RESUMEN
There are increasing numbers of children with special health care needs (CSHCN) who require various levels of care each school day. The purpose of this study was to examine the role of public schools in supporting CSHCN through in-depth key informant interviews. For this qualitative study, the authors interviewed 17 key informants to identify key themes, provide recommendations, and generate hypotheses for further statewide survey of school nurse services. Key informants identified successful strategies and challenges that public schools face in meeting the needs of all CSHCN. Although schools are well intentioned, there is wide variation in the ability of schools to meet the needs of CSHCN. Increased funding, monitoring of school health services, integration of services, and interagency collaboration are strategies that could improve the delivery of health services to CSHCN in schools.
Asunto(s)
Niños con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Especial/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Escolar/organización & administración , Niño , Servicios de Salud del Niño/organización & administración , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Enfermería Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones Académicas/organización & administración , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Children with special health care needs (CSHCN) are at risk for school failure when their health needs are not met. Current studies have identified a strong connection between school success and health. This study attempted to determine (a) how schools meet the direct service health needs of children and (b) who provides those services. The study used the following two methods: (a) analysis of administrative data from the California Basic Educational Data System and (b) a cross-sectional online survey of 446 practicing California school nurses. Only 43% of California's school districts employ school nurses. Unlicensed school personnel with a variety of unregulated training provide school health services. There is a lack of identification of CSHCN, and communication barriers impair the ability to deliver care. Study results indicate that California invests minimally in school health services.
Asunto(s)
Niños con Discapacidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación Especial/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicios de Salud Escolar/organización & administración , California/epidemiología , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Servicios de Enfermería Escolar/estadística & datos numéricos , Instituciones Académicas/organización & administración , Estudiantes/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Nonventilator hospital-acquired pneumonia (NV-HAP) is an underreported and unstudied disease, with potential for measurable outcomes, fiscal savings, and improvement in quality of life. The purpose of our study was to (a) identify the incidence of NV-HAP in a convenience sample of U.S. hospitals and (b) determine the effectiveness of reliably delivered basic oral nursing care in reducing NV-HAP. DESIGN: A descriptive, quasi-experimental study using retrospective comparative outcomes to determine (a) the incidence of NV-HAP and (b) the effectiveness of enhanced basic oral nursing care versus usual care to prevent NV-HAP after introduction of a basic oral nursing care initiative. METHODS: We used the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Problems (ICD-9) codes for pneumonia not present on admission and verified NV-HAP diagnosis using the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention diagnostic criteria. We completed an evidence-based gap analysis and designed a site-specific oral care initiative designed to reduce NV-HAP. The intervention process was guided by the Influencer Model (see Figure) and participatory action research. FINDINGS: We found a substantial amount of unreported NV-HAP. After we initiated our oral care protocols, the rate of NV-HAP per 100 patient days decreased from 0.49 to 0.3 (38.8%). The overall number of cases of NV-HAP was reduced by 37% during the 12-month intervention period. The avoidance of NV-HAP cases resulted in an estimated 8 lives saved, $1.72 million cost avoided, and 500 extra hospital days averted. The extra cost for therapeutic oral care equipment was $117,600 during the 12-month intervention period. Cost savings resulting from avoided NV-HAP was $1.72 million. Return on investment for the organization was $1.6 million in avoided costs. CONCLUSIONS: NV-HAP should be elevated to the same level of concern, attention, and effort as prevention of ventilator-associated pneumonia in hospitals. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Nursing needs to lead the way in the design and implementation of policies that allow for adequate time, proper oral care supplies, ease of access to supplies, clear procedures, and outcome monitoring ensuring that patients are protected from NV-HAP.
Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Higiene Bucal/enfermería , Neumonía/prevención & control , Adulto , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , Atención de Enfermería/métodos , Investigación en Evaluación de Enfermería , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería , Neumonía/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patient safety organizations and researchers describe hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) as a largely preventable hospital-acquired infection that affects patient safety and quality of care. We provide evidence regarding the consequences of HAP among 2019 Medicare beneficiaries. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. PATIENTS: Calendar year 2019 Medicare beneficiaries with HAP during an initial hospitalization, defined by International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) coding on inpatient claims (n = 2,457). Beneficiaries with HAP were matched using diagnosis-related group (DRG) codes with beneficiaries who did not experience HAP (n = 2,457). METHODS: The 2019 calendar year Medicare 5% Standard Analytic Files (SAF), for inpatient, outpatient, physician, and all postacute hospital settings. The case group (HAP) and control group (non-HAP) were matched on disease severity, age, sex, and race and were compared for hospital length of stay, costs, and mortality during the initial hospitalization and across settings for 30, 60, and 90 days after discharge. The 2019 fiscal year MedPAR Claims data were used to determine Medicare costs. RESULTS: Medicare beneficiaries with HAP were 2.8 times more likely to die within 90 days compared with matched beneficiaries who did not develop HAP. Among those who survived, beneficiaries with HAP spent 6.6 more days in the hospital (69%) and cost the Medicare program an average of $14,487 (24%) more per episode of care across initial inpatient and postdischarge services. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of higher mortality and cost among Medicare beneficiaries who develop HAP suggest that HAP prevention should be prioritized as a patient safety and quality initiative for the Medicare program.
Asunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Medicare , Humanos , Anciano , Estados Unidos , Alta del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Gastos en Salud , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Cuidados Posteriores , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/prevención & control , HospitalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: We explored factors associated with perception of barriers to immunization among parents of Hmong origin in California, whose children experience persistent immunization inequities even with health insurance. METHODS: A partnership of academic researchers and members of the Hmong community conducted a community-based participatory research project. We collected data in naturalistic settings with a standardized instrument. We analyzed responses from 417 parents and caregivers and created a structural equation model to determine factors that contributed to perceived barriers. RESULTS: Of 3 potential contributing factors to perceived barriers-nativity, socioeconomic position, and use of traditional Hmong health care (i.e., consulting shamans and herbalists)-the latter 2 significantly predicted higher perceived barriers to immunization. Nativity, indicated by years in the United States, age of arrival in the United States, and English language fluency, did not predict perceived barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions aimed at reducing immunization inequities should consider distinct sociocultural factors that affect immunization rates among different refugee and immigrant groups.
Asunto(s)
Asiático/psicología , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Programas de Inmunización/estadística & datos numéricos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Asia Sudoriental/etnología , California , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a process-based translation method for a health survey instrument, Searching for Hardships and Obstacles to Shots (SHOTS), using a community-based participatory approach with the Hmong community. DESIGN: The study was based on a cross-sectional survey to assess the reliability and validity of the SHOTS immunization survey, an instrument used in the Hmong community, who are refugees originally from Laos living in the United States. METHOD: Process-based universalistic health survey translation methods were used in a six-step procedure to translate the instrument. Mixed methods were used to analyze results, including cognitive interviewing, content validity indexing, Cronbach's α, t tests, and the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. FINDINGS: Participants were able to accurately complete the SHOTS survey in either Hmong or English, depending on participant preference. CONCLUSIONS: Universalistic, process-based, mixed methods used to analyze language translation, in combination with the principles of community-based participatory research, provide effective methods to translate health surveys. Involvement of the community strengthens the quality of translation and improves reliability and validity of survey results. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Healthcare providers require accurate and reliable information from evidence-based health surveys to plan for culturally responsive care. Cross-cultural research often relies on language translation. Translation of a health survey instrument may be improved with universalistic, process-based methodology.
Asunto(s)
Actitud Frente a la Salud/etnología , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/métodos , Encuestas Epidemiológicas/métodos , Investigación Metodológica en Enfermería/métodos , Refugiados/psicología , Traducciones , Adulto , California , Estudios Transversales , Interpretación Estadística de Datos , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Inmunización/psicología , Laos/etnología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Refugiados/estadística & datos numéricos , Semántica , Estadísticas no ParamétricasAsunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Infección Hospitalaria/epidemiología , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud , Instituciones de Salud , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/epidemiología , Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica/prevención & control , Hospitales , Humanos , Control de InfeccionesAsunto(s)
Neumonía Asociada a la Atención Médica , Neumonía , Humanos , Factores de Riesgo , Sobretratamiento , HospitalesRESUMEN
This qualitative study explored the barriers and facilitators of cancer screening among women of Hmong origin. Using a community-based participatory research approach, we conducted focus groups (n=44) with Hmong women who represented four distinct demographic groups among the Hmong community. The participants described sociocultural barriers to screening, which included a lack of accurate knowledge about the causes of cervical cancer, language barriers, stigma, fear, lack of time, and embarrassment. Structural barriers included attitudes and practices of health care providers, lack of insurance, and negative perceptions of services at clinics for the uninsured. Health care providers may require additional training and increased time per visit to provide culturally sensitive care for refugee groups such as the Hmong. Health-related social marketing efforts aimed at improving health literacy may also help to reduce health inequities related to cancer screening among the Hmong.
Asunto(s)
Pueblo Asiatico/psicología , Cultura , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Miedo , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Educación en Salud/organización & administración , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud/etnología , Humanos , Lenguaje , Medicina Tradicional de Asia Oriental , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/etnología , Estigma Social , Factores Socioeconómicos , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Southeast Asian American families are underrepresented among recipients of special education and social services for people with developmental disabilities. Our aims were to use a community-based participatory research approach to examine Hmong and Mien families' perceptions of developmental disabilities and understand barriers to and facilitators of service provision among families experiencing developmental disabilities. We describe here a case study of a successful attempt to engage marginalized and underserved communities to understand their needs to improve access and services for persons with developmental disabilities. METHODS: We conducted 2 focus groups with 11 key informants and 1 focus group with 10 family members of persons with developmental disabilities, as well as in-depth interviews with 3 shamans. Using a thematic analysis approach, we coded notes and transcripts to assess community members' understanding of developmental disabilities, experiences negotiating educational and health care systems, and barriers to high-quality care. RESULTS: A predominant theme was the perception that reliance on governmental support services is not appropriate. Common barriers identified included lack of accurate information, language difficulties, lack of trust, and limited outreach. These perceptions and barriers, combined with limited access to services, interfere with community acceptance and use of available support services. Despite these barriers, participants indicated that with education, outreach, and culturally responsive support, families would likely accept services. CONCLUSIONS: Community-based participatory methods are effective for eliciting root causes of health inequities in marginalized communities. Outreach to community-based organizations and an inclusive research practice identified social and cultural reasons for low service uptake and provided a pathway for the community to improve services for persons with developmental disabilities.