RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: We conducted a cross-sectional study of pregnant women with acute respiratory illness during delivery hospitalizations during influenza season to describe clinical testing for respiratory viruses and infection prevention practices. METHODS: Women had nasal swabs tested for influenza and other respiratory viruses. Among 91 enrolled women, 22 (24%) had clinical testing for influenza. RESULTS: Based on clinical and study testing combined, 41 of 91 (45%) women had samples positive for respiratory viruses. The most common virus was influenza (17 of 91, 19%); 53% (9 of 17) of influenza virus infections were identified through study testing alone. Only 16% of women were on droplet precautions. CONCLUSIONS: Peripartum respiratory infections may be underrecognized.
Asunto(s)
Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/prevención & control , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Periparto , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/virología , Mujeres Embarazadas , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/epidemiología , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/virología , Estaciones del AñoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We had three objectives for our study: 1) to describe the prevalence and burden of experiences of discrimination among Hispanics with poorly controlled diabetes; 2) to evaluate associations among discrimination experiences and their burden with comorbid depression among Hispanics with poorly controlled diabetes; and 3) to evaluate whether discrimination encountered in the health care context itself was associated with comorbid depression for Hispanic adults with diabetes. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of baseline data of a randomized controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: We collected data in the context of an RCT in a clinical setting in New York City. PARTICIPANTS: Our sample comprised 221 urban-dwelling Hispanics, largely of Caribbean origin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measure was major depression, measured by the Euro-D (score > 3). RESULTS: Of 221 participants, 58.8% reported at least one experience of everyday discrimination, and 42.5% reported at least one major experience of discrimination. Depression was associated significantly with counts of experiences of major discrimination (OR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.09 - 1.94, P = .01), aggregate counts of everyday and major discrimination (OR = 1.13, 95% CI = 1.02 - 1.26, P = .02), and the experience of discrimination in getting care for physical health (OR = 6.30, 95% CI= 1.10-36.03). CONCLUSIONS: Discrimination may pose a barrier to getting health care and may be associated with depression among Hispanics with diabetes. Clinicians treating Caribbean-born Hispanics should be aware that disadvantage and discrimination likely complicate a presentation of diabetes.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/etnología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Racismo/etnología , Racismo/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York , Prevalencia , Racismo/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud Urbana/etnologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is associated with autonomic dysregulation during pregnancy; however, less is known about autonomic function in the first week postpartum after preeclampsia. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed data from a prospective cohort of women with and without preeclampsia. Continuous blood pressure and heart rate were measured with finger plethysmography within 7 days postpartum. Frequency-domain blood pressure and heart rate variability (HRV) were calculated using spectral analysis. Time-domain HRV was calculated as the root mean square of successive RR interval differences. We compared results between those with and without preeclampsia, as well as between those with new-onset preeclampsia, chronic hypertension with superimposed preeclampsia, and normotensive participants. RESULTS: A total of 70 postpartum women were enrolled: 20 normotensive, 29 new-onset preeclampsia, and 21 superimposed preeclampsia. Both low- and high-frequency blood pressure variabilities were higher in those with preeclampsia compared with controls (P=0.04 and P=0.02, respectively). This difference was driven by those with new-onset preeclampsia. The preeclampsia group had lower high-frequency HRV (P<0.005), a higher low-/high-frequency ratio of HRV (P<0.005), and lower time-domain HRV (P=0.01); this difference was seen in those with and without chronic hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Postpartum patients with preeclampsia with and without chronic hypertension had lower HRV compared with normotensive postpartum controls. Higher blood pressure variability was observed only in those with nonsuperimposed preeclampsia, suggesting that the autonomic profile of preeclampsia may differ in patients with chronic hypertension.