HER2/neu expression status of post BCG recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder urothelial carcinomas in relation to their primary ones.

BACKGROUND: Transurethral resection (TUR) followed by adjuvant therapy is still the treatment of choice of Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma (NMIBUC). However, recurrence is one of the most troublesome features of these lesions. Early second resection and adjuvant BCG therapy has been shown to improve the outcome. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of C-erbB-2 (HER2/neu) expression status in Non-Muscle-Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma cases, before and after intravesical Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG immunotherapy). MATERIALS AND METHODS: HER2/neu expression was studied in 120 (Ta-T1) Non-Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma cases. The expression was evaluated and compared to the expression after Bacillus Calmette Guerin (BCG) immunotherapy. RESULTS: HER2/neu expression in low and high grade of the Non- Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma was (38%) and (83%) respectively. The difference of the expression rates by tumor grade was statistically significant. In recurring lesions post BCG therapy, C-erbB-2 expression was markedly decreased (31.6%) when compared to its expression before therapy (65%). CONCLUSIONS: The HER2/neu expression increased as the tumor grade rose. The reduction in expression following BCG treatment in Non-Invasive transitional cell carcinoma cases could reflect a reduction of the potential malignancy of the tumor.

Recurrent cutaneous basal cell carcinoma after surgical excision: A retrospective clinicopathological study.

Background: Recurrence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) after complete surgical excision is rarely reported. Risk factors for this negative outcome are not well-studied. We present the clinical and histological features of recurrent BCCs in our institution. Methods: All patients between January 2016 to December 2020 whose primary BCCs were excised with free surgical margins according to the histopathology report, and represented later with local recurrence were included. The medical files were retrieved to record patient's age, sex, sun exposure, tumor site, size, clinical diagnosis, histopathology variant of primary lesion, least free margin distance of the original lesion, and recurrence time. Results: Eighteen patients (11 males and 7 females ranged between 50 and 75 years old) fulfilled the inclusion criteria; all of their lesions were located in head and neck regions. The mean recurrence time was 31.2 months (11-86) and the histological variant was the same of primary in 17/18 patients. Primary tumors showed nodular subtype in 77.8% of patients and 55.6% of the primary tumors were less than 15 mm in diameter. Sun exposure history was given by 77.8% of patients while the rest of patients had non-significant exposure. All recurrent excised lesions were of free margin less than 4 mm. Conclusion: We found that the primary tumors of all studied recurrent BCCs were excised with surgical margins less than 4 mm. We recommend follow up for all excised BCCs either those of low or high risk histological variants. Tumor size does not appear a considerable risk factor for local recurrence.

Enterobius vermicularis in appendectomy specimens; Clinicopathological assessment: Cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND: This study identifies the incidence of appendiceal Enterobius vermicularis (E.v) infestation in all the patients undergoing appendectomy and evaluates the relationship between E. v infestation of the appendix and the acute appendicitis. METHOD: ology: All the routinely examined appendectomy specimens received in the pathology laboratory of a referral hospital over a three year period of time were reviewed for the existence of E. v. These cases were evaluated for clinico-laboratory characterization. RESULTS: Out of 1150 appendectomies for clinical acute appendicitis picture, 31 (2.7%) cases revealed E. v infestation. The age ranged from 6 to 42 years old but more than 80% of the E. v infected cases were children. Twenty four cases (77.4%) did not show any other appendiceal pathology, six cases showed lymphoid hyperplasia and only one case showed concomitant histological acute inflammatory process. CONCLUSION: E. v infestation is an incidental finding during histopathology examination of appendectomy specimens for patients with clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis, however there is no relation between the existence of E. v and occurrence of acute appendicitis which is the main indication for appendectomy, so further studies are recommended to reach out earlier diagnosis to eliminate the unnecessary surgical intervention. Also surgeons should consider E. v as a differential diagnosis when removing a normal looking appendix to take the necessary precautions for minimizing any chance of contamination and sending all the normal looking appendectomy specimens for histopathology examination.