Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 159
Filtrar
Más filtros

Banco de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Clin Invest ; 52(5): e13736, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34932232

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The present population-based cohort study investigated long-term mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR) with bioprosthetic (B) or mechanical aortic valve prostheses (M) in a European social welfare state. METHODS: We analysed patient data from health insurance records covering 98% of the Austrian population between 2010 and 2018. Subsequent patient-level record linkage with national health data provided patient characteristics and clinical outcomes. Further reoperation, myocardial infarction, heart failure and stroke were evaluated as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 13,993 patients were analysed and the following age groups were examined separately: <50 years (727 patients: 57.77% M, 42.23% B), 50-65 years (2612 patients: 26.88% M, 73.12% B) and >65 years (10,654 patients: 1.26% M, 98.74% B). Multivariable Cox regression revealed that the use of B-AVR was significantly associated with higher mortality in patients aged 50-65 years compared to M-AVR (HR = 1.676 [1.289-2.181], p < 0.001). B-AVR also performed worse in a competing risk analysis regarding reoperation (HR = 3.483 [1.445-8.396], p = 0.005) and myocardial infarction (HR = 2.868 [1.255-6.555], p = 0.012). However, the risk of developing heart failure and stroke did not differ significantly after AVR in any age group. CONCLUSIONS: Patients aged 50-65 years who underwent M-AVR had better long-term survival, and a lower risk of reoperation and myocardial infarction. Even though anticoagulation is crucial in patients with M-AVR, we did not observe significantly increased stroke rates in patients with M-AVR. This evident survival benefit in recipients of mechanical aortic valve prostheses aged <65 years critically questions current guideline recommendations.


Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Infarto del Miocardio , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estudios de Cohortes , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/etiología , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
Schmerz ; 35(2): 124-129, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33447917

RESUMEN

Radiofrequency denervation has been established for many years as an important minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. Positive experiences of many users for various indications are contrasted by a nonuniform evidence. With meticulous patient selection and correct assessment of the indications a longer term reduction of pain, a reduced need for analgesics and an improvement in the quality of life can be achieved. The aim of this interdisciplinary position paper is to present the value of radiofrequency denervation in the treatment of chronic pain. The summarized recommendations of the expert group are based on the available evidence and on the clinical experiences of Austrian centers that frequently implement the procedure. The position paper contains recommendations on patient selection and proven indications. We discribe safety aspects, complications, side effects and contraindications.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Articulación Cigapofisaria , Austria , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Desnervación , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/cirugía , Vértebras Lumbares , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento
6.
N Engl J Med ; 382(10): 974, 2020 03 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32130825
13.
Curr Heart Fail Rep ; 12(1): 68-78, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25391350

RESUMEN

Accumulating evidence shows that acute as well as chronic heart disease can directly contribute to an acute or chronic worsening of liver function and vice versa. Description and definition of cardiohepatic syndrome (CHS) in this review are based on the cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) concept. The eye-catching analogy between CHS and CRS is applied to facilitate an understanding of the pathophysiology and overall burden of disease for each of the proposed CHS subtypes, their natural course, and associated morbidity and mortality.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/diagnóstico , Fallo Hepático/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Crónica , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Humanos , Fallo Hepático/fisiopatología , Fallo Hepático/terapia , Pronóstico , Síndrome
14.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 302(1): 281-282, 2020 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440786
15.
Hell J Nucl Med ; 18 Suppl 1: 142, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26665225

RESUMEN

There is a strong need for non-invasive detection of human atherosclerotic lesions. One of the radioisotopic approaches using Indium-111-HIG has been shown to accumulate in oxidized LDL-rich foam cells and inflammatory vascular lesions. Earlier human studies in 200 patients, 100 with peripheral vascular disease and 100 with carotid artery disease comparing In-111-HIG scintigraphy with sonographic data revealed a high sensitivity (70%-77%) but a very low specificity (33%-41%). At this time we concluded the approach "not promising" for human studies. However, clinical follow-up over 5 years now shows that those patients with positive In-111-HIG scintigraphy exhibited a significantly higher vascular morbidity (P<0,01) and mortality (P<0,01), especially in the immediate follow-up period. Retrospective analysis discovered higher CRP and isoprostane (8-epi-prostaglandin (PG) F2α) levels in HIG-positive patients at the time of scintigraphy. These findings indicate that In-111-HIG reflecting vascular lesions with a high inflammatory component, probably more prone to rupture, may identify a population at high vascular risk rather than a lesion at risk. The clinical impact of this finding should be assessed in prospective studies.

17.
Hell J Nucl Med ; 17(3): 211-3, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25397628

RESUMEN

Right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP) with a left bundle branch block on the electrocardiogram may result in regional wall motion abnormalities and decreased left ventricular function (LVF). Furthermore, perfusion defects in dipyridamole technetium-99m-methoxisobutylisonitrile ((99m)Tc-MIBI) myocardial perfusion imaging may occur despite a normal coronary angiogram. In a 68 years old patient, RVAP resulted in regional wall motion abnormalities, markedly decreased LVF and perfusion defects in dipyridamole (99m)Tc-MIBI myocardial perfusion imaging by single photon emission tomography (SPET). Coronary angiography excluded coronary heart disease. Reprogramming of the pacemaker resulted in physiologic activation of the ventricles. Echocardiography showed a normal LV systolic function. Repeated myocardial perfusion imaging was unremarkable. In conclusion, our case confirms thatRVAP may lead to scintigraphic perfusion defects and wall motion abnormalities despite a normal coronary angiogram and this differentiate between ischemia-induced perfusion defects.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Enfermedad de la Arteria Coronaria/diagnóstico por imagen , Imagen de Perfusión Miocárdica/métodos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología , Anciano , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Masculino
18.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 66(1)2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38867365

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Limited data are available from randomized trials comparing outcomes between transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and surgery in patients with different risks and with follow-up of at least 4 years or longer. In this large, population-based cohort study, long-term mortality and morbidity were investigated in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR) for severe aortic stenosis using a surgically implanted bioprosthesis (surgical/biological aortic valve replacement; sB-AVR) or TAVR. METHODS: Individual data from the Austrian Insurance Funds from 2010 through 2020 were analysed. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, assessed in the overall and propensity score-matched populations. Secondary outcomes included reoperation and cardiovascular events. RESULTS: From January 2010 through December 2020, a total of 18 882 patients underwent sB-AVR (n = 11 749; 62.2%) or TAVR (n = 7133; 37.8%); median follow-up was 5.8 (95% CI 5.7-5.9) years (maximum 12.3 years). The risk of all-cause mortality was higher with TAVR compared with sB-AVR: hazard ratio 1.552, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.469-1.640, P < 0.001; propensity score-matched hazard ratio 1.510, 1.403-1.625, P < 0.001. Estimated median survival was 8.8 years (95% CI 8.6-9.1) with sB-AVR versus 5 years (4.9-5.2) with TAVR. Estimated 5-year survival probability was 0.664 (0.664-0.686) with sB-AVR versus 0.409 (0.378-0.444) with TAVR overall, and 0.690 (0.674-0.707) and 0.560 (0.540-0.582), respectively, with propensity score matching. Separate subgroup analyses for patients aged 65-75 years and >75 years indicated a significant survival benefit in patients selected for sB-AVR in both groups. Other predictors of mortality were age, sex, previous heart failure, diabetes and chronic kidney disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective national population-based study, selection for TAVR was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality compared with sB-AVR in patients ≥65 years with severe, symptomatic aortic stenosis in the >2-year follow-up.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica , Válvula Aórtica , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter , Humanos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/mortalidad , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/métodos , Reemplazo de la Válvula Aórtica Transcatéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/estadística & datos numéricos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Selección de Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Puntaje de Propensión , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Resultado del Tratamiento , Bioprótesis , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Seguimiento
19.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 65(1)2024 Jan 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37756697

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This population-based cohort study investigated mid-term outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic or mechanical valve prosthesis in patients aged <50 years in a European social welfare state. METHODS: We analysed patient data from the main social insurance carriers in Austria (2010-2020). Subsequent patient-level record linkage with national health data provided patient characteristics and clinical outcome. Survival, reoperation, myocardial infarction, heart failure, embolic stroke or intracerebral haemorrhage, bleeding other than intracerebral haemorrhage and major adverse cardiac events were evaluated as outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 991 patients were analysed. Regarding demographics, no major differences between groups were observed. Multivariable Cox regression revealed no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.352) with a median follow-up time of 6.2 years. Reoperation-free survival was decreased (hazard ratio = 1.560 [95% CI: 1.076-2.262], P = 0.019) and the risk for reoperation was increased (hazard ratio = 2.770 [95% CI: 1.402-5.472], P = 0.003) in patients who received bioprostheses. Estimated probability of death after reoperation was 0.23 (CL: 0.08-0.35) after 2 years and 0.34 (CL: 0.06-0.53) after 10 years over both groups. Regarding further outcomes, no significant differences between the two groups were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In patients below 50 years of age receiving aortic valve replacement, implantation of bioprostheses when compared to mechanical heart valve prostheses was associated with a significantly higher rate of reoperations and reduced reoperation-free survival. Nevertheless, we could not observe a difference in overall survival. However, long-term follow-up has to evaluate that a significantly lower rate of reoperations may translate in consistently improved long-term survival.


Asunto(s)
Bioprótesis , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Estudios de Cohortes , Diseño de Prótesis , Reoperación , Bioprótesis/efectos adversos , Hemorragia Cerebral/etiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Falla de Prótesis
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA