Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation Periodontal Intrabony Defects Treated With Guided Tissue Regeneration. A Pilot Study.
Joly, Julio Cesar; Palioto, Daniela Bazan; de Lima, Antonio Fernando Martorelli; Mota, Luis Fernando; Caffesse, Raul.
Afiliação
  • Joly JC; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Palioto DB; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • de Lima AFM; Department of Prosthodontics and Periodontics, School of Dentistry of Piracicaba, University of Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil.
  • Mota LF; Department of Periodontics, University of Pittsburgh, PA.
  • Caffesse R; Department of Periodontics, University of Texas, Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
J Periodontol ; 73(4): 353-359, 2002 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29538993
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this clinical and radiographic study was to evaluate the effect of guided tissue regeneration using a bioabsorbable barrier in the treatment of intrabony defects in humans.

METHODS:

Intrabony osseous defects (2 or 3 walls) around mandibular canines and premolars were treated in 10 systemically healthy patients with ages ranging from 35 to 56 years. Prior to the surgical phase, patients were enrolled in a strict maintenance program including oral hygiene instructions and scaling and root planing (presurgical PI and GI <10%). Patients were seen for professional prophylaxis during the duration of the study. Clinical measurements were performed with an electronic probe at baseline and at reentry 8 months following surgical therapy. Measurements included clinical attachment levels (CAL), gingival margin levels (GML), probing depths (PD), bone defect levels (BDL), and alveolar crest level (ACL). A split mouth design was used. Quadrants were randomly assigned for treatment by GTR (experimental) or open flap debridement alone control). Standardized radiographs were taken at baseline and at reentry. Digital images were analyzed by subtraction to assess changes in area (A) and optical density (OD). Data were evaluated using paired t test.

RESULTS:

Statistically significant differences were found in both groups when comparing baseline and post-treatment values for CAL, GML, PD, and BDL (P <0.01). Greater reductions in BDL and gain in A and OD were observed in the GTR group when compared to control (P <0.01). Both therapies were effective in improving the clinical parameters assessed.

CONCLUSION:

Clinical and radiographic findings from this study demonstrated more bone fill in sites treated with GTR. J Periodontol 2002;73353-359.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Periodontol Ano de publicação: 2002 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Brasil