Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 46: 404-409, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33143960

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have identified that the reverse shock index multiplied by the Glasgow Coma Scale score (rSIG) is a good predictor of mortality in trauma patients. However, it is unknown if rSIG has utility as a predictor for massive transfusion (MT) in trauma patients. The present study evaluated the ability of rSIG to predict MT in trauma patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational study performed at a level 1 trauma center. Consecutive patients who presented to the trauma center emergency department between January 2016 and December 2018 were included. The predictive ability of rSIG for MT was assessed as our primary outcome measure. Our secondary outcome measures were the predictive ability of rSIG for coagulopathy, in-hospital mortality, and 24-h mortality. We compared the prognostic performance of rSIG with the shock index, age shock index, and quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment. RESULTS: In total, 1627 patients were included and 117 (7.2%) patients received MT. rSIG showed the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve (0.842; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.806--0.878) for predicting MT. rSIG also showed the highest AUROC for predicting coagulopathy (0.769; 95% CI, 0.728-0.809), in-hospital mortality (AUROC 0.812; 95% CI, 0.772-0.852), and 24-h mortality (AUROC 0.826; 95% CI, 0.789-0.864). The sensitivity of rSIG for MT was 0.79, and the specificity of rSIG for MT was 0.77. All tools had a high negative predictive value and low positive predictive value. CONCLUSION: rSIG is a useful, rapid, and accurate predictor for MT, coagulopathy, in-hospital mortality, and 24- h mortality in trauma patients.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Choque , Heridas y Lesiones/terapia , Adulto , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Pronóstico , República de Corea , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque/mortalidad , Centros Traumatológicos , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad
2.
J Korean Med Sci ; 36(36): e255, 2021 Sep 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34519188

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since the declaration of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, COVID-19 has affected the responses of emergency medical service (EMS) systems to cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on EMS responses to and outcomes of adult OHCA in an area of South Korea. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of adult OHCA patients attended by EMS providers comparing the EMS responses to and outcomes of adult OHCA during the COVID-19 pandemic to those during the pre-COVID-19 period. Propensity score matching was used to compare the survival rates, and logistic regression analysis was used to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the survival of OHCA patients. RESULTS: A total of 891 patients in the pre-COVID-19 group and 1,063 patients in the COVID-19 group were included in the final analysis. During the COVID-19 period, the EMS call time was shifted to a later time period (16:00-24:00, P < 0.001), and the presence of an initial shockable rhythm was increased (pre-COVID-19 vs. COVID-19, 7.97% vs. 11.95%, P = 0.004). The number of tracheal intubations decreased (5.27% vs. 1.22%, P < 0.001), and the use of mechanical chest compression devices (30.53% vs. 44.59%, P < 0.001) and EMS response time (median [quartile 1-quartile 3], 7 [5-10] vs. 8 [6-11], P < 0.001) increased. After propensity score matching, the survival at admission rate (22.52% vs. 18.24%, P = 0.025), survival to discharge rate (7.77% vs. 5.52%, P = 0.056), and favorable neurological outcome (5.97% vs. 3.49%, P < 0.001) decreased. In the propensity score matching analysis of the impact of COVID-19, odds ratios of 0.768 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.592-0.995) for survival at admission and 0.693 (95% CI, 0.446-1.077) for survival to discharge were found. CONCLUSION: During the COVID-19 period, there were significant changes in the EMS responses to OHCA. These changes are considered to be partly due to social distancing measures. As a result, the proportion of patients with an initial shockable rhythm in the COVID-19 period was greater than that in the pre-COVID-19 period, but the final survival rate and favorable neurological outcome were lower.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/mortalidad , SARS-CoV-2 , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Paro Cardíaco Extrahospitalario/complicaciones , Puntaje de Propensión , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos
3.
Am J Emerg Med ; 38(2): 187-190, 2020 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30738590

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Modified shock index (MSI) is a useful predictor in trauma patients. However, the value of prehospital MSI (preMSI) in trauma patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy of preMSI in predicting massive transfusion (MT) and hospital mortality among trauma patients. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-center study. Patients presenting consecutively to the trauma center between January 2016 and December 2017, were included. The predictive ability of both prehospital shock index (preSI) and preMSI for MT and hospital mortality was assessed by calculating the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs). RESULTS: A total of 1007 patients were included. Seventy-eight (7.7%) patients received MT, and 30 (3.0%) patients died within 24 h of admission to the trauma center. The AUROCs for predicting MT with preSI and preMSI were 0.773 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.746-0.798) and 0.765 (95% CI, 0.738-0.791), respectively. The AUROCs for predicting 24-hour mortality with preSI and preMSI were 0.584 (95% CI, 0.553-0.615) and 0.581 (95% CI, 0.550-0.612), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PreSI and preMSI showed moderate accuracy in predicting MT. PreMSI did not have higher predictive power than preSI. Additionally, in predicting hospital mortality, preMSI was not superior to preSI.


Asunto(s)
Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Choque/clasificación , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Área Bajo la Curva , Transfusión Sanguínea/mortalidad , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/tendencias , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Choque/diagnóstico , Choque/epidemiología , Heridas y Lesiones/clasificación , Heridas y Lesiones/complicaciones
7.
PLoS One ; 16(3): e0248810, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33755680

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The effect of alcohol on the outcome and fibrinolysis phenotype in trauma patients remains unclear. Hence, we performed this study to determine whether alcohol is a risk factor for mortality and fibrinolysis shutdown in trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 686 patients who presented to our trauma center and underwent rotational thromboelastometry were included in the study. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Logistic regression analysis was performed to determine whether alcohol was an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality and fibrinolysis shutdown. RESULTS: The rate of in-hospital mortality was 13.8% and blood alcohol was detected in 27.7% of the patients among our study population. The patients in the alcohol-positive group had higher mortality rate, higher clotting time, and lower maximum lysis, more fibrinolysis shutdown, and hyperfibrinolysis than those in the alcohol-negative group. In logistic regression analysis, blood alcohol was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR] 2.578; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.550-4.288) and fibrinolysis shutdown (OR 1.883 [95% CI, 1.286-2.758]). Within the fibrinolysis shutdown group, blood alcohol was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 2.168 [95% CI, 1.030-4.562]). CONCLUSIONS: Alcohol is an independent risk factor for mortality and fibrinolysis shutdown in trauma patients. Further, alcohol is an independent risk factor for mortality among patients who experienced fibrinolysis shutdown.


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación Alcohólica/complicaciones , Coagulación Sanguínea , Fibrinólisis , Heridas y Lesiones/sangre , Heridas y Lesiones/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Etanol/sangre , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Fenotipo
8.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 6980, 2020 04 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32332776

RESUMEN

Rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) can only detect high-degree hyperfibrinolysis (HF), despite being frequently used in trauma patients. We investigated whether considering FIBTEM HF (the presence of maximal lysis (ML) > 15%) could increase ROTEM-based HF detection's sensitivity. This observational cohort study was performed at a level 1 trauma centre. Trauma patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 who underwent ROTEM in the emergency department between 2016 and 2017 were included. EXTEM HF was defined as ML > 15% in EXTEM. We compared mortality rates between EXTEM HF, FIBTEM HF, and non-HF patient groups. Overall, 402 patients were included, of whom 45% were men (mean age, 52.5 years; mean ISS, 27). The EXTEM HF (n = 37), FIBTEM HF (n = 132), and non-HF (n = 233) groups had mortality rates of 81.1%, 22.3%, and 10.3%, respectively. The twofold difference in mortality rates between the FIBTEM HF and non-HF groups remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction (P = 0.01). On multivariable Cox regression analysis, FIBTEM HF was independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.15, 95% confidence interval 1.21-3.84, P = 0.009). Here, trauma patients with FIBTEM HF had significantly higher mortality rates than those without HF. FIBTEM be a valuable diagnostic method to improve HF detection's sensitivity in trauma patients.


Asunto(s)
Fibrinólisis/fisiología , Tromboelastografía/métodos , Heridas y Lesiones/diagnóstico , Heridas y Lesiones/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA