Efficacy of 4 % Articaine and 2 % Lidocaine: A clinical study.
Kambalimath, Deepashri H; Dolas, R S; Kambalimath, H V; Agrawal, S M.
J Maxillofac Oral Surg
; 12(1): 3-10, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24431806
Anesthetic Efficiency of Articaine Versus Lidocaine in the Extraction of Lower Third Molars: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
Comparative Study of the Efficacy of 4% Articaine vs 2% Lidocaine in Surgical Removal of Bilaterally Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
Comparative study of the anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine in inferior alveolar nerve block during surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars.
Anesthetic Efficacy of Buccal Infiltration Articaine versus Lidocaine for Extraction of Primary Molar Teeth.
Is articaine more effective than lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis? An umbrella review.
Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
Efficacy and adverse events of 4% articaine compared with 2% lidocaine on primary molar extraction: A randomised controlled trial.
Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial.
Comparison of Articaine and Lidocaine for Buccal Infiltration After Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block For Intraoperative Pain Control During Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgery.
Hemodynamic changes comparing lidocaine HCl with epinephrine and articaine HCl with epinephrine.