Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Translucency of chairside monolithic zirconias using different sintering ovens: An in vitro investigation.
Stevens, Clinton D; Renné, Walter G; Vág, János.
Afiliação
  • Stevens CD; Downtown Tulsa Dental, Tulsa, OK, United States.
  • Renné WG; The MOD Institute, Charleston, SC, United States.
  • Vág J; Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. Electronic address: vag.janos@semmelweis.hu.
J Dent ; 142: 104839, 2024 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38216029
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the translucency of several monolithic zirconias (MZ) processed in various sintering ovens designed for single-visit, chairside use.

METHODS:

Discs (n = 40) from zirconia blocks were fabricated for each MZ at manufacturer-recommended minimal thicknesses, as provided in each material's instructions for use IPS e.max ZirCAD LT (ZLT); CEREC Zirconia+ (CZ+); 3M Chairside (3M); KATANA Zirconia (KT). Groups (n = 10) were sintered following manufacturer instructions for each oven CEREC SpeedFire, Ivoclar CS4, Ivoclar CS6, and Ivoclar S2 (laboratory furnace control). Specimens were highly polished on one side and glazed on the other. Each side was measured with a spectrophotometer against white and black backgrounds to determine translucency parameter (TP) and contrast ratio (CR) values. Results for TP and CR for each material and oven combination were compared with a linear mixed model. Oven precision was evaluated using the Kruskall-Wallis test.

RESULTS:

Glazed specimens were more translucent than polished ones (p < 0.001). ZLT and CZ+ were more translucent than 3M and KT regardless of the sintering oven (p < 0.01). Several oven/material combinations reached or exceeded the S2 oven TP CS4 with CZ+ and 3M; CS6 with ZLT and KT (p < 0.01). SpeedFire was significantly less precise (p < 0.05) and produced lower TP values for ZLT, CZ+, and KT (p < 0.01). Results for TP and CR were highly correlated.

CONCLUSIONS:

MZ surface finish, material thickness, and oven used all had a significant effect on translucency. Some chairside-oriented solutions produced results with translucency equal to conventionally processed zirconia. CLINICAL

SIGNIFICANCE:

The translucency of a ceramic restoration is an important factor in determining its esthetics. Clinicians desiring the most esthetic outcomes with monolithic zirconia should be aware of the significant effects that surface finishing, material thickness, and the sintering oven used can have on restoration translucency.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zircônio / Cerâmica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Zircônio / Cerâmica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Dent Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos