A Comparative Cohort Study of Visual Outcomes in Femtosecond Laser-Assisted versus Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate visual outcomes after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (LCS) with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS). DESIGN: Prospective, multicenter, comparative case series. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients undergoing femtosecond LCS or PCS with intraocular lens insertion. METHODS: A total of 1876 eyes of 1238 patients (422 male and 772 female) who underwent cataract surgery between January 2012 and June 2014 were included in the study: 1017 eyes from center A and 859 eyes from center B. Cases underwent clinico-socioeconomic selection. Patients with absolute LCS contraindications were assigned to PCS; otherwise, all patients were offered LCS and elected on the basis of their decision to pay (the out-of-pocket cost for LCS). Demographic and postoperative data were collected to determine differences between groups. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Six-month postoperative visual and refractive outcomes. Masked subjective refractions were performed 2 to 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 988 eyes in the LCS group and 888 eyes in the PCS group. Baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was better in LCS compared with PCS (20/44.0 vs. 20/51.5; P < 0.0003). Preoperative surgical refractive aim differed significantly between groups (LCS -0.28 vs. PCS -0.23; P < 0.0001). More patients who received LCS had Toric lenses implanted compared with PCS (47.4% vs. 34.8%; P < 0.0001). Postoperative BCVA was better after LCS (20/24.5 vs. 20/26.4; P = 0.0003) with a greater proportion of LCS cases achieving BCVA >20/30 (LCS 89.7% vs. PCS 84.2%; P = 0.0006) and 20/40 (LCS 96.6% vs. PCS 93.9%; P = 0.0077). However, PCS cases had more letters gained compared with LCS cases (13.5 vs. 12.5 letters; P = 0.0088), reflecting baseline BCVA differences. Mean absolute error was higher in LCS compared with PCS (0.41 diopters [D] vs. 0.35 D; P < 0.0011). The percentage of eyes within 0.5 D of error from preoperative aim refraction was higher in the PCS group (LCS 72.2% vs. PCS 82.6%; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond LCS did not demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in visual outcomes over conventional PCS.

Visual outcomes with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional cataract surgery in toric IOL insertion.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the visual outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (LCS) compared with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (PCS) in patients undergoing Toric IOL insertion. DESIGN: A non-randomized, single surgeon, prospective, comparative cohort case series PARTICIPANTS: Patients undergoing LCS and PCS between January 2012 and July 2014 at a single center. METHODS: The LCS group underwent femtosecond laser pretreatment for the anterior capsulotomy and lens fragmentation. Otherwise standard phacoemulsification surgery and foldable toric intraocular lens insertion proceeded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), pre and post operative cylinder and mean absolute refractive error. RESULTS: A total of 418 eyes from 323 patients were included in the study; with 95 eyes in the PCS group and 323 in the LCS group. There were 243 (75.5%) LCS eyes with a pre-operative BCVA of 20/40 or better and 54 (56.8%) in the PCS group (p < 0.001). For post-operative BCVA, 315 (97.5 %) LCS and 81 (85.3%) PCS eyes had a BCVA of 20/40 or better (p = <0.001). However, there was no significant difference for change in BCVA between the groups (mean gain in EDTRS letter 11.0 for LCS and 10.3 for PCS p = 0.64) or in MAE (mean 0.56D PCS vs 0.65D LCS p = 0.18). CONCLUSION: In patients receiving toric intraocular lenses, there is similar improvement in terms of letters gained with LCS and PCS. Overall, there is no additional benefit for patients undergoing LCS in this cohort.

The use of heterochromatic flicker photometry to determine macular pigment optical density in a healthy Australian population.

PURPOSE: To establish the normal macular pigment density (MPOD) in a healthy adult Australian sample using heterochromatic flicker photometry (HFP). METHODS: Macular pigment density was measured using heterochromatic flicker photometry in a total of 201 subjects ranging in age from 21 to 84 years with healthy macula. Fifty-seven of the healthy subjects also completed a food-frequency dietary questionnaire. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using logMAR, chart and macular morphological profiles were assessed using high-resolution integrated Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT). RESULTS: The average MPOD value was 0.41 ± 0.20 (range 0.07-0.79). There was no statistically significant difference between values in the left and right eye, with good interocular agreement (0.41 vs 0.40, r = 0.893, p < 0.01). Age significantly predicted MPOD score (R (2) = 0.07, p < 0.05). A subgroup analysis of patients who completed the dietary questionnaire revealed a close correlation between higher diet scores and higher MPOD (r = 0.720 p = 0.031). There was no effect of smoking, gender, or iris colour on MPOD values. There was no significant correlation between BCVA, macular OCT profiles, and MPOD. CONCLUSION: Given that MPOD values are potentially affected by geographical variation, we have determined a mean MPOD value for healthy subjects in a population south of the equator, providing a reference point for future studies on Caucasian samples.

Cystoid macular edema after femtosecond laser-assisted versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of postoperative clinical cystoid macular edema (CME) associated with femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (Catalys laser system) versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery. SETTING: Launceston Eye Institute, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. DESIGN: Nonrandomized, single-surgeon, prospective, comparative cohort case series. METHODS: Patients who had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and phacoemulsification cataract surgery between March 2012 and July 2014 were included in the study. The femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery group had anterior capsulotomy, lens fragmentation, with or without corneal incisions via femtosecond laser pretreatment. Standard phacoemulsification surgery and foldable acrylic intraocular lens insertion proceeded in all cases. All patients received topical nonsteroidal drops commencing 2 days preoperatively and continuing for 4 weeks postoperatively. The incidence of postoperative clinical CME (confirmed by optical coherence tomography) and comparison between groups were measured. The main outcome measure was the clinical CME rates. RESULTS: Of the eyes, 833 had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery amd 458 had standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Both groups had similar baseline parameters. There were 7 cases of postoperative CME (0.8%) in the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery group compared to 1 case (0.2%) in the phacoemulsification cataract surgery group, highlighting a trend toward greater cystoid macular edema in the femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery group. This correlated with a change in laser treatment speed (due to a software upgrade), suggesting that retinal safety thresholds need further careful analysis. CONCLUSION: Increased CME might be a subthreshold retinal injury safety signal after femtosecond laser pretreatment and warrants further study. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: There are no financial or conflicts of interest for any author.

Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery: outcomes and safety in more than 4000 cases at a single center.

PURPOSE: To compare the intraoperative complications and safety of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery. SETTING: Single center. DESIGN: Prospective consecutive comparative cohort case series. METHODS: Eyes had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (study group) or phacoemulsification (control group) by 1 of 5 surgeons. The technique comprised manual corneal incisions and capsulorhexis or laser-assisted anterior capsulotomy, lens fragmentation, corneal incisions, phacoemulsification, and intraocular lens implantation. RESULTS: The study group comprised 1852 eyes and the control group, 2228 eyes. Patient demographics were similar between groups. There was a significant improvement in vacuum/docking attempts, surface recognition adjustments, treatment, and vacuum time during the laser procedure in the study group. Anterior capsule tears occurred in 1.84% of eyes in the study group and 0.22% of eyes in the control group (P < .0001). There was no difference in the incidence of anterior capsule tears between the first half and second half of laser-assisted cases. Anterior capsulotomy tags occurred in 1.62% study group eyes. There was no significant difference in posterior capsule tears between the 2 groups (0.43% versus 0.18%). The incidence of significant intraoperative corneal haze and miosis was higher and the effective phacoemulsification time significantly lower in the study group (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Significant intraoperative complications likely to affect refractive outcomes and patient satisfaction were low overall. The 2 cataract surgery techniques appear to be equally safe. Although anterior capsule tears remain a concern, the safety of femtosecond-assisted cataract surgery in terms of posterior capsule complications was equal to that of phacoemulsification. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Effect of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery on the corneal endothelium.

PURPOSE: To compare the effect on the corneal endothelium of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery. SETTING: Private clinic, Tasmania, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective comparative cohort study. METHODS: Femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (study group) or conventional phacoemulsification (control group) was performed. The central corneal thickness, central 3.0 mm corneal volume, volume stress index, and central endothelial cell density (ECD) were measured preoperatively and 1 day, 3 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The study group comprised 405 eyes and the control group, 215 eyes. Postoperative corneal edema was significantly less in the study group at 1 day and 3 weeks. However, the difference was negligible at 6 months. The study group had significant reductions in ECD loss compared with the control group [corrected] at 3 weeks but not at 6 months (6-month mean -150 cells/mm(2) ± 244 [SD] versus -149 cells/mm(2) ± 233). Eyes in the study group with laser-automated corneal incisions had greater endothelial cell loss at 6 months than eyes in the study group with manual corneal incisions and eyes in the control group (P<.0001). Eyes in the study group with zero effective phaco time and manually created corneal incisions had statistically significantly less endothelial cell loss at 6 months than the other groups (P<.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Femtosecond laser pretreatment for cataract surgery was associated with a significant reduction in early postoperative corneal edema and endothelial cell loss compared with conventional phacoemulsification; however, the difference diminished with time. Laser-automated corneal incisions seemed to adversely affect the corneal endothelial cells. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Anterior chamber flare after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine whether postoperative ocular inflammation is less after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery than after conventional phacoemulsification (manual) cataract surgery. SETTING: Private clinic, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. DESIGN: Prospective consecutive investigator-masked nonrandomized parallel cohort study. METHODS: Consecutive cataract patients who had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery or manual cataract surgery by the same surgeon at a single center were assessed. The primary endpoint was postoperative aqueous flare measured by laser flare photometry at 1 day and 4 weeks. Secondary endpoints included retinal thickness measured by optical coherence tomography and slitlamp examination findings at 4 weeks. RESULTS: The per-protocol population comprised 176 patients (100 in laser group; 76 in manual group). Postoperative aqueous flare was significantly greater in the manual cataract surgery group at 1 day (P=.0089) and at 4 weeks (P=.003). There was a significant correlation between effective phacoemulsification time and 1-day postoperative aqueous flare (r = 0.35, P<.0001). The increase in outer zone thickness measured by optical coherence tomography was less in the laser group (P=.007). CONCLUSION: Anterior segment inflammation was less after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery than after manual cataract surgery, and this appeared to be due to a reduction in phacoemulsification energy.