Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Erosive Potential of 1% Phytic Acid on Radicular Dentine at Different Time Intervals.
Afshan, Zareen; Jat, Shahbaz Ahmed; Khan, Javeria Ali; Hasan, Arshad; Rehman Qazi, Fazal Ur.
Afiliación
  • Afshan Z; Department of Operative Dentistry, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Jat SA; Department of Operative Dentistry, Dr. Ishrat ul Ibad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Khan JA; Department of Operative Dentistry, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Hasan A; Department of Operative Dentistry, Dow Dental College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
  • Rehman Qazi FU; Department of Operative Dentistry, Dr. Ishrat ul Ibad Khan Institute of Oral Health Sciences, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Eur Endod J ; 5(1): 28-34, 2020.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32342035
Objective: The objective of this in-vitro study was to compare the erosive potential and smear layer removal ability of 1% Phytic acid (IP6) and 17% Ethylenediaminetetaacetic acid (EDTA). Methods: Canal preparation of 225 single rooted extracted human teeth was performed with Protaper NiTi rotary instruments. Teeth were divided into three groups according to the final irrigation protocol. Group 1: Saline irrigation (n=75), Group 2: 17% EDTA (n=75), Group 3: 1% Phytic Acid (n=75). Roots were splitted and observed under Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) for erosion and smear layer removal. Mean differences between the groups for smear layer removal and erosion were assessed using the Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. (P≤0.05) Friedman and Willcoxon Signed Rank tests were used to make comparisons within the groups. Results: Group 3 was significantly less erosive than Group 2 at all root portions (P<0.001). With regards to smear layer removal, group 2 (EDTA) removed more smear layer compared to group 3 (Phytic acid) at all root portions (P<0.001). Both 17% EDTA and 1% IP6 removed significantly less smear layer in the apical root portion. Intra group comparisons revealed no significant differences at any root level. There was a time dependent increase in erosion and smear layer removal in Group 2, with severe erosion at 5 minutes time interval. In Group 3, however, there was moderate erosion and smear removal at 3 and 5 minutes interval. Conclusion: IP6 at the concentration of 1% and pH 3 was less erosive than 17% EDTA. It exhibited moderate smear layer removal ability.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ácido Fítico / Irrigantes del Conducto Radicular Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Endod J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Ácido Fítico / Irrigantes del Conducto Radicular Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Eur Endod J Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Pakistán