Efficacy of vertical lid split versus lateral canthotomy and cantholysis in the management of orbital compartment syndrome.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of the vertical lid split (VLS) to the standard lateral canthotomy and cantholysis (LC/C) for orbital compartment syndrome (OCS) in the cadaveric model.Methods: Simulated OCS was achieved in seven fresh frozen cadaveric orbits. Orbital pressure (OP) was monitored in one control orbit and six interventional orbits. Initial OP was recorded before three right orbits underwent lateral canthotomy with superior and inferior cantholysis, and three left orbits underwent vertical lid split of the upper and lower eyelids. In all 7 orbits, OP was recorded for a total of 16 min. The main outcome measure was the amount of OP reduction at timed intervals.Results: Beginning OP in the control orbit was 109 mmHg, and average initial OP of the LC/C and VLS orbits were 90 and 103 mmHg, respectively. The control orbit maintained high OP without intervention. One minute after LC/C, OP decreased an average of 58.7 mmHg (65.2%; range 48-65 mmHg). One minute following VLS, OP decreased an average of 63 mmHg (61.0%; range 39-102 mmHg). At 16 min, OP reduction in the LC/C orbits averaged 65.3 mmHg (72.6%; range 56-71 mmHg), and OP reduction in the VLS orbits averaged 78 mmHg (75.5%; range 54-121 mmHg). Both interventions produced a comparable reduction in OP.Conclusions: Vertical lid split was found to be as effective as LC/C in reducing OP. The technical simplicity of the VLS lends itself well to utilization by physicians who are unfamiliar with eyelid surgery.

Assessment of the Safety and Efficacy of Prolapsed Orbital Fat Resection During Involutional Entropion Repair.

PURPOSE: To assess the recurrence rate of involutional entropion in patients treated with a combined approach including a modified Bick procedure, excision of preseptal orbicularis muscle, and conservative resection of prolapsed orbital fat. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients undergoing repair of involutional entropion with the combined procedure including orbital fat resection and a second group with standard entropion repair without orbital fat resection was performed. Only patients with follow-up greater than 6 months were included in the study. RESULTS: Seventy eyelids of 54 patients met all inclusion criteria for the combined procedure group over a 9-year period from 2008 to 2016. Average follow-up was 46.9 months. There was a documented recurrence of entropion in 1 eyelid during the follow-up period (1.4%). The remaining 69 cases had successful subjective and objective results without need for any additional procedures. In the group undergoing entropion repair without fat resection, 22 eyelids of 19 patients had the required follow-up period with a recurrence rate of 4.5% (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The authors demonstrate good surgical success with a combined approach of a modified Bick procedure, preseptal orbicularis excision, and conservative orbital fat resection. Conservative fat resection during entropion repair was found to be safe, and the combined procedure was found to be effective with a rate of recurrent entropion of 1.4% on extended follow-up.The authors propose that orbital fat prolapse contributes to the mechanics of involutional entropion and that conservative orbital fat resection during surgical repair of entropion can be done safely, resulting in low recurrence rates.

Impact of Professional Student Mentored Research Fellowship on Medical Education and Academic Medicine Career Path.

CONTEXT: This study explores the long-term impact of the Professional Student Mentored Research Fellowship (PSMRF) program at the University of Kentucky College of Medicine (UKCOM) on medical students' research productivity and career paths. METHODS: Demographic characteristics, academic profiles, number of publications and residency placements from 2007 to 2012 were used to assess 119 PSMRF graduates against a comparison cohort of 898 UKCOM (non-PSMRF) students. RESULTS: PSMRF students had higher MCAT scores at admission (31.5 ± 0.6 vs. 30.6 ± 0.2, p = 0.007) and achieved higher USMLE Step 1 scores (228 ± 4.2 vs. 223 ± 1.5, p = 0.03) than comparison group. PSMRF students were more likely to publish PubMed-indexed papers (36.7% vs. 17.9%, p < 0.0001), achieve AOA status (19.3% vs. 8.5%, p = 0.0002) and match to top 25 US News and World Report residency programs (23.4% vs. 12.1%, p = 0.008). A greater proportion of PSMRF fellows matched to top tier competitive specialties (23% vs. 14.2%, p = 0.07), however this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: The PSMRF program shows a significant increase in enrollment, as well as positive associations with indicators of success in medical school and subsequent quality of residency program.