROUND: Charcot Marie Tooth disease (CMT) affects one in 2500 people. Genetic testing is often pursued for family planning purposes, natural history studies and for entry into clinical trials. However, identifying the genetic cause of CMT can be expensive and confusing to patients and physicians due to locus heterogeneity. METHODS: We analyzed data from more than 1000 of our patients to identify distinguishing features in various subtypes of CMT. Data from clinical phenotypes, neurophysiology, family history, and prevalence was combined to create algorithms that can be used to direct genetic testing for patients with CMT. FINDINGS: The largest group of patients in our clinic have slow motor nerve conduction velocities (MNCV) in the upper extremities. Approximately 88% of patients in this group have CMT1A. Those who had intermediate MNCV had primarily CMT1X (52.8%) or CMT1B (27.8%). Patients with very slow MNCV and delayed walking were very likely to have CMT1A (68%) or CMT1B (32%). No patients with CMT1B and very slow MNCV walked before 15 months of age. Patients with CMT2A form our largest group of patients with axonal forms of CMT. INTERPRETATION: Combining features of the phenotypic and physiology groups allowed us to identify patients who were highly likely to have specific subtypes of CMT. Based on these results, we created a series of algorithms to guide testing. A more detailed review of this data is published in Annals of Neurology (1).

Molecular diagnostic testing in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and related disorders. Approaches and results.

The inherited neuropathies of the peripheral nervous system are clinically and genetically a heterogeneous group of disorders. Molecular genetic studies have made major breakthroughs in unraveling the underlying gene defects, and DNA diagnosis can now be offered to a large number of families with distinct forms of hereditary peripheral neuropathies. With the currently available technology, however, molecular genetic diagnosis still remains a labor-intensive and costly procedure. We have developed an algorithm for mutation screening based on clinical phenotype, electrophysiological findings, and the relative frequencies of mutations in the distinct peripheral myelin genes.

Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines for IFNL3 (IL28B) genotype and PEG interferon-α-based regimens.

Pegylated interferon-α (PEG-IFN-α or PEG-IFN 2a and 2b)- and ribavirin (RBV)-based regimens are the mainstay for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. IFNL3 (IL28B) genotype is the strongest baseline predictor of response to PEG-IFN-α and RBV therapy in previously untreated patients and can be used by patients and clinicians as part of the shared decision-making process for initiating treatment for HCV infection. We provide information regarding the clinical use of PEG-IFN-α- and RBV-containing regimens based on IFNL3 genotype.

Hereditary neuropathies.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to help neurologists understand new concepts in hereditary neuropathies, from the clinician's point of view, in the molecular era after the burst of information regarding peripheral nerve biology. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies have focused on understanding the pathomechanisms involved in hereditary neuropathies. In the past year identification of new genes has slowed down since scientists have concentrated more on the function of genes causing Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease and Schwann cell-axon interactions to reveal the molecular cell biology of the disease. Animal models for the most common subtypes of human Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease are now available. SUMMARY: Rapid advances in the molecular genetics and cell biology of hereditary neuropathies have highlighted the great genetic complexity of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. The evolution from a simple clinical classification to a complex molecular one has not facilitated our understanding of the disease. Moreover, the new molecular classification is not simple to use as different mutations of the same gene produce a range of phenotypes. The clinicians have to look for specific clinical and electrophysiological clues to direct the patient to appropriate genetic testing.