Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 24(5): e13944, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36254520

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study seeks to describe inpatient antimicrobial use (AU) utilizing the National Healthcare Safety Network-AU (NHSN-AU) framework among solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) within 12 months after transplant. METHODS: This cross-sectional study included SOTr ≥ 18 years of age who underwent transplantation from January 2015 to December 2016 at a Midwestern US transplant center. Inpatient AU was followed for 12 months post-transplant. Hospital days present up to 12 months post-transplant, AU variables, and Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) occurrences were analyzed. RESULTS: The cohort of 530 SOTr included 225 kidney (42.5%), 171 liver (32.3%), 45 lung (8.5%), 40 heart (7.5%), 39 multivisceral (7.4%), seven small bowel (1.3%), and three pancreas (0.6%) transplants. Total days of therapy (DOT) were 22 782 among the cohort, with a median of 5 days [interquartile range [IQR], 1-12]. Lung and liver transplants had the most total DOT (6571 vs. 5569 days), while lungs and small bowels had the highest median DOT (13 [IQR, 2-56] vs. 12 [IQR, 2-31]). The facility-wide DOT/1000 days were lowest in pancreas and highest in lung transplants (5.3 vs. 428.1). Small bowel transplants received the most resistant-Gram-positive infection and hospital-onset infection agents for facility-wide DOT/1000 days present. Pancreas and kidney transplants accounted for the most high-risk CDI agents. CDI occurred in 34 patients, with kidney and liver transplants experiencing 13 each. CONCLUSION: This study represents one of the first reports of AU in SOTr utilizing the NHSN-AU framework. More studies are needed for further peer-to-peer comparison of AU in this complex patient population.


Asunto(s)
Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Trasplante de Riñón , Trasplante de Órganos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Benchmarking , Infecciones por Clostridium/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes
2.
Am J Transplant ; 20(11): 3051-3060, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654332

RESUMEN

Solid organ transplant recipients (SOTr) with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) are expected to have poorer outcomes compared to nontransplant patients because of immunosuppression and comorbidities. The clinical characteristics of 47 SOTr (38 kidneys and 9 nonkidney organs) were compared to 100 consecutive hospitalized nontransplant controls. Twelve of 47 SOTr managed as outpatients were subsequently excluded from the outcome analyses to avoid potential selection bias. Chronic kidney disease (89% vs 57% P = .0007), diabetes (66% vs 33% P = .0007), and hypertension (94% vs 72% P = .006) were more common in the 35 hospitalized SOTr compared to controls. Diarrhea (54% vs 17%, P < .0001) was more frequent in SOTr. Primary composite outcome (escalation to intensive care unit, mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital all-cause mortality) was comparable between SOTr and controls (40% vs 48%, odds ratio [OR] 0.72 confidence interval [CI] [0.33-1.58] P = .42), despite more comorbidities in SOTr. Acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy occurred in 20% of SOTr compared to 4% of controls (OR 6 CI [1.64-22] P = .007). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increasing age and clinical severity were associated with mortality. Transplant status itself was not associated with mortality.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Trasplante de Órganos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Receptores de Trasplantes , Anciano , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Rechazo de Injerto/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 22(2): e13251, 2020 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31997476

RESUMEN

Optimal antimicrobial therapy for Enterococcus faecium bloodstream infection (EFBSI) in the solid organ transplant (SOT) population is not well defined. The purpose of this study was to describe the pharmacotherapy and outcomes of EFBSI in SOT patients. This was a single-center retrospective cohort of SOT patients with EFBSI from 2013 to 2019. Susceptibility testing was performed with Vitek® 2 or Etest. Estimates of optimal DAP pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic exposures (dose <10 mg/kg, fAUC/MIC >27.4) were made from previously established literature and equations. Fifty-one unique cases were included in the analysis. The median age was 61 years and liver (64%), intestinal (19%), and kidney (12%) were the most common organs transplanted. Most patients had indwelling central lines (75%) at the time of bacteremia; intra-abdominal abscesses/fluid collections were present in 44% of patients and 8% had endocarditis. Nineteen (37%) patients had polymicrobial infections. The most common definitive antimicrobial regimens were as follows: DAP plus beta-lactam (46%), DAP monotherapy (18%), and LZD (25%). Of the 33 patients that received DAP, 21% of E faecium isolates developed DAP resistance. 30-day mortality was 25% overall but higher in patients who received an initial DAP dose <10 mg/kg (43% vs 13%). Vancomycin-resistance, severity of illness, neutropenia, and source control were also associated with mortality. Inadequate DAP dosing for EFBSI may be associated with mortality in the SOT population. Larger, controlled analyses are necessary to determine the impact of optimized pharmacodynamics in this population.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Bacteriemia/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Receptores de Trasplantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Anciano , Bacteriemia/mortalidad , Enterococcus faecium , Femenino , Infecciones por Bacterias Grampositivas/mortalidad , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
4.
Transpl Infect Dis ; 20(2): e12854, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29423923

RESUMEN

Antimicrobial management of viral pneumonia has proven to be a challenge in hospitalized immunocompromised patients. A host of factors contribute to the dilemma, such as diagnostic uncertainty, lack of organism identification, and clinical status of the patient. Respiratory virus panel (RVP) use was compared between 131 immunocompromised patients who received send-out (n = 56) vs in-house (n = 75) testing. Antimicrobial optimization interventions consisted of antiviral addition/discontinuation, antibiotic discontinuation/de-escalation, or modification of immunosuppressive regimen. After implementation of an in-house test with audit and feedback, turnaround time of the RVP was reduced from 46.7 to 5.5 hours (P < .001) and time to intervention was reduced from 52.1 to 13.9 hours (P < .001), yet the frequency of antimicrobial optimization interventions was unchanged (30.7% vs 35.7%). Differences were not observed in duration of empiric antibiotic therapy or length of stay. The overall discontinuation rate for patients tested with a RVP was low (4.6%), and those with positive RVP (n = 43) had antibiotics stopped in 14% of cases. Bacterial pneumonia coinfection was confirmed in 2 patients. Further systematic efforts should be taken to reduce antibiotic use in viral pneumonia and identify the major barriers in the immunocompromised population.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/prevención & control , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Anciano , Programas de Optimización del Uso de los Antimicrobianos , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Utilización de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptores de Trasplantes
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 60(6): 892-9, 2015 Mar 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25586686

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Microbiologic cultures, the current gold standard diagnostic method for invasive Candida infections, have low specificity and take up to 2-5 days to grow. We present the results of the first extensive multicenter clinical trial of a new nanodiagnostic approach, T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR), for diagnosis of candidemia. METHODS: Blood specimens were collected from 1801 hospitalized patients who had a blood culture ordered for routine standard of care; 250 of them were manually supplemented with concentrations from <1 to 100 colony-forming units (CFUs)/mL for 5 different Candida species. RESULTS: T2MR demonstrated an overall specificity per assay of 99.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 99.1%-99.6%) with a mean time to negative result of 4.2 ± 0.9 hours. Subanalysis yielded a specificity of 98.9% (95% CI, 98.3%-99.4%) for Candida albicans/Candida tropicalis, 99.3% (95% CI, 98.7%-99.6%) for Candida parapsilosis, and 99.9% (95% CI, 99.7%-100.0%) for Candida krusei/Candida glabrata. The overall sensitivity was found to be 91.1% (95% CI, 86.9%-94.2%) with a mean time of 4.4 ± 1.0 hours for detection and species identification. The subgroup analysis showed a sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI, 85.4%-96.6%) for C. albicans/C. tropicalis, 94.2% (95% CI, 84.1%-98.8%) for C. parapsilosis, and 88.1% (95% CI, 80.2%-93.7%) for C. krusei/C. glabrata. The limit of detection was 1 CFU/mL for C. tropicalis and C. krusei, 2 CFU/mL for C. albicans and C. glabrata, and 3 CFU/mL for C. parapsilosis. The negative predictive value was estimated to range from 99.5% to 99.0% in a study population with 5% and 10% prevalence of candidemia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: T2MR is the first fully automated technology that directly analyzes whole blood specimens to identify species without the need for prior isolation of Candida species, and represents a breakthrough shift into a new era of molecular diagnostics. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01752166.


Asunto(s)
Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidemia/diagnóstico , Espectroscopía de Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Antifúngicos , Candida albicans/aislamiento & purificación , Candida glabrata/aislamiento & purificación , Candida tropicalis/aislamiento & purificación , Femenino , Humanos , Límite de Detección , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
7.
J Pharm Pract ; 36(3): 584-587, 2023 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35090351

RESUMEN

Objectives: Approximately 25% of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) will experience recurrence, which is greater in immunocompromised patients. We report experience with an institutional guideline targeting high-risk immunocompromised patients. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with CDI who met institutional criteria for bezlotoxumab due to high risk for recurrent CDI between June 1, 2017, and November 30, 2018. The primary endpoint of recurrent CDI within 12 weeks was compared between patients who received the standard of care (SoC) plus or minus bezlotoxumab. Results: Twenty-three patients received bezlotoxumab infusion plus SoC and were compared to 30 SoC patients. 84% of patients were immunocompromised and 54.7% were transplant recipients. The primary endpoint occurred in 13% of bezlotoxumab patients compared to 23.3% of SoC patients. No serious adverse effects were identified. Conclusion: Bezlotoxumab was associated with a meaningful reduction in recurrent CDI in this cohort largely comprising immunocompromised and transplant patients. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate bezlotoxumab in this population.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Recurrencia , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Clostridium/prevención & control
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(10): 1345-1348, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34583800

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of clinical decision support on guideline-concordant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) treatment. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental study in >50 ambulatory clinics. SETTING: Primary, specialty, and urgent-care clinics. PATIENTS: Adult patients were eligible for inclusion if they were diagnosed with and treated for a first episode of symptomatic CDI at an ambulatory clinic between November 1, 2019, and November 30, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: An outpatient best practice advisory (BPA) was implemented to notify prescribers that "vancomycin or fidaxomicin are preferred over metronidazole for C.difficile infection" when metronidazole was prescribed to a patient with CDI. RESULTS: In total, 189 patients were included in the study: 92 before the BPA and 97 after the BPA. Their median age was 59 years; 31% were male; 75% were white; 30% had CDI-related comorbidities; 35% had healthcare exposure; 65% had antibiotic exposure; 44% had gastric acid suppression therapy within 90 days of CDI diagnosis. The BPA was accepted 23 of 26 times and was used to optimize the therapy of 16 patients in 6 months. Guideline-concordant therapy increased after implementation of the BPA (72% vs 91%; P = .001). Vancomycin prescribing increased and metronidazole prescribing decreased after the BPA. There was no difference in clinical response or unplanned encounter within 14 days after treatment initiation. Fewer patients after the BPA had CDI recurrence within 14-56 days of the initial episode (27% vs 7%; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical decision support increased prescribing of guideline-concordant CDI therapy in the outpatient setting. A targeted BPA is an effective stewardship intervention and may be especially useful in settings with limited antimicrobial stewardship resources.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile , Infecciones por Clostridium , Sistemas de Apoyo a Decisiones Clínicas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antibacterianos , Infecciones por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Clostridium/tratamiento farmacológico , Fidaxomicina/uso terapéutico , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
9.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 102(1): 115571, 2022 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34768207

RESUMEN

Diagnostic stewardship interventions can decrease unnecessary antimicrobial therapy and microbiology laboratory resources and costs. This retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated factors associated with inappropriate initial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing in patients with suspected community-acquired meningitis or encephalitis. In 250 patients, 202 (80.8%) and 48 (19.2%) were suspected meningitis and encephalitis, respectively. 207 (82.8%) patients had inappropriate and 43 (17.2%) appropriate testing. Any inappropriate CSF test was greatest in the immunocompromised (IC) group (n = 54, 91.5%), followed by non-IC (n = 109, 80.1%) and HIV (n = 44, 80%). Ordering performed on the general ward was associated with inappropriate CSF test orders (adjOR 2.81, 95% CI [1.08-7.34]). Laboratory fee costs associated with excessive testing was close to $300,000 per year. A stepwise algorithm defining empiric and add on tests according to CSF parameters and patient characteristics could improve CSF test ordering in patients with suspected meningitis or encephalitis.


Asunto(s)
Encefalitis/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Encefalitis/diagnóstico , Meningitis Bacterianas/líquido cefalorraquídeo , Meningitis Bacterianas/diagnóstico , Adulto , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Encefalitis/microbiología , Femenino , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Masculino , Meningitis Bacterianas/microbiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(8): 1032-1035, 2022 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34236024

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Urine cultures have poor specificity for catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). We evaluated the effect of a urine-culture stewardship program on urine culture utilization and CAUTI in adult intensive care units (ICUs). DESIGN: A quasi-interventional study was performed from 2015 to 2017. SETTING AND PATIENTS: The study cohort comprised 21,367 patients admitted to the ICU at a teaching hospital. INTERVENTION: The urine culture stewardship program included monthly 1-hour discussions with ICU house staff emphasizing avoidance of "pan-culture" for sepsis workup and obtaining urine culture only if a urinary source of sepsis is suspected. The urine culture utilization rate metric (UCUR; ie, no. urine cultueres/catheter days ×100) was utilized to measure the effect. Monthly UCUR, catheter utilization ratio (CUR), and CAUTI rate were reported on an interactive quality dashboard. To ensure safety, catheterized ICU patients (2015-2016) were evaluated for 30-day readmission for UTI. Time-series data and relationships were analyzed using Spearman correlation coefficients and regression analysis. RESULTS: Urine culture utilization decreased from 3,081 in 2015 to 2,158 in 2016 to 1,218 in 2017. CAUTIs decreased from 78 in 2015 to 60 in 2016 and 28 in 2017. Regression analysis over time showed significant decreases in UCUR (r, 0.917; P < .0001) and CAUTI rate (r, 0.657; P < .0001). The co-correlation between UCUR and CAUTI rate was (r, 0.625; P < .0001) compared to CUR and CAUTI rate (r, 0.523; P = .004). None of these patients was readmitted with a CAUTI. CONCLUSIONS: Urine culture stewardship program was effective and safe in reducing UC overutilization and was correlated with a decrease in CAUTIs. Addition of urine-culture stewardship to standard best practices could reduce CAUTI in ICUs.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres , Infección Hospitalaria , Sepsis , Infecciones Urinarias , Adulto , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/diagnóstico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/epidemiología , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Cateterismo Urinario/efectos adversos , Catéteres Urinarios/efectos adversos , Infecciones Urinarias/diagnóstico , Infecciones Urinarias/prevención & control
12.
Clin Transplant ; 25(1): E82-7, 2011.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20973823

RESUMEN

Given the limited information on Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) during hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), we examined the recent epidemiology of CDI in HSCT recipients at our institution. During the two-yr retrospective study period (2005-2006), 361 transplants were performed: 60% allogeneic and 40% autologous. Among all hospitalized patients in a non-outbreak setting, CDI rates in HSCT recipients were ninefold higher than those in general patients and 1.4-fold higher than those in patients with cancer (24.0 vs. 2.6 vs. 16.8/10,000 patient-days respectively). Sixty-two episodes of CDI occurred in 51 (14%) HSCT recipients: 39 (18%) allogeneic vs. 12 (8%) autologous (p = 0.01). Almost half of CDI episodes occurred within 30 d post-HSCT and 22% before HSCT. Clostridium difficile toxin assay was initially positive in 28% of the first, 31% of the second and 27% of the third stool samples tested. All but one patient responded to therapy with metronidazole or vancomycin. Severe CDI occurred in one patient and recurrent CDI in two patients. CDI is common during HSCT especially in allogeneic transplants during the peri-HSCT period. Prospective studies to better define the epidemiology and identify unique risk factors for CDI and more accurate tests to confirm the diagnosis in this population are needed.


Asunto(s)
Clostridioides difficile/patogenicidad , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/epidemiología , Trasplante de Células Madre Hematopoyéticas , Neoplasias/terapia , Adulto , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/diagnóstico , Enterocolitis Seudomembranosa/microbiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trasplante Homólogo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vancomicina/uso terapéutico
13.
Infect Dis Clin North Am ; 35(4): 1027-1053, 2021 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34752219

RESUMEN

Invasive fungal infections are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in hospitalized patients and in the immunocompromised population. This article reviews the current epidemiology of nosocomial fungal infections in adult patients, with an emphasis on invasive candidiasis (IC) and invasive aspergillosis (IA). Included are descriptions of nosocomial infections caused by Candida auris, an emerging pathogen, and IC- and IA-associated with coronavirus disease 2019. The characteristics and availability of newer nonculture-based tests for identification of nosocomial fungal pathogens are discussed. Recently published recommendations and guidelines for the control and prevention of these nosocomial fungal infections are summarized.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Micosis/epidemiología , Micosis/prevención & control , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/diagnóstico , Infección Hospitalaria/etiología , Hongos/clasificación , Hongos/patogenicidad , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Control de Infecciones/normas , Micosis/diagnóstico , Micosis/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2
14.
J Occup Environ Med ; 63(6): 476-481, 2021 06 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596025

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Examine the effect of a universal facemask policy for healthcare workers (HCW) and incidence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positivity. METHODS: Daily number of symptomatic HCW tested, SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates, and HCW job-descriptions were collected pre and post Universal HCW facemask policy (March 26, 2020). Multiple change point regression was used to model positive-test-rate data. SARS-CoV-2 testing and positivity rates were compared for pre-intervention, transition, post-intervention, and follow-up periods. RESULTS: Between March 12 and August 10, 2020, 19.2% of HCW were symptomatic for COVID-19 and underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing. A single change point was identified ∼March 28-30 (95% probability). Before the change point, the odds of a tested HCW having a positive result doubled every 4.5 to 7.5 days. Post-change-point, the odds of a tested HCW having a positive result halved every 10.5 to 13.5 days. CONCLUSIONS: Universal facemasks were associated with reducing HCW's risk of acquiring COVID-19.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Política de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Máscaras , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , COVID-19/diagnóstico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Prueba de COVID-19 , Atención a la Salud , Personal de Salud/clasificación , Humanos , Michigan/epidemiología
16.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 54(10): 4314-20, 2010 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20660665

RESUMEN

Of the 9 vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) cases reported to date in the literature, 7 occurred in Michigan. In 5 of the 7 Michigan VRSA cases, an Inc18-like vanA plasmid was identified in the VRSA isolate and/or an associated vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) isolate from the same patient. This plasmid may play a critical role in the emergence of VRSA. We studied the geographical distribution of the plasmid by testing 1,641 VRE isolates from three separate collections by PCR for plasmid-specific genes traA, repR, and vanA. Isolates from one collection (phase 2) were recovered from surveillance cultures collected in 17 hospitals in 13 states. All VRE isolates from 2 Michigan institutions (n = 386) and between 60 and 70 VRE isolates (n = 883) from the other hospitals were tested. Fifteen VRE isolates (3.9%) from Michigan were positive for an Inc18-like vanA plasmid (9 E. faecalis [12.5%], 3 E. faecium [1.0%], 2 E. avium, and 1 E. raffinosus). Six VRE isolates (0.6%) from outside Michigan were positive (3 E. faecalis [2.7%] and 3 E. faecium [0.4%]). Of all E. faecalis isolates tested, 6.0% were positive for the plasmid, compared to 0.6% for E. faecium and 3.0% for other spp. Fourteen of the 15 plasmid-positive isolates from Michigan had the same Tn1546 insertion site location as the VRSA-associated Inc18-like plasmid, whereas 5 of 6 plasmid-positive isolates from outside Michigan differed in this characteristic. Most plasmid-positive E. faecalis isolates demonstrated diverse patterns by PFGE, with the exception of three pairs with indistinguishable patterns, suggesting that the plasmid is mobile in nature. Although VRE isolates with the VRSA-associated Inc18-like vanA plasmid were more common in Michigan, they remain rare. Periodic surveillance of VRE isolates for the plasmid may be useful in predicting the occurrence of VRSA.


Asunto(s)
Enterococcus/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus/genética , Plásmidos/genética , Staphylococcus aureus/genética , Resistencia a la Vancomicina/genética , Proteínas Bacterianas/genética , Electroforesis en Gel de Campo Pulsado , Enterococcus faecalis/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecalis/genética , Enterococcus faecium/efectos de los fármacos , Enterococcus faecium/genética , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos
17.
J Clin Microbiol ; 48(11): 4326-8, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20844229

RESUMEN

Two immunocompromised patients with 2009 H1N1 influenza pneumonia had viral shedding for over 5 weeks despite therapy with oseltamivir. Declining or persistently low cycle threshold values noted on serial qualitative real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR) of respiratory specimens implied increasing viral load and probable drug resistance. Oseltamivir resistance was later confirmed by pyrosequencing.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/farmacología , Farmacorresistencia Viral , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/efectos de los fármacos , Gripe Humana/tratamiento farmacológico , Oseltamivir/farmacología , Reacción en Cadena de la Polimerasa de Transcriptasa Inversa/métodos , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Huésped Inmunocomprometido , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/genética , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A/aislamiento & purificación , Gripe Humana/virología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oseltamivir/administración & dosificación , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Esputo/virología , Factores de Tiempo , Carga Viral , Esparcimiento de Virus
18.
Blood ; 111(11): 5403-10, 2008 Jun 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18285548

RESUMEN

The anti-cytomegalovirus (CMV) activity and safety of oral maribavir in CMV-seropositive allogeneic stem-cell transplant recipients were evaluated in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. After engraftment, 111 patients were randomized to receive CMV prophylaxis with maribavir (100 mg twice daily, 400 mg once daily, or 400 mg twice daily) or placebo. Within the first 100 days after transplantation, the incidence of CMV infection based on CMV pp65 antigenemia was lower in each of the respective maribavir groups (15%, P = .046; 19%, P = .116; 15%, P = .053) compared with placebo (39%). Similarly, the incidence of CMV infection based on plasma CMV DNA was lower in each of the respective maribavir groups (7%, P = .001; 11%, P = .007; 19%, P = .038) compared with placebo (46%). Anti-CMV therapy was also used less often in patients receiving each respective dose of maribavir (15%, P = .001; 30%, P = .051; 15%, P = .002) compared with placebo (57%). There were 3 cases of CMV disease in placebo patients but none in the maribavir patients. Adverse events, mostly taste disturbance, nausea, and vomiting, were more frequent with maribavir. Maribavir had no adverse effect on neutrophil or platelet counts. These results show that maribavir can reduce the incidence of CMV infection and, unlike ganciclovir, does not cause myelosuppression.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Infecciones por Citomegalovirus/prevención & control , Ribonucleósidos/administración & dosificación , Trasplante de Células Madre , Adulto , Antivirales/efectos adversos , Antivirales/sangre , Bencimidazoles/efectos adversos , Bencimidazoles/sangre , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Ribonucleósidos/efectos adversos , Ribonucleósidos/sangre , Trastornos del Gusto/inducido químicamente , Trasplante Homólogo , Vómitos/inducido químicamente
19.
Curr Infect Dis Rep ; 12(6): 455-64, 2010 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21308555

RESUMEN

Enterococcus spp have emerged as important pathogens in urinary tract infection (UTI), especially in hospitalized patients. Resistance to multiple antibiotics, including vancomycin, has become common, particularly in infections involving Enterococcus faecium. The management of UTIs caused by Enterococcus spp has become challenging given the presence of underlying comorbidities in these patients and the limited therapeutic options available to treat multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterococcus. Routine therapy for asymptomatic bacteriuria with MDR-Enterococcus is not recommended. Removal of indwelling urinary catheters should be considered. Appropriate antibiotic therapy selection should be guided by urine culture and susceptibility results. Data are limited on the treatment of UTIs caused by MDR-Enterococcus. Potential oral agents active against MDR-Enterococcus that may be considered for acute uncomplicated UTI include nitrofurantoin, fosfomycin, and fluoroquinolones. Potential parenteral agents for the treatment of pyelonephritis and complicated UTIs caused by MDR-Enterococcus include daptomycin, linezolid, and quinipristin-dalfopristin. Aminoglycosides or rifampin may be considered as adjunctive therapy in serious infections.

20.
Int J Infect Dis ; 97: 396-403, 2020 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32623082

RESUMEN

SIGNIFICANCE: The United States is in an acceleration phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Currently there is no known effective therapy or vaccine for treatment of SARS-CoV-2, highlighting urgency around identifying effective therapies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of hydroxychloroquine therapy alone and in combination with azithromycin in hospitalized patients positive for COVID-19. DESIGN: Multi-center retrospective observational study. SETTING: The Henry Ford Health System (HFHS) in Southeast Michigan: large six hospital integrated health system; the largest of hospitals is an 802-bed quaternary academic teaching hospital in urban Detroit, Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients hospitalized with a COVID-related admission in the health system from March 10, 2020 to May 2, 2020 were included. Only the first admission was included for patients with multiple admissions. All patients evaluated were 18 years of age and older and were treated as inpatients for at least 48h unless expired within 24h. EXPOSURE: Receipt of hydroxychloroquine alone, hydroxychloroquine in combination with azithromycin, azithromycin alone, or neither. MAIN OUTCOME: The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Of 2,541 patients, with a median total hospitalization time of 6 days (IQR: 4-10 days), median age was 64 years (IQR:53-76 years), 51% male, 56% African American, with median time to follow-up of 28.5 days (IQR:3-53). Overall in-hospital mortality was 18.1% (95% CI:16.6%-19.7%); by treatment: hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin, 157/783 (20.1% [95% CI: 17.3%-23.0%]), hydroxychloroquine alone, 162/1202 (13.5% [95% CI: 11.6%-15.5%]), azithromycin alone, 33/147 (22.4% [95% CI: 16.0%-30.1%]), and neither drug, 108/409 (26.4% [95% CI: 22.2%-31.0%]). Primary cause of mortality was respiratory failure (88%); no patient had documented torsades de pointes. From Cox regression modeling, predictors of mortality were age>65 years (HR:2.6 [95% CI:1.9-3.3]), white race (HR:1.7 [95% CI:1.4-2.1]), CKD (HR:1.7 [95%CI:1.4-2.1]), reduced O2 saturation level on admission (HR:1.5 [95%CI:1.1-2.1]), and ventilator use during admission (HR: 2.2 [95%CI:1.4-3.3]). Hydroxychloroquine provided a 66% hazard ratio reduction, and hydroxychloroquine+azithromycin 71% compared to neither treatment (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this multi-hospital assessment, when controlling for COVID-19 risk factors, treatment with hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin was associated with reduction in COVID-19 associated mortality. Prospective trials are needed to examine this impact.


Asunto(s)
Azitromicina/uso terapéutico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/tratamiento farmacológico , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapéutico , Neumonía Viral/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/mortalidad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA