Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Psychometric Properties of General Oral Health Assessment Index Across Ages: COSMIN Systematic Review.
Oszlánszky, Judit; Gulácsi, László; Péntek, Márta; Hermann, Péter; Zrubka, Zsombor.
Afiliación
  • Oszlánszky J; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: oszlanszky.judit@semmelweis.hu.
  • Gulácsi L; Health Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, University of Óbuda, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Péntek M; Health Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, University of Óbuda, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Hermann P; Department of Prosthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
  • Zrubka Z; Health Economics Research Center, University Research and Innovation Center, University of Óbuda, Budapest, Hungary.
Value Health ; 27(6): 805-814, 2024 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38492926
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

To systematically review the psychometric properties of the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI) across age groups using the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) methodology.

METHODS:

Data English peer-reviewed articles reporting studies of the development, translation, or validation of GOHAI. SOURCES PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE from Jan 1990 until December 31, 2023. Methodological evaluation based on COSMIN methodology. The results are presented overall and for 4 age groups (≥60 years, all ages, <60 years, ≤45 years). Structural validity was summarized qualitatively. Internal consistency and reliability were synthesized via random-effects meta-analysis of T-transformed Cronbach α values, and Fisher's Z transformed correlation coefficients. Construct validity and responsiveness were assessed using effect sizes.

RESULTS:

Four hundred ninety-seven records were identified, 72 underwent full-text assessment, resulting in 60 included reports. Structural validity was inconsistent across all age groups and overall. Internal consistency was sufficient with overall α = 0.81, and high evidence quality. Test-retest reliability was consistently sufficient across age groups with overall r = 0.84. For construct validity 361 hypotheses were assessed (37.4% for convergent-, 62.6% for known-groups validity). The percentage of confirmed hypotheses in ≥60-years, all ages, <60-years and ≤45-years were 75.5%, 66.7%, 78.9%, and 88.9%, respectively. Responsiveness was not assessed in the <60-years and ≤45-years age groups, leading to indeterminate overall rating with very low evidence quality.

CONCLUSIONS:

This review affirms that GOHAI has sufficient psychometric properties as an oral health-related quality of life instrument in various age groups, but its responsiveness is scarcely researched and its utility for individual-level follow-up is limited. The measurement properties of oral health-related quality of life tools must be scrutinized in the changing demands of personalized and value-based dental care. (PROSPERO registration CRD42022384132).
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría / Salud Bucal Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Psicometría / Salud Bucal Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2024 Tipo del documento: Article