Same-day discharge (SDD) vs standard enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols for major colorectal surgery: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs are well-established, resulting in improved outcomes and shorter length of hospital stay (LOS). Same-day discharge (SDD), or "hyper-ERAS", is a natural progression of ERAS. This systematic review aims to compare the safety and efficacy of SDD against conventional ERAS in colorectal surgery. METHODS: The protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (394793). A systematic search was performed in major databases to identify relevant articles, and a narrative systematic review was performed. Primary outcomes were readmission rates and length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were operative time and blood loss, postoperative pain, morbidity, nausea or vomiting, and patient satisfaction. Risks of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS: Thirteen studies were included, with five single-arm and eight comparative studies, of which one was a randomised controlled trial. This comprised a total of 38,854 patients (SDD: 1622; ERAS: 37,232). Of the 1622 patients on the SDD pathway, 1590 patients (98%) were successfully discharged within 24 h of surgery. While most studies had an overall low risk of bias, there was considerable variability in inclusion criteria, types of surgery or anaesthesia, and discharge criteria. SDD resulted in a significantly reduced postoperative LOS, without increasing risk of 30-day readmission. Intraoperative blood loss and postoperative morbidity rates were comparable between both groups. Operative duration was shorter in the SDD group. Patient-reported satisfaction was high in the SDD cohort. CONCLUSION: SDD protocols appear to be safe and feasible in selected patients undergoing major colorectal operations. Randomised controlled trials are necessary to further substantiate these findings.

The usefulness of non-invasive co-oximetry haemoglobin measurement for screening pre-operative anaemia.

Pre-operative anaemia (haemoglobin < 13.0 g.dl-1 ) is a modifiable peri-operative risk-factor. This is screened for using formal laboratory testing. A non-invasive finger-probe sensor that can accurately measure haemoglobin is a possible alternative. This study considers the accuracy of non-invasive haemoglobin measurement using the Rad-67™ Rainbow (Masimo Corp., Irvine, CA, USA) compared with formal laboratory testing and its usefulness in detecting pre-operative anaemia. A total of 392 patients had measurements taken for non-invasive haemoglobin and perfusion index values using the Rad-67 Rainbow, alongside further peri-operative parameters and a formal laboratory haemoglobin test. Bland-Altman and sensitivity analysis showed that the limits of agreement between non-invasive and formal laboratory haemoglobin testing were between -1.95 g.dl-1 and 2.23 g.dl-1 (p < 0.001). The overall performance of non-invasive haemoglobin measurement was better in men than women (ROC 91.1% vs. 78.2%) and less biased in men, mean -0.08 (SD 1.09, 95%Cl -0.23-0.07) compared with women (mean 0.38 (SD 0.99, 95%CI 0.24-0.52)). Pre-operative anaemia was more prevalent in women than men (50.3% vs. 14.4%). The sensitivity of non-invasive anaemia detection (haemoglobin < 13 g.dl-1 ) was 66% for women and 52% for men. A non-invasive haemoglobin value of 14.0 g.dl-1 had an overall 91% sensitivity for detecting pre-operative anaemia (82% in men and 93% in women). The Rad-67 Rainbow is inadequate for the estimation of formal laboratory haemoglobin and lacks sensitivity for detecting pre-operative anaemia, especially in women. Further advancement in technology and accuracy is needed before it can be recommended as a routine pre-operative screening test.

Defining reasonable patient standard and preference for shared decision making among patients undergoing anaesthesia in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: A cross-sectional study to ascertain what the Singapore population would regard as material risk in the anaesthesia consent-taking process and identify demographic factors that predict patient preferences in medical decision-making to tailor a more patient-centered informed consent. METHODS: A survey was performed involving patients 21 years old and above who attended the pre-operative evaluation clinic over a 1-month period in Singapore General Hospital. Questionnaires were administered to assess patients' perception of material risks, by trained interviewers. Patients' demographics were obtained. Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance was used. Statistical significance was taken at p < 0.05. RESULTS: Four hundred fourteen patients were eligible of which 26 refused to participate and 24 were excluded due to language barrier. 364 patients were recruited. A higher level of education (p < 0.007), being employed (p < 0.046) and younger age group (p < 0.003) are factors identified in patients who wanted greater participation in medical decisions. Gender, marital status, type of surgery, and previous surgical history did not affect their level of participation. The complications most patients knew about were Nausea (64.8%), Drowsiness (62.4%) and Surgical Wound Pain (58.8%). Patients ranked Heart Attack (59.3%), Death (53.8%) and Stroke (52.7%) as the most significant risks that they wanted to be informed about in greater detail. Most patients wanted to make a joint decision with the anaesthetist (52.2%), instead of letting the doctor decide (37.1%) or deciding for themselves (10.7%). Discussion with the anaesthetist (61.3%) is the preferred medium of communication compared to reading a pamphlet (23.4%) or watching a video (15.4%). CONCLUSION: Age and educational level can influence medical decision-making. Despite the digital age, most patients still prefer a clinic consult instead of audio-visual multimedia for pre-operative anaesthetic counselling. The local population appears to place greater importance on rare but serious complications compared to common complications. This illustrates the need to contextualize information provided during informed consent to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship.

A prospective observational prevalence study of elevated HbA1c among elective surgical patients.

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease with high prevalence worldwide. Using glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) as a surrogate for potential pre-DM and DM conditions, our primary objective was to determine the HbA1c epidemiology in non-cardiac elective surgical patients in Singapore. Our secondary aim was to identify risk factors associated with elevated HbA1c. We conducted a prospective, observational single-centre study in adult patients. HbA1c screening was performed. Patient demographics and comorbidities were recorded. Patients were divided into those with HbA1C ≤ 6.0% and HbA1C ≥ 6.1%. Regression analyses were performed to identify associated factors. Subgroup analysis was performed comparing patients with HbA1C ≥ 6.1% and HbA1C ≥ 8.0%. Of the 875 patients recruited, 182 (20.8%) had HbA1c ≥ 6.1%, of which 32 (3.7%) had HbA1c ≥ 8%. HbA1C ≥ 6.1% was associated with Indian ethnicity [1.07 (1.01-1.13), p = 0.023], BMI > 27.5 [1.07 (1.02-1.11), p = 0.002], higher preoperative random serum glucose [1.03 (1.02-1.04), p < 0.001], pre-existing diagnosis of DM [1.85 (1.75-1.96), p < 0.001] and prediabetes [1.44 (1.24-1.67), p < 0.001], and peripheral vascular disease [1.30 (1.10-1.54), p = 0.002]. HbA1c ≥ 8% had an additional association with age > 60 years [0.96 (0.93-0.99), p = 0.017]. The prevalence of elevated HbA1c is high among the surgical population. Targeted preoperative HbA1c screening for at-risk elective surgical patients reduces cost, allowing focused use of healthcare resources.

Preoperative Red Cell Distribution Width and 30-day mortality in older patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort observational study.

Increased red cell distribution width (RDW) is associated with poorer outcomes in various patient populations. We investigated the association between preoperative RDW and anaemia on 30-day postoperative mortality among elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Medical records of 24,579 patients aged 65 and older who underwent surgery under anaesthesia between 1 January 2012 and 31 October 2016 were retrospectively analysed. Patients who died within 30 days had higher median RDW (15.0%) than those who were alive (13.4%). Based on multivariate logistic regression, in our cohort of elderly patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery, moderate/severe preoperative anaemia (aOR 1.61, p = 0.04) and high preoperative RDW levels in the 3rd quartile (>13.4% and ≤14.3%) and 4th quartile (>14.3%) were significantly associated with increased odds of 30-day mortality - (aOR 2.12, p = 0.02) and (aOR 2.85, p = 0.001) respectively, after adjusting for the effects of transfusion, surgical severity, priority of surgery, and comorbidities. Patients with high RDW, defined as >15.7% (90th centile), and preoperative anaemia have higher odds of 30-day mortality compared to patients with anaemia and normal RDW. Thus, preoperative RDW independently increases risk of 30-day postoperative mortality, and future risk stratification strategies should include RDW as a factor.