Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biomechanical and histomorphometric properties of four different mini-implant surfaces.
Yadav, Sumit; Upadhyay, Madhur; Roberts, Wilbur Eugene.
Afiliação
  • Yadav S; *Division of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT and yadav_sumit17@yahoo.com.
  • Upadhyay M; *Division of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT and.
  • Roberts WE; Department of Oro-facial Genetics, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
Eur J Orthod ; 37(6): 627-35, 2015 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25681126
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effects of surface roughness on the removal torque and bone-to-implant contact of four different orthodontic mini-implants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mini-implants and circular discs were made from alloy Ti6Al4V grade 5. On the basis of surface treatment, the study was divided into four groups-group 1: machined (n = 32), no surface treatment; group 2: acid etched (n = 32), with hydrochloric acid; group 3 (n = 32), grit blasted with alumina; and group 4, grit blasted + acid etched (n = 32). Mean surface roughness (Ra) and quadratic average roughness (Rq) from each group were measured two dimensionally in non-contact mode by the optical profilometer. Contact angle measurement of discs from each group was done with a contact angle goniometer. Contact angle of liquids with different hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity was measured: 1. highly hydrophilic liquid sodium chloride (NaCl), 2. lightly hydrophobic liquid dimethylsulfoxide, 3. distilled water, and 4. human blood. One hundred and twenty-eight miniscrews, differing in surface treatment, were placed into the tibias and femurs of adult male New Zealand white rabbits. Rabbits were euthanized after 8 weeks and removal torque and bone-to-implant contact were measured. RESULTS: Surface roughness of group 3 was significantly greater than other groups (P < 0.05). Group 4 had significantly lower contact angle measurements, both for blood and sodium chloride (NaCl; 40.26 degrees, 27.20 degrees) when compared to other three groups (P ≤ 0.01). Group 4 had significantly higher torque and bone-to-implant contact than group 3 (P = 0.007), group 2 (P = 0.003), and group 1 (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: Surface roughness and wettability of mini-implants influence their biological response.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica / Interface Osso-Implante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Animals / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantes Dentários / Procedimentos de Ancoragem Ortodôntica / Interface Osso-Implante Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Animals / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Eur J Orthod Ano de publicação: 2015 Tipo de documento: Article