Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
An up to thirty-year retrospective study on the success and survival of single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns in a dental school setting.
Sarzynski, Isabella; Pfeffer, Juliana; Nowakowski, Anthony; Pesun, Igor.
Afiliação
  • Sarzynski I; DMD Program Graduate, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dr Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Pfeffer J; Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dr Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Electronic address: juliana.pfeffer@umanitoba.ca.
  • Nowakowski A; Assistant Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dr Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
  • Pesun I; Associate Professor, Director of Graduate Prosthodontics, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dr Gerald Niznick College of Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
J Prosthet Dent ; 132(4): 703.e1-703.e5, 2024 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38969577
ABSTRACT
STATEMENT OF

PROBLEM:

Studies investigating the survival of implant-supported crowns provided in a dental school setting are sparse.

PURPOSE:

The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the success and reasons for failure of single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns provided in a dental school. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

Using the axiUm dental management software program and paper charts, all single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns provided between September 1989 and January 2020 were included for evaluation. Success, survival, and failure were recorded as well as reasons for failure. A Kaplan-Meier survival estimate with an associated P value, a life table analysis, and a log-rank test comparing the survival of single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns were performed.

RESULTS:

Over 30 years, 678 implant-supported crowns (586 single unit and 92 splinted) had been provided. Of these crowns, 17 (2.90%) single unit crowns and 5 (5.43%) splinted crowns failed, with most being prosthetic failures for both single units (64.7%) and splinted (80%), rather than biologic failures. A total of 371 single unit (63.3%) and 46 splinted (50.0%) implant crowns were a complete success, and 215 single unit (36.7%) and 46 splinted (50.0%) crowns survived but had some type of complication. The overall implant-supported crown survival rate was 96.8%. The survival distribution of the single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns was not statistically significantly different [χ2(2)=1.285, P=.257].

CONCLUSIONS:

Both single unit and splinted implant-supported crowns had high success rates and showed similar survival rates. The most common causes of complications were also similar, with debonding and screw loosening of crowns being the most common complication for both single unit and splinted crowns.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Falha de Restauração Dentária / Coroas Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Prótese Dentária Fixada por Implante / Falha de Restauração Dentária / Coroas Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Prosthet Dent Ano de publicação: 2024 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá