Isolated Roux-en-Y versus single loop pancreaticojejunal reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy - a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex intra-abdominal operation used for the treatment of benign and malignant disease of the pancreatic head or periampullary region. Despite developments in surgical techniques, pancreaticoduodenectomy is still associated with high rate of postoperative complications. We performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the surgical outcomes of isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy (IRYPJ), and conventional pancreaticojejunostomy(CPJ). METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. We searched the following electronic databases - PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Clinical-Trials.gov. Published trials comparing the efficacy and safety of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were evaluated. The search terms were "pancreaticoduodenectomy," "Whipple," "pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy," "pancreaticojejunostomy," "Roux-en-Y," and "isolated Roux loop pancreaticojejunostomy." Only randomised controlled trials comparing outcome of IRYPJ and CPJ after pancreaticoduodenectomy were included. The analysed outcome measures were postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF), bile leak and delayed gastric emptying (DGE). RESULTS: The initial search yielded 342 results but only four randomised control trials fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included for data synthesis and meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of POPF revealed that IRYPJ is associated with less POPF compared to CPJ but the difference was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 0.58, p = 0.56). A similar finding was also observed with CR-POPF (risk ratio = 0.17, p = 0.87) and DGE (risk ratio = 0.74, p = 0.46). CONCLUSION: Isolated Roux-en-Y pancreaticojejunostomy is not associated with a superior outcome when compared to CPJ.

Effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on liver regeneration capacity after living donor hepatectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) has multiple hepatoprotective activities: it modifies the bile acid pool, decreases levels of endogenous, hydrophobic bile acids while increasing the proportion of nontoxic hydrophilic bile acids. It also has cytoprotective, antiapoptotic, and immunomodulatory properties. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of postoperative administration of UDCA on liver regeneration capacity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind study that was carried out in our Liver transplant Institute. Sixty living liver donors (LLDs) who underwent right lobe living donor hepatectomy were divided into two groups using computer-generated random numbers: one group received oral UDCA 500 mg 12 hourly for 7 days (UDCA group; n=30) from the first postoperative day (POD) and the other did not receive UDCA (non-UDCA group; n=30). Both groups were compared in terms of the following parameters: clinical and demographic parameters, liver enzymes (ALT, AST, ALP, GGT, total bilirubin, direct Bilirubin), and INR. RESULTS: The median ages in the UDCA and non-UDCA were 31 years (95% CI for median: 26-38) and 24 years (95% CI for median: 23-29), respectively. Liver function tests showed significant differences at various times within the first seven PODs. The INR was lower in UDCA group patients on POD3 and POD4. However, GGT was significantly lower on POD6 and POD7 for the UDCA group. Total bilirubin was also significantly lower on POD3 for the UDCA group patients, but ALP was lower all from POD1 to POD7. A significant difference was also observed in AST on POD3, POD5 and POD6. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative administration of oral UDCA significantly improves liver function tests and INR among LLDs.