Congenital solitary osseous choristoma of the left lateral canthus: a case report.

BACKGROUND: An ocular osseous choristoma is a growth of mature, compact bone in the ocular or periocular soft tissue, and it is the rarest form of ocular choristoma, accounting for only 1.7% of all epibulbar choristomas. CASE PRESENTATION: Herein we present the case of a 20-month-old girl who was referred to the oculoplasty clinic with a progressively growing mass in the left lateral canthus. It had been present since birth without ocular involvement. Upon examination the mass was firm with a smooth surface, measured 9 × 6 × 3 mm, and exhibited no episcleral attachment or ocular involvement. An excisional biopsy was performed, and the histopathological findings were consistent with osseous choristoma of the left lateral canthus. CONCLUSIONS: This report highlights the importance of considering osseous choristoma in the differential diagnosis of eyelid lesions, particularly those that have been present since birth. It also emphasizes the need for further studies investigating associations between osseous choristomas and ocular canthi.

Level of Awareness of Certified Non-critical Care Physicians in Diagnosing, Managing, and Disposing Anaphylactic Cases.

Background: Anaphylaxis is known as an acute, severe hypersensitivity reaction that rapidly initiates after exposure to a triggering agent. It is a life-threatening condition, and early recognition and swift intervention are crucial to saving patients' lives. Objective: The objective of this study is to assess the ability of certified non-critical care physicians to recognize, manage, and dispose cases of anaphylaxis. Methods: A survey consisting of 19 questions was developed by expert emergency consultants to evaluate physicians' knowledge regarding the recognition, management, and disposition of anaphylactic episodes. Responses were collected through in-person surveys conducted with physicians from various specialties and varying clinical experience levels at a tertiary care center in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia. Results: In this cross-sectional study, a total of 173 physicians completed the survey, with 81.5% being consultants and 18.5% specialists. Only 5.2% correctly identified all three proposed anaphylaxis clinical scenarios, 16.8% identified two scenarios correctly, and 51.4% identified only one scenario. While 42.8% recognized the first-line management of anaphylaxis, only 24.3% and 24.9% knew the correct epinephrine dose and route, respectively. Regarding the disposition of patients experiencing an anaphylactic episode, 61.9% of responders opted to dispose the case to the emergency department. Conclusion: Our study reveals a knowledge gap among non-critical care physicians practicing in a tertiary care center concerning the identification and management of anaphylaxis. Raising awareness of this life-threatening condition is imperative to address this serious issue.