Effectiveness of anesthetic solutions for pain control in lower third molar extraction surgeries: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials with network meta-analysis.
Rossi, Marco Tulio; de Oliveira, Murilo Navarro; Vidigal, Maria Tereza Campos; de Andrade Vieira, Walbert; Figueiredo, Cristiano Elias; Blumenberg, Cauane; de Almeida, Vinicius Lima; Paranhos, Luiz Renato; Oliveira, Luciana Butini; Siqueira, Walter Luiz; de Brito Júnior, Rui Barbosa.
Clin Oral Investig
; 2020 Nov 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33161499
Is articaine more effective than lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis? An umbrella review.
Anaesthetic efficacy of articaine versus lidocaine in children's dentistry: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Anesthetic Efficiency of Articaine Versus Lidocaine in the Extraction of Lower Third Molars: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.
The efficacy of articaine and lidocaine local anaesthetic in child patients.
Which is the most suitable local anaesthetic when inferior nerve blocks are used for impacted mandibular third molar extraction? A network meta-analysis.
Comparative study of articaine and lidocaine without palatal injection for maxillary teeth extraction.
Effectiveness of 2% Articaine as an anesthetic agent in children: randomized controlled trial.
Volume and effectiveness assessment of articain 4% versus mepivacaine 2% used in third molar surgery: randomized, double-blind, split-mouth controlled clinical trial.
Intraoperative local anaesthesia for reduction of postoperative pain following general anaesthesia for dental treatment in children and adolescents.
Anesthetic Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine in Pediatric Patients During Dental Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.