Decreased "Polar Axis Angle" is Associated with Instability after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A New Method to Assess Functional Component Position on Lateral Seated Radiographs.

BACKGROUND: Research on hip instability has focused on establishing "safe" ranges of combined component position in supine posture or functional placement of the acetabular component based on the hip-spine relationship. A new angle, the polar axis angle (PAA), of the total hip arthroplasty (THA) components describes the concentricity of both components and can be evaluated in functional positions that confer a greater risk of instability (i.e., sitting). The goal of this study was to compare the polar axis angle in functional positions between patients who experienced a postoperative dislocation, and a matched control group who did not have a dislocation. METHODS: An institutional database was searched for patients experiencing a dislocation after primary THA. Patients who had postoperative full-length standing and seated lateral radiographs were included in the dislocator group. A control group of non-dislocator patients was matched 2:1 by age, body mass index (BMI), sex, and hip-spine classification. Radiographic measurements of the neck angle, acetabular ante-inclination, and polar axis angle (PAA) were performed by two separate blinded, trained reviewers. RESULTS: The lateral seated neck angle and lateral seated polar axis angle measurements were significantly lower in the dislocator groups (n = 37) when compared with the control group (n = 74) (23 versus 33 degrees, P < 0.001; 74 versus 83 degrees, P = 0.012, respectively). Significant differences were also observed in changes in the polar axes and neck angles between standing and seated positions (P < 0.001 and P < 0.001, respectively). When comparing patients who have mobile spines versus stiff spines within the dislocator group, there were no differences in the acetabular, neck, or polar axis angles. The effect of neck angle on the polar axis angle showed a linear trend across cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who experience postoperative instability have a significantly lower polar axis angle on lateral seated radiographs when matched for age, sex, BMI, and hip-spine classification. In addition, the lower seated polar axis angle is driven more strongly by decreased functional femoral anteversion, which emphasizes the role of functional femoral version on stability in THA.

Spine or Hip First? Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Sequential Lumbar Spine or Hip Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Lumbar spine pathology frequently coexists in patients who have hip arthrosis. There is controversy on whether lumbar or hip pathology should be first addressed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of sequential lumbar spine (LSP) or hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Using a large national database from 2010 to 2020, we reviewed the records of 241,279 patients who had concurrent hip arthritis and lumbar spine disease defined as spinal stenosis, lumbar radiculopathy, or degenerative disc disease. During the study period, 6,458 (2.7%) patients with concurrent hip/spine disease underwent sequential operative treatment of either the hip joint or lumbar spine within 2 years. The rates of subsequent surgery in either the hip or the spine, opioid requirements, and rates of hip dislocation were determined and analyzed using compared Chi-squared analyses. RESULTS: Patients undergoing THA first had lower risk of subsequent spinal procedure compared to patients who had spinal procedures first (5.7 versus 23.7%, P < .001). This disparity was maintained up to 5 years (P < .001). Opioid requirements at 1 year were highest in patients who underwent spinal procedures only (836 pills/patient) compared to any other group THA only (566 pills/patient), LSP and then THA (564 pills/patient), THA and LSP (586 pills/patient). Also, THA following LSP was associated with significantly higher rates of dislocation compared to patients undergoing THA first (3.2 versus 1.9%, P < .001). CONCLUSION: Total hip arthroplasty first in patients who have concurrent spine disease was associated with lower risk of subsequent surgery, opioid requirement, and risk of postoperative instability compared to patients having lumbar procedure first.

Perioperative Use of Antifibrotic Medications Associated With Lower Rate of Manipulation After Primary TKA: An Analysis of 101,366 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Several commonly prescribed medications have known antifibrotic properties and have been shown to reduce postoperative scar formation in other clinical areas, but it is unknown whether the use of such medications perioperatively in patients undergoing TKA may improve rates of postoperative stiffness. METHODS: A large US employer-sponsored healthcare database (Truven Marketscan) was queried for patients who underwent elective primary TKA for primary osteoarthritis between 2015-2019. Demographic information and comorbidities were recorded, along with whether patients were prescribed one of several medications with known antifibrotic properties during the three months before or after surgery. RESULTS: Complete data were available for 101,366 patients undergoing TKA, of which 4,536 underwent MUA (4.5%). Perioperative use of any antifibrotic medication was associated with a lower likelihood of undergoing MUA (P < .001). When controlling for age, sex, comorbidities, opioid use, length of stay, among other variables, perioperative use of specific ACE inhibitors (OR 0.91, CI 0.84-1, P = .042), COX-2 inhibitors (OR 0.88, CI 0.81-0.96, P = .002), and angiotensin II receptor blockers, specifically losartan (OR 0.80, CI 0.70-0.91, P = .007) all remained significantly associated with lower rates of MUA. CONCLUSION: This study, spanning over a hundred thousand primary TKA procedures over a recent five-year period, demonstrates an association between perioperative use of specific medications with antifibrotic properties and a decreased rate of MUA. These data will help inform future studies aimed to prospectively evaluate the potential of antifibrotic medications in preventing postoperative stiffness in high-risk patients undergoing knee arthroplasty.

Patellofemoral arthroplasty conversion to total knee arthroplasty: An updated retrieval analysis and clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: A prior retrieval analysis found high rates of infection after conversion of PFA to TKA, but was limited by a small sample size. The purpose of this study is to perform a retrieval analysis with clinical correlation on an expanded group of patients to better understand conversion of PFA to TKA. METHOD: A retrospective review of an implant retrieval registry identified 62 conversions of PFA to TKA between 2004-2021. Implants were analyzed for wear pattern and cement fixation. Patient charts were reviewed for demographic information, perioperative data, prior and subsequent surgical procedures, complications and outcomes. Radiographs performed prior to index PFA and conversion procedures were assessed for KL grading. RESULTS: Cement fixation was present on 86% of retrieved components and wear was more pronounced on the lateral side. The most common indication for conversion to TKA was progression of OA in 46.8% of patients, followed by unexplained pain in the absence of radiographic or clinical changes (37.1%), loosening (8.1%), mechanical symptoms (4.8%), traumatic (3.2%). Thirteen patient experienced complications requiring additional procedures including arthrofibrosis (n = 4, 7.3%), PJI (n = 3, 5.5%), instability (n = 3, 5.5%), hematoma (n = 2, 3.6%) and loosening (n = 1, 1.8%). Revision components were used in 1.8% of cases and average post-conversion arc of motion was 119 degrees. CONCLUSIONS: The most common reason for PFA conversion to TKA was progression of osteoarthritis. PFA conversion to TKA is technically similar to primary TKA, but complication rates are more consistent with revision TKA in this study.

Cause for concern? Significant cement coverage in retrieved metaphyseal cones after revision total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Metaphyseal cones are used to manage bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty with increasing popularity. Post-operative radiographs and explant procedures suggest that cement may extrude around the cone implant into the cone-bone interface and prevent biologic in- or on-growth. The purpose of this study was to perform a retrieval analysis to describe the pattern of direct cementation onto the porous surface area of metaphyseal cones. METHODS: Eighteen tibial and femoral cones were identified in an institutional implant retrieval registry. Anterior, posterior, medial and lateral quadrants were digitally mapped for direct cementation, bone ongrowth and fibrous ongrowth were calculated as a percentage of the porous surface area. Plain radiographs from prior to cone explant were analyzed for the presence of cement in all four quadrants and compared with results of the retrieval analysis. RESULTS: Mean bone ongrowth was 25%, direct cementation was 24% (31% in tibial cones) and fibrous ongrowth was 29% of the porous surface area of the retrieved cones. There were no significant differences when comparing patterns of bone or fibrous ongrowth or cementation between anterior, posterior medial and lateral porous surfaces for tibia cones, femoral cones or all cones grouped together. Plain radiographs significantly underestimated the amount of cement covering the cone (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this retrieval study, we found significant cement extrusion around the porous surface of metaphyseal cones in revision TKAs. Optimizing the cone-bone interface may reduce the risk of cement extrusion and theoretically reduce the risk of aseptic loosening.

Decreased Implant Survival is Associated With Younger Patients Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Younger patients are undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) at increasing rates and may face multiple revisions during their lifetimes due to mechanical complications or infections. Questions/Purposes: We sought to compare the early complication rates and revision-free implant-survival rates across age groups of patients undergoing TKA, with particular focus on implant survival in younger patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of data taken from a national insurance database on patients who underwent primary TKA from 2007 to 2015. Kaplan-Meier curve survival analysis and log rank test were performed to evaluate revision rates in 7 age groups (younger than 40, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, 70-79, 80-89, and 90 or more years of age). Complication rates were compared to rates in the age 60 to 79 years age groups using multiple logistic regression, controlling for baseline demographics and comorbidities. Results: There were 114,698 patients included in the analysis. Patients in the younger than 40 years, 40 to 49 years, and 50 to 59 years age groups had increased rates of early mechanical complications; 90-day readmission rates were significantly higher in those age groups as well. Revision-free implant survival at 5 years was significantly worse in patients younger than 60 years of age, particularly those less than 40 years, who had a 77% revision-free implant-survival rate at 5 years. Conclusions: Younger patients had a higher risk of early revision after TKA, as well as an increased rate of mechanical complications and readmissions at 90 days. These outcomes suggest more study is needed to better understand these discrepancies and to better guide preoperative counseling for young patients considering TKA.

Corrective Proximal Humerus Osteotomy with Blade Plate Osteosynthesis in Adolescents: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: Two cases are presented to highlight the indications, surgical technique, and early clinical outcomes associated with proximal humerus corrective osteotomy using a 90° cannulated blade plate in adolescent patients. CONCLUSION: A complex deformity of the proximal humerus in the adolescent patient poses an uncommon yet debilitating clinical condition that is challenging to manage. We report a unique method for surgical correction and fixation using an infant hip osteotomy 90° blade plate that restores native shoulder anatomy, improves function, and has led to early clinical success.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection in Orthopaedic Oncology.

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common complications after surgeries involving musculoskeletal tumors, but we know little about SSI risk factors unique to orthopaedic oncology. A greater understanding of these factors will help risk-stratify patients and guide surgical decision-making. METHODS: A retrospective review at a single-institution identified 757 procedures done on 624 over 6 years. The patients had a preoperative diagnosis of a malignant or potentially malignant neoplasm of the bone or soft tissues. Patient-specific and procedure-specific variables and diagnosis of SSI were recorded for each case. Data were analyzed through univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, significant patient-specific risk factors for SSI included malignancy (P < 0.001), smoking history (P = 0.041), and American Society of Anesthesiologists Score (P = 0.002). Significant procedure-specific risk factors for SSI on univariate analysis included surgery time (P < 0.001), estimated blood loss (P < 0.001), blood transfusion volume (P < 0.001), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0.001), neoadjuvant radiation therapy (P < 0.001), inpatient surgery (P < 0.001), and number of previous surgeries within the study period (P < 0.001). The two factors that independently predicted risk of SSI when controlling for all other variables in a multiple logistic regression were whether the surgery was done on an inpatient basis (P = 0.005) and the number of previous surgeries done on the same site (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found a number of risk factors that correlate markedly with SSI after orthopaedic oncology surgery. The surgeon can use these risk factors to aid in surgical decision-making.

Correction to: At the US Epicenter of the COVID-19 Pandemic, an Orthopedic Residency Program Reorganizes.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1007/s11420-020-09765-5.].

A risk-stratification algorithm to reduce superficial surgical site complications in primary hip and knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site complications (SSCs) are the most common cause for readmission after total joint arthroplasty (TJA), increasing costs while predisposing to inferior long-term outcomes. Prophylactic use of closed-incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) may lower the risk of these complications, especially in high-risk populations, but appropriate-use guidelines are lacking for patients undergoing primary TJA. We sought to develop a risk-stratification algorithm to guide use of ciNPT dressings and test its use in normalizing the rate of superficial SSCs among high-risk groups. METHODS: We reviewed 323 consecutive primary TJAs, where 38% of those patients considered at elevated risk were risk-stratified to receive ciNPT dressings. An individual risk score was developed, assigning points based on patient-specific risk factors. We identified a historical control population of 643 patients who all received the same postoperative dressing to test the impact of this risk score. RESULTS: Compared with historical controls, we observed a modest but significant improvement in superficial SSCs after implementation of risk-stratification (12.0% vs 6.8%; P = .013). Among high-risk patients, there was a marked improvement in SSCs when treated prophylactically with ciNPT dressings as compared with historical controls (26.2% vs 7.3%; P < .001). Low-risk patients, who continued to be treated with standard postoperative dressings, demonstrated no significant improvement (8.6% vs 6.5%; P = .344). CONCLUSIONS: ciNPT dressings are effective at reducing and normalizing risks of superficial SSCs among high-risk primary arthroplasty patients. The proposed risk-stratification algorithm may help identify those patients who benefit most from these dressings.

Preclinical activity of selinexor, an inhibitor of XPO1, in sarcoma.

Selinexor is an orally bioavailable selective inhibitor of nuclear export that has been demonstrated to have preclinical activity in various cancer types and that is currently in Phase I and II clinical trials for advanced cancers. In this study, we evaluated the effects of selinexor in several preclinical models of various sarcoma subtypes. The efficacy of selinexor was investigated in vitro and in vivo using 17 cell lines and 9 sarcoma xenograft models including gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), liposarcoma (LPS), leiomyosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcomas, and alveolar soft part sarcoma (ASPS). Most sarcoma cell lines were sensitive to selinexor with IC50s ranging from 28.8 nM to 218.2 nM (median: 66.1 nM). Selinexor suppressed sarcoma tumor xenograft growth, including models of ASPS that were resistant in vitro. In GIST cells with KIT mutations, selinexor induced G1- arrest without attenuation of phosphorylation of KIT, AKT, or MAPK, in contrast to imatinib. In LPS cell lines with MDM2 and CDK4 amplification, selinexor induced G1-arrest and apoptosis irrespective of p53 expression or mutation and irrespective of RB expression. Selinexor increased p53 and p21 expression at the protein but not RNA level, indicating a post-transcriptional effect. These results indicate that selinexor has potent in vitro and in vivo activity against a wide variety of sarcoma models by inducing G1-arrest independent of known molecular mechanisms in GIST and LPS. These studies further justify the exploration of selinexor in clinical trials targeting various sarcoma subtypes.