RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Daratumumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting CD38, has been approved for use with standard myeloma regimens. An evaluation of subcutaneous daratumumab combined with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for the treatment of transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma is needed. METHODS: In this phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 709 transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma to receive either subcutaneous daratumumab combined with VRd induction and consolidation therapy and with lenalidomide maintenance therapy (D-VRd group) or VRd induction and consolidation therapy and lenalidomide maintenance therapy alone (VRd group). The primary end point was progression-free survival. Key secondary end points were a complete response or better and minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative status. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the risk of disease progression or death in the D-VRd group was lower than the risk in the VRd group. The estimated percentage of patients with progression-free survival at 48 months was 84.3% in the D-VRd group and 67.7% in the VRd group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.42; 95% confidence interval, 0.30 to 0.59; P<0.001); the P value crossed the prespecified stopping boundary (P = 0.0126). The percentage of patients with a complete response or better was higher in the D-VRd group than in the VRd group (87.9% vs. 70.1%, P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with MRD-negative status (75.2% vs. 47.5%, P<0.001). Death occurred in 34 patients in the D-VRd group and 44 patients in the VRd group. Grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in most patients in both groups; the most common were neutropenia (62.1% with D-VRd and 51.0% with VRd) and thrombocytopenia (29.1% and 17.3%, respectively). Serious adverse events occurred in 57.0% of the patients in the D-VRd group and 49.3% of those in the VRd group. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of subcutaneous daratumumab to VRd induction and consolidation therapy and to lenalidomide maintenance therapy conferred a significant benefit with respect to progression-free survival among transplantation-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (Funded by the European Myeloma Network in collaboration with Janssen Research and Development; PERSEUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03710603; EudraCT number, 2018-002992-16.).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Bortezomib/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
What is this summary about?: This summary describes the first analysis of the PERSEUS study, which looked at adults with multiple myeloma that had never been treated before, also called newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Multiple myeloma is a type of cancer in the blood, specifically in plasma cells within the soft, spongy tissue in the center of most bones, called the bone marrow. Researchers wanted to see if adding daratumumab (D) to a standard treatment of three other medicines called VRd, which stands for bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d), could stop the multiple myeloma from getting worse and help participants live longer without multiple myeloma. Half of the participants were assigned to the treatment plan with daratumumab; they received D-VRd during initial treatment phases (induction and consolidation), followed by daratumumab as well as lenalidomide (D-R) in the maintenance phase. The other half of participants received treatment without daratumumab; they received VRd induction and consolidation followed by lenalidomide alone (R) maintenance. In addition, all participants were able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant, a procedure used to further help reduce multiple myeloma. What were the results?: At the time of this analysis of PERSEUS, about 4 years after participants started the study, participants who received D-VRd treatment followed by D-R maintenance had a better response to treatment (as measured by specific markers of multiple myeloma) and were more likely to be alive and free from their multiple myeloma getting worse in comparison to participants who received VRd followed by R maintenance. Side effects (unwanted or undesirable effects of treatment) in both treatment groups were in line with the known side effects of daratumumab and VRd. What do the results mean?: The results of the PERSEUS study showed that including daratumumab in D-VRd induction/consolidation and D-R maintenance was better for treating multiple myeloma than the current standard VRd treatment followed by R maintenance alone in adults with a new diagnosis of multiple myeloma who were also able to receive an autologous stem cell transplant. Of importance, there were no unexpected side effects in either group. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02874742 (GRIFFIN) (ClinicalTrials.gov).^ieng
RESUMEN
Lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is standard treatment for elderly patients with multiple myeloma (MM). In this randomized phase 3 study, we investigated efficacy and feasibility of dose/schedule-adjusted Rd followed by maintenance at 10 mg per day without dexamethasone (Rd-R) vs continuous Rd in elderly, intermediate-fit newly diagnosed patients with MM. Primary end point was event-free survival (EFS), defined as progression/death from any cause, lenalidomide discontinuation, or hematologic grade 4 or nonhematologic grade 3 to 4 adverse event (AE). Of 199 evaluable patients, 101 received Rd-R and 98 continuous Rd. Median follow-up was 37 months. EFS was 10.4 vs 6.9 months (hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51-0.95; P = .02); median progression-free survival, 20.2 vs 18.3 months (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.55-1.10; P = .16); and 3-year overall survival, 74% vs 63% (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.37-1.03; P = .06) with Rd-R vs Rd, respectively. Rate of ≥1 nonhematologic grade ≥3 AE was 33% vs 43% (P = .14) in Rd-R vs Rd groups, with neutropenia (21% vs 18%), infections (10% vs 12%), and skin disorders (7% vs 3%) the most frequent; constitutional and central nervous system AEs mainly related to dexamethasone were more frequent with Rd. Lenalidomide was discontinued for AEs in 24% vs 30% and reduced in 45% vs 62% of patients receiving Rd-R vs Rd, respectively. In intermediate-fit patients, switching to reduced-dose lenalidomide maintenance without dexamethasone after 9 Rd cycles was feasible, with similar outcomes to standard continuous Rd. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02215980.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
The combination of elotuzumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloRd) enhanced the clinical benefit over Rd with a manageable toxicity profile in the ELOQUENT-2 trial, leading to its approval in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The present study is a 3-year follow-up update of a previously published Italian real-life RRMM cohort of patients treated with EloRd. This revised analysis entered 319 RRMM patients accrued in 41 Italian centers. After a median follow-up of 36 months (range 6-55), 236 patients experienced disease progression or died. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 18.4 and 34 months, respectively. The updated multivariate analyses showed a significant reduction of PFS and OS benefit magnitude only in cases with International Staging System stage III. Major adverse events included grade 3/4 neutropenia (18.5%), anemia (15.4%), lymphocytopenia (12.5%), and thrombocytopenia (10.7%), while infection rates and pneumonia were 33.9% and 18.9%, respectively. No new safety signals with longer follow-up have been observed. Of 319 patients, 245 (76.7%) reached at least a partial remission. A significantly lower response rate was found in patients previously exposed to lenalidomide. In conclusion, our study confirms that EloRd is a safe and effective regimen for RRMM patients, maintaining benefits across multiple unfavorable subgroups.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Talidomida/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We investigate safety and efficacy in common clinical practice of the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd56) approved for the ENDEAVOR trial for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: We retro-prospective analyzed 75 patients in three centers in Tuscany, 48 of whom had a clinically relevant comorbidity and 50 of whom were older than 65 years, treated with a median use in the fourth line of therapy. We assessed the efficacy based on the International Myeloma Working Group criteria. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 60%. Median PFS was 10 months in the general cohort; in patients treated for more than 1 cycle of therapy PFS was 12 months. Quality of response to Kd56 treatment was found to positively impact PFS. Refractory status to previous line of therapy or to lenalidomide or an history of exposure to pomalidomide, seemed to have no impact on survival. We also showed a low adverse events rate, with no neuropathy events, and a relatively small number of cardiovascular events above grade 3 (10%). CONCLUSION: Kd56 is an effective and well tolerated regimen in highly pretreated and elderly patients with a good safety profile.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Dexametasona , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/etiología , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Oligopéptidos , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant neoplasm associated with kidney involvement in nearly half of the patients. Cast nephropathy, monoclonal immunoglobulin deposition disease (MIDD), and light chain (AL) amyloidosis are the most common monoclonal immunoglobulin-mediated causes of renal injury. Cardiac involvement is also present in MM, characterized by restrictive cardiomyopathy generated by light chain deposit or amyloid. Thromboembolic complications such as deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism are also described. CASE PRESENTATION: We present an unusual multidisciplinary case of a woman with a newly diagnosed MM associated with severe proteinuria and high natriuretic peptide. A renal and fat pad biopsy with Congo red staining were performed but amyloid deposition was not discovered. While immunofluorescence on fresh frozen unfixed tissue was not contributory, the immunofluorescence on fixed tissue and electron microscopy revealed the correct diagnosis. During subsequent investigations, two intracardiac right-sided masses and massive pulmonary embolism were also detected. CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights that multiple organ involvement in patients with MM may result from a combination of paraprotein-dependent and -independent factors. Moreover, renal diseases induced by monoclonal gammopathies are a group of complex and heterogeneous disorders. Their subtle presentation and their potential multiorgan involvement require the expertise of a multidisciplinary team able to provide the most appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic assessment.
Asunto(s)
Amiloidosis , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas , Enfermedades Renales , Mieloma Múltiple , Embolia Pulmonar , Femenino , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis/complicaciones , Amiloidosis/diagnóstico , Amiloidosis/patología , Riñón/patología , Enfermedades Renales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Renales/etiología , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/patología , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagen , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologíaRESUMEN
Carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (KRd) has been approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 197 RRMM patients (pts) between January 2016 and March 2018 in six Italian hematologic centers, with the aim to evaluate efficacy and safety of KRd in real-life. At KRd initiation 27% carried high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCA) [del17p and/or t(4;14) and/or t(14;16)], median number of prior lines of therapy was 2 (1-8), nearly all pts (96%) received prior bortezomib (18% refractory) while 45% were exposed to lenalidomide (R; 22% refractory). At the median of 12.5 months, 52% of the pts had discontinued treatment, mainly (66%) for progression. Main grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (21%), infections (11%), and hypertension (6%). Overall, the response rate was 88%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 19.8 months and 1-year overall survival (OS) rate was 80.6%. By subgroup analysis, extended PFS and OS were observed for pts who received ≤2 prior lines of therapy (HR = 0.42, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.35, p = 0.001, respectively), not refractory to prior R (HR = 0.37, p < 0.001, and HR = 0.47, p = 0.024), without HRCA (HR = 0.33, p = 0.005 and HR = 0.26, p = 0.016) and achieving ≥ very good partial response (VGPR; HR = 0.17, p < 0.001 and HR = 0.18, p < 0.001). In conclusion, KRd demonstrated to be effective in RRMM pts treated in real-world setting, without new safety concerns. Better survival outcomes emerged for pts with ≤2 prior lines of therapy, achieving at least a VGPR, and without HRCA.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Aberraciones Cromosómicas , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Dexametasona/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Lenalidomida/efectos adversos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mieloma Múltiple/genética , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Recurrencia , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: The treatment of Myeloma after the second relapse is still challenging. The aim of the study was to investigate the outcomes of the POM-DEX regimen in real clinical practice. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively and prospectively analyzed 121 patients with MM treated with POM-DEX in three Italian sites in Tuscany. We assessed the efficacy based on IMWG Uniform Response Criteria in 106 patients who had received at least two courses of the POM-DEX regimen. The median time from diagnosis to use of POM-DEX was 65 months. POM-DEX median use was in the fourth-line therapy. 63.6% were exposed to lenalidomide or thalidomide, 40.5% to bortezomib or carfilzomib or ixazomib, 5.8% to mAbs in the immediately preceding line of therapy. Results: ORR was 43.4%. Median PFS and OS were 8.5 and 14 months. Eighty-nine patients received more than two courses: their median PFS and OS were 11 and 16 months. When used as the third line of therapy, median PFS and OS were 9 and 20 months and, when patients received POM-DEX for more than two courses, median PFS and OS were 14.5 and 22.5 months. Conclusions: POM-DEX is effective in RRMM, regardless of the latest exposure to IMiDs, PIs, and mAbs in the previous line of therapy.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Talidomida , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Talidomida/análogos & derivados , Talidomida/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: ASCT is currently the "gold standard" first-line treatment for multiple myeloma patients younger than 65 years old, and limited data on efficacy and safety in older patients are available. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 83 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients aged 65 or older. All patients were evaluated for fitness at diagnosis and after bortezomib-based induction treatment. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: All patients collected an adequate PBSC graft, mainly after G-CSF plus cyclophosphamide; a median of 6.47 × 106 /kg CD34 + cells was collected. The conditioning regimen consisted of melphalan 100, 140 and 200 mg/m2 in 40, 15 and 28 patients, respectively. Median time to neutrophils' and platelets' recovery was 11 and 12 days, respectively. Adverse events of any grade were referred by 40% of patients. The overall response rate was 93%, CR/sCR were 39%. Median PFS was 35 months; median OS was not reached. In our study cohort, the achievement of at least VGPR after induction therapy and the obtainment of CR/sCR after ASCT are the only parameters that were associated with an improved PFS. ASCT is an effective and safe first-line treatment approach, a careful patients selection reduce the toxicity of the procedure.
Asunto(s)
Bortezomib/administración & dosificación , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Trasplante de Células Madre de Sangre Periférica , Anciano , Autoinjertos , Ciclofosfamida/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Factor Estimulante de Colonias de Granulocitos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Quimioterapia de Inducción , Masculino , Mieloma Múltiple/mortalidad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaAsunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas , Taquicardia Ventricular , Anciano , Humanos , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/mortalidad , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/fisiopatología , Amiloidosis de Cadenas Ligeras de las Inmunoglobulinas/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Taquicardia Ventricular/mortalidad , Taquicardia Ventricular/fisiopatología , Taquicardia Ventricular/terapiaAsunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Lenalidomida/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Terapia RecuperativaAsunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Mielofibrosis Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombocitemia Esencial/complicaciones , Anciano , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Médula Ósea/patología , Calreticulina/genética , Dexametasona/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Hidroxiurea/efectos adversos , Hidroxiurea/uso terapéutico , Lenalidomida/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/complicaciones , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/diagnóstico , Gammopatía Monoclonal de Relevancia Indeterminada/patología , Mieloma Múltiple/complicaciones , Mieloma Múltiple/diagnóstico , Osteólisis/etiología , Mielofibrosis Primaria/diagnóstico , Mielofibrosis Primaria/etiología , Inducción de Remisión , Factores de Riesgo , Eliminación de Secuencia , Estomatitis Aftosa/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
Diagnosis of essential thrombocythemia (ET) has been updated in the last World Health Organization (WHO) classification. We developed a prognostic model to predict survival at diagnosis, named IPSET (International Prognostic Score for ET), studying patients with WHO-defined ET. Age 60 years or older, leukocyte count ≥ 11 × 10(9)/L, and prior thrombosis significantly affected survival, by multivariable Cox regression. On the basis of the hazard ratio, we assigned 2 points to age and 1 each to leukocyte count and thrombosis. So, the IPSET model allocated 867 patients into 3 risk categories with significantly different survival: low (sum of points = 0; median survival not reached), intermediate (sum = 1-2; median survival 24.5 years), and high (sum = 3-4, median survival 13.8 years). The IPSET model was further validated in 2 independent cohorts including 132 WHO-defined ET and 234 Polycythemia Vera Study Group-defined ET patients. The IPSET model was able to predict the occurrence of thrombosis, and not to predict post-ET myelofibrosis. In conclusion, IPSET, based on age ≥ 60 years, leukocyte count ≥ 11 × 10(9)/L, and history of thrombosis allows prognostic assessment of WHO-defined ET and the validation process makes IPSET applicable in all patients phenotypically appearing as ET.
Asunto(s)
Mielofibrosis Primaria/terapia , Trombocitemia Esencial/diagnóstico , Trombocitemia Esencial/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto , Mielofibrosis Primaria/etiología , Pronóstico , Análisis de Supervivencia , Trombocitemia Esencial/terapia , Organización Mundial de la Salud , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Although Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) occur typically in middle to advanced age, any age group may be affected, posing a challenge for their management during pregnancy when they occur in young females. There is a high incidence of thromboembolic events and pregnancy complications in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms, and a possible relationship between these complications is a matter of concern. The aim of this article was to correlate thrombosis and pregnancy outcome in 158 females with ET experiencing 237 pregnancies. Seven patients had a thrombotic event before their first pregnancy, one of them ended (14.3%) in a miscarriage. Among the 151 patients with no history of thrombosis before they became pregnant, 40 (26.5%) had a miscarriage (P = NS). Eighteen patients (11.4%) developed major thrombotic complications (12 splanchnic vein, 1 cerebral vein, 2 coronary syndromes, and 3 strokes) after at least one pregnancy (4 uneventful and 14 complicated). The occurrence of thrombosis was significantly more frequent (P < 0.001) in patients with a history of pregnancy complications (28%) than in those experiencing a normal pregnancy and delivery (3.7%). Pregnancy complications in women with ET are associated with a higher risk of subsequent thromboses, so pregnant women with this neoplasm who miscarry need to be carefully monitored.
Asunto(s)
Complicaciones Hematológicas del Embarazo/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Trombocitemia Esencial/complicaciones , Trombosis/epidemiología , Aborto Espontáneo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Janus Quinasa 2/genética , Mutación Missense , Mutación Puntual , Embarazo , Complicaciones del Embarazo/epidemiología , Resultado del Embarazo , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Mortinato/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Trombocitemia Esencial/genética , Trombofilia/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombofilia/etiología , Trombosis/etiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) is a pathological syndrome characterized by a combination of three key features: microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA), thrombocytopenia, and organ damage, primarily affecting the kidneys. There are several drugs known to have a definite or probable causal association with TMA, and carfilzomib, a second-generation irreversible proteasome inhibitor (PI), approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM), is one of them. In the medical literature, there have been a growing number of reports describing this serious adverse event occurring in MM patients. The precise mechanisms underlying the development of PI-induced TMA are not yet fully understood. Significant improvements in both renal and hematological aspects have been documented following the administration of eculizumab. RECENT FINDINGS: In this report, we present two cases of MM patients who developed TMA while undergoing carfilzomib therapy. These cases were successfully treated at the Haematology Unit, Careggi Hospital in Florence. In our cases as well, the introduction of eculizumab resulted in rapid enhancements in renal function and platelet count, ultimately leading to the discontinuation of hemodialysis after 4 and 2 weeks, respectively. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: We assessed 91 patients who received carfilzomib-based therapies at our Haematology Department, during which we identified two cases of DITMA (2.2% incidence). Additionally, we conducted a literature review and discovered a total of 75 documented cases of carfilzomib-induced TMA. Our experience aligns with the cases reported in literature: this adverse event can manifest at any point during treatment, regardless of the specific drug combinations used alongside carfilzomib. The initial and most crucial step in its management involves discontinuing carfilzomib therapy; therefore, recognizing TMA in a timely manner is of utmost importance. Eculizumab could play a role in improving and expediting the resolution of this potentially fatal adverse event, but further studies are needed. In a MM patient receiving carfilzomib, presenting with anemia, thrombocytopenia, and impaired renal function, a carfilzomib-induced TMA should be suspected in order to discontinue the causative agent.
Asunto(s)
Mieloma Múltiple , Oligopéptidos , Inhibidores de Proteasoma , Microangiopatías Trombóticas , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Mieloma Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteasoma/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteasoma/efectos adversos , Diálisis Renal , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/inducido químicamente , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/diagnóstico , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/epidemiología , Microangiopatías Trombóticas/terapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Therapeutic strategies against multiple myeloma (MM) have evolved dramatically in recent decades, with unprecedent results in the treatment landscape, culminating in the recent incorporation of novel agents in the anti-myeloma armamentarium. AREAS COVERED: BCMA represents one of the most promising targets in MM and currently available immune approaches, either approved or under active investigation, are clearly showing their greater potential over standard regimens. In this context, immunotherapies based on chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-engineered T-cells and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have taken center stage, being the ones that are yielding the most promising results in clinical trials. This review focuses on the current landscape of BsAbs and CAR-T, summarizing the latest advances and possible future developments. EXPERT OPINION: CAR-T and BsAbs anti-BCMA strategies represent breakthrough therapies against MM. However, their inclusion in clinical practice is almost feared, due to the associated limitations, some of which have been addressed here. Meanwhile, all the efforts should be focused on individualizing and choosing the most suitable candidates for each treatment and to understand how to combine, or sequence, these therapies to improve efficacy and minimize toxicity, especially for those patients with limited available treatment options.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Biespecíficos , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva , Mieloma Múltiple , Humanos , Anticuerpos Biespecíficos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/métodos , Inmunoterapia Adoptiva/efectos adversos , Mieloma Múltiple/terapia , Mieloma Múltiple/inmunología , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B/inmunología , Antígeno de Maduración de Linfocitos B/antagonistas & inhibidores , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/inmunología , Receptores Quiméricos de Antígenos/uso terapéutico , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Linfocitos T/inmunologíaRESUMEN
Belantamab mafodotin is the first-in-class antibody-drug conjugates targeting B-cell maturation antigen to have demonstrated effectiveness in triple-class refractory multiple myeloma (TCR-MM) patients. We performed a retrospective study including 78 TCR patients, with at least four prior lines of therapy (LOTs), who received belantamab mafodotin within named patient program and expanded access program in Italy between 2020 and 2022. Median age was 65 years (range 42-86 years), ECOG performance status was ≥1 in 45% of patients. Overall, a clinical benefit was obtained in 36 out of 74 evaluable patients (49%), with 43%, 28%, and 13.5% achieving at least partial response, very good partial response, and complete response, respectively. After a median follow-up of 12 months (range 6-21 months), median duration of response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 14, 5.5, and 12 months, respectively. Age >70 years, good performance status and response were associated with longer PFS and OS. Keratopathy occurred in 58% of patients (G3 2.5%), corneal symptoms in 32% (G3 1.2%) and a reduction in visual acuity in 14%. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 9% of patients. Only 3% of patients discontinued belantamab mafodotin because of side effects. This real-life study demonstrated significant and durable responses of belantamab in TCR-MM patients with four prior LOTs, otherwise ineligible for novel immunotherapies.
RESUMEN
In an international collaborative study, a central histologic review identified 891 patients with essential thrombocythemia, strictly defined by World Health Organization criteria. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, 109 (12%) patients experienced arterial (n = 79) or venous (n = 37) thrombosis. In multivariable analysis, predictors of arterial thrombosis included age more than 60 years (P = .03; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.7), thrombosis history (P = .003; HR = 2.1), cardiovascular risk factors including tobacco use, hypertension, or diabetes mellitus (P = .007; HR = 1.9), leukocytosis (> 11 × 10(9)/L; P = .04; HR = 1.7), and presence of JAK2V617F (P = .009; HR = 2.6). In contrast, only male gender predicted venous thrombosis. Platelet count more than 1000 × 10(9)/L was associated with a lower risk of arterial thrombosis (P = .007; HR = 0.4). These associations, except the one with leukocytosis, remained significant (or near significant) when analysis was restricted to JAK2V617F-positive cases. The current study clarifies the contribution of specific disease and host characteristics to the risk of arterial versus venous thrombosis in essential thrombocythemia.
Asunto(s)
Arterias/patología , Trombocitemia Esencial/complicaciones , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis de la Vena/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/complicaciones , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Incidencia , Agencias Internacionales , Janus Quinasa 2/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación/genética , Policitemia Vera/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Trombocitemia Esencial/terapia , Trombosis/patología , Trombosis de la Vena/patologíaRESUMEN
In addition to dysregulated JAK/STAT signaling, activation of the AKT/mTOR pathway occurs in myelofibrosis, a myeloproliferative neoplasm with no approved therapies. We conducted a phase 1/2 study with everolimus, an mTOR inhibitor, in 39 high- or intermediate-risk primary or postpolycythemia vera/postessential thrombocythemia myelofibrosis subjects. Responses were evaluated in 30 patients of phase 2. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in phase 1 up to 10 mg/d. When this dose was used in phase 2, grade ≥ 3 toxicities were infrequent; the commonest toxicity was grade 1-2 stomatitis. Rapid and sustained splenomegaly reduction of > 50% and > 30% occurred in 20% and 44% of subjects, respectively. A total of 69% and 80% experienced complete resolution of systemic symptoms and pruritus. Response in leukocytosis, anemia, and thrombocytosis occurred in 15%-25%. Clinical responses were not associated with reduced JAK2V617F burden, circulating CD34(+) cells, or cytokine levels, whereas CCDN1 mRNA and phospho-p70S6K level, known targets of mTOR, and WT1 mRNA were identified as possible biomarkers associated with response. Response rate was 60% when European Network for Myelofibrosis criteria were used (8 major, 7 moderate, 3 minor responses) or 23% when IWG-MRT criteria (1 partial response, 6 clinical improvements) were used. These results provide proof-of-concept that targeting mTOR pathway in myelofibrosis may be clinically relevant.
Asunto(s)
Mielofibrosis Primaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/uso terapéutico , Sirolimus/análogos & derivados , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Anciano , Ciclina D1/genética , Everolimus , Femenino , Humanos , Janus Quinasa 2/genética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mutación , Policitemia Vera/complicaciones , Mielofibrosis Primaria/enzimología , Mielofibrosis Primaria/etiología , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Proteínas Quinasas/efectos adversos , ARN Mensajero/genética , ARN Mensajero/metabolismo , Receptores de Trombopoyetina/genética , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Sirolimus/uso terapéutico , Trombocitemia Esencial/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento , Proteínas WT1/genéticaRESUMEN
Introduction: Carfilzomib, a potent, irreversible, selective proteasome inhibitor has demonstrated consistent results in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRd). No prospective studies are yet available that analyzed the efficacy of the KRd combination. Methods: Herein, we report a multicenter prospective observational study on 85 patients who were treated with KRd combination as the second or third line of treatment, according to standard practice. Results: The median age was 61 years; high-risk cytogenetic was found in 26% and renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <60 ml/min) in 17%. After a median follow-up of 40 months, patients received a median number of 16 cycles of KRd, with a median duration of treatment (DoT) of 18 months (range, 16.1-19.2 months). The overall response rate was 95%, with a high-quality response (≥very good partial remission [VGPR]) in 57% of the patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 36 months (range, 29.1-43.2 months). Achievement of at least VGPR and a previous autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) were associated with longer PFS. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR); the 5-year OS rate was 73%. Nineteen patients underwent KRd treatment as a bridge to autologous transplantation, obtaining a post-transplant minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity in 65% of cases. The most common adverse events were hematological, followed by infection and cardiovascular events, rarely G3 or higher, with a discontinuation rate for toxicities of 6%. Our data confirmed the feasibility and safety of the KRd regimen in real life.