Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence of gingival recession after orthodontic tooth movements.
Morris, Jason W; Campbell, Phillip M; Tadlock, Larry P; Boley, Jimmy; Buschang, Peter H.
Afiliação
  • Morris JW; Private Practice, San Diego, Calif.
  • Campbell PM; Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Health Science Center, Dallas, Tex.
  • Tadlock LP; Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Health Science Center, Dallas, Tex.
  • Boley J; Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Health Science Center, Dallas, Tex.
  • Buschang PH; Department of Orthodontics, Baylor College of Dentistry, Texas A&M Health Health Science Center, Dallas, Tex. Electronic address: phbuschang@bcd.tamhsc.edu.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop ; 151(5): 851-859, 2017 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28457262
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

This study was designed to evaluate the long-term prevalence of gingival recession after orthodontic tooth movements, focusing on the effects of mandibular incisor proclination and expansion of maxillary posterior teeth.

METHODS:

Records of 205 patients (162 female, 43 male) were obtained from 2 private practice orthodontists. Using pretreatment (age, 14.0 ± 5.9 years) and posttreatment (age, 16.5 ± 6.0 years) lateral cephalograms and dental models, mandibular incisor proclination and maxillary arch widths were measured. Gingival recession was measured based on posttreatment and postretention (age, 32.3 ± 8.5 years) intraoral photographs and models. Associations between tooth movements and gingival recession were evaluated statistically.

RESULTS:

Only 5.8% of teeth exhibited recession at the end of orthodontic treatment (only 0.6% had recession >1 mm). After retention, 41.7% of the teeth showed recession, but the severity was limited (only 7.0% >1 mm). There was no relationship between mandibular incisor proclination during treatment and posttreatment gingival recession. Incisors that finished treatment angulated (IMPA) at 95° or greater did not show significantly more recession than did those that finished less than 95°. There were weak positive correlations (r = 0.17-0.41) between maxillary arch width increases during treatment and posttreatment recession.

CONCLUSIONS:

Orthodontic treatment is not a major risk factor for the development of gingival recession. Although greater amounts of maxillary expansion during treatment increase the risks of posttreatment recession, the effects are minimal.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária / Retração Gengival Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Técnicas de Movimentação Dentária / Retração Gengival Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop Assunto da revista: ODONTOLOGIA / ORTODONTIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article