Human microRNA sequencing and cytomegalovirus infection risk after kidney transplantation.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with detectable CMV-specific cell-mediated immunity according to the QuantiFERON-CMV assay (QTF-CMV) are expected to have adequate immune protection. Nevertheless, a proportion of patients still develop CMV infection. Human microRNAs (hsa-miRNAs) are promising biomarkers owing to their high stability and easy detection. We performed whole blood miRNA sequencing in samples coincident with the first reactive QTF-CMV after transplantation or cessation of antiviral prophylaxis to investigate hsa-miRNAs differentially expressed according to the occurrence of CMV infection. One-year incidence of CMV viremia was 55.0% (median interval from miRNA sequencing sampling of 29 days). After qPCR validation, we found that hsa-miR-125a-5p was downregulated in KTRs developing CMV viremia within the next 90 days (ΔCt: 7.9 ± 0.9 versus 7.3 ± 1.0; P = .011). This difference was more evident among KTRs preemptively managed (8.2 ± 0.9 versus 6.9 ± 0.8; P < .001), with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.865. Functional enrichment analysis identified hsa-miR-125a-5p targets involved in cell cycle regulation and apoptosis, including the BAK1 gene, which was significantly downregulated in KTRs developing CMV viremia. In conclusion, hsa-miR-125a-5p may serve as biomarker to identify CMV-seropositive KTRs at risk of CMV reactivation despite detectable CMV-CMI.

Invasive aspergillosis in liver transplant recipients in the current era.

Invasive aspergillosis (IA) is a rare but fatal disease among liver transplant recipients (LiTRs). We performed a multicenter 1:2 case-control study comparing LiTRs diagnosed with proven/probable IA and controls with no invasive fungal infection. We included 62 IA cases and 124 matched controls. Disseminated infection occurred only in 8 cases (13%). Twelve-week all-cause mortality of IA was 37%. In multivariate analyses, systemic antibiotic usage (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 4.74; P = .03) and history of pneumonia (aOR, 48.7; P = .01) were identified as independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of IA. Moreover, reoperation (aOR, 5.99; P = .01), systemic antibiotic usage (aOR, 5.03; P = .04), and antimold prophylaxis (aOR, 11.9; P = .02) were identified as independent risk factors associated with the occurrence of early IA. Among IA cases, Aspergillus colonization (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 86.9; P < .001), intensive care unit stay (aHR, 3.67; P = .02), disseminated IA (aHR, 8.98; P < .001), and dialysis (aHR, 2.93; P = .001) were identified as independent risk factors associated with 12-week all-cause mortality, while recent receipt of tacrolimus (aHR, 0.11; P = .001) was protective. Mortality among LiTRs with IA remains high in the current era. The identified risk factors and protective factors may be useful for establishing robust targeted antimold prophylactic and appropriate treatment strategies against IA.

Survey on the approach to antibiotic prophylaxis in liver and kidney transplant recipients colonized with "difficult to treat" Gram-negative bacteria.

BACKGROUND: Performance of active screening for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) and administration of targeted antibiotic prophylaxis (TAP) in colonized patients undergoing liver (LT) and/or kidney transplantation (KT) are controversial issues. METHODS: Self-administered electronic cross-sectional survey disseminated from January to February 2022. Questionnaire consisted of four parts: hospital/transplant program characteristics, standard screening and antibiotic prophylaxis, clinical vignettes asking for TAP in patients undergoing LT and KT with prior infection/colonization with four different MDR-GNB (extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales [ESCR-E], carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales [CRE], multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa [MDR-Pa], and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAb]). RESULTS: Fifty-five respondents participated from 14 countries, mostly infectious disease specialists (69%) with active transplant programs (>100 procedures/year for 34.5% KT and 23.6% LT), and heterogeneous local MDR-GNB prevalence from <15% (30.9%), 15%-30% (43.6%) to >30% (16.4%). The frequency of screening for ESCR-E, CRE, MDR-Pa, and CRAb was 22%, 54%, 17%, and 24% for LT, respectively, and 18%, 36%, 16%, and 11% for KT. Screening time-points were mainly at transplantation 100%, only one-third following transplantation. Screening was always based on rectal swab cultures (100%); multi-site sampling was reported in 40% of KT and 35% of LT. In LT clinical cases, 84%, 58%, 84%, and 40% of respondents reported TAP for prior infection/colonization with ESCR-E, CRE, MDR-Pa, and CRAb, respectively. In KT clinical cases, 55%, 39%, 87%, and 42% of respondents reported TAP use for prior infection/colonization with ESCR-E, CRE, MDR-Pa, and CRAb, respectively. CONCLUSION: There is a large heterogeneity in screening and management of MDR-GNB carriage in LT and KT.

Novel intervention based on an individualized bundle of care to decrease infection in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Infection remains a relevant complication after kidney transplantation (KT). A well-established strategy in modern medicine is the application of bundles of evidence-based practice in clinical settings. The objective of this study is to explore the application of a personalized bundle of measures aimed to reduce the incidence of infection in the first 12 months after KT. METHODS: A single-center prospective cohort of 148 patients undergoing KT between February 2018 and September 2019 that received an individualized infection prevention strategy was compared to a preintervention cohort (n = 159). The bundle comprised a review of the patient's immunization history, infection risk by country of origin, screening for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI), antimicrobial prophylaxis, and immunological assessment. Individualized recommendations were accordingly provided at a scheduled visit at day +30 after transplantation. RESULTS: The intervention cohort showed a higher compliance rate with the recommended vaccine schedule, screening for geographically restricted infections and LTBI, and intravenous immunoglobulin and vitamin D supplementation (p values <.001). The 1-year incidence rate of infection was lower in the intervention cohort (42.6% vs. 57.9%; p value = .037), as was the rate of infection-related hospitalization (17.6% vs. 32.1%; p value = .003) and the incidence of severe bacterial infection. There were no differences in graft rejection or mortality rates between groups. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention, including a bundle of evidence-based practices, enhanced compliance with recommended preventive measures and was correlated with a reduction in the 12-month incidence of infection after KT.

Isavuconazole for Treating Invasive Mould Disease in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients have a higher risk of developing invasive mould diseases (IMD). Isavuconazole is a novel broad-spectrum azole active against Aspergillus spp. and Mucor, well tolerated, with an excellent bioavailability and predictable pharmacokinetics, that penetrates in most tissues rapidly, and has few serious adverse effects, including hepatic toxicity. Contrary to other broad-spectrum azoles, such as voriconazole and posaconazole, isavuconazole appears to show significant smaller drug-drug interactions with anticalcineurin drugs. We have performed an extensive literature review of the experience with the use of isavuconazole in SOT, which included the SOTIS and the ISASOT studies, and published case reports. More than 140 SOT recipients treated with isavuconazole for IMD were included. Most patients were lung and kidney recipients treated for an Aspergillus infection. Isavuconazole was well tolerated (less than 10% of patients required treatment discontinuation). The clinical responses appeared comparable to that found in other high-risk patient populations. Drug-drug interactions with immunosuppressive agents were manageable after the reduction of tacrolimus and the adjustment of mTOR inhibitors at the beginning of treatment. In conclusion, isavuconazole appears to be a reasonable option for the treatment of IMD in SOT. More clinical studies are warranted.

Cytomegalovirus UL44 protein induces a potent T-cell immune response in mice.

Due to the severity of CMV infection in immunocompromised individuals the development of a vaccine has been declared a priority. However, despite the efforts made there is no yet a vaccine available for clinical use. We designed an approach to identify new CMV antigens able to inducing a broad immune response that could be used in future vaccine formulations. We have used serum samples from 28 kidney transplant recipients, with a previously acquired CMV-specific immune response to identify viral proteins that were recognized by the antibodies present in the patient serum samples by Western blot. A band of approximately 45 kDa, identified as UL44, was detected by most serum samples. UL44 immunogenicity was tested in BALB/c mice that received three doses of the UL44-pcDNA DNA vaccine. UL44 elicited both, a strong antibody response and CMV-specific cellular response. Using bioinformatic analysis we demonstrated that UL44 is a highly conserved protein and contains epitopes that are able to activate CD8 lymphocytes of the most common HLA alleles in the world population. We constructed a UL44 ORF deletion mutant virus that produced no viral progeny, suggesting that UL44 is an essential viral protein. In addition, other authors have demonstrated that UL44 is one of the most abundant viral proteins after infection and have suggested an essential role of UL44 in viral replication. Altogether, our data suggests that UL44 is a potent antigen, and favored by its abundance, it may be a good candidate to include in a vaccine formulation.

Isavuconazole Versus Voriconazole as the First-line Therapy for Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Invasive Aspergillosis: Comparative Analysis of 2 Multicenter Cohort Studies.

BACKGROUND: Isavuconazole (ISA) and voriconazole (VORI) are recommended as the first-line treatment for invasive aspergillosis (IA). Despite theoretical advantages of ISA, both triazole agents have not been compared in solid organ transplant recipients. METHODS: We performed a post hoc analysis of 2 retrospective multicenter cohorts of solid organ transplant recipients with invasive fungal disease (the SOTIS [Solid Organ Transplantation and ISavuconazole] and DiasperSOT [DIagnosis of ASPERgillosis in Solid Organ Transplantation] studies). We selected adult patients with proven/probable IA that were treated for ≥48 h with ISA (n = 57) or VORI (n = 77) as first-line therapy, either in monotherapy or combination regimen. The primary outcome was the rate of clinical response at 12 wk from the initiation of therapy. Secondary outcomes comprised 12-wk all-cause and IA-attributable mortality and the rates of treatment-emergent adverse events and premature treatment discontinuation. RESULTS: Both groups were comparable in their demographics and major clinical and treatment-related variables. There were no differences in the rate of 12-wk clinical response between the ISA and VORI groups (59.6% versus 59.7%, respectively; odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49-2.00). This result was confirmed after propensity score adjustment (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.32-2.05) and matching (OR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.31-2.04). All-cause and IA-attributable mortality were also similar. Patients in the ISA group were less likely to experience treatment-emergent adverse events (17.5% versus 37.7%; P = 0.011) and premature treatment discontinuation (8.8% versus 23.4%; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Front-line treatment with ISA for posttransplant IA led to similar clinical outcomes than VORI, with better tolerability and higher treatment completion.

How can we optimize the diagnostic and therapeutic approach to pneumonia? Expert opinion-based recommendations.

Pneumonia continues to be one of the most frequent infectious syndromes and a relevant cause of death and health resources utilization. The OPENIN ("Optimización de procesos clínicos para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de infecciones") Group is composed of Infectious Diseases specialists and Microbiologists and aims at generating recommendations that can contribute to improve the approach to processes with high impact on the health system. Such task relies on a critical review of the available scientific evidence. The first Group meeting (held in October 2023) aimed at answering the following questions: Can we optimize the syndromic and microbiological diagnosis of pneumonia? Is it feasible to safely shorten the length of antibiotic therapy? And, is there any role for the immunomodulatory strategies based on the adjuvant use of steroids, macrolides or immunoglobulins? The present review summarizes the literature reviewed for that meeting and offers a series of expert recommendations.

Recommendations on the use of azole antifungals in hematology-oncology patients / Recomendaciones sobre el uso de antifúgicos azolicos en el paciente oncohematológico

The administration of antifungals for therapeutic and, especially, prophylactic purposes is virtually a constant in patients requiring hematology-oncology treatment. Any attempt to prevent or treat Aspergillus or Mucor infections requires the administration of some drugs in the azole group, which include voriconazole, posaconazole and isavuconazole, noted for their activity against these pathogens. One very relevant aspect is the potential risk of interaction when associated with one of the antineoplastic drugs used to treat hematologic tumors, with serious complications. In this regard, acalabrutinib, bortezomib, bosutinib, carfilzomib, cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine A, dasatinib, duvelisib, gilteritinib, glasdegib, ibrutinib, imatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, prednisone, ruxolitinib, tacrolimus, all-transretinoic acid, arsenic trioxide, venetoclax, or any of the vinca alkaloids, are very clear examples of risk, in some cases because their clearance is reduced and in others because of increased risk of QTc prolongation, which is particularly evident when the drug of choice is voriconazole or posaconazole. (AU)

La administración de antifúngicos con fines terapéuticos y especialmente, profilácticos es casi un constante en el paciente que precisa tratamiento oncohematológico. El intento de evitar o de tratar infecciones por Aspergillus o por Mucor exige la administración de algunos fármacos pertenecientes al grupo de los azoles, entre los que destacan por su actividad frente a estos patógenos, voriconazol, posaconazol e isavuconazol. Un aspecto de gran importancia es el riesgo potencial de interacciones cuando se asocian a alguno de los fármacos antineoplásico utilizados en el tratamiento de los tumores hematológicos, dando lugar a graves complicaciones. En este sentido, acalabrutinib, bortezomid, bosutinib, carfizolid, ciclofosfamida, ciscloporina A, dasatinib, duvelisib, gilteritinib, glasdegib, ibrutinib, imatinib, nilotinib, ponatinib, prednisona, ruxolitinib, tacrolimus, transretinoico, trióxido de Arsenio, venetoclax, o cualquiera de los alcaloides de la vinca, representan ejemplos muy evidentes de riesgos en unos casos porque su aclaramiento resulta reducido, en otros porque que se potencia el riesgo de prolongación del QTc, especialmente evidentes cuando el fármaco elegido es voriconazol o posaconazol. (AU)

Prevention and therapy of viral infections in patients with solid organ transplantation / Prevención y tratamiento de las infecciones virales en receptores de trasplante de órgano sólido

Solid organ transplantation (SOT) is the best treatment option for end-stage organ disease. The number of SOT procedures has been steadily increasing worldwide during the past decades. This trend has been accompanied by the continuous incorporation of new antimicrobial drugs and by the refinement of strategies aimed at minimizing the risk of opportunistic infection. Nonetheless, viral infections, which can occur at any stage of the post-transplant period, remain a clinical challenge that negatively impacts both patient and graft outcomes. This review offers an overview of the most relevant viral infections in the SOT population, with a focus on herpesviruses (cytomegalovirus, Epstein–Barr virus, varicella-zoster virus, and herpes simplex virus 1 and 2) and polyomaviruses (human BK polyomavirus). In addition, the currently recommended prophylactic and treatment approaches are summarized, as well as the new antiviral agents in different phases of clinical development.(AU)

El trasplante de órgano sólido (TOS) es la mejor opción para el tratamiento de la enfermedad orgánica terminal, con un incremento sostenido a lo largo de las últimas décadas. Esta tendencia ha estado acompañada por la constante incorporación de nuevos antimicrobianos y el perfeccionamiento de las estrategias destinadas a minimizar el riesgo de infección oportunista. No obstante, las infecciones virales, que pueden aparecer en cualquier momento de la evolución post-trasplante, siguen constituyendo un desafío clínico con un impacto negativo en la evolución del receptor como del injerto. La presente revisión ofrece una panorámica de las infecciones virales más relevantes en el receptor de TOS, con énfasis en los herpesvirus (citomegalovirus, virus de Epstein-Barr, virus varicela-zóster y virus herpes simplex 1 y 2) y poliomavirus (poliomavirus humano BK). Se repasan igualmente las estrategias de profilaxis y tratamiento actualmente recomendadas, así como los nuevos agentes antivirales en diversas fases de desarrollo clínico.(A)

Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection: An official clinical practice guideline of the Spanish Society of Chemotherapy (SEQ), Spanish Society of Internal Medicine (SEMI) and the working group of Postoperative Infection of the Spanish Society of Anesthesia and Reanimation (SEDAR) / Recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la infección por Clostridioides difficile. Guía de práctica clínica de la Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia, Sociedad Española de Medicina Interna y grupo de trabajo de Infección Postoperatoria de la Sociedad Española de Anestesia y Reanimación

This document gathers the opinion of a multidisciplinary forum of experts on different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in Spain. It has been structured around a series of questions that the attendees considered relevant and in which a consensus opinion was reached. The main messages were as follows: CDI should be suspected in patients older than 2 years of age in the presence of diarrhea, paralytic ileus and unexplained leukocytosis, even in the absence of classical risk factors. With a few exceptions, a single stool sample is sufficient for diagnosis, which can be sent to the laboratory with or without transportation media for enteropathogenic bacteria. In the absence of diarrhoea, rectal swabs may be valid. The microbiology laboratory should include C. difficile among the pathogens routinely searched in patients with diarrhoea. Laboratory tests in different order and sequence schemes include GDH detection, presence of toxins, molecular tests and toxigenic culture. Immediate determination of sensitivity to drugs such as vancomycin, metronidazole or fidaxomycin is not required. The evolution of toxin persistence is not a suitable test for follow up. Laboratory diagnosis of CDI should be rapid and results reported and interpreted to clinicians immediately. In addition to the basic support of all diarrheic episodes, CDI treatment requires the suppression of antiperistaltic agents, proton pump inhibitors and antibiotics, where possible. Oral vancomycin and fidaxomycin are the antibacterials of choice in treatment, intravenous metronidazole being restricted for patients in whom the presence of the above drugs in the intestinal lumen cannot be assured. Fecal material transplantation is the treatment of choice for patients with multiple recurrences but uncertainties persist regarding its standardization and safety. Bezlotoxumab is a monoclonal antibody to C. difficile toxin B that should be administered to patients at high risk of recurrence. Surgery is becoming less and less necessary and prevention with vaccines is under research. Probiotics have so far not been shown to be therapeutically or preventively effective. The therapeutic strategy should be based, rather than on the number of episodes, on the severity of the episodes and on their potential to recur. Some data point to the efficacy of oral vancomycin prophylaxis in patients who reccur CDI when systemic antibiotics are required again

El presente documento recoge la opinión de un foro multidisciplinar de expertos sobre distintos aspectos del diangóstico y tratamiento de la infección por Clostridioides difficile (CDI) en España. Se ha estructurado alrededor de una serie de preguntas que los asistentes consideraron pertinentes y en las que se llegó a una opinión de consenso. Los principales mensajes fueron los siguientes: CDI debe sospecharse en pacientes mayores de 2 años de edad ante la presencia de diarrea, ileo paralítico y leucocitosis inexplicada, aún en ausencia de los factores de riesgo clásicos. Salvo excepciones, es suficiente con una sola muestra de heces para su diagnóstico que pueden ser enviadas al laboratorio con o sin medio de transporte para bacterias enteropatógenas. En ausencia de diarrea, pueden ser válidos los isopados rectales. El laboratorio de microbiología debe incluir a C. difficile entre los patógenos buscados de rutina en pacientes con diarrea. Las pruebas de laboratorio en diferentes esquemas de orden y secuencia incluyen la detección de GDH, la presencia de toxinas, las pruebas moleculares y el cultivo toxigénico. No se precisa la determinación inmediata de sensibilidad frente a fármacos como vancomicina, metronidazol o fidaxomicina. La evolución de la persistencia de toxina no es un test adecuado para el seguimiento del proceso. Además del soporte básico de toda diarrea, el tratamiento de CDI requiere la supresión de los agentes antiperistálticos, de los inhibidores de la bomba de protones y de los antibióticos, cuando sea posible. Vancomicina oral y fidaxomicina son los antibacterianos de elección en el tratamiento, restringiéndose metronidazol intravenoso para enfermos en los que no se pueda asegurar la presencia en la luz intestinal de los fármacos anteriores. El trasplante de materia fecal es el tratamiento de elección para pacientes con múltiples recurrencias pero persisten incertidumbres sobre su estandarización y seguridad. Bezlotoxumab es un anticuerpo monoclonal frente a la toxina B de C. difficile que debe administrarse a pacientes con alto riesgo de recurrencias. La cirugía es un procedimiento cada vez menos necesario y la prevención mediante vacunas se encuentra en fase de investigación. Los probióticos no han demostrado, hasta el momento, eficacia terapéutica ni preventiva. La estrategia terapéutica debe basarse, más que en el número de episodios, en la gravedad de los mismos y en la potencialidad de recurrir. Algunos datos apuntan a la eficacia de la profilaxis con vancomicina oral en pacientes que recurren cuando vuelven a precisar antibióticos sistémicos

And then there were none / Remedando a Agatha Christie: ¿qué microorganismo es el culpable?

No disponible

Executive summary of clinical practice guideline for the management of invasive diseases caused by Aspergillus: 2018 Update by the GEMICOMED-SEIMC/REIPI / Resumen ejecutivo del documento de consenso del GEMICOMED perteneciente a la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC) sobre el tratamiento de las infecciones invasoras producidas por Aspergillus

Aspergillus infection is a significant cause of morbi-mortality in an at-risk population. The Study Group of Fungal Infections (GEMICOMED) from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) has reviewed announcements made in invasive aspergillosis management. We have organized our recommendations in such a way as to provide a guide in resolving different clinical situations concerning the entire spectrum of invasive diseases caused by Aspergillus in various populations. Diagnostic approach, treatment and preventions strategies are outlined. It is not our aim that these guidelines supplant clinical judgment with respect to specific patients; however, it is our objective to perform a comprehensive summary of quality of care evidence for invasive aspergillosis management in different settings

Las infecciones causadas por Aspergillus causan una elevada morbimortalidad en la población susceptible. EL Grupo de Estudio de Micología Médica de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (GEMICOMED/SEIMC) ha revisado las novedades más importantes sobre el manejo de las infecciones invasoras causadas por Aspergillus. Hemos organizado nuestras recomendaciones en 3 apartados: diagnóstico, tratamiento y profilaxis en diferentes grupos de pacientes susceptibles de padecer estas infecciones. Se revisan distintas situaciones clínicas que pueden estar causadas por este hongo. Nuestro objetivo no es que estas guías de tratamiento suplanten el juicio clínico de los médicos ante un determinado paciente; sin embargo, sí deseamos poder ofrecer un resumen comprensible sobre las evidencias que existen para realizar un óptimo manejo de la infección invasora causada por Aspergillus en diferentes situaciones clínicas

Highlights in solid transplant infectious diseases 2015-2017 / Lo más destacado en infección en trasplante de órgano sólido 2015-2017

Solid organ transplant recipients have an increased risk of developing infections due to the lifelong treatment with immunosuppressive drugs. Herein we review recent (2015-2017) and relevant published advances in the field of bacterial, viral and fungal-infections in this population. We also address the most up-to-date immunological assays that can predict the risk of infection. Finally, we review current guidelines and how they improve the usual clinical care

Los receptores de un trasplante de órgano sólido tienen un mayor riesgo de desarrollar infecciones secundario a la inmunosupresión. En este artículo, revisamos los avances más recientes (2015-2017) y significativos en el campo de las infecciones bacterianas, virales y fúngicas en esta población. También revisamos los estudios inmunológicos que midiendo la respuesta inmune pueden predecir el riesgo de desarrollar una infección. Por último, revisamos las guías clínicas más recientes y cómo pueden mejorar la atención prestada a estos pacientes

Tocilizumab therapy in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: A matched retrospective cohort analysis / Tocilizumab en el tratamiento de la neumonía por SARS-CoV-2: análisis de una cohorte retrospectiva pareada

Background:The effect of immunomodulatory therapy with tocilizumab for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in real-life clinical practice remains controversial.Methods:Single-center retrospective matched cohort analysis including 47 consecutive patients treated with intravenous tocilizumab for severe COVID-19 pneumonia (“TCZ group”), matched by age, comorbidities, time from symptoms onset and baseline SpO2/FiO2 ratio with 47 patients receiving standard of care alone (“SoC group”).Results:There were no significant differences between the TCZ and SoC groups in the rate of clinical improvement (hospital discharge and/or a decrease of ≥2 points on a six-point ordinal scale) by day 7 (51.1% [24/47] versus 48.9% [23/47]; P-value=1.000). No differences were observed at day 14 in terms of clinical improvement (72.3% versus 76.6%; P-value=0.791), all-cause mortality (10.6% versus 12.8%; P-value=1.000), and the composite of invasive mechanical ventilation and/or death (25.5% versus 23.4%; P-value=1.000) either. Patients in the TCZ group had a more rapid normalization of C-reactive protein levels.Conclusions:No apparent benefit was observed in patients with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab as compared to a matched retrospective cohort. (AU)

Antecedentes:El efecto del tratamiento inmunomodulador con tocilizumab en la COVID-19 sigue siendo controvertido.Métodos:Estudio unicéntrico de cohortes retrospectivas pareadas que incluyó a 47 pacientes con COVID-19 grave tratados con tocilizumab intravenoso («grupo TCZ»), emparejados por edad, comorbilidades mayores, evolución de síntomas y cociente SpO2/FiO2 basal con 47 pacientes que recibieron tratamiento estándar únicamente («grupo SoC»).Resultados:No observamos diferencias significativas entre los grupos de TCZ y SoC en la tasa de mejoría clínica (alta hospitalaria y/o descenso de ≥ 2 puntos en una escala ordinal de 6 puntos) al día 7 (51,1% [24/47] vs. 48,9% [23/47]; P=1,000). Tampoco hubo diferencias al día 14 en las tasas de mejoría clínica (72,3% vs. 76,6%; P=0,791), mortalidad (10,6% vs. 12,8%; P=1,000) o en el compuesto de ventilación mecánica invasiva y/o muerte (25,5% vs. 23,4%; P=1,000). Los pacientes en el grupo de TCZ presentaron una normalización más rápida de la proteína C reactiva.Conclusiones:Respecto a una cohorte retrospectiva pareada, no detectamos un beneficio asociado al tratamiento con tocilizumab en pacientes con neumonía por COVID-19. (AU)

Manejo de la infección y la neutropenia febril en el paciente con cáncer sólido / Management of infection and febrile neutropenia in patients with solid cancer

Un grupo de expertos de la Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica (SEIMC) y de la Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM) han revisado en este documento los principales aspectos que deben considerarse en la evaluación de los pacientes con cáncer sólido y complicaciones infecciosas. Para ello se han establecido unas recomendaciones sobre la profilaxis de las infecciones más prevalentes en estos pacientes, el uso de vacunas, las medidas de control de la infección por catéteres vasculares y la prevención de la infección ante determinadas maniobras quirúrgicas. A continuación, se han revisado los criterios de manejo de la neutropenia febril y del uso de factores estimulantes de colonias, para terminar dando una serie de pautas sobre el tratamiento del paciente oncológico con infección grave. El documento se completa con una serie de medidas para el control de la infección hospitalaria (AU)

A group of experts from the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) have reviewed in this paper the main aspects to be considered in the evaluation of patients with solid cancer and infectious diseases. They have established a series of recommendations on the prevention of the most prevalent infections in these patients, the use of vaccines, the control measures of vascular catheter infection and prevention of infections before certain surgical procedures. Also the criteria for management of febrile neutropenia and the use of colony-stimulating factors were revised. Finally they provide a series of recommendations for the treatment of cancer patients with severe infection. The document is completed with a series of measures for the control of hospital infection (AU)

Enfermedades invasoras por hongos levaduriformes en el receptor de un trasplante de órgano sólido / Invasive yeast diseases in solid organ transplant recipients

Las infecciones fúngicas causadas por levaduras son poco frecuentes en la actualidad en los receptores de órgano sólido. La más común es la candidiasis (2%), que suele presentarse en el primer mes postrasplante en pacientes con factores de riesgo. Se han descrito factores de riesgo comunes y otros específicos de cada tipo de trasplante, lo que permite realizar estrategias de profilaxis dirigida de gran eficacia. La presentación clínica predominante es la fungemia, así como las infecciones cercanas al injerto. La criptococosis es más tardía, su incidencia no ha disminuido y no se conocen los factores de riesgo. En presencia de infecciones muy precoces ha de considerarse la posibilidad de transmisión con el injerto. La criptococosis suele manifestarse como meningitis, neumonía o infección diseminada. Es preciso excluir siempre la posibilidad de complicaciones asociadas como la hipertensión intracraneal y la reconstitución inmune. Dada la carencia de ensayos terapéuticos específicos en esta población, las recomendaciones de tratamiento antifúngico se basan en la información derivada de la población general. Es importante, sin embargo, considerar de forma cuidadosa el riesgo de interacciones medicamentosas, sobre todo entre azoles e inhibidores de la calcineurina. Tanto la candidiasis como la criptococosis incrementan significativamente la mortalidad de los pacientes receptores de órgano sólido (AU)

Infection. Its incidence remains stable and the specific risk factors have not been identified. When cryptococcosis is detected very early, transmission with the allograft should be considered. The most common clinical presentations include meningitis, pneumonia, and disseminated infection. Intracranial hypertension and immune reconstitution syndrome have to be considered. No therapeutic clinical trials have been conducted in solid organ transplant recipients, thus treatment recommendations are derived from data obtained from the general population. It is particularly important to consider the possibility of drug-drug interactions, mainly between azoles and calcineurin inhibitors. Both invasive candidiasis and cryptococcosis increase the mortality significantly in solid organ transplant recipients (AU)

EPICO 3.0. Antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients / EPICO 3.0. Profilaxis antifúngica en el paciente trasplantado de órgano sólido

Background. Although over the past decade the management of invasive fungal infection has improved, considerable controversy persists regarding antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. Aims. To identify the key clinical knowledge and make by consensus the high level recommendations required for antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients. Methods. Spanish prospective questionnaire, which measures consensus through the Delphi technique, was conducted anonymously and by e-mail with 30 national multidisciplinary experts, specialists in invasive fungal infections from six national scientific societies, including intensivists, anesthetists, microbiologists, pharmacologists and specialists in infectious diseases that responded to 12 questions prepared by the coordination group, after an exhaustive review of the literature in the last few years. The level of agreement achieved among experts in each of the categories should be equal to or greater than 70% in order to make a clinical recommendation. In a second term, after extracting the recommendations of the selected topics, a face-to-face meeting was held with more than 60 specialists who were asked to validate the pre-selected recommendations and derived algorithm. Measurements and primary outcomes. Echinocandin antifungal prophylaxis should be considered in liver transplant with major risk factors (retransplantation, renal failure requiring dialysis after transplantation, pretransplant liver failure, not early reoperation, or MELD > 30); heart transplant with hemodialysis, and surgical re-exploration after transplantation; environmental colonization by Aspergillus, or cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection; and pancreas and intestinal transplant in case of acute graft rejection, hemodialysis, initial graft dysfunction, post-perfusion pancreatitis with anastomotic problems or need for laparotomy after transplantation. Antifungal fluconazole prophylaxis should be considered in liver transplant without major risk factors and MELD 20-30, split or living donor, choledochojejunostomy, increased transfusion requirements, renal failure without replacement therapy, early reoperation, or multifocal colonization or infection with Candida; intestinal and pancreas transplant with no risk factors for echinocandin treatment. Liposomal amphotericin B antifungal prophylaxis should be considered in lung transplant (inhalant form) and liver transplant with major risk factors. Antifungal prophylaxis with voriconazole should be considered in lung transplant, and heart transplant with hemodialysis, surgical re-exploration after transplantation, environmental colonization by Aspergillus, or CMV infection. Conclusions. The management of antifungal prophylaxis in solid organ transplant recipients requires the application of knowledge and skills that are detailed in our recommendations and the algorithm developed therein. These recommendations, based on the DELPHI methodology, may help to identify potential patients, standardize their management and improve overall prognosis (AU)

Antecedentes. Aunque en la última década se ha observado una mejora en el tratamiento de la infección fúngica invasiva, todavía existen numerosas controversias en la profilaxis antifúngica del paciente trasplantado de órgano sólido. Objetivos. Identificar los principales conocimientos clínicos y elaborar recomendaciones con un alto nivel de consenso, necesarias para la profilaxis antifúngica del paciente trasplantado de órgano sólido. Métodos. Se realizó un cuestionario prospectivo español, que valora el consenso mediante la técnica Delphi. El cuestionario se llevó a cabo de forma anónima y por correo electrónico con 30 expertos multidisciplinarios nacionales, especialistas en infecciones fúngicas invasivas de seis sociedades científicas nacionales, que incluían intensivistas, anestesistas, microbiólogos, farmacólogos y especialistas en enfermedades infecciosas que respondieron a 12 preguntas preparadas por el grupo de coordinación, tras una revisión exhaustiva de la bibliografía de los últimos años. El nivel de acuerdo alcanzado entre los expertos en cada una de las categorías debía ser igual o superior al 70% para elaborar una recomendación. En un segundo término, después de extraer las recomendaciones de los temas seleccionados, se celebró una reunión presencial con más de 60 especialistas y se les solicitó la validación de las recomendaciones preseleccionadas y del algoritmo derivado de estas. Mediciones y resultados principales. Debe considerarse la profilaxis antifúngica con equinocandinas en el trasplante hepático con los principales factores de riesgo (retrasplante, insuficiencia renal postrasplante con necesidad de diálisis, insuficiencia hepática pretrasplante, reintervención quirúrgica no precoz, o MELD > 30); trasplante cardíaco con hemodiálisis, y reexploración quirúrgica postrasplante; colonización ambiental por Aspergillus, o infección por citomegalovirus; trasplante de páncreas e intestino si existe rechazo agudo del injerto, hemodiálisis, disfunción inicial del injerto, problemas en la anastomosis con pancreatitis posperfusión, o necesidad de laparotomía postrasplante. Debe considerarse la profilaxis antifúngica con fluconazol en el trasplante hepático sin los principales factores de riesgo y MELD de 20-30, split o donante vivo, coledocoyeyunostomía, altos requerimientos transfusionales, fracaso renal sin necesidad de terapia sustitutiva, reintervención precoz o colonización multifocal o infección por Candida, y trasplante de páncreas e intestino sin factores de riesgo para el tratamiento con equinocandina. Debe considerarse la profilaxis antifúngica con anfotericina B liposómica en el trasplante pulmonar (vía inhalada) y el trasplante hepático con los principales factores de riesgo. Debe considerarse la profilaxis antifúngica con voriconazol en el trasplante pulmonar y el trasplante cardíaco con hemodiálisis, reexploración quirúrgica postrasplante, colonización ambiental por Aspergillus o enfermedad por citomegalovirus. Conclusiones. El manejo de la profilaxis antifúngica del paciente trasplantado de órgano sólido requiere la aplicación de los conocimientos y destrezas que se detallan en nuestras recomendaciones y en el algoritmo desarrollado. Estas recomendaciones basadas en la metodología Delphi pueden ayudar a identificar a los potenciales pacientes, estandarizar su tratamiento en conjunto y mejorar su pronóstico (AU)

La infección fúngica invasiva: una enfermedad lo suficientemente compleja como para que existan especialistas en su abordaje / Invasive fungal disease: An entity with enough complexity to justify the existence of specialists in its manegment

No disponible