RESUMEN
Background and Objective: Glucose-Potassium Ratio (GPR) has emerged as a biomarker in several pathophysiological conditions. However, the association between GPR and long-term outcomes in stroke patients has not been investigated. Our study evaluated the applicability of baseline GPR as a predictive prognostic tool for clinical outcomes in ischemic stroke patients. Methods: The multicenter retrospective cohort study included acute-subacute adult ischemic stroke patients who had their baseline serum GPR levels measured. Eligible patients were categorized into two sub-cohorts based on the baseline GPR levels (<1.67 vs. ≥ 1.67). The primary outcome was the incidence of 30-day hemorrhagic transformation, while stroke recurrence, and all-cause mortality within twelve months, were considered secondary. Results: Among 4083 patients screened, 1047 were included in the current study. In comparison with GPR < 1.67 group, patients with ≥ 1.67 GPR had a significantly higher ratio of all-cause mortality within twelve months (aHR 2.07 [95 % CI 1.21-3.75] p = 0.01), and higher ratio of 30-day hemorrhagic transformation but failed to reach the statistical significance (aHR 1.60 [95 % CI 0.95-2.79], p = 0.08). Conclusion: Overall, baseline GPR serum is an independent predictor of all-cause mortality within twelve months in patients with acute and subacute ischemic stroke. Further clinical studies are necessary to validate these findings.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: In patients with asthma, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is a biomarker for eosinophilic airway inflammation. However, the correlation with the blood eosinophil count, immunoglobulin E (IgE), and spirometric values is not well established. We aimed to investigate the correlation between FeNO, blood eosinophils, IgE, and spirometric values in asthmatic patients. METHODS: Data were extracted from the electronic medical records of adult asthmatic patients, and included the FeNO, blood eosinophil count, IgE, and spirometric values. The correlation between the markers was investigated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 135 adult patients (30% male) were analyzed. The mean FeNO was 36 ppb and almost half (48%) had a FeNO > 25 ppb. The mean blood eosinophil count was 377 cells/mm3, and 42% had a blood eosinophil count > 300 cells/mm3. There was a significant positive correlation between FeNO and the blood eosinophil count (r = 0.42, sensitivity 63%, specificity 77%, AUC 72%, p < 0.0001) as well as with the IgE (r = 0.35, sensitivity 78%, specificity 44%, AUC 68%, p < 0.0007). There was significant negative correlation between FeNO and FEV1% (r = -0.18, sensitivity 35%, specificity 85%, AUC 67%, p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: The blood eosinophil count, IgE, and spirometric values were correlated with the severity of the eosinophilic airway inflammation (high FeNO). Asthmatic patients with a higher FeNO level had a higher eosinophil count, higher IgE levels, and lower FEV1 values.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To examine perceived stress among residents in Saudi Arabia and its associated risk factors. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of all residents registered at the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was conducted between May and October 2012. We assessed the likelihood of stress using the perceived stress scale (PSS). RESULTS: Out of the 4000 residents contacted, 1035 responded and 938 were included. The mean (±standard deviation) PSS score was 22.0±5.1 (median 22 and inter-quartile range of 18-25). With the exception of gender and nationality, no significant associations were found between stress and socio-demographic or behavioral factors. Stress was associated with higher workload, sleep deprivation, dissatisfaction with colleagues and the program, and harmful ideations. Stressors included work-related, academic, and homesickness stressors. In multivariate analysis, the following were independently associated with stress: Saudi nationality, facing homesick stressor, facing work-related stressor, dissatisfaction with relationships with colleagues, and frequent thoughts of quitting the medical profession. CONCLUSION: Residents in Saudi Arabia are at comparable or slightly higher risk of perceived stress than that reported among residents worldwide. Unfortunately, most of the participants never received stress management, which highlights the need for stress management programs during residency.