Validation of the Hospital Asthma Severity Score (HASS) in children ages 2-18 years old.

INTRODUCTION: The Hospital Asthma Severity Score (HASS) was developed to communicate inpatient asthma severity between providers. The purpose of this prospective study was to validate the HASS against the Pediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) and spirometry for assessment of inpatient asthma exacerbation severity in patients 2-18 years old, at a single point-in-time. METHODS: This study was registered with clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02782065). Children admitted to a tertiary care, free-standing children's hospital were assessed for asthma severity using the HASS, PRAM, and pulmonary function by spirometry. Inter-rater agreement of HASS and PRAM scores was assessed between two blinded clinician raters. Spirometry results were obtained by a certified pulmonary laboratory technician and correlated with HASS and PRAM scores. RESULTS: The sample included 58 subjects. Allowing for a one-point difference in continuous HASS and PRAM scores, inter-rater agreement was 79% for the HASS and 60% for the PRAM. When the scores were categorized as mild, moderate, and severe, inter-rater agreement was 62% for the HASS and 93% for the PRAM (p < .0001). Additionally, intra-rater agreement between HASS and PRAM severity categories was 71% for Rater 1 and 64% for Rater 2. A weak correlation was noted between both the HASS and FEV1 (r = -0.31; p = 0.11), and PRAM and FEV1 (r = -0.30; p = 0.11) for the 29 subjects with acceptable spirometry results. CONCLUSIONS: The HASS and PRAM have acceptable inter-rater and intra-rater agreement. These results support validation of the HASS for managing hospitalized patients during asthma exacerbations.

Competency-based Professional Advancement Model for Advanced Practice RNs.

The process of developing a 3-tiered advanced practice RN (APRN) competency-based professional advancement model at Boston Children's Hospital is described. The model recognizes the contributions of entry-level and expert APRNs to advanced clinical practice and outcomes, impact, and leadership, while incorporating the tenets of Patricia Benner's Novice to Expert Model and the American Association of Critical- Care Nurses Synergy Model of Care.

Standardized Tracheostomy Education Across the Enterprise.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this quality improvement project was to create a Tracheostomy Subject Matter Expert (Trach SME) Committee to standardize tracheostomy care, education, and the discharge process across Boston Children's Hospital. DESIGN AND METHODS: Boston Children's Hospital (BCH) is a free-standing urban tertiary pediatric hospital with 15 inpatient units. The newly formed Trach SME Committee evaluated the discharge process across the enterprise including hospital satellites and intra-hospital practice. Education materials were centralized, and policies were reviewed, revised and standardized to reflect current best practice. The Trach SME provided education to Trach Champions from each area that became resources for their respective units. The Trach SME also developed measurement outcomes to assess the effectiveness of the education process. RESULTS: In the implementation year of 2104, our 7-day unplanned readmission rate for tracheostomy patients was 18.18%. This rate decreased to 6.67% in 2015 and to 0% in 2016. In 2015, we began to monitor 30-day unplanned readmissions and the rate was 6.67% in 2015 and decreased to 0% in 2016. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Standardization of policies, procedures and caregiver educational materials for the management of patients with a tracheostomy tube improved tracheostomy care across the enterprise and reduced tracheostomy readmission rates.

Development of an Institution-Wide Pediatric End-of-Life Summit.

End-of-life (EOL) care in pediatrics is a unique subspecialty lacking adequate provider education and training. Patient and family outcomes may improve when clinicians are provided with training in this care. Recognizing the need for this specialized education, a small group of bereavement coordinators created an institution-wide pediatric EOL summit at a large urban pediatric teaching hospital. One hundred forty-five clinicians from 14 diverse disciplines attended the first annual pediatric EOL summit. A survey was sent to the participants for feedback. The survey results suggested an overwhelmingly positive response to the summit. Continuing to provide this educational conference is critical to improving care for patients and families, particularly at the end of life.

Ethical Issues Considered When Establishing a Pediatrics Gender Surgery Center.

As part of establishing a gender surgery center at a pediatric academic hospital, we undertook a process of identifying key ethical, legal, and contextual issues through collaboration among clinical providers, review by hospital leadership, discussions with key staff and hospital support services, consultation with the hospital's ethics committee, outreach to other institutions providing transgender health care, and meetings with hospital legal counsel. This process allowed the center to identify key issues, formulate approaches to resolving those issues, and develop policies and procedures addressing stakeholder concerns. Key issues identified during the process included the appropriateness of providing gender-affirming surgeries to adolescents and adults, given the hospital's mission and emphasis on pediatric services; the need for education on the clinical basis for offered procedures; methods for obtaining adequate informed consent and assent; the lower and upper acceptable age limits for various procedures; the role of psychological assessments in determining surgical eligibility; the need for coordinated, multidisciplinary patient care; and the importance of addressing historical access inequities affecting transgender patients. The process also facilitated the development of policies addressing the identified issues, articulation of a guiding mission statement, institution of ongoing educational opportunities for hospital staff, beginning outreach to the community, and guidance as to future avenues of research and policy development. Given the sensitive nature of the center's services and the significant clinical, ethical, and legal issues involved, we recommend such a process when a establishing a program for gender surgery in a pediatric institution.